Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 34:4 (2017) ► pp. 516558
References

References

Anderson, Gregory D. S.
2006Auxiliary verb constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira
2008Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Martin
2010Die Ingredienzen des romanischen Imperfekts. Linguistische Berichte 221. 79–108.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1980Wanna and the gradience of auxiliaries. In Gunter Brettschneider & Christian Lehmann (eds.), Wege zur Universalienforschung. Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 60. Geburtstag von Hansjakob Seiler, 292–299. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Burgos, Daniel
2003<Acabar de + infinitive> and <recién + Past> : Free variation or complementary distribution? In Claus Pusch & Andreas Wesch (eds.), Verbalperiphrasen in den (ibero-)romanischen Sprachen = Perífrasis verbals en les llengües (ibero-)romàniques = Perífrasis verbales en las lenguas (ibero-)románicas, 105–112. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark
2002Corpus del español (100 million words, 1200s–1900s). http://​www​.corpusdelespanol​.org (22 December 2015.)
[ p. 553 ]
2015–2016Corpus del español, web/dialects. http://​www​.corpusdelespanol​.org/ (8 March 2017.)
Detges, Ulrich & Richard Waltereit
2002Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 21(2). 151–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2009APO: Avoid pragmatic overload. In Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jaqueline Visconti (eds.), Current trends in diachronic semantics and pragmatics, 21–41. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández de Castro, Félix
1999Las perífrasis verbales en el español actual. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés
2006La Historiografía medieval como fuente de datos lingüísticos. Tradiciones consolidadas y rupturas necesarias. In José Jesus Bustos Tovar & José Luis Girón Alchonchel (eds.), Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española, vol. 11, 1779–1807. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
García Fernández, Luis, Ángeles Carrasco Gutiérrez, Bruno Camus Bergareche, María Martínez Atienza & María Ángeles García Serrano
(eds.) 2006Diccionario de perífrasis verbales. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Gil, David & Eitan Grossman
2014Allative-future syncretism in Malayic languages and beyond. Paper presented at Syntax of the World’s Languages 6, Pavia.Google Scholar
Grossman, Eitan & Ira Noveck
2015What can historical linguistics and experimental pragmatics offer each other? Linguistic Vanguard 1. 145–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis
2014On the pragmatics of subjectification: The grammaticalization of verbless allative futures (with a case study in Ancient Egyptian). Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46(1). 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2008Particles at the semantics/pragmatics interface: Synchronic and diachronic issues. A study with special reference to the French phasal adverbs. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard & Richard Waltereit
2006GCI theory and language change. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38(1). 235–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2002On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuteva, Tania
2004Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2000Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, John L.
1993The phonetics of sound change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.Google Scholar
[ p. 554 ]
Olbertz, Hella
1991Acabar y no acabar. In Henk Haverkate, Kees Hengeveld, Gijs Mulder & Hella Olbertz (eds.), Exploraciones semánticas y pragmáticas del español, 29–41. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1998Verbal periphrases in a functional grammar of Spanish. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1991The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics 17. 409–441.Google Scholar
1995The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
2015R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://​www​.R​-project​.org (26 December 2015)
Real Academia Española
2010Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Manual. Madrid: Escasa Libros.Google Scholar
Recanati, François
2004Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012Pragmatic enrichment. In Gillian Russel & Delia Graff Fara (eds.), The Routledge companian to the philosophy of language, 67–78. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
1947Elements of symbolic logic. London: Collier-MacMillan.Google Scholar
Ripley, Brian, William Venables & R Development Core Team
2015nnet. Software for feed-forward neural networks with a single hidden layer, and for multinomial log-linear models, R package version 7-3-11.Google Scholar
Rivas, Elena
1996Esquemas sintácticos y valores semánticos de acabar en castellano medieval. In Manuel Casado Velarde, Antonio Freire Lamas, José E. López Pereira & José Ignacio Pérez Pascual (eds.), Scripta philologica in memoriam Manuel Taboada Cid, vol. 2, 621–634. La Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. & Richard Waltereit
2009Presupposition accommodation and language change. In Hubert Cuyckens, Kristin Davidse & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 75–102. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vet, Co
2005L’imparfait: emploi anaphorique et emplois non anaphoriques. In Emmanuelle Labeau & Pierre Larrivée (eds.), Nouveaux développements de l’imparfait, 33–44. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Veyrat Rigat, Montserrat
1994La perífrasis verbal acabar de + infinitivo y la resolución de su ambigüedad. Vox Romanica 53. 238–252.Google Scholar
Weinrich, Harald
2001 [1964]Tempus: besprochene und erzählte Welt. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Yllera, Alicia
1980Sintaxis histórica del verbo español: Las perífrasis medievales. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

De Troij, Robbert & Freek Van de Velde
2020. Beyond Mere Text Frequency: Assessing Subtle Grammaticalization by Different Quantitative Measures. A Case Study on the Dutch Soort Construction. Languages 5:4  pp. 55 ff. Crossref logo
Ehmer, Oliver & Malte Rosemeyer
2018. Inferences in Interaction and Language Change. Open Linguistics 4:1  pp. 536 ff. Crossref logo
Gafter, Roey J., Scott Spicer & Mira Ariel
2019. How does ‘bring’ (not) change to ‘give’?. Folia Linguistica 53:2  pp. 443 ff. Crossref logo
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt
2020. Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2  pp. 165 ff. Crossref logo
Rosemeyer, Malte & Mar Garachana
2019. De la consecución a la contraexpectación: la construccionalización de lograr/conseguir + infinitivo . Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12:2  pp. 383 ff. Crossref logo
Rosemeyer, Malte & Eitan Grossman
2021. Why don’t grammaticalization pathways always recur?. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.