Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 37:3 (2020) ► pp. 273317
References

References

Adams, James N.
2007The regional diversification of Latin 200BC–AD 600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016An anthology of informal Latin, 200BC–AD 900. Fifty texts with translations and linguistic commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Marianne
1987From Old French to the theory of Pro-Drop. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5. 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arteaga, Deborah
1994Impersonal constructions in Old French. In Michael Mazzola (ed.), Issues and theory in Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Linguistics XXIII, 141–157. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Balon, Laurent & Pierre Larrivée
2016L’ancien français n’est déjà plus une langue à sujet nul – nouveau témoignage des textes légaux. Journal of French Language Studies 26. 221–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte L. M.
2000Archaic syntax in Indo-European. The spread of transitivity in Latin and French. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003The adverbial formation in mente in Vulgar and Late Latin. A problem in grammaticalization. In Heiko Solin, M. Leiwo, & Hilla Halla-aho (eds.), Latin tardif – latin vulgaire VI, 439–457. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
2010Fore-runners of Romance -mente adverbs in Latin prose and poetry. In Eleanor Dickey & Anna Chahoud (eds.), Colloquial and literary Latin, 339–354. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming a. Language contact & language borrowing? Compound verb forms in the Old French translation of the Gospel of St. Mark. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 1–34.
Forthcoming b. FINITE VERB + INFINITIVE + OBJECT in non- Standard Latin. Early brace constructions? Latin vulgaire – latin tardif XII.
In prep. The status of brace constructions.
Braune, Wilhelm & A. Ebbinghaus
1961 [1880]Gotische Grammatik. 16th edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Brunot, Ferdinant
1924Histoire de la langue française des origines à 1990. Tome III. La formation de la langue classique. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Buridant, Claude
2000Grammaire nouvelle de l’ancien français. Paris: Sedes.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl & Berthold Delbrück
1886–1916Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Diefenbach, Lorenz
1831Uber die jetzigen romanischen Schriftsprachen, die spanische, portugiesische, rhätoromanische (in der Schweiz), französische, italienische und dakoromanische. Leipzig: Ricker.Google Scholar
Diez, Friedrich
1836Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen. Bonn: Weber.Google Scholar
Dufresne, Monique & Fernande Dupuis
1994Modularity and the reanalysis of the French subject pronoun. Probus 6. 103–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durham, Charles
1913Formal Latin and informal Latin. The Classical Weekly 6. 97–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faral, Edmond
(ed.) 1973 [1872]La conquête de Constantinople – Villehardouin. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles
1959Disglossia. Word 15. 325–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foulet, Lucien
1930 [1919]Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. 3rd edn. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Franzén, Torsten
1939Etude sur la syntaxe des pronoms personnels sujets en ancien français. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Fuchs, August
1849Die romanische Sprache in ihren Verhältnisse zum Lateinischen. Halle: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, Thomas & Vjacelsav Ivanov
1994 [1984]Indo-European and the Indo- Europeans. A Reconstruction and historical analysis of a proto-language and a proto-culture. Part 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Glikman, Julie & Nicolas Mazziotta
2013Représentation de l’oral et syntaxe dans la prose du Queste del Saint Graal (1225–1230). In Dominique Lagorgette & Pierre Larrivée (eds.), Représentations du sens linguistique 5. 47–64.Google Scholar
Guillot, Céline, Serge Heiden, Alexei Lavrentiev & Bénédicte Pincemin
2014L’oral représenté dans un corpus français médiéval (9e-15e): Approche contrastive et outillée de la variation diasystématique. Halshs-00760647 (https://​halshs​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/halshs​-00760647v2. Accessed June 2019).
Haiman, John
1974Targets and syntactic change. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirschbūhler, Paul
1992L’omission du sujet dans les subordonnées V1: Les cent nouvelles nouvelles et Les cent nouvelles nouvelles anonymes . Travaux de Linguistique 25. 25–46.Google Scholar
Ingham, Richard
2014Old French negation, the Tobler/Mussafia law, and V2. Lingua 17. 25–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Georg
2009Losing the null subject. A contrastive study of (Brazilian) Portuguese and (Medieval) French. In Georg Kaiser & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Null subjects, expletives, and locatives in Romance”. Arbeitspapier 123, 131–156. Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz 2009.Google Scholar
Kibler, William W.
1984An introduction to Old French. New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher
1985Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36(85). 15–43.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie
2007Clausal architecture in Early Old French. Lingua 117. 289–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1993Theoretical bases of Indo-European linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lemieux, Monique & Fernande Dupuis
1995The locus of verb movement in non- asymmetric verb second languages: The case of Middle French. In Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds.), Principles of diachronic syntax, 80–109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
1979Histoire de la langue française aux XIVe et XVe siècles. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
2012L’oral représenté en français médiéval, un accès construit à une face cachée des langues mortes. In C. Guillot, Bernard Combettes, Alexei Laveniev, E. Oppermann-Marsaux & Sophie Prèvost (eds.), Le changement en français. Etudes de linguistique diachronique, 247–264. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
2018De So à SV: vers le sujet obligatoire et antéposé en français, les dernières phases d’un changement. Journal of French Language Studies 28. 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane & Jacqueline Picoche
1998Histoire de la langue française. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine & Jean Vendryes
1924Traité de grammaire comparée des langues classiques. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Moignet, Gérard
(ed.) 1969La chanson de Roland. Paris: Bordas.Google Scholar
1973Grammaire de l’ancien français. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Nestle, Eberhard, Kurt Aland, & Barbara Aland
(eds.) 1979 [1878]Novum testamentum graece et latine. 7th edn. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1993Verbs and diachronic syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Simonenko, Alexandra, Benoit Crabbé & Sophie Prévost
Skårup, Paul
1975Les premières zones de la proposition en ancien français. Essai de syntaxe de position. Copenhague: Akademisk Vorlag.Google Scholar
Sneddon, Clive
1978A critical edition of the four Gospels of the Old French translation of the Bible. University of Oxford, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
2011The Old French Bible. The first complete vernacular Bible in Western Europe. In Susan Boynton & Diane J. Reilly (eds.). The practice of the Bible in the Middle Ages. Production, reception, and performance in Western Christianity, 296–314. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
2002On the creation of the Old French Bible. Nottingham Medieval Studies 46. 25–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storey, Christopher
(ed.) 1968La vie de Saint Alexis. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Studer, Paul & Joan Evans
(eds.) 1924Anglo-Norman lapidaries. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald
1970Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenhaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Väänänen, Veikko
1983Le problème de la diversification du Latin. In Wolfgang Haase (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. 29.1, 480–506. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara
1997Syntactic change in medieval French. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Reenen, Pieter & Lene Schøsler
1995The thematic structure of the main clause in Old French: OR versus SI . In Henning Andersen (ed.), Historical linguistics 1993, 16–20. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ventris, Michael & John Chadwick
1956Documents in Mycenaean Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winters, Margaret
1987Innovations in French negation: A cognitive grammar account. Diachronica 4. 27–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wirth-Jaillard, Aude
2013De Estienne Husson pour ce qu’il dit à Jannon Morelot: ‘Un filz de bastarde ne me puet valoir!’: Représentation de l’oral dans les documents comptables médiévaux. In Dominique Lagorgette & Pierre Larrivée (eds.), Représentations du sens linguistique 5. 65–80.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Michael
2009On the evolution of expletive subject pronouns in Old French. In Georg Kaiser & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Null subjects, expletives, and locatives in Romance”. Arbeitspapier 123, 63–92. Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
2018Changes in status and paradigms? On subject pronouns in medieval French. Transactions of the Philological Society 116. 131–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar