Cover not available
Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 24:2 (2007) ► pp.427–433
Book review

Ljuba N. Veselinova. Suppletion in Verb Paradigms: Bits and pieces of the puzzle. Ljuba N. Veselinova. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2006. xvii, 234 pp.

Reviewed by
| Northwestern University
Published online: 21 December 2007
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.24.2.11sim
References (19)
References
Ackerman, Farrell, & Gregory T. Stump. 2004. “Paradigms and periphrastic expression: A study in realization-based lexicalism”. Projecting Morphology ed. by Louisa Sadler & Andrew Spencer, 111–158. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Albright, Adam. 2003. “A quantitative study of Spanish paradigm gaps”. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 22 Proceedings ed. by Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura, 1–14. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Aski, Janice. 1995. “Verbal suppletion: An analysis of Italian, French, and Spanish to go ”. Linguistics 331.403–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown, & Greville Corbett. 2005. The Syntax-Morphology Interface: A study of syncretism. [= Cambridge studies in linguistics , 1091]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent, & Carol Chapman. 1997. “Paradigms, periphrases and pronominal inflection: A feature-based account”. Yearbook of Morphology 1996 ed. by Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle, 155–180. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1989. “Large linguistic areas and language sampling”. Studies in Language 13:2.257–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar Olafur. 1999. “‘When in doubt …’: Intraparadigmatic dependencies and gaps in Icelandic”. NELS 29: Proceedings of the 29th meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, ed. by Pius Tamanji, Masako Hirotani & Nancy Hall, 105–119. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA Publications, The University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie. 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew, Marina Chumakina, Greville Corbett & Dunstan Brown. 2004. “Suppletion: frequency, categories and distribution of stems”. Studies in Language 28:2.387–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2000. “*I amn’t”. Language 76:2.297–323.Google Scholar
Juge, Matthew. 1999. “On the rise of suppletion in verbal paradigms”. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 25:1.183–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 1992. “Irregularity as a determinant of morphological change”. Journal of Linguistics 281.285–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “When lexemes become allomorphs: On the genesis of suppletion”. Folia Linguistica 38:3–4.227–256.Google Scholar
Nübling, Damaris. 1999. “The development of “junk”: Irregularization strategies of HAVE and SAY in the Germanic languages”. Yearbook of Morphology 1999 ed. by Geert Booij & Jaap Van Marle, 53–74. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sims, Andrea. 2006. Minding the gaps: Inflectional defectiveness in paradigmatic morphology. Ph.D. thesis: Linguistics Department, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Strunk, Klaus. 1977. “Überlegungen zu defektivität und suppletion im Griechischen und Indogermanischen”. Glotta 551.2–34.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2006. “Heteroclisis and paradigm linkage”. Language 82:2.279–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Nigel & Kersti Börjars. 1996. Suppletion and syntactic theory. Proceedings of the LFG ‘96 Conference ed. by Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King. CSLI publications online: [URL]