Cover not available
Review article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 25:3 (2008) ► pp.411–430
Review article

Historical Phonology and Evolutionary Phonology

| Brigham Young University
| University of Wisconsin – Madison
Published online: 15 December 2008
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.25.3.06smi
References (51)
References
Anderson, Stephen R. 1981. “Why phonology isn’t ‘natural’”. Linguistic Inquiry 121.493–539.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon & Harms Robert. 1972. “How do languages get crazy rules?” Linguistic Change and Generative Theory ed. by R. Stockwell & R. Macaulay, 1–21. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2006a. “A theoretical synopsis of evolutionary phonology”. Theoretical Linguistics 321.117–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006b. “Reply to commentaries”. Theoretical Linguistics 321.245–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. To appear. “Natural and unnatural sound patterns: A pocket field guide”. Naturalness and Iconicity in Language ed. by Klaas Willems & Ludovic De Cuypere. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Braune, Wilhelm. 1987. Althochdeutsche Grammatik. 14th edition. ed. by Hans Eggers. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Brown, Jason. 2006. “Review of Blevins 2004”. Linguist List 17.743 (Mar. 10).Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle Morris. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2008. “Evolutionary linguistics”. Annual Review of Anthropology 371.219–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Boer, Bart. 2006. “Review of Blevins (2004)”. Journal of Linguistics 421.703–708. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eilers, R. E. 1977. “Context-sensitive perception of naturally produced stop and fricative consonants by infants”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 611.1321–1336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guion, Susan G. 1996. Velar Palatalization: Coarticulation, perception, and sound change. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
1998. “The role of perception in the sound change of velar palatalization”. Phonology 551.18–52.Google Scholar
Hajek, John. 1997. Universals of Sound Change in Nasalization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1999. “Finality, prosody and change”. Proceedings of LP’98 ed. by Osamu Fujimura, Brian Joseph & Bohumil Palek, 15–30. Prague: The Karolinum Press.Google Scholar
Holsinger, David. 2000. Lenition in Germanic: Prosodic templates in sound change. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin – Madison.Google Scholar
Holsinger, David J. Forthcoming. “Germanic prosody and consonantal strength”. Lenition and Fortition ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo
Howell, Robert B. 1991. Old English Breaking and its Germanic Analogues. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Grover. 2008. “Review of Blevins”. Linguist List 19.2765 (Sept. 11).Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1975. Phonology: Theory and analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
1977. “Phonologization”. Linguistic Studies offered to Joseph Greenberg, ed. by A. Juilland, 407–18. Saratoga, Calif.: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. & Lee Ahrong. 2004. “Perceived syllable structure in the adaptation of loanwords in Korean”. Proceedings of the 2004 Linguistic Society of Korea International Conference (Vol. I1: Forum Lectures and Workshops), 117–136. Seoul: Hansin.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. & Salmons Joseph. 2006. “Fundamental regularities in the Second Consonant Shift”. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 181.45–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa, Joseph Salmons, & Robert Fox. 2006. “Prosodic prominence effects on vowels in chain shifts”. Language Variation & Change 18:3.285–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johns, T. F. 1991. “Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning”. Classroom Concordancing ed. by T. F. Johns & P. King, 1–13. Birmingham: ELR.Google Scholar
Kawasaki, Haruko. 1982. An Acoustical Basis for Universal Constraints on Sounds Sequences. PhD Dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Keller, R. E. 1961. German Dialects: Phonology and morphology with selected texts. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Explanation in Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kürsten, Otto & Bremer Otto. 1910. Lautlehre der Mundart von Buttelstedt bei Weimar. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1984. Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 2007. “Facts, theory and dogmas in historical linguistics: Vowel quantity from Latin to Romance”. Historical Linguistics 2005 ed. by Joseph C. Salmons & Shannon Dubenion-Smith, 311–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Robert & Vennemann Theo. 1983. “Sound change and syllable structure in Germanic phonology”. Language 591.514–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1971. “The role of physiological and acoustic models in explaining the direction of sound change”. Project on Linguistic Analysis Reports (Berkeley) 151.25–40.Google Scholar
1981. “The listener as a source of sound change”. Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior ed. by Carrie S. Masek, Robert A. Hendrick & Mary Frances Miller, 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1993. “The phonetics of sound change”. Historical Linguistics: Problems and perspectives ed. by Charles Jones, 237–78. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ritt, Nikolaus. 2004. Selfish Sounds and Linguistic Evolution: A Darwinian approach to language change. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1945. A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Samuels, Bridget. 2007. “On evolutionary phonology” (Review of Blevins 2004). Biolinguistics 11.118–122.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Blondeau Hélène. 2008. “Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French”. Language 83:3.560–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schirmunski, Viktor M. 1962. Deutsche Mundartforschung: Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre der deutschen Mundarten. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Seidl, Amanda & Buckley Eugene. 2005. “On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules”. Language Learning and Development 11.289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Laura Catharine. 2004. Cross-level Interactions in West Germanic Phonology and Morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin – Madison.Google Scholar
. 2007a. “Old Frisian vowel balance and its relationship to West Germanic apocope and syncope”. Advances in Old Frisian Philology, special issue of Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 641.379–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007b. “The resilience of prosodic templates in the history of West Germanic”. Historical Linguistics 2005: Selected papers from the 17th International Conference on Historical Linguistics , Madison , 31 July–5 August 2005 ed. by Joseph C. Salmons & Shannon Dubenion-Smith, 351–365. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Smith, Laura Catharine, Joseph C. Salmons & David J. Holsinger. In preparation. “The mediation of perceptual cues: Evidence from cluster reduction”. Manuscript.
Steriade, Donca. 1999. “Alternatives to syllable-based accounts of consonantal phonotactics”. Item Order in Language and Speech. Vol. 11. ed. by Osamu Fujimura, Brian Joseph & Bohumil Palek, 205–245. Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai. 1939. “Grundzüge der Phonologie”. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, no. 71.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1972. “Rule inversion”. Lingua 291.209–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Richard. 2000. The Phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

武, 嘉毅
2024. Analyzing Vowel Nasalization in Phonological Shifts—Taking the Jin Dialects of Chinese and French as Examples. Modern Linguistics 12:04 ► pp. 668 ff. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2011. A panchronic study of aspirated fricatives, with new evidence from Pumi. Lingua 121:9 ► pp. 1518 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.