Review published In:
DiachronicaVol. 2:1 (1985) ► pp.97–104
Book review
. Toward Proto-Nostratic: A new approach to the comparison of Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Afroasiatic. Allan R. Bom-hard. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 27]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ. Co., 1984. x, 356 pp.
Reviewed by
References (6)
Cohen, Marcel. 1937. “Кλειτορίς.” Mélanges Emile Boisacq (= Université Libre de Bruxelles,
Annuaire de 1’Institut de Philologie et d’Histoire Orientales et Slaves
, 51), 187–190.
. 1947. Essai comparatif sur le vocabulaire et la phonétique du chamito-semitique (=
Bibliothèque de 7’Ecole des Hautes Études
, 2911). Paris: Honoré Champion.
Levin, Saul. 1971. The Indo-European and Semitic Languages. Albany: State University of New York Press.
. 1980. “An Accentual Correspondence between Hebrew and Hausa.” Forum Linguisticum 41.232–240.
. 1982. “
Homo : humus and the Semitic Counterparts: The Oldest Culturally Significant Etymology?” Papers from the 3rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics (=
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory
, 131), 207–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Möller, Hermann. 1911. Vergleichendes indogermanisch-semitisches Wörterbuch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Azal Al-Aswad, Behrouz Minaei-Bidgoli, Mohammad-Ebrahim Shenassa, Sayyed-Ali Hossayni & Habib Seryani
2024. Noor-stem v.1 A Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating the Arabic Stemmers. Signal and Data Processing 21:1 ► pp. 101 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.