Review article published In:
Vol. 25:3 (2008) ► pp.411430
Anderson, Stephen R.
1981 “Why phonology isn’t ‘natural’”. Linguistic Inquiry 121.493–539.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon & Harms Robert
1972 “How do languages get crazy rules?Linguistic Change and Generative Theory ed. by R. Stockwell & R. Macaulay, 1–21. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette
2006a “A theoretical synopsis of evolutionary phonology”. Theoretical Linguistics 321.117–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006b “Reply to commentaries”. Theoretical Linguistics 321.245–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
To appear. “Natural and unnatural sound patterns: A pocket field guide”. Naturalness and Iconicity in Language ed. by Klaas Willems & Ludovic De Cuypere Amsterdam John Benjamins DOI logo
Braune, Wilhelm
1987Althochdeutsche Grammatik. 14th edition. ed. by Hans Eggers. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Brown, Jason
2006 “Review of Blevins 2004”. Linguist List 17.743 (Mar. 10).Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle Morris
1968The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2008 “Evolutionary linguistics”. Annual Review of Anthropology 371.219–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Boer, Bart
2006 “Review of Blevins (2004)”. Journal of Linguistics 421.703–708. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eilers, R. E.
1977 “Context-sensitive perception of naturally produced stop and fricative consonants by infants”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 611.1321–1336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guion, Susan G.
1996Velar Palatalization: Coarticulation, perception, and sound change. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
1998 “The role of perception in the sound change of velar palatalization”. Phonology 551.18–52.Google Scholar
Hajek, John
1997Universals of Sound Change in Nasalization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1999 “Finality, prosody and change”. Proceedings of LP’98 ed. by Osamu Fujimura, Brian Joseph & Bohumil Palek, 15–30. Prague: The Karolinum Press.Google Scholar
Holsinger, David
2000Lenition in Germanic: Prosodic templates in sound change. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin – Madison.Google Scholar
Holsinger, David J.
Forthcoming. “Germanic prosody and consonantal strength”. Lenition and Fortition ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral Berlin Mouton de Gruyter DOI logo
Howell, Robert B.
1991Old English Breaking and its Germanic Analogues. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Grover
2008 “Review of Blevins”. Linguist List 19.2765 (Sept. 11).Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M.
1975Phonology: Theory and analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
1977 “Phonologization”. Linguistic Studies offered to Joseph Greenberg, ed. by A. Juilland, 407–18. Saratoga, Calif.: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. & Lee Ahrong
2004 “Perceived syllable structure in the adaptation of loanwords in Korean”. Proceedings of the 2004 Linguistic Society of Korea International Conference (Vol. I1: Forum Lectures and Workshops), 117–136. Seoul: Hansin.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. & Salmons Joseph
2006 “Fundamental regularities in the Second Consonant Shift”. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 181.45–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa, Joseph Salmons, & Robert Fox
2006 “Prosodic prominence effects on vowels in chain shifts”. Language Variation & Change 18:3.285–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
2002Foundations of Language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johns, T. F.
1991 “Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning”. Classroom Concordancing ed. by T. F. Johns & P. King, 1–13. Birmingham: ELR.Google Scholar
Kawasaki, Haruko
1982An Acoustical Basis for Universal Constraints on Sounds Sequences. PhD Dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Keller, R. E.
1961German Dialects: Phonology and morphology with selected texts. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1982Explanation in Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kürsten, Otto & Bremer Otto
1910Lautlehre der Mundart von Buttelstedt bei Weimar. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1984Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele
2007 “Facts, theory and dogmas in historical linguistics: Vowel quantity from Latin to Romance”. Historical Linguistics 2005 ed. by Joseph C. Salmons & Shannon Dubenion-Smith, 311–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
2001The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Robert & Vennemann Theo
1983 “Sound change and syllable structure in Germanic phonology”. Language 591.514–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J.
1971 “The role of physiological and acoustic models in explaining the direction of sound change”. Project on Linguistic Analysis Reports (Berkeley) 151.25–40.Google Scholar
1981 “The listener as a source of sound change”. Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior ed. by Carrie S. Masek, Robert A. Hendrick & Mary Frances Miller, 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1993 “The phonetics of sound change”. Historical Linguistics: Problems and perspectives ed. by Charles Jones, 237–78. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ritt, Nikolaus
2004Selfish Sounds and Linguistic Evolution: A Darwinian approach to language change. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
1945A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Samuels, Bridget
2007“On evolutionary phonology” (Review of Blevins 2004). Biolinguistics 11.118–122.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Blondeau Hélène
2008 “Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French”. Language 83:3.560–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schirmunski, Viktor M.
1962Deutsche Mundartforschung: Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre der deutschen Mundarten. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Seidl, Amanda & Buckley Eugene
2005 “On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules”. Language Learning and Development 11.289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Laura Catharine
2004Cross-level Interactions in West Germanic Phonology and Morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin – Madison.Google Scholar
2007a “Old Frisian vowel balance and its relationship to West Germanic apocope and syncope”. Advances in Old Frisian Philology, special issue of Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 641.379–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b “The resilience of prosodic templates in the history of West Germanic”. Historical Linguistics 2005: Selected papers from the 17th International Conference on Historical Linguistics , Madison , 31 July–5 August 2005 ed. by Joseph C. Salmons & Shannon Dubenion-Smith, 351–365. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Smith, Laura Catharine, Joseph C. Salmons & David J. Holsinger
In preparation. “The mediation of perceptual cues: Evidence from cluster reduction”. Manuscript.
Steriade, Donca
1999 “Alternatives to syllable-based accounts of consonantal phonotactics”. Item Order in Language and Speech. Vol. 11. ed. by Osamu Fujimura, Brian Joseph & Bohumil Palek, 205–245. Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai
1939 “Grundzüge der Phonologie”. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, no. 71.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo
1972 “Rule inversion”. Lingua 291.209–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Richard
2000The Phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Jacques, Guillaume
2011. A panchronic study of aspirated fricatives, with new evidence from Pumi. Lingua 121:9  pp. 1518 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.