Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English
Exploring cross-constructional variation and change
Christoph Wolk | Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies
Joan Bresnan | Stanford University
Anette Rosenbach | Tanagra Wines
Benedikt Szmrecsanyi | University of Leuven
We present a cross-constructional approach to the history of the genitive alternation and the dative alternation in Late Modern English (AD 1650 to AD 1999), drawing on richly annotated datasets and modern statistical modeling techniques. We identify cross-constructional similarities in the development of the genitive and the dative alternation over time (mainly with regard to the loosening of the animacy constraint), a development which parallels distributional changes in animacy categories in the corpus material. Theoretically, we transfer the notion of ‘probabilistic grammar’ to historical data and claim that the corpus models presented reflect past speakers’ knowledge about the distribution of genitive and dative variants. The historical data also helps to determine what is constant (and timeless) in the effect of selected factors such as animacy or length, and what is variant.
Keywords: Late Modern English, corpus linguistics, cross-constructional analysis, animacy, dative alternation, genitive alternation, probabilistic grammar
Published online: 11 November 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.30.3.04wol
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.30.3.04wol
Cited by
Cited by 57 other publications
Berg, Thomas
2018. Frequency and serial order.
Linguistics 56:6 ► pp. 1303 ff. 
Bresnan, Joan
2016. Linguistics: The Garden and the Bush.
Computational Linguistics 42:4 ► pp. 599 ff.
D'Arcy, Alexandra & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2015. Not always variable: Probing the vernacular grammar.
Language Variation and Change 27:3 ► pp. 255 ff.
DE CUYPERE, LUDOVIC
2015. The Old Englishto-dative construction.
English Language and Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
De Troij, Robbert & Freek Van de Velde
2020. Beyond Mere Text Frequency: Assessing Subtle Grammaticalization by Different Quantitative Measures. A Case Study on the Dutch Soort Construction.
Languages 5:4 ► pp. 55 ff.
De Vaere, Hilde, Ludovic De Cuypere & Klaas Willems
2018. Alternating constructions with ditransitive geben in present-day German
.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0
Diessel, Holger
2019.
In The Grammar Network,
Diessel, Holger
2020. A Dynamic Network Approach to the Study of Syntax.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
Divjak, Dagmar
2019.
In Frequency in Language,
EHRET, KATHARINA, CHRISTOPH WOLK & BENEDIKT SZMRECSANYI
2014. Quirky quadratures: on rhythm and weight as constraints on genitive variation in an unconventional data set.
English Language and Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
Fang, Yu & Haitao Liu
2021. Predicting syntactic choice in Mandarin Chinese: a corpus-based analysis of ba sentences and SVO sentences.
Cognitive Linguistics 0:0
Flach, Susanne
2021. From movement into action to manner of causation: changes in argument mapping in the into-causative.
Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 247 ff.
Fonteyn, Lauren
2018. Assessing theory with practice: an evaluation of two aspectual-semantic classification models of gerundive nominalizations.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0
FONTEYN, LAUREN & NIKKI VAN DE POL
2016. Divide and conquer: the formation and functional dynamics of the Modern English ing-clause network.
English Language and Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 185 ff.
Ford, Marilyn & Joan Bresnan
2015. Generating data as a proxy for unavailable corpus data: the contextualized sentence completion task.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11:1
Gardner, Matt Hunt & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2020.
The bike, the back, and the boyfriend.
English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 41:2 ► pp. 225 ff.
GRAFMILLER, JASON
2014. Variation in English genitives across modality and genres.
English Language and Linguistics 18:3 ► pp. 471 ff.
Heller, Benedikt, Tobias Bernaisch & Stefan Th. Gries
2017. Empirical perspectives on two potential epicenters: The genitive alternation in Asian Englishes.
ICAME Journal 41:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
Heller, Benedikt, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Jason Grafmiller
2017. Stability and Fluidity in Syntactic Variation World-Wide.
Journal of English Linguistics 45:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Hilpert, Martin
2018.
In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],
► pp. 21 ff.
Hoff, Mark
2020. Cerca mío/a or cerca de mí ? A variationist analysis of Spanish locative + possessive on Twitter.
Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Horch, Stephanie
2019. Complementing corpus analysis with web-based experimentation in research on World Englishes.
English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 40:1 ► pp. 24 ff.
JANKOWSKI, BRIDGET L. & SALI A. TAGLIAMONTE
2014. On the genitive's trail: data and method from a sociolinguistic perspective.
English Language and Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 305 ff.
Jäschke, Katja & Ingo Plag
2016. THE DATIVE ALTERNATION IN GERMAN-ENGLISH INTERLANGUAGE.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38:3 ► pp. 485 ff.
Klavan, Jane & Dagmar Divjak
2016. The cognitive plausibility of statistical classification models: Comparing textual and behavioral evidence.
Folia Linguistica 50:2
Klotz, Michael
2019. Explaining Explain: Some Remarks on Verb Complementation, Argument Structure and the History of Two English Verbs.
English Studies 100:3 ► pp. 339 ff.
Krawczak, Karolina
2021.
In
Give Constructions across Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language, 29],
► pp. 75 ff.
Kubota, Maki, Caroline Heycock, Antonella Sorace & Jason Rothman
2020. Cross-Linguistic Influence on L2 Before and After Extreme Reduction in Input: The Case of Japanese Returnee Children.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
Lehmann, Hans Martin
2018. Lexical preference and variation in the complementation of provide
.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Levshina, Natalia
2015.
In How to do Linguistics with R,
Lindström, Liina & Kristel Uiboaed
2017. Syntactic variation in ‘need’-constructions in Estonian dialects.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 40:3 ► pp. 313 ff.
Lorente Sánchez, Juan
2018. ‘Give it him and then I’ll give you money for it’. The dative alternation in Contemporary British English.
Research in Corpus Linguistics ► pp. 15 ff.
Lorenz, David
2020.
In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],
► pp. 244 ff.
MacKenzie, Laurel
2020. Comparing Constraints on Contraction Using Bayesian Regression Modeling.
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3
Muylle, Merel, Thomas G.G. Wegner, Sarah Bernolet & Robert J. Hartsuiker
2020. English norming data for 423 short animated action movie clips.
Acta Psychologica 202 ► pp. 102957 ff.
Nykiel, Joanna
2015. Constraints on ellipsis alternation: A view from the history of English.
Language Variation and Change 27:2 ► pp. 227 ff.
PIJPOPS, DIRK, DIRK SPEELMAN, STEFAN GRONDELAERS & FREEK VAN DE VELDE
2018. Comparing explanations for the Complexity Principle: evidence from argument realization.
Language and Cognition 10:3 ► pp. 514 ff.
ROSENBACH, ANETTE
2014. English genitive variation – the state of the art.
English Language and Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
Ryskin, Rachel, Roger P. Levy & Evelina Fedorenko
2020. Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward.
Neuropsychologia 136 ► pp. 107258 ff.
Röthlisberger, Melanie, Jason Grafmiller & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2017. Cognitive indigenization effects in the English dative alternation.
Cognitive Linguistics 28:4
Shao, Bin, Yingying Cai & Graeme Trousdale
2019. A Multivariate Analysis of Diachronic Variation in A Bunch of noun: A Construction Grammar Account.
Journal of English Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 150 ff.
Smet, Hendrik De, Frauke D’hoedt, Lauren Fonteyn & Kristel Van Goethem
2018. The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation.
Cognitive Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2019. Register in variationist linguistics.
Register Studies 1:1 ► pp. 76 ff.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Douglas Biber, Jesse Egbert & Karlien Franco
2016. Toward more accountability: Modeling ternary genitive variation in Late Modern English.
Language Variation and Change 28:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Jason Grafmiller, Benedikt Heller & Melanie Röthlisberger
2016. Around the world in three alternations.
English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 37:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
TAMAREDO, IVÁN, MELANIE RÖTHLISBERGER, JASON GRAFMILLER & BENEDIKT HELLER
2020. Probabilistic indigenization effects at the lexis–syntax interface.
English Language and Linguistics 24:2 ► pp. 413 ff.
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Catherine E. Travis
2019. Variationist typology: Shared probabilistic constraints across (non-)null subject languages
.
Linguistics 57:3 ► pp. 653 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2020. The intertwining of differentiation and attraction as exemplified by the history of recipient transfer and benefactive alternations.
Cognitive Linguistics 31:4 ► pp. 549 ff.
Van de Velde, Freek
2019. Review: The Changing English Language.
Journal of English Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Van de Velde, Freek & Isabeau De Smet
2021. Markov Models for Multi-state Language Change.
Journal of Quantitative Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.
Velde, Freek Van de & Alek Keersmaekers
2020. What are the determinants of survival curves of words?.
Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 2:2 ► pp. 127 ff.
Yao, Yao
2018. NP weight effects in word order variation in Mandarin Chinese.
Lingua Sinica 4:1
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria
2016. “May Depend on Me Sending It You”.
Journal of English Linguistics 44:2 ► pp. 138 ff.
YÁÑEZ-BOUZA, NURIA & DAVID DENISON
2015. Which comes first in the double object construction?.
English Language and Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
2019.
In Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax,
ZEHENTNER, EVA
2018. Ditransitives in Middle English: on semantic specialisation and the rise of the dative alternation.
English Language and Linguistics 22:01 ► pp. 149 ff.
Zehentner, Eva & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2020.
In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],
► pp. 168 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.