Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 40:2 (2023) ► pp.238285
References (100)
References
Adamik, Béla. 2017a. On the Vulgar Latin merger of /b/ and /w/ and its correlation with the loss of intervocalic /w/: Dialectological evidence from inscriptions. Pallas. Revue d’études antiques 1031. 25–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. Potential Greek influence on the Vulgar Latin sound change [b]>[𝛽]: Dialectological evidence from inscriptions. Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 57(1). 11–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adams, Douglas Q. 1975. The distribution of retracted sibilants in medieval Europe. Language 282–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adams, James Noel. 2007. The regional diversification of Latin 200 BC-AD 600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, William Sidney. 1989. Vox Latina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, James M. & Jo Ann Creore. 2018. Readings in Romance linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
ATILF. 1998–2019a. glas. [URL]. (August 29, 2019).
ATILF, (Analyse et Traitement Informatique de la Langue Française). 1998–2018. Trésor de la langue français informatisé. Université de Lorraine, CNRS. At [URL]
. 1998–2019b. dartre. In Trésor de la langue française informatisé, Université de Lorraine, CNRS. At [URL]. (November 16, 2019).
. 1998–2019c. glaive. In Trésor de la langue française informatisé, Université de Lorraine, CNRS. At [URL]. (August 29, 2019).
. 1998–2019d. marchand. In Trésor de la langue française informatisé, Université de Lorraine, CNRS. At [URL]. (November 16, 2019).
. 1998–2019e. marché. In Trésor de la langue française informatisé, Université de Lorraine, CNRS. At [URL]. (November 16, 2019).
. 1998–2019f. par. In Trésor de la langue française informatisé, Université de Lorraine, CNRS. At [URL]. (November 16, 2019).
. 1998–2019g. parchemin. In Tlfi (trésor de la Langue Française) informatisé), Université de Lorraine, CNRS. At [URL]. (November 16, 2019).
Banniard, Michel. 2001. Causes et rythmes du changement langagier en Occident Latin (IIIe-VIIIe s.). Travaux Neuchatelois de Linguistique (Tranel) 34(35). 85–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbarino, Joseph L. 2018. The evolution of the Latin /b/-/ṷ/ merger: A quantitative and comparative analysis of the B-V alternation in Latin inscriptions. [URL]. (September 3, 2019).
Blom, Alderik. 2009. Lingua gallica, lingua celtica: Gaulish, Gallo-Latin, or Gallo-Romance? Keltische Forschungen 41. 7–54Google Scholar
Borin, Lars. 1988. A computer model of sound change: An example from Old Church Slavic. Literary and Linguistic Computing 3(2). 105–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourciez, Édouard & Jean Bourciez. 1967. Phonétique française: étude historique. Tradition de l’humanisme. Paris: Klincksieck.
Bourciez, Édouard Eugène Joseph. 1889. Précis historique de phonétique française: ou exposé des loi qui régissent la transformation des mots latins en français. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Brunot, Ferdinand & Gustave Charlier. 1927. Histoire de la langue française des origines à 1900, t. vii. la propagation du français en France jusqu’à la fin de l’Ancien Régime. Revue belge de Philologie et d’Histoire 6(1). 326–330.Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene. 2003. The phonetic origin and phonological extension of Gallo-Roman palatalization. In First north-american phonology conference, vol. 11, Montreal: Concordia University.Google Scholar
Burton-Hunter, Sarah K. 1976. Romance etymology: A computerized model. Computers and the Humanities 10(4). 217–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cerquiglini, Bernard. 2018. Une langue orpheline. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
de la Chaussée, François. 1974. Initiation à la phonétique historique de l’ancien français. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper& Row.Google Scholar
Cravens, Thomas. 2002. Comparative historical phonology: Italo-Romance clues to Ibero-Romance sound change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1946. Stages of Old French phonetic changes observed in Modern Spanish. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 7–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dendien, Jacques & Jean-Marie Pierrel. 2003. Le Trésor de la Langue Française informatisé: un exemple d’informatisation d’un dictionnaire de langue de référence. Traitement automatique des langues 44(2). 11–37.Google Scholar
Diefenbach, Lorenz. 1831. Ueber die jetzigen romanischen schriftsprachen, die spanische, portugiesische, rhätoromanische, in der schweiz, französische, italiaänische nd dakoromaische, in mehren ländern des östlichen Europa, mit vorbemerkungen über Entstehung, Verwandtschaft usw dieses, Sprachstammes. Frankfurt am Main: J. Ricker.Google Scholar
Diez, Friedrich. 1836. Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen, 3 vols. Bonn: Weber (3rd ed. 1870– 1872).Google Scholar
Dunn, Michael. 2015. Language phylogenies. In The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 208–229. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eastlack, Charles L. 1977. Iberochange: A program to simulate systematic sound change in IberoRomance. Computers and the Humanities 11(2). 81–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esau, Helmut. 1976. The medieval German sibilants /s/ and /ʐ/. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 75(1/2). 188–197. [URL]
Figge, Udo. 1966. Die romanische anlautsonorisation. Bonn: Romanisches Seminar der Universität Bonn.Google Scholar
File-Muriel, Richard J. & Earl K. Brown. 2011. The gradient nature of s-lenition in Caleño Spanish. Language Variation and Change 23(2). 223–243. (February 28, 2021). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fouché, Pierre. 1952/1966. Phonétique historique du français. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Fought, John. 1979. The ‘medieval sibilants’ of the Eulalia-Ludwigslied manuscript and their development in early Old French. Language 842–858. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleason, Henry A. 1959. Counting and calculating for historical reconstruction. Anthropological Linguistics 11. 22–32.Google Scholar
Grimes, Joseph E. & Frederick B. Agard. 1959. Linguistic divergence in Romance. Language 35(4). 598–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Tracy Alan. 2007. Segmental features. The Cambridge handbook of phonology 311–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Lee. 2003. Phono (version 4.0): Software for modeling regular historical sound change. In Actas: Viii simposio internacional de comunicación social: Santiago de cuba, 20–24.Google Scholar
Herman, J. 1965. Aspects de la différenciation territoriale du latin sous l’empire. Paris: Klincksieck.
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2009. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hombert, Jean-Marie, Médard Mouele & Lai-Won Seo. 1991. Outils informatiques pour la linguistique historique bantu. Pholia 61. 131–136Google Scholar
Jackson, Kenneth Hurlstone. 1953. Language and history in early Britain: A chronological survey of the Brittonic languages, first to twelfth century A.D. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D. & Brian D. Joseph. 2003. Reconsidering the canons of sound-change. In Historical linguistics 2001: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. 2371. 205–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C Douglas. 1972/2019. Formal aspects of phonological description, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joos, Martin. 1952. The medieval sibilants. Language 28(2). 222–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Ronald M. & Martin Kay. 1981. Phonological rules and finite-state transducers. In Linguistic Society of America meeting handbook, fifty-sixth annual meeting, 27–30.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Jeff Good. 1968. Linguistic universals and language change. Universals in linguistic theory, 170–202.Google Scholar
Kondrak, Grzegorz. 2002. Algorithms for language reconstruction: University of Toronto dissertation.
. 2003. Phonetic alignment and similarity. Computers and the Humanities 37(3). 273–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lodge, R Anthony. 2004. A sociolinguistic history of Parisian French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. French: From dialect to standard. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowe, John B. & Martine Mazaudon. 1994. The reconstruction engine: A computer implementation of the comparative method. Computational Linguistics 20(3). 381–417.Google Scholar
Lusignan, Serge. 1986. Parler vulgairement: les intellectuels et la langue française aux XIIIe et XIVe siècles, 11. Librairie philosophique J. Vrin; Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Machonis, Peter A. 1990. Histoire de la langue: du latin à l’ancien français. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Maniet, A. 1985. Un programme de phonologie diachronique: de l’«indo-européen» au latin par ordinateur; version définitive. Cahiers de l’Institut de linguistique de Louvain 11(1–2). 203–243.Google Scholar
Marchot, Paul. 1901. Petite phonétique du française prélittéraire (VIe-Xe siècles). Freiburg: B. Veith.Google Scholar
Marr, Clayton & David R. Mortensen. 2020. Computerized forward reconstruction for analysis in diachronic phonology, and Latin to French reflex prediction. In Proceedings of LT4HALA 2020–1st workshop on language technologies for historical and ancient languages, 28–36.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1952. Celtic lenition and Western Romance consonants. Language 28(2). 192–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1970. Economie des changements phonétiques. Berne: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Mazzola, Michael L. 2013. Analogy among French sounds. In Research on old french: The state of the art, 149–165. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm. 1908. Historische grammatik der französischen sprache. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles. 2009. Histoire des systèmes phonique et graphique du français. Romanische Sprachgeschichte/Histoire linguistique de la Romania 31. 2907–2926.Google Scholar
Mortensen, David R., Patrick Littell, Akash Bharadwaj, Kartik Goyal, Chris Dyer & Lori Levin. 2016. PanPhon: A resource for mapping IPA segments to articulatory feature vectors. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical papers, 3475–3484.Google Scholar
Muzaffar, Towhid Bin. 1997. Computer simulation of Shawnee historical phonology: Memorial University of Newfoundland dissertation.
Noske, Roland. 2011. L’accent en proto-français: arguments factuels et typologiques contre l’influence du francique. In Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 2008, 307–320. Institut de Linguistique Française, Paris.Google Scholar
Nyrop, Kristoffer. 1899. Grammaire historique de la langue française vol. 3. Copenhague/Paris: Gyldendal/Nordisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Pei, Mario A. 1949. A new methodology for Romance classification. Word 5(2). 135–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penzl, Herbert. 1968. Die mittelhochdeutschen sibilanten und ihre Weiterentwicklung. Word 24(1–3). 340–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piwowarczyk, Dariusz. 2016. Abstract: A computational-linguistic approach to historical phonology. New Developments in the Quantitative Study of Languages 701.Google Scholar
Pope, Mildred Katharine. 1934. From Latin to Modern French with especial consideration of AngloNorman: Phonology and morphology. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Rebecca. 1994. Historical linguistics, language change and the history of French. Journal of French Language Studies 4(1). 75–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. The Romance languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. Linguistic change in French. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. Phonemic overlapping and repulsion revisited. General and Theoretical Linguistics 71. 235–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pyysalo, Jouna. 2017. Proto-Indo-European lexicon: The generative etymological dictionary of Indo-European languages. In Proceedings of the 21st Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics, nodalida, 22–24 May 2017, Gothenburg, Sweden 1311, 259–262. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. 2002. Weakening and strengthening in Romance revisited. Italian Journal of Linguistics 141. 327–374.Google Scholar
Rey, Alain. 2013. Dictionnaire historique de la langue française. Paris: Le Robert.Google Scholar
Rheinfelder, Hans. 1975. Altfranzösische grammatik, 2 bde. I: Laut.Google Scholar
Richter, Elise. 1934. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Romanismen, i: Chronologische Phonetik des Französischen. Halle: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rochet, Bernard L. 2015. The formation and evolution of the French nasal vowels, vol. 1531. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2014. Muta cum liquida in the light of Tertenia Sardinian metathesis and compensatory lengthening Latin tr> Old French vrr. In Variation within and across Romance languages: Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ottawa, 5–7 May 2011, 77–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Short, Ian R. 2013. Manual of Anglo-Norman, vol. 81. Manchester: Anglo-Norman Text Society.Google Scholar
Simonet, Miquel, José I. Hualde & Marianna Nadeu. 2012. Lenition of /d/ in spontaneous Spanish and Catalan. In Thirteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, 1416–1419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sims-Williams, Patrick. 2018. Mechanising historical phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society 116(3). 555–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Raoul N. 1969. A computer simulation of phonological change. ITL-Tijdschrift voor Toegepaste Linguistiek 5(1). 82–91.Google Scholar
Straka, Georges. 1970. L’évolution phonétique du latin au français sous l’effet de l’énergie et de la faiblesse articulatoires. Centre de philologie et de littératures romanes.Google Scholar
Suchier, Hermann. 1893. Altfranzösische Grammatik. Halle: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1952. Lexico-statistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts: with special reference to North American Indians and Eskimos. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96(4). 452–463.Google Scholar
Thurot, Charles. 1881. De la prononciation française depuis le commencement du XVIe siècle: d’après les témoinages des grammairiens, vol. 11. Paris: Impr. nationale.Google Scholar
Van Horn Melton, James. 2003. Absolutism and the eighteenth-century origins of compulsory schooling in Prussia and Austria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Voyles, Joseph B. 1972. The phonetic quality of OHG Z. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 71(1). 47–55. [URL]
von Wartburg, Walther et al. 1922–2002. Französisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. eine darstellung des galloromanischen sprachschatzes. Klopp/Winter/Teubner/Zbinden. 251 vols.Google Scholar
Wehr, Barbara. 2001. Ein westlich-atlantischer sprachbund: Irisch, Französisch, Portugiesisch. In Fremd und Eigen. untersuchungen zu Grammatik und Wortschatz des Uralischen und Indogermanischen in memoriam Hartmut Katz, 253–78. Vienna: Edition Praesens.Google Scholar
Wernicke-Heinrichs, Meike. 1996. The evolution of French R: A phonological perspective: Theses (Dept. of French)/Simon Fraser University dissertation.
Zink, Gaston. 1986. Phonétique historique du français. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

List, Johann-Mattis, Nathan W. Hill, Frederic Blum & Cristian Juárez
2024. Grouping sounds into evolving units for the purpose of historical language comparison. Open Research Europe 4  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.