A corpus approach to the history of Russian po delimitatives
This paper illustrates how enriched diachronic treebank data can shed new light on an old and vexed topic, even when that topic is
primarily morphological and semantic in nature rather than syntactic. The topic is the rise of the Russian po
delimitatives, a change seen as crucial in most accounts of the history of Russian aspect, since it represents a major step in
generalising the derivational aspect system. Earlier accounts concur that the po delimitatives spread fairly
recently, too recently for the development to be connected to the loss of the aorist tense, which also had delimitative readings
with atelic verbs. Using treebank data from the Tromsø Old Russian and Old Church Slavonic Treebank, enriched with tags for
derivational morphology and semantics, I show that the po delimitatives were not marginal even in the earliest
Slavic sources, either in terms of frequency or semantics, and that they first complemented and then competed with the
delimitative aorists. It can thus be claimed that the exotic po delimitatives grew organically out of the old
Indo-European inflectional aspect system.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous approaches
- 3.Data and method
- 4.The semantic development of the po prefix
- 5.Aorists vs. po: Verb classes across time
- 5.1OCS
- 5.2Old East Slavic
- 5.3Middle Russian
- 6.Delimitative contexts in Old East Slavic
- 7.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References (24)
References
Amse-De Jong, Tine H. 1974. The meaning of the finite verb forms in the Old Church Slavonic Codex Suprasliensis: A synchronic study. The Hague: Mouton.
Bermel, Neil. 1995. Aspect and the shape of action in Old Russian author(s). Russian Linguistics 19(3). 333–348.
Bermel, Neil. 1997. Context and the lexicon in the development of Russian aspect (University of California Publications in Linguistics 129). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dickey, Stephen M. 2007. A prototype account of the development of delimitative po- in Russian. In Dagmar Divjak & Agata Kochanska (eds.), Cognitive paths into the Slavic domain, 326–371. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Dickey, Stephen. 2012. Orphan prefixes and the grammaticalization of aspect in South Slavic. Jezikoslovlje 13(1). 71–105.
Dmitrieva, Ol’ga. 1991. Formirovanie semantičeskoj struktury russkogo glagol’nogo prefiksa po-. In Lidija I. Barannikova (ed.), Aktivnye processy v jazyke i reči, 68–74. Saratov: Izdatel’stvo Saratovskogo universiteta.
Dmitrieva, Ol’ga. 2000. Formirovanie sistemy russkix delimitativnyx glagolov. In T. V. Kočetkova (ed.), Predloženie i slovo: paradigmatičeskij, tekstovyj i kommunikativnyj aspekty, 28–33. Saratov: Izdatel’stvo Saratovskogo pedagogičeskogo instituta.
Dostál, Antonin. 1954. Studie o vidovém systému v staroslověnštině. Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine & Aleksandrs Berdičevskis. 2015. Linguistics vs. digital editions: The Tromsø Old Russian and OCS treebank. Scripta & e-Scripta 14–15. 9–25.
Eckhoff, Hanne, Kristin Bech, Kristine Eide, Gerlof Bouma, Dag Trygve Truslew Haug, Odd Einar Haugen & Marius Jøhndal. 2018. The PROIEL treebank family: A standard for early attestations of Indo-European languages. Language Resources and Evaluation 52(1). 29–65.
Forsyth, James. 1972. The nature and development of the aspectual opposition in the Russian verb. The Slavonic and East European Review 50(121). 493–506.
Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew & Marius Jøhndal. 2008. Creating a parallel treebank of the old Indo-European Bible translations. In Caroline Sporleder & Kiril Ribarov (eds.), Proceedings of the language technology for cultural heritage data workshop (LaTeCh 2008), 27–34. Marrakech, Morocco. [URL] (last accessed 10 July 2018.)
Janda, Laura A., Anna Endresen, Julia Kuznetsova, Olga Lyashevskaya, Anastasia Makarova, Anastasia, Tore Nesset & Svetlana Sokolova. 2013. Why Russian aspectual prefixes aren’t empty: Prefixes as verb classifiers. Bloomington: Slavica.
Lakoff, George. 1966. Stative adjectives and verbs in English. (Report NSF-17). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Computation Lab.
Meillet, Antoine. 1934. Le slave commun. Paris: Champion.
Mišina, Ekaterina A. 2017. K izučeniju perfektivnogo imperfekta v drevnerusskom jazyke (v sopostavlenii so staroslavjanskim). Russian Linguistics 41(1). 1–15.
Němec, Igor. 1954. O slovanské předponě po- slovesné. Slavia 231. 1–22.
Růžička, Rudolf. 1957. Der Verbalaspekt in der altrussischen Nestorchronik (Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Slawistik 14). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Schooneveld, Cornelis H. van. 1951. The aspect system of the Old Church Slavonic and Old Russian verbum finitum byti. Word 71. 96–103.
Sigalov, Pavel S. 1975. Istorija russkix ograničitel’nyx glagolov. Trudy po russkoj i slavjanskoj filologii: Serija lingvističeskaja 241. 141–181.
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160.
Živov, Viktor M. 2017. Istorija jazyka russkoj pis’mennosti, vol. 11. Moscow: Universitet Dmitrija Požarskogo.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Gvozdanović, Jadranka
2020.
Introduction.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:2
► pp. 153 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.