Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 31:1 (2014) ► pp. 1–22

The third gender of Old Italian

| Universität Zürich
| Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien
We demonstrate that Old Italian had a three-gender system within which the neuter still qualified as a fully fledged gender value. To substantiate this claim, we adduce evidence showing that (a) Old Italian had three distinct sets of controllers, each of which selected a separate agreement pattern; (b) to each one of those three controller sets, including the neuter, nouns were assigned belonging to different productive inflectional classes and (c) the neuter still selected at least one dedicated agreement formative, thereby still displaying traces of its original status as a target gender. This novel evidence from Old Italian squares well with what is known about past stages of other Romance varieties. Also, we briefly address the consequences of our results both for a reconstruction of the Latin-Romance transition and, more broadly, for the theoretical and methodological approach to the study of the diachronic development of gender systems.
Keywords: agreement, inflectional class, target vs. controller gender, neuter, productivity, Romance diachronic morphology
Published online: 21 July 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.1.01gar
References
Acquaviva, Paolo
2008 Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2000 Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alig, Balthasar
1674 Epistolas ad Evangelis sin tuttas domeingias, a firaus; a gijs della quareisma, cun la Passiun de N. S. I. Christi. Cuera si Cuort: Barbisch.Google Scholar
Alkire, Ti & Carol Rosen
2010 Romance languages: A historical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ascoli, Graziadio Isaia
1880–1883 Annotazioni sistematiche al Barlaam e Giosafat soprasilvano. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 71. 406–602.Google Scholar
Baldelli, Ignazio
1973 La carta pisana di Filadelfia. Conto navale pisano dei primi decenni del sec. XII. Studi di Filologia Italiana 311. 5–33.Google Scholar
Bateman, Nicoleta & Maria Polinsky
2010 Romanian as a two-gender language. In Donna Gerdts, John Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Festschrift for David Perlmutter, 41–77. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bibla
1718 La S. Bibla quei ei: Tut la Soinchia Scartira, ner Tuts ils Cudischs d’ilg Veder a Nief Testament, Cun ils Cudischs Apocryphs. Messa giu Ent ilg Languaig Rumonsch de la Ligia Grischa tras Anchins Survients d’ilg Plaid da Deus d’ils Venerands Colloquis Sur-a Sut ilg Guault. Coira: Andrea Pfeffer.Google Scholar
Bifrun, Iachiam
(ed.) 1560 L’g Nuof Testamaint da nos Signer Jesu Christi. Basel/Poschiavo: Jacobus Kündig, Stefano Catani, Dolfino Landolfi. (Reprinted 2001, Bern: Schweizerische Landesbibliothek).Google Scholar
Bonfante, Giuliano
1961 Esiste il neutro in italiano? Quaderni dell’Istituto di Glottologia di Bologna 61. 103–109. (Reprinted in Studii romeni, by Bonfante Giuliano, 1973, 161–170. Rome: Società accademica romena.).Google Scholar
1964 Il neutro italiano, romeno e albanese. Acta Philologica della Societas Academica Dacoromana 31. 27–37. (Reprinted in Studii romeni, by Bonfante Giuliano, 1973, 173–187. Rome: Società accademica romena.).Google Scholar
1977 Ancora il neutro italiano e romeno. L’Italia Dialettale 401. 287–292.Google Scholar
Candinas, Theo
1982 Romontsch sursilvan. Grammatica elementara per emprender igl idiom sursilvan. Cuera: Ligia Romontscha.Google Scholar
Castellani, Arrigo
1958 Frammenti d’un libro di banchieri fiorentini del 1211. Studi di Filologia Italiana 161. 19–95. (Reprinted in Saggi di linguistica e filologia italiana e romanza (1946–1976), vol. II by Arrigo Castellani, 1980, 73–140. Rome: Salerno Editrice.)Google Scholar
1976 I più antichi testi italiani. Edizione e commento, 2nd edn. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
CDL= Luigi Schiaparelli
(ed.) 1929–1933 Codice Diplomatico Longobardo, 2 vols1. Rome: Istituto Storico Italiano.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G
1991 Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2008 Determining morphosyntactic feature values: The case of case. In Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds.), Case and grammatical relations: Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 The penumbra of morphosyntactic feature systems. In Jonathan Bobaljik, Uli Sauerland & Andrew Nevins (eds.), Markedness and underspecification in the morphology and semantics of agreement. Morphology 21(2). 445–480.Google Scholar
D’Achille, Paolo & Anna M. Thornton
2003 La flessione del nome dall’italiano antico all’italiano contemporaneo. In Nicoletta Maraschio & Teresa Poggi Salani (eds.), Italia linguistica anno Mille, Italia linguistica anno Duemila. Atti del XXXIV congresso internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana , Firenze, 19–21 ottobre 2000, 211–230. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
De Bartholomaeis, Vincenzo
(ed.) 1907 Buccio di Ranallo, Cronaca aquilana rimata di Buccio di Ranallo di Popplito di Aquila. Rome: Istituto Storico Italiano.Google Scholar
De Blasi, Nicola
(ed.) 1986 “Libro de la destructione de Troya”. Volgarizzamento napoletano trecentesco da Guido delle Colonne. Rome: Bonacci.Google Scholar
Decurtins, Caspar
1880–1883 Quattro testi soprasilvani/Vier sürselvische Texte. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 71. 149–364.Google Scholar
Della Valle, Valeria
1982 Le lettere volgari di Filippo Belforti vescovo di Volterra (1348–1353). Studi Linguistici Italiani 81. 155–263.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U
2003 Degrees of grammatical productivity in inflectional morphology. Italian Journal of Linguistics 15(1). 31–62.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi
1994 Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German and other languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Anna M. Thornton
1996 Italian nominal inflection. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 55–571. 1–26.Google Scholar
Faraoni, Vincenzo
Forthcoming. Manifestazioni del neutro italo-romanzo nella documentazione notarile altomedievale. In Éva Buchi, Jean-Paul Chauveau & Jean-Marie Pierrel (eds.) Actes du XXVIIe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes (Nancy, 15–20 juillet 2013) 3 vols1 Strasbourg Société de linguistique romane/ÉliPhi
Faraoni, Vincenzo, Francesco Gardani & Michele Loporcaro
2013 Manifestazioni del neutro nell’italo-romanzo medievale. In Emili Casanova Herrero & Cesáreo Calvo Rigual (eds.), Actas del XXVI Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y Filología Románicas (Valencia, 6–11 septiembre 2010), vol. 21, 171–182. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka F
1990 Two cases of underspecification in morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 211. 539–550.Google Scholar
Formentin, Vittorio
(ed.) 1998 Loise de Rosa, Ricordi. Rome: Salerno Editrice.Google Scholar
Ganzoni, Gian Paul
1977 Grammatica ladina. Grammatica sistematica dal rumantsch d’Engiadin’ Ota per scolars e creschieus da lingua rumauntscha e tudascha. Samedan, Switzerland: Lia Rumantscha.Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco
2013 Dynamics of morphological productivity: The evolution of noun classes from Latin to Italian. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giurgea, Ion
2010 Romanian genderless pronouns and parasitic gaps. In Sonia Colina, Antxon Olarrea & Ana Maria Carvalho (eds.), Romance linguistics 2009: Selected papers from the 39th LSRL , 231–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Graur, Alexander
1928 Les substantifs neutres en roumain. Romania 541. 249–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Robert
1965 The “neuter” in Romance: A pseudo-problem. Word 211. 421–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F
1958 A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Igartua, Iván
2006  Genus alternans in Indo-European. Indogermanische Forschungen 1111. 56–70.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971 On the Rumanian neuter. In Selected writings, vol. II, World and language, 187–189. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1964 The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Larson, Pär
1988 Gli elementi volgari nelle carte del “Codice Diplomatico Longobardo”. Florence: University of Florence MA thesis.Google Scholar
2000 Tra linguistica e fonti diplomatiche: quello che le carte dicono e non dicono. In Jószef Herman & Anna Marinetti (eds.), La preistoria dell’italiano. Atti della Tavola Rotonda di Linguistica Storica (Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia, 11–13 giugno 1998), 151–166. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich
1976 Linguistica romanza, 2 vols1., 2nd edn. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2009 Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levasti, Arrigo
(ed.) 1924–1926 Beato Iacopo da Varagine, Leggenda Aurea. Volgarizzamento toscano del Trecento. Florence: Libreria Editrice Fiorentina.Google Scholar
Lisini, Alessandro
(ed.) 1903 Il Costituto del comune di Siena volgarizzato nel MCCCIX-MCCCX. Siena: Tip. e Lit. Sordomuti di L. Lazzeri.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele & Tania Paciaroni
2011 Four gender-systems in Indo-European. Folia Linguistica 45(2). 389–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin
1995 A linguistic history of Italian. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1996 On the Romance inflectional endings -i and -e: A methodological issue. Romance Philology 50(2). 147–182.Google Scholar
Matasović, Ranko
2004 Gender in Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Martinus, Johannes & Andreas V. Rauch
1693 Abyss dal’aeternitat in 3 cudeschs considerata. Turi [Zurich]: Simler.Google Scholar
Menichetti, Aldo
(ed.) 1965 Chiaro Davanzati, Rime. Bologna: Commissioneper i testi di lingua.Google Scholar
Merlo, Clemente
1952 Ital. le labbra, le braccia e sim. Italica (Bulletin of the American Society of Teachers of Italian) 29(4). 229–234.Google Scholar
Negroni, Carlo
(ed.) 1886 La Bibbia volgare secondo la rara edizione del I di ottobre MCCCCLXXI, vol. 9: I Quattro Evangeli e gli Atti degli Apostoli, i Maccabei. Bologna: Romagnoli.Google Scholar
Pelaez, Mario
1928 Un nuovo testo dei Bagni di Pozzuoli in volgare napoletano. Studj Romanzi 191. 47–134.Google Scholar
Penello, Nicoletta, Paola Benincà, Laura Vanelli & Roberta Maschi
2010 Morfologia flessiva. In Giampaolo Salvi & Lorenzo Renzi (eds.), Grammatica dell’italiano antico, 1389–1491. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Pernicone, Vincenzo
(ed.) 1946 Franco Sacchetti, Il Trecentonovelle. Florence: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Polidori, Filippo-Luigi
(ed.) 1845 Rosaio della vita, trattato morale attribuito a Matteo de’ Corsini e composto nel MCCCLXXIII. Florence: Società Poligrafica Italiana.Google Scholar
Politzer, Frida & Robert L. Politzer
1953 Romance trends in 7th and 8th century Latin documents. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Rovai, Francesco
2012 Between feminine singular and neuter plural: Reanalysis patterns. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(1). 94–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sabatini, Francesco
1965a Esigenze di realismo e dislocazione morfologica in testi preromanzi. Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medioevale 71 ( Studi in onore di A. Schiaffini ), 972–988. (Reprinted in Italia linguistica delle origini. Saggi editi dal 1956 al 1996 ed. by Vittorio Coletti, Rosario Coluccia, Paolo D’Achille & Nicola De Blasi, 1996, 99–131. Lecce, Italy: Argo.)Google Scholar
1965b Sull’origine dei plurali italiani: il tipo in -i . Studi Linguistici Italiani 51. 5–39. (Reprinted in Italia linguistica delle origini. Saggi editi dal 1956 al 1996 ed. by Vittorio Coletti, Rosario Coluccia, Paolo D’Achille & Nicola De Blasi, 1996, 133–172. Lecce, Italy: Argo.)Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo & Lorenzo Renzi
(eds.) 2010 Grammatica dell’italiano antico. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Schön, Ilse
1971 Neutrum und Kollektivum. Das Morphem -a im Lateinischen und Romanischen. Innsbruck: Institut für Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Spescha, Arnold
1989 Grammatica sursilvana. Cuera, Switzerland: Casa editura per mieds d’instrucziun.Google Scholar
Süthold, Michael
1994 Manoscritto Lucano: Ein unveröffentlichtes Kochbuch aus Süditalien vom Beginn des 16. Jahrhunderts. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Tekavčić, Pavao
1975 Agli albori dell’italiano. Linguistica 151. 209–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1980 Grammatica storica dell’italiano, 2 vols1. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Togeby, Knud
1952 Le problème du neutre roumain. Cahiers Sextil Puşcariu 1(2). 265–268.Google Scholar
Väänänen, Veikko
1967 Introduction au latin vulgaire, 2nd edn. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Velleman, Antonius
1915 Grammatica teoretica, pratica ed istorica della lingua ladina d’Engiadin’ Ota, vol. 1: Il Substantiv, l’Artichel, l’Aggetiv, il Pronom. Zurich: Füssli.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Hugh
1985–1991 The Latin neuter plurals in Romance (I–VII). Ronshu 261. 137–150, 271.157–171, 281.33–46, 291.47–61, 301.109–122, 311.113–127, 321.35–50, collected in http://​www6​.ocn​.ne​.jp​/~wil​/lnp​.pdf (12 August 2012).Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Ayoun, Dalila & Stefano Maranzana
2022.  In The Acquisition of Gender [Studies in Bilingualism, 63], ► pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
Corbett, Greville G.
2022. Splits, internal and external, as a window into the nature of features. Morphology 32:1 ► pp. 45 ff. Crossref logo
Cruschina, Silvio
2021. Language contact and morphological competition: Plurals in central Sicily. Word Structure 14:2 ► pp. 174 ff. Crossref logo
Dworkin, Steven N.
2016. Do Romanists need to reconstruct Proto-Romance?. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 132:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Miola, Emanuele
2017. The position of Piedmontese on the Romance grammaticalization cline. Folia Linguistica 51:1 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.