Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 36:2 (2019) ► pp. 139180
References

References

Aitchison, Jean
2013Language change: Progress or decay? 4th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte
2012Variable past tense forms in 19th-century American English: Linking normative grammars and language change. American Speech 87. 257–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Harald
2008Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Harald & Fermin Moscoso del Prado Martin
2005Semantic density and past-tense formation in three Germanic languages. Language 81. 666–698. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Christopher Gordon
1997The etymology of the Old High German weak verb. Newcastle upon Tyne: PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. & Thomas Cable
2013History of the English language. 6th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beckner, Clay & Andrew Wedel
2009The roles of acquisition and usage in morphological change. Berkeley Linguistics Society 35(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bentz, Christian & Bodo Winter
2013Languages with more second language learners tend to lose nominal case. Language Dynamics and Change 3. 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergsland, Knut & Hans Vogt
1962On the validity of glottochronology. Current Anthropology 3. 115–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc & Boris New
2009Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41. 977–990. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc & Kevin Diependaele
2013Dealing with zero word frequencies: A review of the existing rules of thumb and suggestion for an evidence-based choice. Behavior Research Methods 45. 422–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82. 711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Ryan, Ragnar Svare & Joseph Salmons
2012Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of German verbs. Journal of Historical Linguistics 2. 153–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 169 ]
Cuskley, Christine, Martina Pugliese, Claudio Castellano, Francesca Colaiori, Vittorio Loreto & Francesca Tria
2014Internal and external dynamics in language: Evidence from verb regularity in a historical corpus of English. PLoS ONE 9(8). e102882. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalgaard, Peter
2008Introductory statistics with R. 2nd edn. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dammel, Antje, Jessica Nowak & Mirjam Schmuck
2010Strong-verb paradigm leveling in four Germanic languages: A category frequency approach. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22. 337–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Clerck, Bernard & Klaar Vanopstal
2015Patterns of regularisation in British, American and Indian English: A closer look at irregular verbs with t/ed variation. In Collins, P. (ed.), Grammatical change in English world-wide, 335–372. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, Luc
1982De Wachtendonckse psalmen en glossen: Een lexikologisch woordgeografische studie met proeve van kritische leestekst en glossaria, Deel 2. Nederland: Secretariaat van de Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde.Google Scholar
De Smet, Isabeau, Katrien Beuls, Dirk Pijpops & Freek Van de Velde
2017Language-specific differences in regularization rates of the Germanic preterite. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics (ICHL). San Antonio, July 31-August 4.
De Vriendt, Sera F. L.
1965Sterke werkwoorden en sterke werkwoordsvormen in de 16de eeuw. Brussel: Belgisch interuniversitair centrum voor neerlandistiek.Google Scholar
De Vries, Matthias & Lammert te Winkel
1851–1998Woordenboek der Nederlandsche taal. (http://​gtb​.inl​.nl)
Diessel, Holger
2007Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology 25. 108–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dieter, Ferdinand
1900Laut- und Formenlehre der Altgermanischen Dialekte. Leipzig: O. R. Reisland.Google Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav
2010How do words change inflection class? Diachronic evidence from Norwegian. Language Sciences 32. 366–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fertig, David
2009Are strong verbs really dying to fit in? Paper presented at GLAC 15, Banff, May 2.
2016Spreading like wildfire: Morphological variation and the dynamics of the Great English Verb Regularization. Paper presented at St. Petersburg State University, January 21.
. Manuscript. The regularisation-through-derivation effect and the historical development of verbs in the West Germanic languages.
Fox, John
2003Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. Journal of Statistical Software 8(15). 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Johannes
1883Mittelniederländische Grammatik: Mit Lesestücken und Glossar. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.Google Scholar
1971Altfränkische Grammatik. 2nd edn. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Gahl, Susanne
2008“Time” and “thyme” are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language 84. 474–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th
2013Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction. 2nd edn. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Jacob
1819Deutsche Grammatik. Göttingen: Dieterichsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
[ p. 170 ]
Gysseling, Maurits
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten C. van den Toorn
1997Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. 2nd edn. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Harrell, Frank E. Jr.
(with contributions from Charles Dupont and many others) 2015Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 3.17–1. https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=Hmisc
Hill, Eugen
2010A case study in grammaticalized inflectional morphology: Origin and development of the Germanic weak preterite. Diachronica 27(3). 411–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Eric, Anne Merkuur, Marjoleine Sloos & Jeroen van de Weijer
2018Calculating a pattern’s competitive strength: Competition between /æ/ and /ʌ/ in irregular simple pasts and past participles in English. The Mental Lexicon 13(1). 143–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holthausen, Ferdinand
1921Altsächsisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Horst, Johannes van der
2010Met (het) oog op morgen: Opstellen over taal, taalverandering en standaardtaal. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Peter Buehlmann, Sandrine Dudoit, Annette Molinaro & Mark Van Der Laan
2006Survival ensembles. Biostatistics 7(3). 355–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hüning, Matthias, Ulrike Vogel, Ton van der Wouden & Arie Verhagen
(eds.) 2006Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels. Handelingen van de workshop op 30 september en 1 oktober 2005 aan de Freie Universität Berlin. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.Google Scholar
Jescheniak, Jörg D. & Willem J. M. Levelt
1994Word frequency effects in speech production: retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20(4). 824–843.Google Scholar
Koelmans, L.
1978Inleiding tot het lezen van zeventiende-eeuwse teksten. Utrecht: Instituut De Vooys voor Nederlandse Taal- en letterkunde.Google Scholar
Knooihuizen, Remco & Oscar Strik
2014Relative productivity potentials of Dutch verbal inflection patterns. Folia Linguistica Historica 35. 173–200.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1990How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26. 79–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Phonology and morphology. In Hogg, Richard & David Denison (eds.), A history of the English language, 43–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995Thoughts on grammaticalization. 2nd edn. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia
2015How to do linguistics with R. Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Erez, Jean-Baptiste Michel, Joe Jackson, Tina Tang & Martin A. Nowak
2007Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature 449. 713–716. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mailhammer, Robert
2007The Germanic strong verbs: Foundations and development of a new system. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Neil, Wayne
1978The evolution of the Germanic inflectional systems: A study in the causes of language change. Orbis 27. 248–286.Google Scholar
Oostdijk, Nelleke, Wim Goedertier, Frank Van Eynde, Louis Boves, Jean-Pierre Martens, Michael Moortgat & Harald Baayen
2002Experiences from the Spoken Dutch corpus project.Google Scholar
[ p. 171 ]
Pijnenburg, Wilhelmus Johannes Juliana, K. H. van Dalen-Oskam, Katrien Depuydt & T. H. Schoonheim, H. T. Aalbrecht, P. Burger, M. C. van Dalen, G. H. Dambrink, M. J.M van Diepen & K. Stooker
(eds.) 2000Vroegmiddelnederlands woordenboek. (http://​gtb​.ivdnt​.org)
Pijnenburg, Wilhelmus Johannes Juliana, Arend Quak, T. H. Schoonheim, M. A. Mooijaart & K. Louwen
(eds.) 2012Oudnederlands woordenboek. (http://​gtb​.ivdnt​.org)
Pijpops, Dirk, Katrien Beuls & Freek Van de Velde
2015The rise of the verbal weak inflection in Germanic: An agent based model. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal 5. 81–102.Google Scholar
Pijpops, Dirk & Freek Van de Velde
2016Constructional contamination: how does it work and how do we measure it? Folia Linguistica 50(2). 543–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pijpops, Dirk, Isabeau De Smet & Freek Van de Velde
2018Constructional contamination in morphology and syntax. Four case studies. Constructions and Frames 10(2). 269–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven
1998Words and rules. Lingua 106. 219–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prokosch, Eduard
2009 [1939]A comparative Germanic grammar. Surrey: Tiger Xenophon.Google Scholar
Quak, Arend
1981Die altmittel- und altniederfränkischen Psalmen und Glossen. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Quak, Arend & Johannes van der Horst
2002Inleiding Oudnederlands. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2017R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. http://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Ruigendijk, Esther, Freek Van de Velde & Roel Vismans
(eds.) 2012Special issue: Dutch between English and German. Leuvense Bijdragen – Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology 98. 1–176.Google Scholar
Sanders, Willy
1974Der Leidener Willeram. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Santen, Ariane van
1997Hoe sterk zijn de sterke werkwoorden? In Ariane van Santen & Marijke van der Wal (eds.), Taal in tijd en ruimte: Voor Cor van Bree bij zijn afscheid als hoogleraar Historische Taalkunde en Taalvariatie aan de Vakgroep Nederlands van de Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, 45–56. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.Google Scholar
Scott, Alan
(ed.) 2016New directions in comparative Germanic linguistics. Special issue of the Journal of Germanic Linguistics 28(4).Google Scholar
Sijs, Nicoline van der
2010Etymologiebank. (http://​etymologiebank​.nl/)
Simpson, John & Edmund Weiner
(eds.) 1989The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smessaert, Hans, Johannes van der Horst & Freek Van de Velde
(eds.) 2017A Germanic Sandwich 2013. Special issue of Leuvense Bijdragen – Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology 101.Google Scholar
Speelman, Dirk
2014Logistic regression: A confirmatory technique for comparisons in corpus linguistics. In Dylan Glynn & Justyna A. Robinson (eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantative studies in polysemy and synonymy, 487–533. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strik, Oscar
2015Modelling analogical change: A history of Swedish and Frisian verb inflection. Groningen: PhD thesis.Google Scholar
[ p. 172 ]
Strobl, Carolin, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Achim Zeileis & Torsten Hothorn
2007Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 8(25). http://​www​.biomedcentral​.com​/1471​-2105​/8​/25. Crossref
Strobl, Caroline, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Thomas Kneib, Thomas Augustin & Achim Zeileis
2008Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 9(307). http://​www​.biomedcentral​.com​/1471​-2105​/9​/307. Crossref
Tack, P.
