Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 17:1 (2000) ► pp.192206
References (16)
Références
Auger, Julie. 1995. “Les clitiques pronominaux en français parlé informel: une approche morphologique.” Revue québécoise de linguistique 241.21–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. “Le redoublement des sujets en français québécois: une approche variationniste.” Revue canadienne de linguistique 43:1.37–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaulieu, Louise & Balcom Patricia. 1998. “Le statut de pronoms personnels sujets en français acadien du nord-est du Nouveau-Brunswick.” Linguistica Atlantica 201.1–27.Google Scholar
Bourhis, Richard Y. 1982. “Language policies and language attitudes: le monde de la francophonie.” Attitudes towards Language Variation: Social and Applied Contexts ed. by Ellen. B. Ryan & Howard Giles, 34–63. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Bourhis, Richard Y. & Lepicq Dominique. 1993. “Quebec French and language issues in Quebec.” Trends in Romance Linguistics and Philology, Volume 51: Bilingualism and Linguistic Conflict in Romance ed. by Rebecca Posner & John. N. Green, 345–381. La Haye et Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie. 1997. “Attitudes envers l’enseignement et l’apprentissage du français cadien en Louisiane.” Revue des sciences de l’éducation 23:3.699–715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Højrup, Thomas. 1983. “The concept of life-mode: A form-specifying mode of analysis applied to contemporary western Europe.” Ethnologia Scandinavica 18–50.Google Scholar
King, Ruth & Nadasdi Terry. 1995a. “La puissance des pronoms faibles en français terre-neuvien.” Actes du 19e colloque annuel de l’Association de linguistique des provinces atlantiques ed. by Donna L. Lillian, 129–137. Charlottetown: University of Prince Edward Island.Google Scholar
. 1995b. “Le non-redoublement du sujet en acadien.” Communication présentée au Congrès annuelde l’Association canadienne de linguistique, au Congrès des Sociétés savantes, Montréal.
Le Page, Robert B. 1968. “Problems of descriptions in multilingual communities.” Transactions of the Philological Society, 189–212. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
1978. “Projection, focusing and diffusion, or steps towards a sociolinguistic theory of language, illustrated from sociolinguistic survey of multilingual communities, stages I: Belize (British Honduras) and II: St-Lucia.” Society for Caribbean Linguistics Occasional Paper 9. Schoolof Education, University of the West Indies, St-Augustine, Trinidad. Mimeo. Reprinted in York Papers in Linguistics 91, University of York: Department of Language.Google Scholar
McEntegart, Damian & Page Robert B. Le. 1982. “An appraisalof the statistical techniques used in the sociolinguist survey of multilingual communities.” Variation in speech communities ed. by Suzanne Romaine, 105–24. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Péronnet, Louise. 1995. “Le français acadien.” Français de France et français du Canada ed. by Pierre Gauthier & Thomas Lavoie, 399–439. Lyon: Centre de linguistique, Université de Lyon III Jean Moulin.Google Scholar
Sanders, Carol, ed. 1993. French Today: Language in its Social Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdman, Albert, Thomas Klingler, Margaret Marshall & Kevin Rottet. 1998. Dictionary of Louisiana Creole. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar