Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 39:2 (2022) ► pp.159–192

Weaving together the diverse threads of category change

Intersubjective ἀμέλει ‘of course’ and imperative particles in Ancient Greek

ORCID logo | Ghent University

This paper investigates category changes among imperative particles in Ancient Greek. Using diachronic evidence from the category change of the imperative ἀμέλει (amélei ‘don’t worry’ > ‘of course’) and similar imperative particles, ἄγε (áge), ἴθι (íthi), φέρε (fére), εἰπέ μοι (eipé moi) and ἰδού (idoú), this paper investigates the diachronic interdependence of intersubjectification, grammaticalization and language change in general. It does this in four ways. First, I show that intersubjectification can take place without subjectification (pace Traugott 2003: 134). Second, I detail the intersubjectification of ἀμέλει with changes in the cognitive domain (no practical > no epistemic worries), the pragmatic domain (responsively resolving > independently assuming resolved worries) and contextual conditions (creating intersubjective alignment > assuming it). Third, I tease apart the various diachronic origins of changes which have affected ἀμέλει. Finally, using contrastive evidence from parallel category changes of Ancient Greek imperative particles, I argue that whereas the imperative particles can be variously affected by structural grammaticalization changes, they all display signs of context change (as shown by illocutionary extensions to occurrence with declarative and interrogative illocutions). Thus, the diverse threads of category change can be woven together by tracing the contexts of change as well as the diachronic processes shaping them.

Keywords: category change, grammaticalization, intersubjectification, imperatives, Ancient Greek, morphosyntactic change, context, language change
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Category change of Ancient Greek imperatives
    • 1.2Grammaticalization, intersubjectification and category change
    • 1.3Organization of the paper
  • 2.Previous views on ἀμέλει
  • 3.The intersubjectification of ἀμέλει: Semantic and contextual change
  • 4.Morphosyntactic changes: Grammaticalization, intersubjectification and language change
  • 5.The interdependence of intersubjectification, grammaticalization and category change
  • 6.Contrastive evidence from the category change of Ancient Greek imperative particles
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20031.lar
References
Bailey, Nicholas
2009 Thetic constructions in Koine Greek. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Bentein, Klaas
2016 Verbal periphrasis: Have- and Be- constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biraud, Michele
2010 Les interjections du théâtre grec antique: Etude sémantique et pragmatique. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Blomqvist, Jerker
1969 Greek particles in Hellenistic prose. Lund: Cwk Gleerup.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, Anna, Annemieke Drummen & Mark de Kreij
2016 Particles in Ancient Greek discourse: Five volumes exploring particle use across genres. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2008 The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Susan E. Brennan
1991 Grounding in communication. In Lauren Resnick, John M. Levine, & Stephanie D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 127–141. Washington: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Company Company, Concepción
2006 Subjectification of verbs into discourse markers: Semantic-pragmatic change only? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 201. 97–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2019 Taking diachronic evidence seriously: Result-oriented vs. source-oriented explanations of typological universals. In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja A. Seržant (eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, 25–46. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
2015 Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers? More than a terminological issue. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(1):59–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denniston, John D.
1954 The Greek particles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Devos, Maud & Jenneke van der Wal
(eds.) 2014 ‘COME’ and ‘GO’ off the beaten grammaticalization path. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002 A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2). 365–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
2019 Grammaticalization accounts of word order correlations. In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja Seržant (eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, 63–95. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, John. M.
1929 The characters of Theophrastus. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Emde Boas, Evert van, Albert Rijksbaron, Luuk Huitink & Mathieu de Bakker
2019 The Cambridge grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara
2019 The embodied basis of discourse and pragmatic markers in Greek and Latin. In Egle Mocciaro & William Michael Short (eds.), Toward a cognitive classical linguistics: The embodied basis of constructions in Greek and Latin, 69–92. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara & Chiara Ghezzi
2014 The pragmaticalization of verbs of movement and exchange in Latin and Italian: Paths of development from lexicon to pragmatics. In Ilona Badescu & Mihaela Popescu (eds.), Studia Linguistica et Philologica in honorem Prof. Univ. Dr. Michaela Livescu, 116–39. Craiova: Editura Universitaria.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke, Lieselotte Brems & Freek Van de Velde
2014 Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification. Typology and operationalization. In Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification in grammar and discourse, 129–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara
2014 The development of discourse and pragmatic markers. In Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds.), Discourse and pragmatic markers from Latin to the Romance languages, 10–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, David
2014 Wackernagel’s Law I. In Georgios K. Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek language and linguistics, 508–513. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
2016 Classical Greek syntax. Wackernagel’s law in Herodotus. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goutsos, Dionysis
2017 A corpus-based approach to functional markers in Greek. In Chiara Fedriani & Andrea Sansò (eds.), Pragmatic markers, discourse markers and modal particles: New perspectives, 125–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002 On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Jeffrey
2002 Aristophanes: Lysistrata. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991 On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization I, 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elisabeth Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey C.
2007 Syntax: From Classical Greek to the Koine. In Anastasios-Phoivos Christidis (ed.), A history of Ancient Greek: From the beginnings to late antiquity, 618–631. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jonge, Casper C. de
2008 Between grammar and rhetoric. Dionysius of Halicarnassus on language, linguistics and literature. Leiden/Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Julia, Marie-Ange
2018 Le grec classique possède-t-il un présentatif? In Felicia Logozzo & Paolo Poccetti (eds.), Ancient Greek linguistics: New perspectives, insights, and approaches, 411–427. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labiano Ilundain, Juan M.
2000 Estudio de las interjecciones en las comedias de Aristófanes. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Langslow, David R.
2009 Jakob Wackernagel lectures on syntax with special reference to Greek, Latin, and Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, John A. L.
2007 Ἐξαποστέλλω. In Jan Joosten & Peter J. Tomson (eds.), Voces Biblicae: Septuagint Greek and its significance for the New Testament, 99–113. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
2013 The Atticist grammarians. In Stanley E. Porter and Andrew W. Pitts, The language of the New Testament: Context, history and development, 283–308. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2015 Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd ed. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Couso, María J.
2010 Subjectification and intersubjectification. In Andreas H. Jucker, & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 127–163. Berlin/New York (NY): De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markopoulos, Theodore
2009 The future in Greek. From Ancient to Medieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthaios, Stephanos
2007 Das Adverb in der Grammatikographie, T.1. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft, no. Bd 17. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò
2014  Go and come as sources of directive constructions. In Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.), ‘COME’ and ‘GO’ off the beaten grammaticalization path, 165–184. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2017 Three types of subjectivity, three types of intersubjectivity, their dynamicization and a synthesis. In Danïel van Olmen, Hubert Cuyckens & Lobke Ghesguière (eds.), Aspects of grammaticalization: (Inter)subjectification and directionality, 19–46. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nicolle, Steve
2011 Pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 401–412. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nordgren, Lars
2015 Greek interjections. Syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Revuelta Puigdollers, Antonio
2017 Illocutionary force and modality: How to tackle the issue in Ancient Greek. In Camille Denizot & Olga Spevak (eds.), Pragmatic approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek, 17–43. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricci, Claudia, Corinne Rossari & Adriana Spiridon
2009 Grammaticalization and pragmatics: Facts, approaches, theoretical issues. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, Albert
2006 The syntax and semantics of the verb in Classical Greek. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Rodd, Jennifer M., Gareth Gaskell & William D. Marslen-Wilson
2002 Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 46(2). 245–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
la Roi, Ezra
2019 Epistemic modality, particles and the potential optative in Classical Greek, Journal of Greek Linguistics 19(1).59–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 A rephilologized diachronic analysis of ‘Post-Classical Greek’: Pitfalls and principles for progress, Journal of Greek Linguistics 20(2). 213–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
forthc. a. The insubordination of if- and that-clauses in from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A diachronic constructional typology. Symbolae Osloensis 951. DOI logo
forthc. b. Counterfactuals from Archaic to Classical Greek. In Georgios K. Giannakis ed. Encyclopedia of Greek language and linguistics (EGLL)
subm. a. The Atticist manuals as metalinguistic resource for morpho-syntactic change in Post-Classical Greek.
subm. b. The pragmatics of the past: A new typology of past conditionals in Ancient Greek.
Say, Sergey
2004 Grammaticalization of word order: Evidence from Lithuanian. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization, 363–384. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard & Albert Debrunner
1950 Griechische Grammatik. Band 2. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C.
2002 Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5–6). 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978 Assertion. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, 315–332. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio
2017 From immediate to extended intersubjectification: A gradient approach to intersubjective awareness and semasiological change. Language and Cognition 91. 88–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thijs, Kees
2017 The Attic particle μήν: Intersubjectivity, contrast and polysemy. Journal of Greek Linguistics 171. 73–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995 Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Intersubjectification and clause periphery. In Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification in grammar and discourse, 7–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2005 Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2010 Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. How do they intersect? In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Goethem, Kristel, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede
2018 Category change from a constructional perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2005 Constructions of intersubjectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wouters, Alfons
1979 The grammatical papyri from Graeco-Roman Egypt: Contributions to the study of the ‘ars grammatica’ in antiquity. Brussels: Paleis der Academiën.Google Scholar
Zakowski, Samuel
2014 εἰπέ μοι as a Parenthetical: A structural and functional analysis, from Homer to Menander. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 54(2). 157–91.Google Scholar
2018 The evolution of the Ancient Greek deverbal pragmatic markers áge, íthi and phére. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19(1). 55–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar