Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 36:2 (2019) ► pp. 181221
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2000Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2016How gender shapes the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aksenov, A. T.
1984K probleme èsktralingvističeskoj motivacii grammatičeskoj kategorii roda. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 1984(1). 14–25.Google Scholar
Appleyard, David
2015Ethiopian Semitic and Cushitic ancient contact features in Ge‘ez and Amharic. In Aaron Michael Butts (ed.), Semitic languages in contact, 16–32. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Audring, Jenny
2014Gender as a complex feature. Language Sciences 43. 5–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Xavier
2015Losing classifiers and acquiring gender. Insights from Austronesian languages. Paper presented at the workshop ‘Loss and gain in language’. University of Agder, 20–22 May 2015.
Bally, Charles
1926Le langage et la vie. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
[ p. 212 ]
Baugh, Albert C. & Thomas Cable
2002A history of the English language. 5th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Belyaev, Oleg
2010Evolution of case in Ossetic. Iran and the Caucasus 14. 287–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bichakjian, Bernard H.
1999Language evolution and the complexity criterion. Psycoloquy 10 (online: http://​www​.cogsci​.ecs​.soton​.ac​.uk​/cgi​/psyc​/newpsy​?10​.033, accessed 14.07.2017).
Bickel, Balthasar, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Taras Zakharko & Giorgio Iemmolo
2015Exploring diachronic universals of agreement: Alignment patterns and zero marking across person categories. In Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective, 29–52. Berlin: De Mouton Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bleek, Wilhelm H. I.
1872The concord, the origin of pronouns, and the formation of classes or genders of nouns. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 1. 64–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bogoljubov, Mixail N.
1966Jagnobskij jazyk. In Vladimir V. Vinogradov (ed.), Indoevropejskie jazyki (Jazyki narodov SSSR. Vol. 1), 342–361. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & William J. Poser
2008Language classification: History and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chamoreau, Claudine
2012Spanish diminutive markers -ito/-ita in Mesoamerican languages: A challenge for acceptance of gender distinction. In Martine Vanhove, Thomas Stolz, Aina Urdze & Hitomi Otsuka (eds.), Morphologies in contact, 72–90. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Cheung, Johnny
2008The Ossetic case system revisited. In Alexander Lubotsky, Jos Schaeken & Jeroen Wiedenhof (eds.), Evidence and counter-evidence: Essays in honour of Frederik Kortlandt. Vol. 1: Balto-Slavic and Indo-European linguistics (Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 32), 87–105. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Chirikba, Viacheslav A.
2008The problem of the Caucasian Sprachbund. In Pieter Muysken (ed.), From linguistic areas to areal linguistics (Studies in Language Companion Series 90), 25–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clamons, Robbin
1995How recent contact erased ancient traces in the gender systems of the Oromo dialects. In Mushira Eid & Gregory Iverson (eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on historical issues in sociolinguistics/social issues in historical linguistics, 389–400. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Claudi, Ulrike
1985Zur Entstehung von Genussystemen: Überlegungen zu einigen theoretischen Aspekten, verbinden mit einer Fallstudie des Zande. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Combrink, Johan
1978Afrikaans: Its origin and development. In Leonard W. Lanham & Karel P. Prinsloo (eds.), Language and communication studies in South Africa: Current studies and directions in research and inquiry, 69–95. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
2008Inflectional morphology and language contact, with special reference to mixed languages. In Peter Siemund & Noemi Kintana (eds.), Language contact and contact languages (Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 7), 15–32. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
1991Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 213 ]
1995Agreement (research into syntactic change). In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, 1235–1244. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2013Number of genders. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
2014Gender typology. In Greville G. Corbett (ed.), The expression of gender (The Expression of Cognitive Categories 6), 87–130. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Cornips, Leonie & Aafke Hulk
2006External and internal factors in bilingual and bidialectal language development: Grammatical gender of the Dutch definite determiner. In Claire Lefebvre, Lydia White & Christine Jourdan (eds.), L2 acquisition and creole genesis: Dialogues, 355–378. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curzan, Anne
2003Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2004The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard M.
1910Modern Greek in Asia Minor. Journal of Hellenic Studies 30.109–132, 267–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1916Modern Greek in Asia Minor: A study of the dialects of Sílli, Cappadocia and Phárasa with grammars, texts, translations, and glossary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deumert, Ana
2001Variation and standardization at the Cape (1888–1922): A contribution to Afrikaans socio-historical linguistics. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 13. 301–352.Google Scholar
2004Language standardization and language change: The dynamics of Cape Dutch (Impact: Studies in Language and Society 19). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.
2011Historical linguistics and the comparative study of African languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dolberg, Florian
2014Gender variation, change, and loss in Mediaeval English: Evidence from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. PhD thesis. University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C.
1993Internally and externally motivated change in language contact settings: Doubts about dichotomy. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 131–155. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1992The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68(1). 81–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Order of relative clause and noun. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Duke, Janet
2010Gender reduction and loss in Germanic: Three case studies. In Damaris Nübling, Antje Dammel & Sebastian Kürschner (eds.), Kontrastive Germanistische Linguistik, 643–673. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav
2011Gender and contact: A Natural Morphology perspective. In Peter Siemund (ed.), Linguistic universals and language variation, 167–199. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 214 ]
2013Inflectional change, ‘sound laws’ and the autonomy of morphology: The case of Scandinavian case and gender reduction. Diachronica 30(1). 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience
2006The Vaupés melting pot: Tucanoan influence on Hup. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology, 267–189. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007Birth of a noun classification system: The case of Hup. In Leo Wetzels (ed.), Language endargement and endangered languages: Linguistic and anthropological studies with special emphasis on the languages and cultures of the Andean-Amazonian border area, 107–128. Leiden: Publications of the Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS).Google Scholar
Fodor, István
1959The origin of grammatical gender. Lingua 8(1). 1–41; 8(2). 186–214.Google Scholar
Friedman, Viktor A.
1996Typological and areal features linking and separating the Balkans and the Caucasus. In Ian I. Press & Frank E. Knowles (eds.), Papers from the fourth world congress for Soviet and East European studies (Harrogate – July 1990): Language and linguistics ( Papers in Slavonic Linguistics Occasional Series III), 99–111. London: University of London.Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco
2012Plural across inflection and derivation, fusion and agglutination. In Lars Johanson & Martine Robbeets (eds.), Copies versus cognates in bound morphology, 71–97. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardani, Francesco, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze
2015Borrowed morphology: An overview. In Francesco Gardani, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze (eds.), Borrowed morphology (Language Contact and Bilingualism 8), 1–23. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gorrochategui, Joaquín
2009Vasco antiguo: algunas cuestiones de geografía e historia lingüísticas. Palaeohispanica 9. 539–555.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1978How does a language acquire gender markers? In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, 48–81. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gündoğdu, Songül
2015Loss of gender distinction in Muş Kurmanji. Paper presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. Leiden, Leiden University. 3 September 2015.
Hamp, Eric C.
1965The Albanian dialect of Mandres. Die Sprache 11. 137–154.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993A grammar of Lezgian (Mouton Grammar Library 9). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2003On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 16. 529–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Mechthild Reh
1984Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Rainer Vossen
1983On the origin of gender in Eastern Nilotic. In Rainer Vossen & Marianne Bechhaus-Gerst (eds.), Nilotic studies: Proceedings of the International Symposium on languages and history of the Nilotic peoples, Cologne, January 4–6 1982, part II (Kölner Beiträge zur Afrikanistik 10), 255–268. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond
2010Language contact: Reconsideration and reassessment. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 1–28. Malden: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 215 ]
Hinskens, Frans
2014The lenition and deletion of medial voiced obstruents in Afrikaans: Some internal, external, and extralinguistic factors. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 26(3). 248–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Nicholas A.
2012The noun classifiers of Cuchumatán Mayan languages: A case of diffusion from Otomanguean. International Journal of American Linguistics 78(3). 411–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even
1976Some aspects of language contact in Anatolia. Working Papers in Linguistics (Oslo) 7/8. 142–160.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio, Gorka Elordieta & Arantzazu Elordieta
1994The Basque dialect of Lekeitio (Supplements of the Anuario del Seminario de Filología vasca “Julio de Urquijo” 34). Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco & Donostia/San Sebastián: Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa.Google Scholar
Hurch, Bernhard
1989Hispanisierung im Baskischen. In Norbert Boretzky, Werner Enninger & Thomas Stolz (eds.), Vielfalt der Kontakte. Beiträge zum 5. Essener Kolloquium über ‘Grammatikalisierung: Natürlichkeit und Systemökonomie’ vom 6–8.10.1988 an der Universität Essen, 11–35. Band I. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Muhammad H.
1973Grammatical gender: Its origin and development. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Igartua, Iván
2015From cumulative to separative exponence in inflection: Reversing the morphological cycle. Language 91(3). 676–722. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janhunen, Juha
2000Grammatical gender from east to west. In Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Mirja Saari (eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition. II: Manifestations of gender (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124), 699–708. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janse, Mark
2009aGreek-Turkish language contact in Asia Minor. Études helléniques / Hellenic Studies 17: 37–54.Google Scholar
2009bWatkins’ Law and the development of agglutinative inflections in Asia Minor Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 9. 93–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1955Growth and structure of the English language. 9th ed. London: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars
2006On the roles of Turkic in the Caucasus area. In Yaron Matras, April McMahon & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Linguistic areas: Convergence in historical and typological perspective, 160–181. Hampshire: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles
1988Grammatical gender in English: 950 to 1250. London, New York: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Karatsareas, Petros
2009The loss of grammatical gender in Cappadocian Greek. Transactions of the Philological Society 107. 196–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011A study of Cappadocian Greek nominal morphology from a diachronic and dialectological perspective. PhD thesis. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
2014On the diachrony of gender in Asia Minor Greek: The development of semantic gender in Pontic. Language Sciences 43. 77–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Convergence in word structure: Revisiting agglutinative inflection in Cappadocian Greek. Diachronica 33(1). 31–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 216 ]
Kastovsky, Dieter
2000Inflectional classes, morphological restructuring, and the dissolution of Old English grammatical gender. In Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Mirja Saari (eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition. II: Manifestations of gender (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124), 709–727. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael & David A. Zubin
1984Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation. Linguistische Berichte 93. 26–50.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Bernhard Wälchli
2001The Circum-Baltic languages: An areal-typological approach. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), The Circum-Baltic languages. Vol. 2: Grammar and typology, 615–750. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kossmann, Maarten
2015Contact-induced change. In Matthew Baerman (ed.), The Oxford handbook of inflection, 251–271. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Ruth
2015The morphosyntax of gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kusmenko, Jurij K.
2000Entwicklung des Genussystems in den skandinavischen Sprachen. In Fritz Paul (ed.), Arbeiten zur Skandinavistik. 13. Arbeitstagung der deutschsprachigen Skandinavistik, 469–479. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1992Phonology and morphology. In Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. II: 1066–1476, 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leslau, Wolf
1945The influence of Cushitic on the Semitic languages of Ethiopia: A problem of substratum. Word 1. 59–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1952The influence of Sidamo on the Ethiopic languages of Gurage. Language 28(1). 63–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2011The origin of the Proto-Indo-European gender system: Typological considerations. Folia Linguistica 45(2). 435–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Masica, Colin P.
1991The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matasović, Ranko
2004Gender in Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
2008Diachronic and areal typology of gender and other agreement systems. Lecture given at the Università di Macerata, 8–9 April 2008 (online: http://​mudrac​.ffzg​.hr​/~rmatasov​/Macerata​.pdf, accessed 21.06.2017).
2014Nominal agreement in PIE from the areal and typological point of view. In Sergio Neri & Roland Schuhmann (eds.), Studies on the collective and feminine in Indo-European from a diachronic and typological perspective, 233–255. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018An areal typology of agreement systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron
2007The borrowability of structural categories. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 31–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Universals of structural borrowing. In Peter Siemund (ed.), Linguistic universals and language variation, 204–233. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 217 ]
Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel
2007Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language 31(4). 829–865. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, William K.
1956The Latvian element in modern Livonian. In Margarete Woltner and Herbert Bräuer (eds.), Festschrift für Max Vasmer zum 70. Geburtstag, 307–318. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John
2001The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 6. 125–166.Google Scholar
2002What happened to English? Diachronica 9(2). 217–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Language interrupted: Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1926 [1919]Le genre grammatical et l’élimination de la flexion. In Antoine Meillet, Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, 199–210, Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Milroy, James
1992Middle English dialectology. In Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. II: 1066–1476, 156–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mirković, Jelena, Maryellen C. McDonald & Mark Seidenberg
2005Where does gender come from? Evidence from a complex inflectional system. Language and Cognitive Processes 20(1/2). 139–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike & Ruth Spriggs
2000Gender in Teop (Bougainville, Papua New Guinea). In Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Mirja Saari (eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition. I: Approaches to gender (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124), 321–349. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
1997Kitúba. In Sarah G. Thomason (ed.), Contact languages: A wider perspective, 173–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter
2012Contacts between indigenous languages in South America. In Lyle Campbell & Verónica Grondona (eds.), The indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide, 235–258. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1992Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: Chicago University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Diachronically stable structural features. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Historical Linguistics 1993: Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993, 337–355. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Diversity and stability in language. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 283–310. Malden: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ponelis, Fritz
1993The development of Afrikaans (Duisburger Arbeiten zur Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft 18). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
[ p. 218 ]
Poplack, Shana & Stephen Levey
2010Contact-induced grammatical change: A cautionary tale. In Peter Auer & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation. Vol. 1: Theories and methods, 391–419. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don & Joseph F. Eska
2013Historical linguistics: Toward a twenty-first century reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberge, Paul T.
1993The formation of Afrikaans. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 27. 1–112.Google Scholar
2002Convergence and the formation of Afrikaans. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14(1). 57–93.Google Scholar
Rubino, Carl
1997A reference grammar of Ilocano. PhD thesis. University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette
2007Types of loan: Matter and pattern. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 15–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Salmons, Joseph C.
1992The evolution of gender assignment from ohg to nhg . In Rosina Lippi-Green (ed.), Recent developments in Germanic linguistics, 81–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salmons, Joseph C. & Thomas C. Purnell
2010Contact and the development of American English. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 454–477. Malden: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandström, Caroline
2000The changing system of grammatical gender in the Swedish dialects of Nyland, Finland. In Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Mirja Saari (eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition. II: Manifestations of gender (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124), 793–806. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1992Language decay and contact-induced change: Similarities and differences. In Matthias Brenzinger (ed.), Language death: Factual and theoretical explorations with special reference to East Africa, 59–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette
2010Neuter gender in eastern Indonesia. Oceanic Linguistics 49(2). 407–435.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank
2011Bora loans in Resígaro: Massive morphological and little lexical borrowing in a moribund Arawakan language (Cadernos de Etnolingüística. Série Monografias 2). Online: http://​www​.etnolinguistica​.org​/mono:2 (accessed 04.02.2018).
Singer, Ruth
2012Do nominal classifiers mediate selectional restrictions? An investigation of the function of semantically based nominal classifiers in Mawng (Iwaidjan, Australian). Linguistics 50(5). 955–990. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smits, Caroline
1996Disintegration of inflection: The case of Iowa Dutch. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Sollid, Hilde, Philipp Conzett & Åse Mette Johansen
2014Gender and noun inflection: The fate of ‘vulnerable’ categories in Northern Norwegian. In Kurt Braummüller, Steffen Höder & Karoline Kühl (eds.), Stability and divergence in language contact: Factors and mechanisms (Studies in Language Variation 16), 179–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
[ p. 219 ]
Spyropoulos, Vassilios, Anthi Revithiadou & Giorgos Markopoulos
2013From fusion to agglutination in Asia Minor: The curious case of Asia Minor Greek. Paper presented at the 19th International Congress of Linguists, Geneva, 21–27 July 2013.
Stilo, Donald L.
2005Iranian as buffer zone between the universal typologies of Turkic and Semitic. In Éva Ágnes Csató, Bo Isaksson & Carina Jahani (eds.), Linguistic convergence and areal diffusion: Case studies from Iranian, Semitic, and Turkic, 35–63. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas
2012Survival in a niche: On gender-copy in Chamorro (and sundry languages). In Martine Vanhove, Thomas Stolz, Aina Urdze & Hitomi Otsuka (eds.), Morphologies in contact, 93–140. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Stucky, Susan U.
1978How a noun class system may be lost: Evidence from Kituba (lingua franca Kikongo). Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 8(1). 216–233.Google Scholar
Sundermann, Werner
1989Mittelpersisch. In Rüdiger Schmitt (ed.), Compendium linguarum Iranicarum, 138–164. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Tadmor, Uri
2007Grammatical borrowing in Indonesian. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 301–328. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G.
1980Morphological instability, with and without language contact. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 17), 359–372. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997A typology of contact languages. In Arthur K. Spears & Donald Winford (eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles, 71–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Language contact: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman
1988Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thordarson, Fridrik
1989Ossetic. In Rüdiger Schmitt (ed.), Compendium linguarum Iranicarum, 456–479. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
2009Ossetic grammatical studies. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Trask, Robert L.
2003The noun phrase: Nouns, determiners and modifiers; pronouns and names. In José Ignacio Hualde & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), A grammar of Basque (Mouton Grammar Library 26), 113–170. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1999Language contact and the function of linguistic gender. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 33. 133–152.Google Scholar
2009Sociolinguistic typology and complexification. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 98–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013Gender maintenance and loss in Totenmålet, English, and other major Germanic varieties. In Terje Lohndal (ed.), In search of Universal Grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque, 77–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Coetsem, Frans
2000A general and unified theory of the transmission process in language contact (Monographien zur Sprachwissenschaft 19). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
[ p. 220 ]
van Marle, Jaap
1995On the fate of adjectival declension in Overseas Dutch (with some notes on the history of Dutch). In Henning Andersen (ed.), Historical Linguistics 1993: Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993, 283–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, Hans
1988 [1945]Substrat et convergence dans l’évolution linguistique. Remarques sur l’évolution et la structure de l’arménien, du géorgien, de l’ossète et du turc. In Even Hovdhaugen & Fridrik Thordarson (eds.), Linguistique caucasienne et arménienne ( Studia caucasologica II ), 177–192. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1953Languages in contact: Findings and problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
Wells, Spencer et al.
2001The Eurasian heartland: A continental perspective on Y-chromosome diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98(18). 10244–10249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Søren & Eric W. Holman
2009Temporal stability of linguistic typological features. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald
2005Contact-induced changes: Classification and processes. Diachronica 22(2). 373–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zubin, David A. & Klaus-Michael Köpcke
1981Gender: A less than arbitrary grammatical category. In Roberta A. Hendrick, Carrie S. Masek & Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Papers from the Seventeenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, April 30May 1 1981, 439–449. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
[ p. 221 ]