Cover not available
Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 14:1 (1997) ► pp.124–130
Book review

Anthony Fox. Linguistic Reconstruction: An introduction to theory and method. Anthony Fox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. xvii, 372 pp.

Reviewed by
| University of Illinois
Published online: 1 January 1997
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.14.1.08sch
References (47)
References
Aitchison, Jean. 1991. Language Change: Progress or decay, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Allen, William Sidney. 1987. Vox graeca. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Altmann, Gabriel & Werner Lehfeldt. 1973. Allgemeine Sprachtypologie. Munchen: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Anthony, David. 1991. “The Archaeology of Indo-European Origins”. Journal of Indo-European Studies 19:3/4.193–222.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo. 1989. Historical and Comparative Linguistics. 2nd ed. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arens, Hans. 1969. Sprachwissenschaft. 2nd rev. ed. Freiburg/Breisgau: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
Battistella, Edwin L. 1990. Markedness: The evaluative superstructure of language. Albany, N.Y.: State Univ. of New York.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Kay Paul. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, Henrik. 1970. Problems of Typological and Genetic Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1977. Linguistic Reconstruction: Its potentials and limitations in new perspective. (= Journal of Indo-European Studies’, Monograph Series, 21.) Washington, D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Bonfante, Giuliano. 1945. “On Reconstruction and Linguistic Method”.Word 11.83–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1946. “Additional Notes on Reconstruction”. Word 21.132–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernhard. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. 2nd ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cowan, William. 1971. Workbook in Comparative Reconstruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 1992. An Introduction to Historical Linguistics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Droixhe, Daniel. 1978. La linguistique et l’appel de Thistoire (1600–1800): Rationalisme et revolutions positivistes. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1974. Proto-Indo-European Syntax. (= Journal of Indo-European Studies’, Monograph Series, 11.) Butte, Montana: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, Thomas V. & Ivanov Vjaceslav V.. 1984. Indoevropejskij jazyk i indoevropejcij. 21 vols. Tbilisi: Izdatelstvo Tbilisskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of Historical Linguistics. 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1958. “Typological Studies and Their Contribution to Historical Comparative Linguistics”. Proceedings of the VIHth International Congress of Linguistics ed. by Eva Sivertsen et al., 17–35. Oslo: Oslo Univ. Press. (Repr. in Selected Writings , Vol.11, 523–532. The Hague: Mouton, 1962; 2nd ed., 1971.)Google Scholar
Job, Michael. 1995. “Did Proto-Indo-European Have Glottalized Stops?”. Diachronica 12:2. 237–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuryɫowicz, Jerzy. 1935. Etudes indo-europe’ennes. Krakow: Polska Akademja Umiejetu-osci.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1993. A Course in Phonetics. 3rd ed. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace & Jo-vanovich.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1975. “Internal Reconstruction and Generative Phonology”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1975.1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1992. Historical Linguistics: An introduction. 3rd ed. London: Rout-ledge.Google Scholar
Mallory, James P. 1973. “A Short History of the Indo-European Problem”. Journal of Indo-European Studies 11.21–65.Google Scholar
1989. In Search of the Indo-Europeans. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1986. Indogermanische Grammatik. Band 1/21: Lautlehre . Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1925. La mithode comparative en Unguistique historique. Oslo: Asche-houg.Google Scholar
. 1937 [1903]. Introduction d Vetude comparative des langues indo-europeennes. Hachette. 8th ed., with a foreword by Emile Benveniste. Paris: Hachette. (Repr., University, Ala.: Univ. of Alabama Press, 1967.)Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Time and Space. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Holger. 1931. Linguistic Science in the Nineteenth Century. Transl. by John Webster Spargo. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1947. Phonemics. Ann Arbor, Mich: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rask, Rasmus. 1818. Undersögelse om det gamle Nordiske eller Islandske Sprogs Oprin-delse. Kobenhavn: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Römer, Ruth. 1985. Sprachwissenschaft und Rassenideologie in Deutschland. Munchen: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Robins, R[obert] H. 1990. A Short History of Linguistics. 3rd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schlerath, Bernfried. 1981. “1st ein Raum/Zeit-Modell fur eine rekonstruierte Sprache mog-lich?”. Zeitschrift fiir vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft 95/2.175–202.Google Scholar
. 1982. “Sprachvergleich und Rekonstruktion: Methoden und Moglichkeiten”. Incontri Linguistici 1982.53–69.Google Scholar
. 1987. “On the Reality and Status of a Reconstructed Language”. Journal of Indo-European Studies 15:1/2.41–46.Google Scholar
Schrodt, Richard. 1976. Die germanische Lautverschiebung und ihre Stellung im Kreise der indogermanischen Sprachen. 2nd ed. (= Wiener Arbeiten zur germanischen Altertums-kunde undPhilologie , 11.) Wien: Halosar.Google Scholar
Schwink, Frederick W. 1994. Linguistic Typology, Universality, and the Realism of Reconstruction. (= Journal of Indo-European Sutdies Monograph Series, 121.) Washington, D.C.: Institute for the Stud y of Man.Google Scholar
Specht, Franz. 1947 [1944]. Der Ursprung der indogermanischen Deklination. Neudruck. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Szemerenyi, Oswald. 1990 [1970]. Einfuhrung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft. 4th ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1958 [1939]. Grundziige der Phonologic 21. Auflage. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Stephen. 1957. The Principles of Semantics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Voegelin, C[harles] F. & Voegelin Florence] M.. 1977. Classification and Index of the-World’s Languages. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar