Article published In:
Vol. 38:2 (2021) ► pp.189209


Leis Will, 1150
Diplomatic transcription available at [URL]
Patronage, 1205
Edited by Ange-Ignace Marnier 1839Établissements et coutumes, assises et arrêts de l’Échiquier de Normandie. Paris: Techener.Google Scholar
Arrêt de l’échiquier de Normandie, 1207–1211
Edited by Ange-Ignace Marnier 1839Établissements et coutumes, assises et arrêts de l’Échiquier de Normandie. Paris: Techener.Google Scholar
Très ancien coutumier de Normandie, 1250
Edited by Ange-Ignace Marnier 1839Établissements et coutumes, assises et arrêts de l’Échiquier de Normandie. Paris: Techener.Google Scholar
Grand coutumier de Normandie, 1300
MS Harvard, HLS MS 91. [URL]
Adams, Marianne P.
1987From Old French to the theory of pro-drop. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5(1). 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alboiu, Gabriela, Virginia Hill & Ioanna Sitaridou
2015Discourse-driven V-to-C in Early Modern Romanian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33(4). 1057–1088. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrade, Aroldo Leal De & Charlotte Galves
2019Contrast and word order: A case study on the history of Portuguese. Glossa 4(1). 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto
2004Topic, focus, and V2. The structure of CP and IP: Defining the CP sublayers. Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP, 52–75. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den
1982On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. Werner Abrahams (ed.), On the formal syntax of the Westgermania, 47–131. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupuis, Fernande, Daniel Gosselin, Benoît Habert, Sonia Lafond & Monique Dupuis
1993Methodological Aspects of the categorization of a Middle French corpus with a computer-assisted text analysis software (SATO). Reinhard Köhler and Burghard B. Rieger (eds.), Contributions to quantitative linguistics, 183–193. Trier: QUALICO. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne
1992Discourse and diachrony: The rise and fall of Old French SI. Marinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein (eds.), Internal and external factors in syntactic change, 433–473. Berlin and New York: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Janet D.
1998Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 291. 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foulet, Lucien
1919Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Fuß, Eric
2008V2/V3 in Old High German: Multiple projections vs. multiple specifiers. MS, Universität Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Guimier, Claude
1997La place du sujet nominal dans les phrases à adverbe initial. Catherine Fuchs (ed.), La place du sujet en français contemporain, 43–96. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar
Haeberli, Eric & Tabea Ihsane
2016Revisiting the loss of verb movement in the history of English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 341. 497–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
1974Targets and syntactic change. The Hague and Paris: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Svetlana Petrova
2010From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 1201. 315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2015Verb second. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax – Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook, vol. 11, 242–283. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ingham, Richard
2018Topic, Focus and null subjects in Old French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 63(2). 242–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Georg
2002Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A. & Michael Zimmermann
2011On the decrease in subject-verb inversion in French declaratives. Esther Rinke & Tanja Kupisch (eds.), The development of grammar: Language acquisition and diachronic change: In honour of Jürgen M. Meisel, 355–381. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van
2012Rethinking the loss of V2. Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Terttu Nevalainen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 1182–1199. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
1989Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 11. 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Ann Taylor & Don Ringe
2000 The Middle English verb-second constraint: A case study in language contact and language change. Herring, P. van Reenen & L. Schoesler (eds.), Textual parameters in older languages, 353–391. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labelle, Marie
2007Clausal architecture in Early Old French. Lingua 117(1). 289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre
2019To be or not to be informational: Preverbal complements in Medieval French V2 configurations. Glossa 4(1). 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In press. La diachronie longue du sujet postposé dans un corpus homogène. Studia Linguistica Romanica.
Le Coultre, Julien
1875De l’ordre des mots dans Crestien de Troye. Dresden: B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1999The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou
2009The consequences of the loss of verb-second in English: Information structure and syntax in interaction. English Language and Linguistics 131. 197–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
1985Dire le vrai: l’adverbe ‘si’ en français médiéval: essai de linguistique historique. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
2000Le décumul du “thème” dans l’évolution du français. Le Français moderne 68(1). 31–40.Google Scholar
2018De S0 à SV: Vers le sujet obligatoire et antéposé en français, les dernières phases d’un changement. Journal of French Language Studies 281. 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, Eric
2012The left periphery in Old French. Deborah Arteaga (ed.), Research in Old French: The state of the art, 327–350. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M., Martin Elsig & Esther Rinke
2013Language acquisition and change: A morphosyntactic perspective. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2014Word order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, Sophie
2006Topicalisation, focalisation et constructions syntaxiques en français médiéval: des relations complexes. Denis Apothéloz, Bernard Combettes & Franck Neveu (eds.), Les linguistiques du détachement: actes du colloque international de Nancy, 427–439. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2015Diachronie du français et linguistique de corpus: une approche quantitative renouvelée. Langages 197(1). 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rinke, Esther & Jürgen M. Meisel
2009Subject inversion in Old French: Syntax and information structure. Georg A. Kaiser & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Null Subjects, Expletives, and Locatives in Romance”. Arbeitspapier Nr. 1231. 93–130. Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2012Verbs and diachronic syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Samo, Giuseppe
2018Towards a criterial V2. PhD Dissertation, Université de Genève.Google Scholar
Schøsler, Lene & Pieter van Reenen
2000The pragmatic functions of the Old French particles AINZ, APRES, DONC, LORS, OR, PUIS, and SI. Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen & Lene Schøsler (eds.), Textual parameters and older languages, 59–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skårup, Povl
1975Les premières zones de la proposition en ancien français. Essai de syntaxe de position. Etudes romanes de l’université de Copenhague.Google Scholar
Steiner, Brittany D. J.
2014The evolution of information structure and verb second in the history of French. PhD Dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Thiersch, Craig
1978Topics in German syntax. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf
1892Zur Stellung des Verbums im Altfranzösischen. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 161. 289–307.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara
1993Verb-first declaratives introduced by et and the position of pro in Old and Middle French. Lingua 891, 281–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Syntactic change in Medieval French. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanelli, Laura, Lorenzo Renzi & Paola Benincà
1985Typologie des pronoms sujets dans les langues romanes. Actes du XIIe Congrès de Linguistique et Philologie, volume 31, 163–176.Google Scholar
Venneman, Theo
1974Topics, subjects and word order: From SXV to SVX via TVX. John M. Anderson & C. Jones (eds.), Historical Linguistics, volume 11, 339–376. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike & Hans G. Müller
2019The hidden life of V3: An overlooked word order variant on verb-second. Mailin Antomo & Sonja Müller (eds.), Non-canonical verb positioning in main clauses, 201–224. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Willis, David
1997Clausal coordination and the loss of verb-second in Welsh. Oxford Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 21. 151–172.Google Scholar
1998Syntactic change in Welsh: A study of the loss of Verb-Second. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Sam
2018aVerb second in medieval Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018bProbing the syntax of a problematic particle: Old French ‘si’ revisited. Transactions of the Philological Society 116(3). 332–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Michael & Georg Kaiser
2010Much ado about nothing? On the categorial status of et and ne in Medieval French. Corpus 91. 265–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar