This study is concerned with Vegliote, the last remnant of the Dalmatian branch of the Romance languages, as used by its very last speaker in the last quarter of the 19th century. Specifically, I shall deal with a peculiar morphological neutralization of the distinction between present and past imperfect tenses, which becomes increasingly common in that speaker’s usage over the last twenty years of his life. After careful consideration of the status and significance of data gleaned from analysis of the idiolect of just this one speaker, I shall explain the analogical mechanisms of the change and argue that they constitute strong evidence for the diachronic importance of Aronoff’s notion of the ‘morphome’ — a recurrent distributional regularity, wholly lacking in extramorphological motivation, within the inflectional paradigm. I shall also consider the significance of these facts for our understanding of the morphological processes at work in language death.
2010. How do words change inflection class? Diachronic evidence from Norwegian. Language Sciences 32:3 ► pp. 366 ff.
Enger, Hans-Olav
2013. Morphological theory and grammaticalisation: the role of meaning and local generalisations. Language Sciences 36 ► pp. 18 ff.
Enger, Hans-Olav
2014. Reinforcement in inflection classes: Two cues may be better than one. Word Structure 7:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Enger, Hans-Olav
2016. The No Blur Principle and Faroese conjugation. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 138:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Enger, Hans-Olav
2017. Vocabular Clarity and insular Scandinavian: A response to Ϸorgeirsson. Folia Linguistica 51:3
Enger, Hans‐Olav
2007. The No Blur Principle meets Norwegian dialects*. Studia Linguistica 61:3 ► pp. 278 ff.
Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway
2010. The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages,
Meul, Claire
2010. The intra-paradigmatic distribution of the infix -I/ESC- from Latin to Modern Romance: morphomic patterning and beyond. Morphology 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Maiden, Martin
2005. Morphological autonomy and diachrony. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004 [Yearbook of Morphology, ], ► pp. 137 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.