Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 39:2 (2022) ► pp. 159192
References
Bailey, Nicholas
2009Thetic constructions in Koine Greek. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Bentein, Klaas
2016Verbal periphrasis: Have- and Be- constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biraud, Michele
2010Les interjections du théâtre grec antique: Etude sémantique et pragmatique. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Blomqvist, Jerker
1969Greek particles in Hellenistic prose. Lund: Cwk Gleerup.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, Anna, Annemieke Drummen & Mark de Kreij
2016Particles in Ancient Greek discourse: Five volumes exploring particle use across genres. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2008The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Susan E. Brennan
1991Grounding in communication. In Lauren Resnick, John M. Levine, & Stephanie D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 127–141. Washington: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Company Company, Concepción
2006Subjectification of verbs into discourse markers: Semantic-pragmatic change only? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 201. 97–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2019Taking diachronic evidence seriously: Result-oriented vs. source-oriented explanations of typological universals. In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja A. Seržant (eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, 25–46. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
2015Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers? More than a terminological issue. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(1):59–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denniston, John D.
1954The Greek particles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Devos, Maud & Jenneke van der Wal
(eds.) 2014‘COME’ and ‘GO’ off the beaten grammaticalization path. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2). 365–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
2019Grammaticalization accounts of word order correlations. In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja Seržant (eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, 63–95. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, John. M.
1929The characters of Theophrastus. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Emde Boas, Evert van, Albert Rijksbaron, Luuk Huitink & Mathieu de Bakker
2019The Cambridge grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara
2019The embodied basis of discourse and pragmatic markers in Greek and Latin. In Egle Mocciaro & William Michael Short (eds.), Toward a cognitive classical linguistics: The embodied basis of constructions in Greek and Latin, 69–92. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara & Chiara Ghezzi
2014The pragmaticalization of verbs of movement and exchange in Latin and Italian: Paths of development from lexicon to pragmatics. In Ilona Badescu & Mihaela Popescu (eds.), Studia Linguistica et Philologica in honorem Prof. Univ. Dr. Michaela Livescu, 116–39. Craiova: Editura Universitaria.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke, Lieselotte Brems & Freek Van de Velde
2014Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification. Typology and operationalization. In Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification in grammar and discourse, 129–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara
2014The development of discourse and pragmatic markers. In Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds.), Discourse and pragmatic markers from Latin to the Romance languages, 10–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, David
2014Wackernagel’s Law I. In Georgios K. Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek language and linguistics, 508–513. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
2016Classical Greek syntax. Wackernagel’s law in Herodotus. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goutsos, Dionysis
2017A corpus-based approach to functional markers in Greek. In Chiara Fedriani & Andrea Sansò (eds.), Pragmatic markers, discourse markers and modal particles: New perspectives, 125–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Jeffrey
2002Aristophanes: Lysistrata. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization I, 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elisabeth Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey C.
2007Syntax: From Classical Greek to the Koine. In Anastasios-Phoivos Christidis (ed.), A history of Ancient Greek: From the beginnings to late antiquity, 618–631. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jonge, Casper C. de
2008Between grammar and rhetoric. Dionysius of Halicarnassus on language, linguistics and literature. Leiden/Boston: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Julia, Marie-Ange
2018Le grec classique possède-t-il un présentatif? In Felicia Logozzo & Paolo Poccetti (eds.), Ancient Greek linguistics: New perspectives, insights, and approaches, 411–427. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labiano Ilundain, Juan M.
2000Estudio de las interjecciones en las comedias de Aristófanes. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Langslow, David R.
2009Jakob Wackernagel lectures on syntax with special reference to Greek, Latin, and Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, John A. L.
2007Ἐξαποστέλλω. In Jan Joosten & Peter J. Tomson (eds.), Voces Biblicae: Septuagint Greek and its significance for the New Testament, 99–113. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
2013The Atticist grammarians. In Stanley E. Porter and Andrew W. Pitts, The language of the New Testament: Context, history and development, 283–308. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2015Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd ed. Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Couso, María J.
2010Subjectification and intersubjectification. In Andreas H. Jucker, & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 127–163. Berlin/New York (NY): De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markopoulos, Theodore
2009The future in Greek. From Ancient to Medieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthaios, Stephanos
2007Das Adverb in der Grammatikographie, T.1. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft, no. Bd 17. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò
2014 Go and come as sources of directive constructions. In Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.), ‘COME’ and ‘GO’ off the beaten grammaticalization path, 165–184. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2017Three types of subjectivity, three types of intersubjectivity, their dynamicization and a synthesis. In Danïel van Olmen, Hubert Cuyckens & Lobke Ghesguière (eds.), Aspects of grammaticalization: (Inter)subjectification and directionality, 19–46. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nicolle, Steve
2011Pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 401–412. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nordgren, Lars
2015Greek interjections. Syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olmen, Daniël van
2010The imperative of intentional visual perception as a pragmatic marker: A contrastive study of Dutch, English and Romance. Languages in Contrast 10(2). 223–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Revuelta Puigdollers, Antonio
2017Illocutionary force and modality: How to tackle the issue in Ancient Greek. In Camille Denizot & Olga Spevak (eds.), Pragmatic approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek, 17–43. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, Claudia, Corinne Rossari & Adriana Spiridon
2009Grammaticalization and pragmatics: Facts, approaches, theoretical issues. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, Albert
2006The syntax and semantics of the verb in Classical Greek. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Rodd, Jennifer M., Gareth Gaskell & William D. Marslen-Wilson
2002Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 46(2). 245–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
la Roi, Ezra
2019Epistemic modality, particles and the potential optative in Classical Greek, Journal of Greek Linguistics 19(1).59–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020A rephilologized diachronic analysis of ‘Post-Classical Greek’: Pitfalls and principles for progress, Journal of Greek Linguistics 20(2). 213–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
forthc. a. The insubordination of if- and that-clauses in from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A diachronic constructional typology. Symbolae Osloensis 951. Crossref
forthc. b. Counterfactuals from Archaic to Classical Greek. In Georgios K. Giannakis ed. Encyclopedia of Greek language and linguistics (EGLL)
subm. a. The Atticist manuals as metalinguistic resource for morpho-syntactic change in Post-Classical Greek.
subm. b. The pragmatics of the past: A new typology of past conditionals in Ancient Greek.
Say, Sergey
2004Grammaticalization of word order: Evidence from Lithuanian. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization, 363–384. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard & Albert Debrunner
1950Griechische Grammatik. Band 2. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C.
2002Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5–6). 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1978Assertion. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, 315–332. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio
2017From immediate to extended intersubjectification: A gradient approach to intersubjective awareness and semasiological change. Language and Cognition 91. 88–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thijs, Kees
2017The Attic particle μήν: Intersubjectivity, contrast and polysemy. Journal of Greek Linguistics 171. 73–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Intersubjectification and clause periphery. In Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification in grammar and discourse, 7–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2005Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2010Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. How do they intersect? In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Goethem, Kristel, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede
2018Category change from a constructional perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2005Constructions of intersubjectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wouters, Alfons
1979The grammatical papyri from Graeco-Roman Egypt: Contributions to the study of the ‘ars grammatica’ in antiquity. Brussels: Paleis der Academiën.Google Scholar
Zakowski, Samuel
2014εἰπέ μοι as a Parenthetical: A structural and functional analysis, from Homer to Menander. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 54(2). 157–91.Google Scholar
2018The evolution of the Ancient Greek deverbal pragmatic markers áge, íthi and phére. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19(1). 55–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar