Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 39:2 (2022) ► pp.159–192

Weaving together the diverse threads of category change

Intersubjective ἀμέλει ‘of course’ and imperative particles in Ancient Greek

ORCID logo | Ghent University
This paper investigates category changes among imperative particles in Ancient Greek. Using diachronic evidence from the category change of the imperative ἀμέλει (amélei ‘don’t worry’ > ‘of course’) and similar imperative particles, ἄγε (áge), ἴθι (íthi), φέρε (fére), εἰπέ μοι (eipé moi) and ἰδού (idoú), this paper investigates the diachronic interdependence of intersubjectification, grammaticalization and language change in general. It does this in four ways. First, I show that intersubjectification can take place without subjectification (pace Traugott 2003: 134). Second, I detail the intersubjectification of ἀμέλει with changes in the cognitive domain (no practical > no epistemic worries), the pragmatic domain (responsively resolving > independently assuming resolved worries) and contextual conditions (creating intersubjective alignment > assuming it). Third, I tease apart the various diachronic origins of changes which have affected ἀμέλει. Finally, using contrastive evidence from parallel category changes of Ancient Greek imperative particles, I argue that whereas the imperative particles can be variously affected by structural grammaticalization changes, they all display signs of context change (as shown by illocutionary extensions to occurrence with declarative and interrogative illocutions). Thus, the diverse threads of category change can be woven together by tracing the contexts of change as well as the diachronic processes shaping them.
Keywords: category change, grammaticalization, intersubjectification, imperatives, Ancient Greek, morphosyntactic change, context, language change
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Category change of Ancient Greek imperatives
    • 1.2Grammaticalization, intersubjectification and category change
    • 1.3Organization of the paper
  • 2.Previous views on ἀμέλει
  • 3.The intersubjectification of ἀμέλει: Semantic and contextual change
  • 4.Morphosyntactic changes: Grammaticalization, intersubjectification and language change
  • 5.The interdependence of intersubjectification, grammaticalization and category change
  • 6.Contrastive evidence from the category change of Ancient Greek imperative particles
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20031.lar
References (73)
References
Bailey, Nicholas. 2009. Thetic constructions in Koine Greek. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Bentein, Klaas. 2016. Verbal periphrasis: Have- and Be- constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biraud, Michele. 2010. Les interjections du théâtre grec antique: Etude sémantique et pragmatique. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Blomqvist, Jerker. 1969. Greek particles in Hellenistic prose. Lund: Cwk Gleerup.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, Anna, Annemieke Drummen & Mark de Kreij. 2016. Particles in Ancient Greek discourse: Five volumes exploring particle use across genres. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Susan E. Brennan. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Lauren Resnick, John M. Levine, & Stephanie D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 127–141. Washington: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Company Company, Concepción. 2006. Subjectification of verbs into discourse markers: Semantic-pragmatic change only? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 201. 97–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2019. Taking diachronic evidence seriously: Result-oriented vs. source-oriented explanations of typological universals. In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja A. Seržant (eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, 25–46. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul. 2015. Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers? More than a terminological issue. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(1):59–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denniston, John D. 1954. The Greek particles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Devos, Maud & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.). 2014. ‘COME’ and ‘GO’ off the beaten grammaticalization path. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2). 365–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 2019. Grammaticalization accounts of word order correlations. In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja Seržant (eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, 63–95. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, John. M. 1929. The characters of Theophrastus. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Emde Boas, Evert van, Albert Rijksbaron, Luuk Huitink & Mathieu de Bakker. 2019. The Cambridge grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara. 2019. The embodied basis of discourse and pragmatic markers in Greek and Latin. In Egle Mocciaro & William Michael Short (eds.), Toward a cognitive classical linguistics: The embodied basis of constructions in Greek and Latin, 69–92. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara & Chiara Ghezzi. 2014. The pragmaticalization of verbs of movement and exchange in Latin and Italian: Paths of development from lexicon to pragmatics. In Ilona Badescu & Mihaela Popescu (eds.), Studia Linguistica et Philologica in honorem Prof. Univ. Dr. Michaela Livescu, 116–39. Craiova: Editura Universitaria.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke, Lieselotte Brems & Freek Van de Velde. 2014. Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification. Typology and operationalization. In Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification in grammar and discourse, 129–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara. 2014. The development of discourse and pragmatic markers. In Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds.), Discourse and pragmatic markers from Latin to the Romance languages, 10–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, David. 2014. Wackernagel’s Law I. In Georgios K. Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek language and linguistics, 508–513. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2016. Classical Greek syntax. Wackernagel’s law in Herodotus. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goutsos, Dionysis. 2017. A corpus-based approach to functional markers in Greek. In Chiara Fedriani & Andrea Sansò (eds.), Pragmatic markers, discourse markers and modal particles: New perspectives, 125–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Jeffrey. 2002. Aristophanes: Lysistrata. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization I, 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elisabeth Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey C. 2007. Syntax: From Classical Greek to the Koine. In Anastasios-Phoivos Christidis (ed.), A history of Ancient Greek: From the beginnings to late antiquity, 618–631. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jonge, Casper C. de. 2008. Between grammar and rhetoric. Dionysius of Halicarnassus on language, linguistics and literature. Leiden/Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Julia, Marie-Ange. 2018. Le grec classique possède-t-il un présentatif? In Felicia Logozzo & Paolo Poccetti (eds.), Ancient Greek linguistics: New perspectives, insights, and approaches, 411–427. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labiano Ilundain, Juan M. 2000. Estudio de las interjecciones en las comedias de Aristófanes. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Langslow, David R. 2009. Jakob Wackernagel lectures on syntax with special reference to Greek, Latin, and Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, John A. L. 2007. Ἐξαποστέλλω. In Jan Joosten & Peter J. Tomson (eds.), Voces Biblicae: Septuagint Greek and its significance for the New Testament, 99–113. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
2013. The Atticist grammarians. In Stanley E. Porter and Andrew W. Pitts, The language of the New Testament: Context, history and development, 283–308. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd ed. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Couso, María J. 2010. Subjectification and intersubjectification. In Andreas H. Jucker, & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 127–163. Berlin/New York (NY): De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markopoulos, Theodore. 2009. The future in Greek. From Ancient to Medieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthaios, Stephanos. 2007. Das Adverb in der Grammatikographie, T.1. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft, no. Bd 17. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò. 2014. Go and come as sources of directive constructions. In Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.), ‘COME’ and ‘GO’ off the beaten grammaticalization path, 165–184. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2017. Three types of subjectivity, three types of intersubjectivity, their dynamicization and a synthesis. In Danïel van Olmen, Hubert Cuyckens & Lobke Ghesguière (eds.), Aspects of grammaticalization: (Inter)subjectification and directionality, 19–46. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nicolle, Steve. 2011. Pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 401–412. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nordgren, Lars. 2015. Greek interjections. Syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Revuelta Puigdollers, Antonio. 2017. Illocutionary force and modality: How to tackle the issue in Ancient Greek. In Camille Denizot & Olga Spevak (eds.), Pragmatic approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek, 17–43. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricci, Claudia, Corinne Rossari & Adriana Spiridon. 2009. Grammaticalization and pragmatics: Facts, approaches, theoretical issues. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, Albert. 2006. The syntax and semantics of the verb in Classical Greek. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Rodd, Jennifer M., Gareth Gaskell & William D. Marslen-Wilson. 2002. Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 46(2). 245–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
la Roi, Ezra. 2019. Epistemic modality, particles and the potential optative in Classical Greek, Journal of Greek Linguistics 19(1).59–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. A rephilologized diachronic analysis of ‘Post-Classical Greek’: Pitfalls and principles for progress, Journal of Greek Linguistics 20(2). 213–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. forthc. a. The insubordination of if- and that-clauses in from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A diachronic constructional typology. Symbolae Osloensis 951. DOI logo
. forthc. b. Counterfactuals from Archaic to Classical Greek. In Georgios K. Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Greek language and linguistics (EGLL).
. subm. a. The Atticist manuals as metalinguistic resource for morpho-syntactic change in Post-Classical Greek.
. subm. b. The pragmatics of the past: A new typology of past conditionals in Ancient Greek.
Say, Sergey. 2004. Grammaticalization of word order: Evidence from Lithuanian. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization, 363–384. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard & Albert Debrunner. 1950. Griechische Grammatik. Band 2. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C. 2002. Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5–6). 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978. Assertion. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, 315–332. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio. 2017. From immediate to extended intersubjectification: A gradient approach to intersubjective awareness and semasiological change. Language and Cognition 91. 88–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thijs, Kees. 2017. The Attic particle μήν: Intersubjectivity, contrast and polysemy. Journal of Greek Linguistics 171. 73–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Intersubjectification and clause periphery. In Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification in grammar and discourse, 7–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. 2005. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. How do they intersect? In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Goethem, Kristel, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede. 2018. Category change from a constructional perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wouters, Alfons. 1979. The grammatical papyri from Graeco-Roman Egypt: Contributions to the study of the ‘ars grammatica’ in antiquity. Brussels: Paleis der Academiën.Google Scholar
Zakowski, Samuel. 2014. εἰπέ μοι as a Parenthetical: A structural and functional analysis, from Homer to Menander. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 54(2). 157–91.Google Scholar
. 2018. The evolution of the Ancient Greek deverbal pragmatic markers áge, íthi and phére. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19(1). 55–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar