Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 38:2 (2021) ► pp.189–209

An information structure scenario for V2 loss in Medieval French

ORCID logo | Normandie Université | Université de Caen Normandie, CRISCO
This paper discusses word order change in Medieval French. Verb-second (V2) configurations are generally understood as having an initial XP and the verb in the left periphery. How has this configuration been lost in French? Under an Information Structure scenario, the XP is in initial position because of its characterized (discourse-old) informational value, which motivates the left-peripheral position of the verb. The decline of the characterized informational value of the XP thus accounts for the gradual loss of V2. The informational behaviour of XPs was examined in unambiguous V2 configurations with an overt post-verbal subject in Medieval French. This detailed quantitative study of a calibrated corpus shows that XPs with a characterized informational value were predominant with productive V2 configurations, that they gradually declined as productive V2 was lost, and that they increasingly failed to attract the verb to the left periphery. These observations can be accounted for if V2 in Medieval French was driven by informational values and if it disappeared along with the informational cues provided by the XPs.
Keywords: word order change, V2, information structure, left periphery, Medieval French
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.V2 in Medieval French
  • 3.Predictions based on an informational account
  • 3.1Testing Prediction 1: Fewer informational XPs?
  • 3.2Testing prediction 2: Fewer informational phrases in left-peripheral position?
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • Resources
  • References
Published online: 1 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19040.lar
References (58)
Resources
Leis Will, 1150. Diplomatic transcription available at [URL]
Patronage, 1205. Edited by Ange-Ignace Marnier. 1839. Établissements et coutumes, assises et arrêts de l’Échiquier de Normandie. Paris: Techener.Google Scholar
Arrêt de l’échiquier de Normandie, 1207–1211. Edited by Ange-Ignace Marnier. 1839. Établissements et coutumes, assises et arrêts de l’Échiquier de Normandie. Paris: Techener.Google Scholar
Très ancien coutumier de Normandie, 1250. Edited by Ange-Ignace Marnier. 1839. Établissements et coutumes, assises et arrêts de l’Échiquier de Normandie. Paris: Techener.Google Scholar
Grand coutumier de Normandie, 1300. MS Harvard, HLS MS 91. [URL]
References
Adams, Marianne P. 1987. From Old French to the theory of pro-drop. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5(1). 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alboiu, Gabriela, Virginia Hill & Ioanna Sitaridou. 2015. Discourse-driven V-to-C in Early Modern Romanian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33(4). 1057–1088. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrade, Aroldo Leal De & Charlotte Galves. 2019. Contrast and word order: A case study on the history of Portuguese. Glossa 4(1). 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto. 2004. Topic, focus, and V2. The structure of CP and IP: Defining the CP sublayers. Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP, 52–75. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den. 1982. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. Werner Abrahams (ed.), On the formal syntax of the Westgermania, 47–131. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupuis, Fernande, Daniel Gosselin, Benoît Habert, Sonia Lafond & Monique Dupuis. 1993. Methodological Aspects of the categorization of a Middle French corpus with a computer-assisted text analysis software (SATO). Reinhard Köhler and Burghard B. Rieger (eds.), Contributions to quantitative linguistics, 183–193. Trier: QUALICO. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1992. Discourse and diachrony: The rise and fall of Old French SI. Marinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein (eds.), Internal and external factors in syntactic change, 433–473. Berlin and New York: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Janet D. 1998. Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 291. 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foulet, Lucien. 1919. Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Fuß, Eric. 2008. V2/V3 in Old High German: Multiple projections vs. multiple specifiers. MS, Universität Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Guimier, Claude. 1997. La place du sujet nominal dans les phrases à adverbe initial. Catherine Fuchs (ed.), La place du sujet en français contemporain, 43–96. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar
Haeberli, Eric & Tabea Ihsane. 2016. Revisiting the loss of verb movement in the history of English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 341. 497–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. 1974. Targets and syntactic change. The Hague and Paris: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Svetlana Petrova. 2010. From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 1201. 315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2015. Verb second. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax – Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook, vol. 11, 242–283. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ingham, Richard. 2018. Topic, Focus and null subjects in Old French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 63(2). 242–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Georg. 2002. Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A. & Michael Zimmermann. 2011. On the decrease in subject-verb inversion in French declaratives. Esther Rinke & Tanja Kupisch (eds.), The development of grammar: Language acquisition and diachronic change: In honour of Jürgen M. Meisel, 355–381. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van. 2012. Rethinking the loss of V2. Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Terttu Nevalainen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 1182–1199. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 11. 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Ann Taylor & Don Ringe. 2000. The Middle English verb-second constraint: A case study in language contact and language change. Herring, P. van Reenen & L. Schoesler (eds.), Textual parameters in older languages, 353–391. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labelle, Marie. 2007. Clausal architecture in Early Old French. Lingua 117(1). 289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre. 2019. To be or not to be informational: Preverbal complements in Medieval French V2 configurations. Glossa 4(1). 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. In press. La diachronie longue du sujet postposé dans un corpus homogène. Studia Linguistica Romanica.
Le Coultre, Julien. 1875. De l’ordre des mots dans Crestien de Troye. Dresden: B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 2009. The consequences of the loss of verb-second in English: Information structure and syntax in interaction. English Language and Linguistics 131. 197–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane. 1985. Dire le vrai: l’adverbe ‘si’ en français médiéval: essai de linguistique historique. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
. 2000. Le décumul du “thème” dans l’évolution du français. Le Français moderne 68(1). 31–40.Google Scholar
. 2018. De S0 à SV: Vers le sujet obligatoire et antéposé en français, les dernières phases d’un changement. Journal of French Language Studies 281. 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, Eric. 2012. The left periphery in Old French. Deborah Arteaga (ed.), Research in Old French: The state of the art, 327–350. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M., Martin Elsig & Esther Rinke. 2013. Language acquisition and change: A morphosyntactic perspective. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2014. Word order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, Sophie. 2006. Topicalisation, focalisation et constructions syntaxiques en français médiéval: des relations complexes. Denis Apothéloz, Bernard Combettes & Franck Neveu (eds.), Les linguistiques du détachement: actes du colloque international de Nancy, 427–439. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2015. Diachronie du français et linguistique de corpus: une approche quantitative renouvelée. Langages 197(1). 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rinke, Esther & Jürgen M. Meisel. 2009. Subject inversion in Old French: Syntax and information structure. Georg A. Kaiser & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Null Subjects, Expletives, and Locatives in Romance”. Arbeitspapier Nr. 1231. 93–130. Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2012. Verbs and diachronic syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Samo, Giuseppe. 2018. Towards a criterial V2. PhD Dissertation, Université de Genève.Google Scholar
Schøsler, Lene & Pieter van Reenen. 2000. The pragmatic functions of the Old French particles AINZ, APRES, DONC, LORS, OR, PUIS, and SI. Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen & Lene Schøsler (eds.), Textual parameters and older languages, 59–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skårup, Povl. 1975. Les premières zones de la proposition en ancien français. Essai de syntaxe de position. Etudes romanes de l’université de Copenhague.Google Scholar
Steiner, Brittany D. J. 2014. The evolution of information structure and verb second in the history of French. PhD Dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Thiersch, Craig. 1978. Topics in German syntax. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf. 1892. Zur Stellung des Verbums im Altfranzösischen. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 161. 289–307.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara. 1993. Verb-first declaratives introduced by et and the position of pro in Old and Middle French. Lingua 891, 281–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Syntactic change in Medieval French. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanelli, Laura, Lorenzo Renzi & Paola Benincà. 1985. Typologie des pronoms sujets dans les langues romanes. Actes du XIIe Congrès de Linguistique et Philologie, volume 31, 163–176.Google Scholar
Venneman, Theo. 1974. Topics, subjects and word order: From SXV to SVX via TVX. John M. Anderson & C. Jones (eds.), Historical Linguistics, volume 11, 339–376. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike & Hans G. Müller. 2019. The hidden life of V3: An overlooked word order variant on verb-second. Mailin Antomo & Sonja Müller (eds.), Non-canonical verb positioning in main clauses, 201–224. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Willis, David. 1997. Clausal coordination and the loss of verb-second in Welsh. Oxford Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 21. 151–172.Google Scholar
. 1998. Syntactic change in Welsh: A study of the loss of Verb-Second. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Sam. 2018a. Verb second in medieval Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018b. Probing the syntax of a problematic particle: Old French ‘si’ revisited. Transactions of the Philological Society 116(3). 332–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Michael & Georg Kaiser. 2010. Much ado about nothing? On the categorial status of et and ne in Medieval French. Corpus 91. 265–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar