Article published in:
Document Design
Vol. 1:1 (1999) ► pp. 3951
Cited by

Cited by 28 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Conjunctive Markers of Contrast in English and French [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 99], Crossref logo
Abel, Roman & Martin Hänze
2019. Generating Causal Relations in Scientific Texts: The Long-Term Advantages of Successful Generation. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Aidinlou, Nader Assadi & Ambigapathy A/L Pandian
2011. The Impact of Local and Global Conjunctions on ESL Reading Comprehension: A Systemic Perspective. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 2:2 Crossref logo
Al-Surmi, Mansoor
2011. Discourse Markers and Reading Comprehension: Is there an effect?. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 1:12 Crossref logo
Cevasco, Jazmín
2009. The Role of Connectives in the Comprehension of Spontaneous Spoken Discourse. The Spanish journal of psychology 12:1  pp. 56 ff. Crossref logo
Cevasco, Jazmín, Felipe Muller & Federico Bermejo
2020. Comprehension of topic shifts by Argentinean college students: Role of discourse marker presence, causal connectivity and prior knowledge. Current Psychology 39:3  pp. 1072 ff. Crossref logo
Crosson, Amy C. & Nonie K. Lesaux
2013. Does knowledge of connectives play a unique role in the reading comprehension of English learners and English-only students?. Journal of Research in Reading 36:3  pp. 241 ff. Crossref logo
Hall, Sophie Susannah, John Maltby, Ruth Filik & Kevin B. Paterson
2016. Key skills for science learning: the importance of text cohesion and reading ability. Educational Psychology 36:2  pp. 191 ff. Crossref logo
Jalilifar, A. R. & Z. G. Shooshtari
2011. Metadiscourse Awareness and ESAP Comprehension. Journal of College Reading and Learning 41:2  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Kamalski, Judith, Ted Sanders & Leo Lentz
2008. Coherence Marking, Prior Knowledge, and Comprehension of Informative and Persuasive Texts: Sorting Things Out. Discourse Processes 45:4-5  pp. 323 ff. Crossref logo
Kent Lee
2013. Korean ESL Learners’ Use of Connectors in English Academic Writing. English Language Teaching 25:2  pp. 81 ff. Crossref logo
Kleijn, Suzanne, Henk L.W. Pander Maat & Ted J.M. Sanders
2019. Comprehension Effects of Connectives Across Texts, Readers, and Coherence Relations. Discourse Processes 56:5-6  pp. 447 ff. Crossref logo
2017. Processing of positive-causal and negative-causal coherence relations in primary school children and adults: a test of the cumulative cognitive complexity approach in German. Journal of Child Language 44:2  pp. 297 ff. Crossref logo
Lefèvre, N. & G. Lories
2004. Text cohesion and metacomprehension: Immediate and delayed judgments. Memory & Cognition 32:8  pp. 1238 ff. Crossref logo
Maury, Pascale & Amélie Teisserenc
2005. The role of connectives in science text comprehension and memory. Language and Cognitive Processes 20:3  pp. 489 ff. Crossref logo
Moncada, Fernando
2018. Interacción entre conectores y conocimiento previo en el procesamiento de la coherencia causal. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 76  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Morera, Yurena, Manuel De Vega & Juan Camacho
2010. Differences in continuity of force dynamics and emotional valence in sentences with causal and adversative connectives. Cognitive Linguistics 21:3 Crossref logo
Nadal, Laura & Inés Recio Fernández
2019.  In Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 305],  pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo
Pander Maat, H. & T. Sanders
2006.  In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Safaie, Sepehr
2020. The effects of explicit and implicit teaching of connectors on the reading comprehension performance of Iranian EFL learners. Cogent Education 7:1  pp. 1777806 ff. Crossref logo
Sarda, Laure, Shirley Carter-Thomas & Benjamin Fagard
2011. Présentation du numéro. Discours :8 Crossref logo
Speyer, Augustin & Anita Fetzer
2014.  In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 254],  pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Taboada, Maite & William C. Mann
2006. Rhetorical Structure Theory: looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Studies 8:3  pp. 423 ff. Crossref logo
Welie, Camille, Rob Schoonen, Folkert Kuiken & Huub van den Bergh
2017. Expository text comprehension in secondary school: for which readers does knowledge of connectives contribute the most?. Journal of Research in Reading 40  pp. S42 ff. Crossref logo
Welie, Camille, Rob Schoonen & Folkert Kuiken
2018. The role text structure inference skill plays for eighth graders’ expository text comprehension. Reading and Writing 31:9  pp. 2065 ff. Crossref logo
Wetzel, Mathis, Sandrine Zufferey & Pascal Gygax
2020. Second Language Acquisition and the Mastery of Discourse Connectives: Assessing the Factors That Hinder L2-Learners from Mastering French Connectives. Languages 5:3  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
2008. Generating basic skills reports for low-skilled readers. Natural Language Engineering 14:4  pp. 495 ff. Crossref logo
Zufferey, Sandrine, Willem Mak, Liesbeth Degand & Ted Sanders
2015. Advanced learners’ comprehension of discourse connectives: The role of L1 transfer across on-line and off-line tasks. Second Language Research 31:3  pp. 389 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.