1897Oudnederfrankische grammatica. Gent: A. Siffer.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Harald, Baayen
2012Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2). 135–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ten Kate, Lambert Hz
2001 [1723]Aenleiding tot de kennisse van het verhevene deel der Nederduitsche sprake: Eerste deel. Eds. Jan Noordegraaf en Marijke van der Wal. Alphen aan den Rijn: Uitgeverij Canaletto/Repro-Holland BV.) (http://​www​.dbnl​.org​/tekst​/kate002aenl01​_01/)
Tops, Guy A. J.
1974The origin of the Germanic dental preterit. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Van Bree, Cor
1987Historische grammatica van het Nederlands. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Van Coetsem, Frans
1990Ablaut and reduplication in the Germanic verb. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Van de Ketterij, Cornelis
1980Grammaticale interpretatie van Middelnederlandse teksten: Instructiegrammatica. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Van den Toorn, Maarten C., Wilhelmus Pijnenburg, Arjan van Leuvensteijn & Johannes van der Horst
1997Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse taal. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek & Britta Kestemont
2015Using mixed-effects logistic regression to assess the determinants of regularisation of strong inflection in Dutch. Paper presented at SLE 48 Workshop. Shifting classes: Germanic strong and weak preterites and participles, Leiden, September 3.
Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet & Lobke Ghesquière
2013On multiple source constructions in language change. Studies in Language 37. 473–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek & Dirk Pijpops
2018Grensoverschrijdend syntactisch gedrag. In Timothy Colleman, Johan De Caluwe, Veronique De Tier, Anne-Sophie Ghyselen, Liesbet Triest, Roxane Vandenberghe & Ulrike Vogl (eds.), Woorden om te bewaren. Huldeboek voor Jacques Van Keymeulen, 433–449. Gent: UGent, Vakgroep Taalkunde, Afdeling Nederlands.Google Scholar
Van Haeringen, Coenraad B.
1940De taaie levenskracht van het sterke werkwoord. De Nieuwe Taalgids 31. 241–255.Google Scholar
1956Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels. Den Haag: Servire.Google Scholar
Van Helten, Willem Lodewijk
1973 [1887]Middelnederlandsche spraakkunst. Walluf: Sändig.Google Scholar
Van Loey, Adolphe
1973Middelnederlandse spraakkunst: I Vormleer. Kapellen: De Sikkel.Google Scholar
Venables, W. N. & Brian D. Ripley
2002Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verwijs, Eelco, Jakob Verdam, Frederik Stoett, Willem De Vreese, G. I. Lieftinck & Anton Beekman
1885–1941Middelnederlandsch woordenboek. (http://gtb.ivdnt.org)Google Scholar
Vismans, Roel, Matthias Hüning & Fred Weerman
(eds.) 2010Special issue: Dutch between English and German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22(4).Google Scholar
[ p. 173 ]
Vosters, Rik
2012Geolinguistic data and the past tense debate: Linguistic and extralinguistic aspects of Dutch verb regularization. In Gunther De Vogelaer & Guido Seiler (eds.), The dialect laboratory: Dialects as a testing ground for theories of language change, 227–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wal, Marijke van der & Cor Van Bree
2008Geschiedenis van het Nederlands. Houten: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred
2006‘It’s the economy, stupid!’ Een vergelijkende blik op ‘men’ en ‘man’. In Matthias Hüning, Ulrike Vogl, Ton Van der Wouden, & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels, 19–47. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred, Mike Olson & Robert A. Cloutier
2013Synchronic variation and loss of case: Formal and informal language in a Dutch corpus of 17th-century Amsterdam texts. Diachronica 30(3). 353–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weijnen, Antonius A.
1958Nederlandse dialectkunde. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley
2017stringr: Simple, consistent wrappers for common string operations. R package version 1.2.0. https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=stringr
Wickham, Hadley & François Romain
2015dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 0.4.3. https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=dplyr
Wickham, Hadley
2011The split-apply-combine strategy for data analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 40(1). 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Reshaping data with the reshape Package. Journal of Statistical Software 21(12). 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Charles D.
2002Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

De Smet, Isabeau & Freek Van de Velde
2020. A corpus-based quantitative analysis of twelve centuries of preterite and past participle morphology in Dutch. Language Variation and Change 32:2  pp. 241 ff. Crossref logo
De Smet, Isabeau & Freek Van de Velde
2020. Semantic differences between strong and weak verb forms in Dutch. Cognitive Linguistics 31:3  pp. 393 ff. Crossref logo
Pijpops, Dirk, Isabeau De Smet & Freek Van de Velde
2018. Constructional contamination in morphology and syntax. Constructions and Frames 10:2  pp. 269 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.