A corpus approach to the history of Russian po delimitatives
This paper illustrates how enriched diachronic treebank data can shed new light on an old and vexed topic, even when that topic is
primarily morphological and semantic in nature rather than syntactic. The topic is the rise of the Russian po
delimitatives, a change seen as crucial in most accounts of the history of Russian aspect, since it represents a major step in
generalising the derivational aspect system. Earlier accounts concur that the po delimitatives spread fairly
recently, too recently for the development to be connected to the loss of the aorist tense, which also had delimitative readings
with atelic verbs. Using treebank data from the Tromsø Old Russian and Old Church Slavonic Treebank, enriched with tags for
derivational morphology and semantics, I show that the po delimitatives were not marginal even in the earliest
Slavic sources, either in terms of frequency or semantics, and that they first complemented and then competed with the
delimitative aorists. It can thus be claimed that the exotic po delimitatives grew organically out of the old
Indo-European inflectional aspect system.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous approaches
- 3.Data and method
- 4.The semantic development of the po prefix
- 5.Aorists vs. po: Verb classes across time
- 5.1OCS
- 5.2Old East Slavic
- 5.3Middle Russian
- 6.Delimitative contexts in Old East Slavic
- 7.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References
Amse-De Jong, Tine H.
1974 The meaning of the finite verb forms in the Old Church Slavonic Codex Suprasliensis: A synchronic study. The Hague: Mouton.


Bermel, Neil
1995 Aspect and the shape of action in Old Russian author(s).
Russian Linguistics 19(3). 333–348.


Bermel, Neil
1997 Context and the lexicon in the development of Russian aspect (
University of California Publications in Linguistics 129). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Dickey, Stephen M.
2007 A prototype account of the development of delimitative po- in Russian. In
Dagmar Divjak &
Agata Kochanska (eds.),
Cognitive paths into the Slavic domain, 326–371. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.


Dickey, Stephen
2012 Orphan prefixes and the grammaticalization of aspect in South Slavic.
Jezikoslovlje 13(1). 71–105.

Dmitrieva, Ol’ga
1991 Formirovanie semantičeskoj struktury russkogo glagol’nogo prefiksa po-. In
Lidija I. Barannikova (ed.),
Aktivnye processy v jazyke i reči, 68–74. Saratov: Izdatel’stvo Saratovskogo universiteta.

Dmitrieva, Ol’ga
2000 Formirovanie sistemy russkix delimitativnyx glagolov. In
T. V. Kočetkova (ed.),
Predloženie i slovo: paradigmatičeskij, tekstovyj i kommunikativnyj aspekty, 28–33. Saratov: Izdatel’stvo Saratovskogo pedagogičeskogo instituta.

Dostál, Antonin
1954 Studie o vidovém systému v staroslověnštině. Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.

Dowty, David R.
1979 Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.


Eckhoff, Hanne Martine & Aleksandrs Berdičevskis
2015 Linguistics vs. digital editions: The Tromsø Old Russian and OCS treebank.
Scripta & e-Scripta 14–15. 9–25.

Eckhoff, Hanne Martine & Dag Trygve Truslew Haug
Eckhoff, Hanne, Kristin Bech, Kristine Eide, Gerlof Bouma, Dag Trygve Truslew Haug, Odd Einar Haugen & Marius Jøhndal
2018 The PROIEL treebank family: A standard for early attestations of Indo-European languages.
Language Resources and Evaluation 52(1). 29–65.


Forsyth, James
1972 The nature and development of the aspectual opposition in the Russian verb.
The Slavonic and East European Review 50(121). 493–506.

Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew & Marius Jøhndal
2008 Creating a parallel treebank of the old Indo-European Bible translations. In
Caroline Sporleder &
Kiril Ribarov (eds.),
Proceedings of the language technology for cultural heritage data workshop (LaTeCh 2008), 27–34. Marrakech, Morocco.
[URL] (last accessed 10 July 2018.)
Janda, Laura A., Anna Endresen, Julia Kuznetsova, Olga Lyashevskaya, Anastasia Makarova, Anastasia, Tore Nesset & Svetlana Sokolova
2013 Why Russian aspectual prefixes aren’t empty: Prefixes as verb classifiers. Bloomington: Slavica.

Lakoff, George
1966 Stative adjectives and verbs in English. (
Report NSF-17). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Computation Lab.

Meillet, Antoine
1934 Le slave commun. Paris: Champion.

Mišina, Ekaterina A.
2017 K izučeniju perfektivnogo imperfekta v drevnerusskom jazyke (v sopostavlenii so staroslavjanskim).
Russian Linguistics 41(1). 1–15.


Němec, Igor
1954 O slovanské předponě po- slovesné.
Slavia 231. 1–22.

Růžička, Rudolf
1957 Der Verbalaspekt in der altrussischen Nestorchronik (
Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Slawistik 14). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

Schooneveld, Cornelis H. van
1951 The aspect system of the Old Church Slavonic and Old Russian verbum finitum byti.
Word 71. 96–103.


Sigalov, Pavel S.
1975 Istorija russkix ograničitel’nyx glagolov.
Trudy po russkoj i slavjanskoj filologii: Serija lingvističeskaja 241. 141–181.

Vendler, Zeno
1957 Verbs and times.
The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160.


Živov, Viktor M.
2017 Istorija jazyka russkoj pis’mennosti, vol. 11. Moscow: Universitet Dmitrija Požarskogo.

Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Gvozdanović, Jadranka
2020.
Introduction.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:2
► pp. 153 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.