Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 18:2 (2001) ► pp.241265
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Zavalevskyi, Yurii , Svitlana Gorbenko & Oksana Lozova
2022. Рsychological and pedagogical conditions for the development of STEM education. Problems of Education :2(97)  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
van Gelderen, Elly
2021. Variations on what for in the history of English. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 24:3  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Kwon, K.
2016. Reanimating voices from the past: an alternative reading of Novgorod Birch Bark Letter N370. Russian Linguistics 40:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Kwon, Kyongjoon
2015. What is for for?: Reconstructing the development of what for construction in russian. Transactions of the Philological Society 113:3  pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Marelj, Marijana & Ora Matushansky
2015. Mistaking For: Testing the Theory of Mediated Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 46:1  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
권경준
2011. The Diachronic Development of the Russian čto za Construction. 러시아연구 21:1  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
권경준
2014. Motivations for the Developments of the Idiom Byti za Odinъ Mužь and Its Synonymic Expressions in Old Russian. 러시아연구 24:2  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Danylenko, Andrii
2005. Is there any possessive perfect in North Russian?. <i>WORD</i> 56:3  pp. 347 ff. DOI logo
Danylenko, Andrii
2015. On the mechanisms of the grammaticalization of comitative and instrumental categories in Slavic. Journal of Historical Linguistics 5:2  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.