Cover not available
Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 14:2 (1997) ► pp.373–378
Book review

Antonio Loprieno. Ancient Egyptian: A linguistic introduction. Antonio Loprieno. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. xv, 322 pp.

Reviewed by
| Indiana University
Published online: 1 January 1997
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.14.2.11hod
References (22)
References
Ehret, Christopher. 1995. Reconstructing Proto-Afroasiatic (Proto-Afrasian), (= University of California Publications; Linguistics , 1261.) Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Alan Henderson. 1957. Egyptian Grammar. 3rd ed., rev. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, William C. 1955. A Papyrus of the Late Middle Kingdom in the Brooklyn Museum. (= Wilbour Monographs , 51.) Brooklyn, N.J.: The Brooklyn Museum.Google Scholar
Hoch, James E. 1994. Semitic Words in Egyptian Texts of the New Kingdom and Third Intermediate Period. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Carleton T. 1981. “Comparative Evidence for Egyptian Phonology”. Studies Presented to Hans Jakob Polotsky ed. by Dwight W. Young, 401–413. East Gloucester, Mass.: Pirtle & Poison.Google Scholar
1983a. “Afroasiatic. The horizon and beyond”. Jewish Quarterly Review 741.137–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983b. “Relating Afroasiatic to Indo-European”. Studies in Chadic and Afroasiatic Linguistics ed. by Ekkehard Wolff & Hilke Meyer-Bahlburg, 33–50. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
1987a. “The Status of Lisramic (Hamito-Semitic) Sound Correspondences”. Proceedings of the Fourth International Hamito-Semitic Congress ed. by Hermann Jungraithmayr & Walter W. Müller, 11–24. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987b. “Lislakh Cluster Resolution”. Anthropological Linguistics 291.91–104.Google Scholar
1987c. “The Divergence of the Egyptian Suffix Conjugation”. Working with No Data ed. by David M. Golomb, 153–163. Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
1988a. “Consonant Ablaut in Lislakh”. FUCUS: A Semitic/Afrasian gathering in remembrance of Albert Ehrman ed. by Yoël Arbeitman, 267–276. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988b. “Prothetic Alif and Canonical Form in Egyptian”. On Language: Rhetorica, phonologica, syntactical A festschrift for Robert P. Stock-well ed. by Caroline Duncan-Rose & Theo Vennemann, 195–202. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1989a. “Touching the Bases”. The Fifteenth LACUS Forum 1988 ed. by Ruth M. Brend & David G. Lockwood, 5–21. Lake Bluff, Ill.: LACUS.Google Scholar
1989b. “Hausa and the Prothetic Alif”. Current Progress in Chadic Linguistics ed. by Zygmunt Frajzyngier, 219–232. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990. “Splitting Homonyms”. The Sixteenth LACUS Forum 1989 ed. by Michael P. Jordan, 168–176. Lake Bluff, I11.:LACUS.Google Scholar
1991. “Prothetic Alif in Egypto-Coptic”. Ägypten im Afro-Orientalischen Kontext: Gedenkschrift Peter Behrens ed. by Daniela Mendel & Ulrike Claudi (= Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere, Sondernummer 1991), 171–176. Köln: Institut fur Afrikanistik, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
1992a. “Consonant Ablaut in Egyptian”. Discussions in Egyptology 231.15–22.Google Scholar
1992b. “Tooth and Claw”. Anthropological Linguistics 341.202–232.Google Scholar
1994. “Some Proto Affixes”. The Twentieth LACUS Forum 1993 ed. by Valerie Becker Makkai, 526–536. Chapel Hill, N.C.: LACUS.Google Scholar
Loret, Victor. 1945. “La lettre / dans l’alphabet hiéroglyphique”. Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres; Comptes rendus des séances de l’année 1945, 236–244. Paris: Henri Didier.Google Scholar
Orel, Vladimir E. and Olga V. Stolbova. 1995. Hamito-Semitic Etymological Dictionary. (= Handbuch der Orientalistik , 1:18.) Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Rössler, Otto. 1971. “Das Ägyptische als semitische Sprache”. Christentum am roten Meer 1 ed. by Franz Altheim & Ruth Stiehl, 263–326. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar