Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 35:1 (2018) ► pp. 35–70

On morphological internalization

The origin of the Old Irish oblique relative conjunct particle -(s)a N -

| University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU)
This paper deals with the creation of the Old Irish oblique relative conjunct particle -(s)a N - (e.g., dianepir “for which he says” = do-(s)a N -epir) as the outcome of the internalization of a demonstrative form used as a light head, which initially stood as a morphologically independent form. The initial step of this change was the grammaticalization of that demonstrative as the oblique element of a paradigm of relative-clause type forms in which the subject and object functions of the antecedent of the relative are also distinguished. Internalization is defined as an abrupt morphological change creating grammatical elements; its specific mechanism is the mirror image of externalization and must be distinguished from other morphological changes such as incorporation.
Keywords: Old Irish, verbal complex, relative clause, NPrel function, light head, morphological internalization and externalization, incorporation, morphophonological marker
Published online: 16 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16036.gar
References

[ p. 68 ]References

Ahlqvist, Anders
1985 The syntax of relative marking in Old Irish. Folia Linguistica Historica 6(2). 323–346.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2007 Typological distinctions in word-formation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 2nd edn., 1–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.
2007 Relative clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 2: Complex constructions, 2nd edn., 206–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
2001 Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breatnach, Liam
1980 Some remarks on the relative in Old Irish. Ériu 31. 1–9.Google Scholar
Citko, Barbara
2004 On headed, headless, and light-headed relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22. 95–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
1999 Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DIL: Dictionary of the Irish language
. Based mainly on Old and Middle Irish materials (and contributions to a dictionary of the Irish language). Dublin: Royal Irish Academy 1913–1975 (compact edition 1983). The edition quoted is the electronic version of 2013 (‘eDIL’) available at http://​dil​.ie/ (18 December 2017).
Epps, Patience
2009 Escape from the noun phrase: From relative clause to converb and beyond in an Amazonian language. Diachronica 26(3). 287–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eska, Joseph F.
2007 Bergin’s rule: Syntactic diachrony and discourse strategy. Diachronica 24(2). 253–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García-Castillero, Carlos
2012 The paradigm of clause types in Old Irish: The morphological encoding of illocutionary force. In H. Craig Melchert (ed.), The Indo-European verb: Proceedings of the Conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Los Angeles, 13–15 September 2010, 61–72. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
2013a Morphological externalisation and the Old Irish verbal particle ro . Transactions of the Philological Society 111(1). 108–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b Old Irish tonic pronouns as extraclausal constituents. Ériu 63. 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 De-adjectival preverbs in the Old Irish verbal complex: A synchronic and diachronic study. Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 61. 57–100.Google Scholar
2017 The split for, a gecko morpheme in the Old Irish verbal complex. In Ivo Hajnal, Daniel Kölligan & Katharina Zipser (eds.), Miscellanea Indogermanica. Festschrift für José Luis García Ramón zum 65. Geburtstag, 195–206. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck Bereich Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Forthcoming Clause typing in the Old Irish verbal complex: Morphological expression, paradigmatic organization and syntactic implications.Google Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B.
1998 Incorporation. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 84–100. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason D.
2015 Incorporation. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, vol. 1, 413–434. Berlin: De Gruyter-Mouton.Google Scholar
[ p. 69 ]
Heath, Jeffrey
1997 Lost wax: Abrupt replacement of key morphemes in Australian agreement complexes. Diachronica 14(2). 197–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Pierre-Yves
1992 La relative ‘nasalisante’ en vieil-irlandais. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 86. 226–264.Google Scholar
McCone, Kim
2006 The origins and development of the insular Celtic verbal complex. Maynooth: National University of Ireland.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2000 Incorporation. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphologie / Morphology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung / An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation, vol. 1, 916–928. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ó hUiginn, Ruairí
1983 On the Old Irish figura etymologica. Ériu 34. 123–133.Google Scholar
1986 The Old Irish nasalizing relative clause. Ériu 37. 33–87.Google Scholar
Pappas, Panayiotis A.
2001 The microcosm of a morphological change: Variation in the thelo + infinitive counterfactuals in Early Modern Greek. Diachronica 18(1). 59–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, Peter
1994 The Celtic adverbs for ‘against’ and ‘with’ and the early apocope of *-i . Ériu 45. 151–189.Google Scholar
Stokes, Whitley & John Strachan
(eds.) 1901–1903 Thesaurus Palaeohibernicus. A collection of Old Irish glosses, scholia, prose and verse. (With a supplement by Whitley Stokes.) Dublin: Dublin Institute of Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf
1946 A grammar of Old Irish. Revised and enlarged edition. Translated from the German by Daniel A. Binchy & Osborn Bergin. Dublin: Dublin Institute of Advanced Studies (reprinted with supplement 1975).Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
1963 Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the Old Irish verb. Celtica 6. 1–49.Google Scholar
[ p. 70 ]
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Stoynova, Natalia
2021. A nonstandard type of affix reordering. Studies in Language Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.