Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 37:2 (2020) ► pp. 178214
References

References

Albright, Adam
2002The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
2008Explaining universal tendencies and language particulars in analogical change. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 144–181. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alkire, Ti & Carol Rosen
2010Romance languages: A historical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Henning
1973Abductive and deductive change. Language 49. 765–793. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Bernard
1970 [1946]Studies in colloquial Japanese I. Inflection. Journal of the American Oriental Society 66. 97–109. Reprinted in Roy Andrew Miller (ed.) 1970 Bernard Bloch on Japanese, 1–24. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casali, Roderic F.
1997Vowel elision in hiatus contexts: Which vowel goes? Language 73. 493–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Resolving hiatus. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Campbell, A.
1961Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana
2002The phonology of Romanian: A constraint-based approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. M.
1916Modern Greek in Asia Minor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Chene, Brent
1985 r-Epenthesis and the Japanese verb. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 10. 172–207.Google Scholar
2016Description and explanation in morphophonology: The case of Japanese verb inflection. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25. 37–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 r-Epenthesis and Ryukyuan. Gengo Kenkyu 155. 101–130.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. On the (ir)regularity of Dunan verbal morphophonology. Journal of Japanese Linguistics. Available at http://​www​.f​.waseda​.jp​/dechene​/RP​-IDVM​.pdf (accessed 14 Feb 2020).
. MS. ð-Epenthesis as a default in Modern Greek nominal inflection. http://​www​.f​.waseda​.jp​/dechene​/RP​-dEDMGI​.pdf (accessed 14 Feb 2020).
de Lacy, Paul
2006Markedness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fertig, David
2000Morphological change up close. Two and a half centuries of verbal inflection in Nuremberg. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Two conceptions of analogical innovation/change. In Peter Auer and Robert W. Murray (eds.), Hermann Paul’s Principles of language history revisited: Translations and reflections, 209–236. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2016Mechanisms of paradigm leveling and the role of universal preferences in morphophonological change. Diachronica 33. 423–460. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke
2010A history of the Japanese language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fukushima, Kunimichi
1969 “myū” to “myō” no kōtai [Variation between “myū” and “myō”]. In Masayoshi Ōki, Yasuo Kitahara, Hideo Komatsu, Norio Nakada, Kazuo Mabuchi & Muneaki Morino (eds.), Saeki Umetomo hakase koki kinen kokugogaku ronshū [Papers in Japanese linguistics offered to Dr. Umetomo Saeki on his 70th birthday], 533–551. Tōkyō: Hyōgensha.Google Scholar
GAJ (Grammar Atlas of Japanese Dialects) = Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo
1989–2006Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew
2008Paradigmatic uniformity and markedness. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 125–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, & James White
2015Saltation and the P-map. Phonology 32. 267–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hikosaka, Yoshinobu
1999 Kyūshū ni okeru ichi/nidan katsuyō no godanka – “Kōgohō” kara GAJ e [The assimilation of unigrade and bigrade inflection to consonant-stem inflection in Kyūshū—from the Spoken Language Survey Report to the Grammar Atlas of Japanese dialects ]. In Takeyoshi Satō (ed.), Goi/gohō no shinkenkyū [New research on lexicon and grammar], 277–292. Tōkyō: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Hirayama, Teruo & Ichirō Ōshima
1969Gotō Rettō no hōgen [The dialects of the Gotō archipelago]. Tōkyō Toritsu Daigaku Toshi Kenkyū Iinkai [Tokyo Metropolitan University Urban Research Committee].Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1991Principles of historical linguistics, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Modern Greek Studies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
1998Lexikó tis koinís neoellenikís (Dictionary of Standard Modern Greek). http://​www​.greek​-language​.gr​/greekLang​/modern​_greek​/tools​/lexica​/triantafyllides​/index​.html (accessed 14 Feb 2020).
