Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 18:2 (2001) ► pp.241265
Cited by (10)

Cited by 10 other publications

Zavalevskyi, Yurii , Svitlana Gorbenko & Oksana Lozova
2022. Рsychological and pedagogical conditions for the development of STEM education. Problems of Education :2(97)  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
van Gelderen, Elly
2021. Variations on what for in the history of English. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 24:3  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Kwon, K.
2016. Reanimating voices from the past: an alternative reading of Novgorod Birch Bark Letter N370. Russian Linguistics 40:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Kwon, Kyongjoon
2015. What is for for?: Reconstructing the development of what for construction in russian. Transactions of the Philological Society 113:3  pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Marelj, Marijana & Ora Matushansky
2015. Mistaking For: Testing the Theory of Mediated Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 46:1  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
권경준
2011. The Diachronic Development of the Russian čto za Construction. 러시아연구 21:1  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
권경준
2014. Motivations for the Developments of the Idiom Byti za Odinъ Mužь and Its Synonymic Expressions in Old Russian. 러시아연구 24:2  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Danylenko, Andrii
2005. Is there any possessive perfect in North Russian?. <i>WORD</i> 56:3  pp. 347 ff. DOI logo
Danylenko, Andrii
2015. On the mechanisms of the grammaticalization of comitative and instrumental categories in Slavic. Journal of Historical Linguistics 5:2  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.