Article published In:
DiachronicaVol. 20:2 (2003) ► pp.289–330
On detecting borrowing
Distance-based and character-based approaches
Two computational methods for detecting borrowing among a family of genetically related languages are proposed. One method, based on the detection of branches with negative length in lexicostatistical trees, is shown to work poorly. As we demonstrate, this method is similar to another recently proposed method for detecting borrowing based on skewing in lexicostatistical data. A second method, using character-based classification techniques in common use in the classification of biological taxa, is shown to be more effective. This method allows borrowed characters and the languages among which the borrowing may have taken place to be identified — in some cases, the most likely direction of the borrowing can also be specified.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Feleke, Tekabe Legesse
2021. Ethiosemitic languages: Classifications and classification determinants. Ampersand 8 ► pp. 100074 ff. 
Ciobanu, Alina Maria & Liviu P. Dinu
2020. Automatic Identification and Production of Related Words for Historical Linguistics. Computational Linguistics 45:4 ► pp. 667 ff.
Miller, John E., Tiago Tresoldi, Roberto Zariquiey, César A. Beltrán Castañón, Natalia Morozova, Johann-Mattis List & Søren Wichmann
2020. Using lexical language models to detect borrowings in monolingual wordlists. PLOS ONE 15:12 ► pp. e0242709 ff.
List, Johann‐Mattis
2019. Automated methods for the investigation of language contact, with a focus on lexical borrowing. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:10
List, Johann‐Mattis, Shijulal Nelson‐Sathi, Hans Geisler & William Martin
2014. Networks of lexical borrowing and lateral gene transfer in language and genome evolution. BioEssays 36:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Erdem, Esra
2009. PHYLO-ASP: Phylogenetic Systematics with Answer Set Programming. In Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5753], ► pp. 567 ff.
Croft, William
2008. Evolutionary Linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 37:1 ► pp. 219 ff.
Nichols, Johanna & Tandy Warnow
2008. Tutorial on Computational Linguistic Phylogeny. Language and Linguistics Compass 2:5 ► pp. 760 ff.
Brooks, Daniel R., Esra Erdem, Selim T. Erdoğan, James W. Minett & Don Ringe
2007. Inferring Phylogenetic Trees Using Answer Set Programming. Journal of Automated Reasoning 39:4 ► pp. 471 ff.
Atkinson, Quentin D., Russell D. Gray & Chris Simon
2005. Curious Parallels and Curious Connections—Phylogenetic Thinking in Biology and Historical Linguistics. Systematic Biology 54:4 ► pp. 513 ff.
Brooks, Daniel R., Esra Erdem, James W. Minett & Donald Ringe
2005. Character-Based Cladistics and Answer Set Programming. In Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3350], ► pp. 37 ff.
Wang, William S-Y. & James W. Minett
2005. Vertical and horizontal transmission in language evolution. Transactions of the Philological Society 103:2 ► pp. 121 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.