Phonetic comparison, varieties, and networks
Swadesh’s influence lives on here too
While his eponymous basic vocabulary lists and the study of language divergence may be Swadesh’s most appreciated legacies, we demonstrate that phonetic quantification of language varieties also follows very much in the tradition of Swadesh’s own work. We compare a few different measures of phonetic distance on a very small set of data from Germanic varieties, showing the influence of lexicostatistics and the relevance of Swadesh’s ‘Mesh Principle’. What we emphasise overall is that Swadesh’s influence is palpable, even in domains outside those for which he is best remembered.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Atkinson, Mark, Simon Kirby, Kenny Smith & Christine A Caldwell
2015.
Speaker Input Variability Does Not Explain Why Larger Populations Have Simpler Languages.
PLOS ONE 10:6
► pp. e0129463 ff.
Ladd, D. Robert, Seán G. Roberts & Dan Dediu
2015.
Correlational Studies in Typological and Historical Linguistics.
Annual Review of Linguistics 1:1
► pp. 221 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.