Review published In:
Vol. 14:1 (1997) ► pp.137147
Aitchison, Jean
1981Language Change: Progress or decay? London: Fon-tana.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo
1972An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. New York: Macmillan. (2nd ed., Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1989.)Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985 “Diagrammatic Iconicity in Stem-Inflection Relations”. Iconicity in Syntax ed. by John Haiman, 11–47. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963 “Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements”. Universals of Language ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, 73–113. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1980 “The Iconicity of Grammar: Isomorphism and motivation”. Language 561.515–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Martin
1978The Evolution of French Syntax: A comparative approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John
1979 “Implicational Universals as Predictors of Word Order Change”. Language 551.618–648. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, Robert D.
1969Historical Linguistics and Generative Grammar. Engle-wood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1978 “Rule Reordering”. Readings in Historical Phonology ed. by Philip Baldi & Ronald N. Werth, 218–235. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1974 “Linguistic Orthogenesis? Scots vowel length and the English length conspiracy”. Historical Linguistics ed. by John M. Anderson & Charles Jones, Volume II1: Theory and Description in Phonology , 311–343. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1980On Explaining Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1990 “How to Do Things with Junk: Exaptation in language evolution”. Journal of Linguistics 261.79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985 “Grammaticalization: Sychronic variation and dia-chronie change”. Lingua e Sile 20:3.303–318.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1973 “A Structural Principle of Language and Its Implications”. Language 491.47–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1979Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.Google Scholar
1991How to Set Parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stampe, David
1972How I Spent My Summer Vacation. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State Univ., Columbus.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1972a “Diachronic Syntax and Generative Grammar”. A Reader in Historical and Comparative Linguistics ed. by Alan R. Keiler, 201–216. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
1972bA History of English Syntax: A transformational approach to the history of English sentence structure. Ibid.Google Scholar
1982 “From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization”. Perspectives on Historical Linguistics ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel, 245–271. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo
1972 “Rule Inversion”. Lingua 291.209–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1974 “Topics, Subjects and Word Order: From SXV to SVX via TVX”. Historical Linguisticscd. by John M. Anderson & Charles Jones, Volume I1: Syntax, Morphology, Internal and Comparative Reconstruction , 339–376. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1975 “An Explanation of Drift”. Word Order and Word Order Change ed by Charles N. Li, 269–305. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1978 “Phonetic and Conceptual Analogy”. Readings in Historical Phonology ed. by Philip Baldi & Ronald N. Werth, 258–274. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U.
1989Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

[no author supplied]
1998. . Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 54:7  pp. 919 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.