Allan R. Bom-hard. Toward Proto-Nostratic: A new approach to the comparison of Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Afroasiatic. Allan R. Bom-hard. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 27]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ. Co., 1984. x, 356 pp.

Reviewed by

Saul Levin | SUNY at Binghamton

Published online: 1 January 1985

https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.2.1.09lev

References (6)

References

Cohen, Marcel. 1937. “Кλειτορίς.” Mélanges Emile Boisacq (= Université Libre de Bruxelles, Annuaire de 1’Institut de Philologie et d’Histoire Orientales et Slaves , 51), 187–190.

. 1947. Essai comparatif sur le vocabulaire et la phonétique du chamito-semitique (= Bibliothèque de 7’Ecole des Hautes Études , 2911). Paris: Honoré Champion.

Levin, Saul. 1971. The Indo-European and Semitic Languages. Albany: State University of New York Press.

. 1980. “An Accentual Correspondence between Hebrew and Hausa.” Forum Linguisticum 41.232–240.

. 1982. “ Homo : humus and the Semitic Counterparts: The Oldest Culturally Significant Etymology?” Papers from the 3rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory , 131), 207–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Möller, Hermann. 1911. Vergleichendes indogermanisch-semitisches Wörterbuch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Allan R. Bom-hard. Toward Proto-Nostratic: A new approach to the comparison of Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Afroasiatic. Allan R. Bom-hard. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 27]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ. Co., 1984. x, 356 pp.

Allan R. Bom-hard. Toward Proto-Nostratic: A new approach to the comparison of Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Afroasiatic. Allan R. Bom-hard. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 27]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ. Co., 1984. x, 356 pp.