Erich Round | University of Queensland | University of Surrey
This article investigates the evolutionary and spatial dynamics of typological characters in 117 Indo-European languages. We partition types of change (i.e., gain or loss) for each variant according to whether they bring about a simplification in morphosyntactic patterns that must be learned, whether they are neutral (i.e., neither simplifying nor introducing complexity) or whether they introduce a more complex pattern. We find that changes which introduce complexity show significantly less areal signal (according to a metric we devise) than changes which simplify and neutral changes, but we find no significant differences between the latter two groups. This result is compatible with a scenario where certain types of parallel change are more likely to be mediated by advergence and contact between proximate speech communities, while other developments are due purely to drift and are largely independent of intercultural contact.
2007Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Grammars in contact, 1–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baayen, R. Harald
2008Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville Corbett
(eds.)2015Understanding and measuring morphological complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2014Hidden Markov models for studying the evolution of binary morphological characters. In László Zsolt Garamszegi (ed.), Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology: Concepts and practice, 395–408. Heidelberg: Springer.
Bentz, Christian & Bodo Winter
2013Languages with more second language learners tend to lose nominal case. Language Dynamics and Change 3(1). 1–27.
Bickel, Balthasar
2011Statistical modeling of language universals. Linguistic Typology 151. 401–413.
Bollback, Jonathan P.
2006SIMMAP: Stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies. BMC Bioinformatics 71. 88.
Botero, Carlos A., Beth Gardner, Kathryn R. Kirby, Joseph Bulbulia, Michael C. Gavin & Russell D. Gray
2014The ecology of religious beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(47). 16784–16789.
Braunmüller, Kurt
1984Morphologische Undurchsichtigkeit – ein Charakteristikum kleiner Sprachen. Kopenhagener Beiträge zur Germanistischen Linguistik 221. 48–68.
Chang, William, Chundra Cathcart, David Hall & Andrew Garrett
2015Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European Steppe Hypothesis. Language 91(1). 194–244.
Clark, Philip J. & Francis C. Evans
1954Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35(4). 445–453.
Darlington, Richard B. & Andrew F. Hayes
2017Regression analysis and linear models: Concepts, applications, and implementation. London: Guilford Press.
Daumé, Hal
2009Non-parametric Bayesian areal linguistics. In Human language technologies: The 2009 annual conference of the North American chapter of the ACL, 593–601. Boulder, CO: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Dediu, Dan
2010A Bayesian phylogenetic approach to estimating the stability of linguistic features and the genetic biasing of tone. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 278(1704). 474–479.
Delbrück, Berthold
1900Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen, vol. 31. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.
Drummond, A. J., M. A. Suchard, D. Xie & A. Rambaut
2012Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29(8). 1969–1973.
2015Indo-European: Methods and problems. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 645–656. Oxford: Routledge.
1975Proto-Indo-European syntax: The order of meaningful elements (Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph 1). Butte, MT: Montana College of Mineral Science and Technology.
Gamkrelidze, Tamaz & Vyacheslav I. Ivanov
1995Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans (translated by Johanna Nichols). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Garrett, Andrew
2006Convergence in the formation of Indo-European subgroups: Phylogeny and chronology. In Peter Forster & Colin Renfrew (eds.), Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages, 139–151. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Gelman, Andrew & Donald B. Rubin
1992Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science 71. 457–511.
Graham, Christopher
2016Geographical correlates of rare word orders: A computational approach to quantitative typology and language contact. University of California, Davis dissertation.
Gumperz, John J. & Robert Wilson
1971Convergence and creolization. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages, 151–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie
2005The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haug, Dag
2015Treebanks in historical linguistic research. In Carlotta Viti (ed.), Perspectives on historical syntax, 187–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
2014Sound symbolism in the languages of Australia. PloS One 9(4). e92852.
Hock, Hans Henrich
1996 [1993]Subversion or convergence? The issue of pre-Vedic retroflexion reexamined. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 23(2). 73–115.
Hoenigswald, Henry M.
1960Language change and linguistic reconstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hoenigswald, Henry M.
1966Criteria for the subgrouping of languages. In Henrik Birnbaum & Jaan Puhvel (eds.), Ancient Indo-European dialects, 1–12. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Jäger, Gerhard & Johann-Mattis List
Forthcoming. Using ancestral state reconstruction methods for onomasiological reconstruction in multilingual word lists. Language Dynamics and Change 81.
2000The Middle English verb-second constraint: A case study in language contact and language change. In Susan C. Herring, Pieter Th. van Reenen & Lene Schøsler (eds.), Textual parameters in older languages, 353–392. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1997Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liggett, Thomas M.
2010Continuous time Markov processes: An introduction, vol. 1131 Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
List, Johann-Mattis, Shijulal Nelson-Sathi, William Martin & Hans Geisler
2014Using phy-logenetic networks to model Chinese dialect history. In Søren Wichmann & Jeff Good (eds.), Quantifying language dynamics, 125–154. Leiden: Brill.
Lupyan, Gary & Rick Dale
2010Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS One 51. 1–10.
Martinet, André
1975Évolution des langues et reconstruction. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Meid, Wolfgang
1975Probleme der räumlichen und zeitlichen Gliederung des Indogermanischen. In Helmut Rix (ed.), Flexion und Wortbildung, 204–19. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Meillet, Antoine
1925La méthode comparative en linguistique historique. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co.
Miestamo, Matti, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson
(eds.)2008Complexity in linguistic theory, language learning and language change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nakhleh, Luay, Donald Ringe & Tandy Warnow
2005Perfect phylogenetic networks: A new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81(2). 382–420.
Nichols, Johanna
1986Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 621. 56–119.
Nichols, Johanna
1998The Eurasian spread zone and the Indo-European dispersal. In Roger M. Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.), Archaeology and language II: Correlating archaeological and linguistic hypotheses, 220–266. London: Routledge.
Nichols, Johanna
2003Diversity and stability in languages. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical linguistics, 283–310. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nichols, Johanna
2009Linguistic complexity: A comprehensive definition and survey. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 110–125. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nichols, Johanna & Tandy Warnow
2008Tutorial on computational linguistic phylogeny. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5). 760–820.
Nielsen, Rasmus
2002Mapping mutations on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 51(5). 729–739.
Paradis, Emmanuel
2014Simulation of phylogenetic data. In László Zsolt Garamszegi (ed.), Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology: Concepts and practice, 335–350. Heidelberg: Springer.
Renfrew, Colin
2000At the edge of knowability: Towards a prehistory of languages. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 10(1). 7–34.
Rosenthal, Jeffrey S.
2011Optimal proposal distributions and adaptive MCMC. In Steve Brooks, Andrew Gelman, Galin L. Jones & Xiao-Li Meng (eds.), Handbook of Markov chain Monte Carlo, 93–112. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Ross, Malcolm
2013Diagnosing contact processes from their outcomes: The importance of life stages. Journal of Language Contact 6(1). 5–47.
Sapir, Edward
1921Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Schaller, Helmut Wilhelm
1975Die Balkansprachen: eine Einführung in die Balkanphilologie. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Swadesh, Morris
1952Lexicostatistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 961. 452–463.
Swadesh, Morris
1955Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. International Journal of American Linguistics 211. 121–137.
Trudgill, Peter
1974Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 3(2). 215–246.
Trudgill, Peter
2001Contact and simplification: Historical baggage and directionality in linguistic change. Linguistic Typology 51. 371–374.
Vennemann, Theo
1994Linguistic reconstruction in the context of European prehistory. Transactions of the Philological Society 921. 215–284.
Viti, Carlotta
2010The information structure of OVS in Vedic. In Gisella Ferraresi & Rosemarie Lühr (eds.), Diachronic studies on information structure: Language acquisition and change, 37–62. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Viti, Carlotta
2014Reconstructing syntactic variation in Proto-Indo-European. Indo-European Linguistics 21. 73–111.
Wichmann, Søren
2015Diachronic stability and typology. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 212–224. London: Routledge.
Willis, David
1998Syntactic change in Welsh: A study of the loss of the verb-second. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2014Molecular evolution: A statistical approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yanovich, Igor
2016Genetic drift explains Sapir’s “drift” in semantic change. In Seán G. Roberts, Christine Cuskley, Luke McCrohon, Lluis Barceló-Coblijn, Olga Fehér & Tessa Verhoef (eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 11th international conference (EVOLANGX11), Online at [URL].
2023. Why we need a gradient approach to word order. Linguistics 61:4 ► pp. 825 ff.
List, Johann-Mattis & Robert Forkel
2021. Automated identification of borrowings in multilingual wordlists. Open Research Europe 1 ► pp. 79 ff.
List, Johann-Mattis & Robert Forkel
2021. Automated identification of borrowings in multilingual wordlists. Open Research Europe 1 ► pp. 79 ff.
List, Johann-Mattis & Robert Forkel
2022. Automated identification of borrowings in multilingual wordlists. Open Research Europe 1 ► pp. 79 ff.
List, Johann‐Mattis
2019. Automated methods for the investigation of language contact, with a focus on lexical borrowing. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:10
Macklin-Cordes, Jayden L. & Erich R. Round
2022. Challenges of sampling and how phylogenetic comparative methods help: with a case study of the Pama-Nyungan laminal contrast. Linguistic Typology 26:3 ► pp. 533 ff.
Wichmann, Søren & Taraka Rama
2021. Testing methods of linguistic homeland detection using synthetic data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.