Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 31:1 (2014) ► pp.1–22

The third gender of Old Italian

| Universität Zürich
| Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien
We demonstrate that Old Italian had a three-gender system within which the neuter still qualified as a fully fledged gender value. To substantiate this claim, we adduce evidence showing that (a) Old Italian had three distinct sets of controllers, each of which selected a separate agreement pattern; (b) to each one of those three controller sets, including the neuter, nouns were assigned belonging to different productive inflectional classes and (c) the neuter still selected at least one dedicated agreement formative, thereby still displaying traces of its original status as a target gender. This novel evidence from Old Italian squares well with what is known about past stages of other Romance varieties. Also, we briefly address the consequences of our results both for a reconstruction of the Latin-Romance transition and, more broadly, for the theoretical and methodological approach to the study of the diachronic development of gender systems.
Keywords: agreement, inflectional class, target vs. controller gender, neuter, productivity, Romance diachronic morphology
Published online: 21 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.1.01gar
References (73)
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alig, Balthasar. 1674. Epistolas ad Evangelis sin tuttas domeingias, a firaus; a gijs della quareisma, cun la Passiun de N. S. I. Christi. Cuera si Cuort: Barbisch.Google Scholar
Alkire, Ti & Carol Rosen. 2010. Romance languages: A historical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ascoli, Graziadio Isaia. 1880–1883. Annotazioni sistematiche al Barlaam e Giosafat soprasilvano. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 71. 406–602.Google Scholar
Baldelli, Ignazio. 1973. La carta pisana di Filadelfia. Conto navale pisano dei primi decenni del sec. XII. Studi di Filologia Italiana 311. 5–33.Google Scholar
Bateman, Nicoleta & Maria Polinsky. 2010. Romanian as a two-gender language. In Donna Gerdts, John Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Festschrift for David Perlmutter, 41–77. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bibla. 1718. La S. Bibla quei ei: Tut la Soinchia Scartira, ner Tuts ils Cudischs d’ilg Veder a Nief Testament, Cun ils Cudischs Apocryphs. Messa giu Ent ilg Languaig Rumonsch de la Ligia Grischa tras Anchins Survients d’ilg Plaid da Deus d’ils Venerands Colloquis Sur-a Sut ilg Guault. Coira: Andrea Pfeffer.Google Scholar
Bifrun, Iachiam (ed.). 1560. L’g Nuof Testamaint da nos Signer Jesu Christi. Basel/Poschiavo: Jacobus Kündig, Stefano Catani, Dolfino Landolfi. (Reprinted 2001, Bern: Schweizerische Landesbibliothek).Google Scholar
Bonfante, Giuliano. 1961. Esiste il neutro in italiano? Quaderni dell’Istituto di Glottologia di Bologna 61. 103–109. (Reprinted in Studii romeni, by Bonfante Giuliano, 1973, 161–170. Rome: Società accademica romena.).Google Scholar
. 1964. Il neutro italiano, romeno e albanese. Acta Philologica della Societas Academica Dacoromana 31. 27–37. (Reprinted in Studii romeni, by Bonfante Giuliano, 1973, 173–187. Rome: Società accademica romena.).Google Scholar
. 1977. Ancora il neutro italiano e romeno. L’Italia Dialettale 401. 287–292.Google Scholar
Candinas, Theo. 1982. Romontsch sursilvan. Grammatica elementara per emprender igl idiom sursilvan. Cuera: Ligia Romontscha.Google Scholar
Castellani, Arrigo. 1958. Frammenti d’un libro di banchieri fiorentini del 1211. Studi di Filologia Italiana 161. 19–95. (Reprinted in Saggi di linguistica e filologia italiana e romanza (1946–1976), vol. II by Arrigo Castellani, 1980, 73–140. Rome: Salerno Editrice.)Google Scholar
. 1976. I più antichi testi italiani. Edizione e commento, 2nd edn. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
CDL= Luigi Schiaparelli (ed.). 1929–1933. Codice Diplomatico Longobardo, 2 vols1. Rome: Istituto Storico Italiano.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. Determining morphosyntactic feature values: The case of case. In Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds.), Case and grammatical relations: Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The penumbra of morphosyntactic feature systems. In Jonathan Bobaljik, Uli Sauerland & Andrew Nevins (eds.), Markedness and underspecification in the morphology and semantics of agreement. Morphology 21(2). 445–480.Google Scholar
D’Achille, Paolo & Anna M. Thornton. 2003. La flessione del nome dall’italiano antico all’italiano contemporaneo. In Nicoletta Maraschio & Teresa Poggi Salani (eds.), Italia linguistica anno Mille, Italia linguistica anno Duemila. Atti del XXXIV congresso internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana , Firenze, 19–21 ottobre 2000, 211–230. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
De Bartholomaeis, Vincenzo (ed.). 1907. Buccio di Ranallo, Cronaca aquilana rimata di Buccio di Ranallo di Popplito di Aquila. Rome: Istituto Storico Italiano.Google Scholar
De Blasi, Nicola (ed.). 1986. “Libro de la destructione de Troya”. Volgarizzamento napoletano trecentesco da Guido delle Colonne. Rome: Bonacci.Google Scholar
Decurtins, Caspar. 1880–1883. Quattro testi soprasilvani/Vier sürselvische Texte. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 71. 149–364.Google Scholar
Della Valle, Valeria. 1982. Le lettere volgari di Filippo Belforti vescovo di Volterra (1348–1353). Studi Linguistici Italiani 81. 155–263.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2003. Degrees of grammatical productivity in inflectional morphology. Italian Journal of Linguistics 15(1). 31–62.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi. 1994. Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German and other languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Anna M. Thornton. 1996. Italian nominal inflection. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 55–571. 1–26.Google Scholar
Faraoni, Vincenzo. Forthcoming. Manifestazioni del neutro italo-romanzo nella documentazione notarile altomedievale. In Éva Buchi, Jean-Paul Chauveau & Jean-Marie Pierrel (eds.), Actes du XXVIIe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes (Nancy, 15–20 juillet 2013), 3 vols1. Strasbourg: Société de linguistique romane/ÉliPhi.
Faraoni, Vincenzo, Francesco Gardani & Michele Loporcaro. 2013. Manifestazioni del neutro nell’italo-romanzo medievale. In Emili Casanova Herrero & Cesáreo Calvo Rigual (eds.), Actas del XXVI Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y Filología Románicas (Valencia, 6–11 septiembre 2010), vol. 21, 171–182. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. 1990. Two cases of underspecification in morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 211. 539–550.Google Scholar
Formentin, Vittorio (ed.). 1998. Loise de Rosa, Ricordi. Rome: Salerno Editrice.Google Scholar
Ganzoni, Gian Paul. 1977. Grammatica ladina. Grammatica sistematica dal rumantsch d’Engiadin’ Ota per scolars e creschieus da lingua rumauntscha e tudascha. Samedan, Switzerland: Lia Rumantscha.Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco. 2013. Dynamics of morphological productivity: The evolution of noun classes from Latin to Italian. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giurgea, Ion. 2010. Romanian genderless pronouns and parasitic gaps. In Sonia Colina, Antxon Olarrea & Ana Maria Carvalho (eds.), Romance linguistics 2009: Selected papers from the 39th LSRL , 231–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Graur, Alexander. 1928. Les substantifs neutres en roumain. Romania 541. 249–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Robert. 1965. The “neuter” in Romance: A pseudo-problem. Word 211. 421–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Igartua, Iván. 2006. Genus alternans in Indo-European. Indogermanische Forschungen 1111. 56–70.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. On the Rumanian neuter. In Selected writings, vol. II, World and language, 187–189. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1964. The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Larson, Pär. 1988. Gli elementi volgari nelle carte del “Codice Diplomatico Longobardo”. Florence: University of Florence MA thesis.Google Scholar
. 2000. Tra linguistica e fonti diplomatiche: quello che le carte dicono e non dicono. In Jószef Herman & Anna Marinetti (eds.), La preistoria dell’italiano. Atti della Tavola Rotonda di Linguistica Storica (Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia, 11–13 giugno 1998), 151–166. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich. 1976. Linguistica romanza, 2 vols1., 2nd edn. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2009. Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levasti, Arrigo (ed.). 1924–1926. Beato Iacopo da Varagine, Leggenda Aurea. Volgarizzamento toscano del Trecento. Florence: Libreria Editrice Fiorentina.Google Scholar
Lisini, Alessandro (ed.). 1903. Il Costituto del comune di Siena volgarizzato nel MCCCIX-MCCCX. Siena: Tip. e Lit. Sordomuti di L. Lazzeri.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele & Tania Paciaroni. 2011. Four gender-systems in Indo-European. Folia Linguistica 45(2). 389–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 1995. A linguistic history of Italian. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1996. On the Romance inflectional endings -i and -e: A methodological issue. Romance Philology 50(2). 147–182.Google Scholar
Matasović, Ranko. 2004. Gender in Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Martinus, Johannes & Andreas V. Rauch. 1693. Abyss dal’aeternitat in 3 cudeschs considerata. Turi [Zurich]: Simler.Google Scholar
Menichetti, Aldo (ed.). 1965. Chiaro Davanzati, Rime. Bologna: Commissioneper i testi di lingua.Google Scholar
Merlo, Clemente. 1952. Ital. le labbra, le braccia e sim. Italica (Bulletin of the American Society of Teachers of Italian) 29(4). 229–234.Google Scholar
Negroni, Carlo (ed.). 1886. La Bibbia volgare secondo la rara edizione del I di ottobre MCCCCLXXI, vol. 9: I Quattro Evangeli e gli Atti degli Apostoli, i Maccabei. Bologna: Romagnoli.Google Scholar
Pelaez, Mario. 1928. Un nuovo testo dei Bagni di Pozzuoli in volgare napoletano. Studj Romanzi 191. 47–134.Google Scholar
Penello, Nicoletta, Paola Benincà, Laura Vanelli & Roberta Maschi. 2010. Morfologia flessiva. In Giampaolo Salvi & Lorenzo Renzi (eds.), Grammatica dell’italiano antico, 1389–1491. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Pernicone, Vincenzo (ed.). 1946. Franco Sacchetti, Il Trecentonovelle. Florence: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Polidori, Filippo-Luigi (ed.). 1845. Rosaio della vita, trattato morale attribuito a Matteo de’ Corsini e composto nel MCCCLXXIII. Florence: Società Poligrafica Italiana.Google Scholar
Politzer, Frida & Robert L. Politzer. 1953. Romance trends in 7th and 8th century Latin documents. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Rovai, Francesco. 2012. Between feminine singular and neuter plural: Reanalysis patterns. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(1). 94–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sabatini, Francesco. 1965a. Esigenze di realismo e dislocazione morfologica in testi preromanzi. Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medioevale 71 ( Studi in onore di A. Schiaffini ), 972–988. (Reprinted in Italia linguistica delle origini. Saggi editi dal 1956 al 1996 ed. by Vittorio Coletti, Rosario Coluccia, Paolo D’Achille & Nicola De Blasi, 1996, 99–131. Lecce, Italy: Argo.)Google Scholar
. 1965b. Sull’origine dei plurali italiani: il tipo in -i . Studi Linguistici Italiani 51. 5–39. (Reprinted in Italia linguistica delle origini. Saggi editi dal 1956 al 1996 ed. by Vittorio Coletti, Rosario Coluccia, Paolo D’Achille & Nicola De Blasi, 1996, 133–172. Lecce, Italy: Argo.)Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo & Lorenzo Renzi (eds.). 2010. Grammatica dell’italiano antico. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Schön, Ilse. 1971. Neutrum und Kollektivum. Das Morphem -a im Lateinischen und Romanischen. Innsbruck: Institut für Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Spescha, Arnold. 1989. Grammatica sursilvana. Cuera, Switzerland: Casa editura per mieds d’instrucziun.Google Scholar
Süthold, Michael. 1994. Manoscritto Lucano: Ein unveröffentlichtes Kochbuch aus Süditalien vom Beginn des 16. Jahrhunderts. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Tekavčić, Pavao. 1975. Agli albori dell’italiano. Linguistica 151. 209–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1980. Grammatica storica dell’italiano, 2 vols1. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Togeby, Knud. 1952. Le problème du neutre roumain. Cahiers Sextil Puşcariu 1(2). 265–268.Google Scholar
Väänänen, Veikko. 1967. Introduction au latin vulgaire, 2nd edn. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Velleman, Antonius. 1915. Grammatica teoretica, pratica ed istorica della lingua ladina d’Engiadin’ Ota, vol. 1: Il Substantiv, l’Artichel, l’Aggetiv, il Pronom. Zurich: Füssli.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Hugh. 1985–1991. The Latin neuter plurals in Romance (I–VII). Ronshu 261. 137–150, 271.157–171, 281.33–46, 291.47–61, 301.109–122, 311.113–127, 321.35–50, collected in [URL] (12 August 2012).Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Wild, Mario & Stefano Cristelli
2023. La flessione del nome nel dialetto di Blera (VT). Classi flessive, produttività e genere grammaticale. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 30 ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Ayoun, Dalila & Stefano Maranzana
2022. Chapter 5. The second language acquisition of grammatical gender and number in Italian. In The Acquisition of Gender [Studies in Bilingualism, 63], ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Corbett, Greville G.
2022. Splits, internal and external, as a window into the nature of features. Morphology 32:1 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Cruschina, Silvio
2021. Language contact and morphological competition: Plurals in central Sicily. Word Structure 14:2 ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Miola, Emanuele
2017. The position of Piedmontese on the Romance grammaticalization cline. Folia Linguistica 51:1 DOI logo
Dworkin, Steven N.
2016. Do Romanists need to reconstruct Proto-Romance?. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 132:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.