Ito, Chiyuki
2010Analogy and lexical restructuring in the development of nominal stem inflection from Middle to Contemporary Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19. 357–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ito, Junko & Armin Mester
2004Morphological contrast and merger: ranuki in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 20. 1–18. Also in the Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-711. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Itoi, Kan’ichi
1961 Ōita/Miyazaki hokubu [Ōita and northern Miyazaki]. In Misao Tōjō (ed.), Kyūshū/Ryūkyū hōgen [Kyūshū/Ryūkyū dialects] (Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 4), 239–267. Tōkyō: Tōkyōdō.Google Scholar
Kamimura, Takaji
1983 Kyūshū hōgen no gaisetsu [An outline of Kyūshū dialects]. In Kiichi Iitoyo, Sukezumi Hino & Ryōichi Satō (eds.), Kyūshū chihō no hōgen [The dialects of the Kyūshū region] (Kōza hōgengaku [Course in dialectology] 9), 1–28. Tōkyō: Kokusho Kankōkai.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1973Productivity in phonology. In Michael J. Kenstowicz and Charles W. Kisseberth (eds.), Issues in phonological theory, 169–176. The Hague: Mouton. Reprinted in Kiparsky, Paul 1982 Explanation in phonology, 165–173. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kokugo Gakkai [Society for Japanese Linguistics] 1980Kokugogaku daijiten [Great dictionary of Japanese linguistics]. Tōkyō: Tōkyōdō.Google Scholar
Kokugo Chōsa Iinkai [Japanese Language Survey Committee] 1906Kōgohō chōsa hōkokusho [Report on the survey of spoken usage], 2 vols. Tōkyō: Monbushō [Ministry of Education].Google Scholar
Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo [National Language Research Institute] 1989–2006Hōgen bunpō zenkoku chizu [Grammar atlas of Japanese dialects], 6 vols. Tōkyō: Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1945–1949La nature des procès dits «analogiques». Acta Linguistica V. 15–37. Reprinted in Eric P. Hamp, Fred W. Householder, and Robert Austerlitz (eds.) 1966 Readings in linguistics II, 158–174. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kyūshū Hōgen Gakkai [Kyūshū Dialect Society] 1991Kyūshū hōgen no kisoteki kenkyū [Basic research on Kyūshū dialects], revised edn. Tōkyō: Kazama Shobō.Google Scholar
Lombard, Alf
1954Le verbe Roumain: Étude morphologique, Tome I. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Mańczak, Witold
1958Tendences générales des changements analogiques. Lingua 7. 298–325, 387–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Gary F., Steven Pinker, Michael Ullman, Michelle Hollander, T. John Rosen, Fei Xu and Harald Clahsen
1992Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57.4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melissaropoulou, Dimitra
2013Gradualness in analogical change as a complexification stage in a language simplification process: A case study from Modern Greek dialects. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri, and Piera Molinelli (eds.), Synchrony and diachrony: A dynamic interface, 125–150. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nishio, Minoru, Etsutarō Iwabuchi & Shizuo Mizutani
(eds.) 2000Iwanami kokugo jiten [Iwanami dictionary of the Japanese language], 6th edn. Tōkyō: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Omodaka, Hisataka, Tōru Asami, Teizō Ikegami, Itaru Ide, Haku Itō, Yoshiaki Kawabata, Masatoshi Kinoshita, Noriyuki Kojima, Atsuyoshi Sakakura, Akihiro Satake, Kazutami Nishimiya & Shirō Hashimoto
(eds.) 1967Jidaibetsu kokugo daijiten: Jōdaihen [Great historical dictionary of Japanese: Nara period]. Tōkyō: Sanseidō.Google Scholar
Ōnishi, Takuichirō
2006 Gengo chirigaku no saikidō [A new start for linguistic geography]. In Seiichi Nakai, Daniel Long & Kenjirō Matsuda (eds.), Nihon no fiirudo gengogaku [Field linguistics in Japan], 80–93. Toyama: Katsura Shobō.Google Scholar
2016 okiru [get up]. In Takuichirō Ōnishi (ed.), Shin Nihon gengo chizu [New linguistic atlas of Japan], 150–151. Tōkyō: Asakura Shoten.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1886Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 2nd edn. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
1920Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 5th edn. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don
2006From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic (A linguistic history of English, vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, Ioão
1955 [1604-1608]Arte da lingoa de Iapam. Nagasaki: Collegio de Iapão. Japanese translation by Doi Tadao published as Rodriguez, Ioão 1955 Nihon daibunten [Great Japanese grammar]. Tōkyō: Sanseidō.Google Scholar
Sakanashi, Ryūzō
1982 Kindai no bunpō II (Kamigata-hen) [Grammar of the early modern period II (Kyōto-Ōsaka)]. In Hiroshi Tsukishima, (ed.), Bunpō-shi [Grammatical history] (Kōza kokugo-shi [Course in the history of Japanese] 4), 467–536. Tōkyō: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Skoruppa, Katrin, Anna Lambrechts & Sharon Peperkamp
2011The role of phonetic distance in the acquisition of phonological alternations. North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS) 39(2). 717–729.Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter
1978Bidirectional leveling as evidence for relational rules. Lingua 45. 67–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1982Local and general markedness. Language 58. 832–849. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, Akiho & Morihide Akimoto
(eds.) 2001Nihongo bunpō daijiten [Great dictionary of Japanese grammar]. Tōkyō: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, Toshiaki & Yukihiro Yamaguchi
1972Toyohashi chihō no hōgen [The dialect of the Toyohashi region]. Toyohashi: Toyohashi Bunka Kyōkai.Google Scholar