Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 35:4 (2018) ► pp.451–486

Pragmatic differentiation of negative markers in the early stages of Jespersen’s cycle in North Germanic

 | University of Cambridge
 | University of Cambridge
This article investigates the pragmatic function of new negative markers during incipient renewal of negation in ‘Jespersen’s cycle’. We outline a typology of these markers, suggesting a pathway by which they begin as specialized for use with discourse-old propositions and later expand to inferred propositions before finally becoming possible with discourse-new propositions. This framework is applied to an overlooked case of Jespersen’s cycle in North Germanic: replacement of early Norwegian ei(gi) “not” by ekki (originally “nothing”) from 1250 to 1550. We document a sharp rise in frequency of ekki around 1425, suggesting that, until then, ekki had been restricted to negating discourse-old propositions. Once this constraint was lifted, ei(gi) and ekki competed directly, resulting in rapid replacement of ei(gi) by ekki. This typologically unusual direct replacement of a negator with no intervening doubling stage can be attributed to the new negator’s origin as a negative indefinite and the lack of negative concord in early Norwegian.
Keywords: negation, cyclic change, Jespersen’s cycle, information structure, emphasis, Old Norwegian, Middle Norwegian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background to Jespersen’s cycle
  • 3.Explanations for Jespersen’s cycle: Emphatic negation and information structure
  • 4.Emphasis and activation
  • 5.Operationalizing activation
  • 6.Negation in North Germanic
  • 7.Method
  • 8.Results
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Texts cited
  • References
Published online: 17 January 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16040.bla
References (79)
Texts cited
Dokumentasjonsprosjektet. 1997. Ein kort introduksjon til Dokumentasjonsprojektet. [URL]
Diplomatarium Norvegicum. 1901–1903. ed. H. J. Huitfeldt-Kaas, vol. 161. Oslo: Christiania.Google Scholar
Diplomatarium Norvegicum. Romerske oldbreve. 1902–1919. eds. H. J. Huitfeldt-Kaas, Gustav Storm, Alexander Bugge, Christian Brinchmann & Oluf Kolsrud, vols. 17–18. Oslo: Christiania.Google Scholar
Diplomatarium Norvegicum. Aktstykker vedrørende Norges forbindelse med De britiske øer. 1910–1915. eds. H. J. Huitfeldt-Kaas, Gustav Storm, Alexander Bugge, Christian Brinchmann & Oluf Kolsrud, vols. 19–201. Oslo: Christiania.Google Scholar
Diplomatarium Norvegicum. 1847–1861. eds. Christian C. A. Langer & Carl R. Unger, vols. 1–51. Oslo: Christiania.Google Scholar
. 1970–1976. ed. Hallvard Magerøy, vol. 211. Oslo: Christiania.Google Scholar
. 1990–95. ed. Ferdinand Linthoe Næshagen, vol. 221. Oslo: Christiania.Google Scholar
. 1863–1900. eds. Carl R. Unger & H. J. Huitfeldt-Kaas, vols. 6–151. Oslo: Christiania.Google Scholar
Hávamál. In Jónsson, Guðni. 1949. Eddukvæði (Sæmundar-Edda). Reykjavík: Kostnaðarmaður: Sigurður Kristjánsson.Google Scholar
Vǫluspá. In Dronke, Ursula. 1997. The Poetic Edda. Volume II: Mythological Poems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
References
Auwera, Johan van der. 2010. On the diachrony of negation. In Laurence R. Horn (ed.), The expression of negation, 73–109. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ayres-Bennett, Wendy. 1994. Negative evidence: Or another look at the non-use of ne in seventeenth-century French. French Studies 481. 63–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty J. 2006. Semantic and pragmatic contributions to information status. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 381. 14–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, Tam. 2015. Gender and language change in Old Norse sentential negatives. Language Variation and Change 271. 349–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, Tam T. 2017. Speech in space and time: Contact, change and diffusion in medieval Norway. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.Google Scholar
Breitbarth, Anne. 2009. A hybrid approach to Jespersen’s cycle in West Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 121. 81–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The history of Low German negation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breitbarth, Anne, Christopher Lucas & David Willis. 2013. Incipient Jespersen’s cycle: The (non-)grammaticalization of new negative markers. In Jürg Fleischer & Horst J. Simon (eds.), Sprachwandelvergleich – Comparing diachronies, 143–164. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1985. Subject clitics and Ā-bound traces. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 81. 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj. 2003. On the synchronic and diachronic status of the negative adverbial ikke / not . Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 721. 1–53.Google Scholar
. 2005. Interfaces: Negation – Syntax – Brain. Aarhus: Aarhus University dissertation.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1976. Mica. Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell’Università di Padova 11. 101–12.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 171. 79–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich. 2003. La grammaticalisation des constructions de négation dans une perspective onomasiologique, ou: la déconstruction d’une illusion d’optique. In Peter Koch & Andreas Blank (eds.), Kognitive romanische Onomasiologie und Semasiologie, 213–33. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Richard Waltereit. 2002. Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 211. 151–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1996. Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics 261. 475–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2006. Meaning change in grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The many careers of negative polarity items. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections, 299–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa. 1999. The interpretation of no-pas in Catalan. Journal of Pragmatics 191. 353–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2002. Negation in C: The syntax of negated verbs in Old Norse. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 251. 190–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language 641. 501–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnibeth Beale. 2007. The emergence of emphatic ne in conversational Swiss French. Journal of French Language Studies 171. 249–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Alan H. 1904. The word iwn3. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 411. 130–5.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2008. Negative cycles. Linguistic Typology 121. 195–243.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2001. The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy 241. 659–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 2009. The grammaticalization of negation markers in Old and Middle French: A discourse-functional approach. In Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), Current trends in diachronic pragmatics and semantics, 227–251. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. On the evolution of temporal n-words in Medieval French. Language Sciences 341. 76–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The grammaticalization of negative indefinites: The case of the temporal/aspectual n-words plus and mais in Medieval French. In Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), The diachrony of negation, 185–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard & Jacqueline Visconti. 2009. On the diachrony of ‘reinforced’ negation in French and Italian. In Corinne Rossari, Claudia Ricci & Adriana Spiridon (eds.), Grammaticalization and pragmatics: Facts, approaches, theoretical issues, 137–71. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, Susan E. & Herbert H. Clark. 1974. What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 131. 512–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellquist, Elof. 1922. Svensk etymologisk ordbok. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2000. Pick a theory (not just any theory): Indiscriminatives and the free-choice indefinite. In Laurence R. Horn & Yatsuhiko Kato (eds.), Negation and polarity: Syntactic and semantic perspectives, 147–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Indrebø, Gustav. 1951. Norsk målsoga. Bergen: J. Grieg.Google Scholar
Israel, Michael. 1996. Polarity sensitivity and lexical semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 191. 619–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Minimizers, maximizers and the rhetoric of scalar reasoning. Journal of Semantics 181. 297–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The grammar of polarity: Pragmatics, sensitivity, and the logic of scales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Agnes. 2010. Anything is nothing is something: On the diachrony of polarity types of indefinites. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 281. 787–822. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and other languages. (Det Kgl. Videnskabernes Selskab. Historisk-Filologiske Meddelser I 5). Copenhagen: Høst & Søn.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi, Joel Priestly, Kristin Hagen, Tor Anders Åfarli & Øystein Alexander Vangsnes. 2009. The Nordic Dialect Corpus. Online at: [URL] (accessed 23 March 2018).
Kiparsky, Paul & Cleo Condoravdi. 2006. Tracking Jespersen’s cycle. In Mark Janse, Brian D. Joseph & Angela Ralli (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, 172–197. Mytilene: Doukas.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie & Maria Teresa Espinal. 2014. Diachronic changes in negative expressions. Lingua 1451. 194–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, William A. 1993. Negation, indefinites, and the Jespersen cycle. In Joshua S. Guenter, Barbara A. Kaiser & Cheryl C. Zoll (eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 437–446. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre. 2010. The pragmatic motifs of the Jespersen cycle: Default, activation and the history of negation in French. Lingua 1201. 2240–2258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The syntax of pragmatics: The case of presuppositional negatives. Syntaxe et Sémantique 151. 115–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. The pragmatics of marked configurations: Negative doubling in French. Journal of Pragmatics 951. 34–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magnússon, Ásgeir Blondal. 1989. Íslensk orðsifjabók. Reykjavík: Orðabók Háskólans: Mál og menning.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1912. L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia 121. 384–400.Google Scholar
Munch, Christine B. Østbø. 2013. North Germanic negation: A microcomparative perspective. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.Google Scholar
Mørck, Endre. 1980. Passiv i mellomnorsk diplom. M.A. thesis. Universitetet i Oslo.Google Scholar
. 1999. Sociolinguistic studies on the basis of medieval Norwegian charters. In Ernst Håkon Jahr (ed.), Language change: Advances in historical sociolinguistics, 263–290. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mæhlum, Brit & Unn Røyneland. 2012. Det norske dialektlandskapet: innføring i studiet av dialekter. Oslo: Cappelen Damm akademisk.Google Scholar
Piñón, Christopher J. 1991. Presupposition and the syntax of negation in Hungarian. In Lise M. Dobrin, Lynn Nichols & Rossa M. Rodriguez (eds.), Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 1991, Part two: The parasession on negation, 246–62. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Price, Glanville. 1978. L’interrogation négative sans ne . Studii şi Cercetări Lingvistice 291. 599–606.Google Scholar
. 1993. Pas (point) without ne in interrogative clauses. French Language Studies 31. 191–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwegler, Armin. 1983. Predicate negation and word-order change: A problem of multiple causation. Lingua 611. 297–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Word-order changes in predicate negation strategies in Romance languages. Diachronica 51. 21–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott. 2005. The pragmatics of negation in Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua 1151. 1427–1456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Fine-tuning Jespersen’s Cycle. In Betty J. Birner & G. Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in honour of Laurence R. Horn, 327–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallage, Phillip. 2013. Functional differentiation and grammatical competition in the English Jespersen Cycle. Journal of Historical Syntax 21. 1–25.Google Scholar
. 2017. Negation in early English: Grammatical and functional change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Negative polarity and the quantifier cycle: Comparative perspectives from European languages. In Pierre Larrivée & Richard P. Ingham (eds.), The evolution of negation: Beyond the Jespersen cycle, 313–356. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2016. Incipient Jespersen’s cycle in Old English negation. In Sten Vikner, Henrik Jørgensen & Elly van Gelderen (eds.), Let us have articles betwixt us: Papers in historical and comparative linguistics in honour of Johanna L. Wood, 465–491. Aarhus: Dept. of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
Willis, David, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth. 2013. Comparing diachronies of negation. In David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth (eds.), The history of negation in the languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, volume 1: Case studies, 1–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wouden, Ton van der. 1997. Negative contexts: Collocation, polarity and multiple negation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Negation and clausal structure: A comparative study of Romance languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde H. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam dissertation.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Magistro, Giuseppe
2023. The rise and fall of illocutionary negation: Evidence from Veneto. Journal of Pragmatics 208 ► pp. 138 ff. DOI logo
Vindenes, Urd
2023. Chapter 9. Minimizers as negative reinforcers in Norwegian. In Constructional Approaches to Nordic Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language, 37], ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Larrivée, Pierre
2019. Chapter 6. Historical pragmatics, explicit activation and wh in situ in French. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 15], ► pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Larrivée, Pierre
2020. Sémantique de la grammaire, parcours typologiques et changement historique. Semiotica 2020:234 ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.