Cover not available
Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 23:2 (2006) ► pp.426–433
Book review

Yaron Matras & Peter Bakker. The Mixed Language Debate: Theoretical and empirical advances. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003. vi, 325 pp.

Reviewed by
| Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
Published online: 15 December 2006
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23.2.11gra
References (19)
References
Bakker, Peter. 2002. “An early vocabulary of British Romani (1619): A linguistic analysis”. Romani Studies, Fifth Series, 12:2.75–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2000. “Chamorro historical phonology”. Oceanic Linguistics 391.83–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borrow, George. 1841. The Zincali. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Costenoble, H. 1940. Die Chamoro-Sprache. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow, Es-sex: Longman.Google Scholar
Embleton, Sheila M. 1986. Statistics in Historical Linguistics. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Golovko, Evgeni V. & Vakhtin Nikolai B.. 1990. “Aleut in contact: The CIA enigma.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 221.97–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grant, Anthony P. 2002. “Fabric, pattern, shift and diffusion: What changes in Oregon Penutian languages can tell historical linguistics.” Proceedings of the Meeting of the Hokan-Penutian Workshop June 17–18, 2000, University of California at Berkeley, edited by Laura Buszard-Welcher, 33–56. Berkeley: Survey of California and Other Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Grant, Anthony. 2003. Review of Ruth King, The lexical basis of grammatical borrowing: a Prince Edward Island case study (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2000). Word 54:3.251–256.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1984. “Language contact and language change”. Annual Review of Anthropology 1984.367–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Roger. 1977. Svensk rommani/ upptecknad av Roger Johansson; med etymologiska och grammatiska kommentarer av Gösta Bergman och Erik Ljungberg samt förord av Adam Heymowski (= Acta Academiae Regiae Gustavi Adolphi , 551). Uppsala: Gustav Adolfs Akademi.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia. 1994. A Grammar of Berbice Dutch Creole. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Page, Robert B. & Andrée Tabouret-Keller. 1985. Acts of Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lerch, Hans-Günter. 1976. Das Manische in Giessen. Giessen: Anabas.Google Scholar
Macalister, Robert A. S. 1914. The Language of the Nawar or Zutt, the Nomad Gypsy Smiths of Palestine. London & Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Miskow, Johan & Viggo Brøndal. 1923. “Sigøjnersprog i Danmark”. Danske Studier 97–143.Google Scholar
Mous, Maarten. 2003. The Making of a Mixed Language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Ian E. 1994. “Berbiciaansche woorde.” Amsterdam Creole Studies 111.67–74.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 1996. “Contact-induced change and the comparative method: cases from Papua New Guinea”. The Comparative Method Reviewed: Irregularity and regularity in linguistic change, ed. by Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross, 180–217. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar