Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 31:1 (2014) ► pp. 74105
References

References

Arppe, Antti, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Dylan Glynn, Martin Hilpert & Arne Zeschel
2010Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora 5(1). 1-27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Harald
2008Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Backus, Ad
1996Two in one: Bilingual speech of Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands. Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
2001The role of semantic specificity in insertional codeswitching: Evidence from Dutch Turkish. In Rodolfo Jacobson (ed.), Codeswitching worldwide II, 125-154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Adam
2009Studies in Canadian English: Lexical variation in Toronto. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Boon, Ton den & Dirk Geeraerts
(eds.) 2005Van Dale groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal, 14th edn. Utrecht: Van Dale Lexicografie.Google Scholar
Borland, Colin
1982How basic is “basic” vocabulary? Current Anthropology 23(3). 315-316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowern, Claire, Patience Epps, Russell Gray, Jane Hill, Keith Hunley, Patrick McConvell & Jason Zentz
2011Does lateral transmission obscure inheritance in hunter-gatherer languages? PLoS ONE 6(9). e25195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Dan Slobin
1982Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English present tense. Language 58. 265-289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell-Harris, Catherine L. & Alison L. Morris
2008Fast pairs: A visual word recognition paradigm for measuring entrenchment, top-down effects and subjective phenomenology. Consciousness and Cognition 17. 1063-1081. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald
1987Is there a core vocabulary? Some implications for language teaching. Applied Linguistics 8. 187-193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chesley, Paula & Harald R. Baayen
2010Predicting new words from newer words: Lexical borrowing in French. Linguistics 48(4). 1343-1374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W.
1971A method of semantic description. In Dany D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics, 436-471. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doğruöz, Seza & Ad Backus
2009Innovative constructions in Dutch Turkish: An assessment of ongoing contact-induced change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(1). 41-63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dyen, Isidore
1965Lexicostatistics in comparative linguistics. Lingua 13. 230-239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, Philip & Graeme Hirst
2002Near-synonymy and lexical choice. Computational Linguistics 28(2). 105-144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embleton, Sheila M.
1986Statistics in historical linguistics. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, Benjamin Bergen & Jörg Zinken
2007The cognitive linguistics reader. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Everitt, Brian S. & Torsten Hothorn
2010A handbook of statistical analyses using R. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
Faraway, Julian J.
2005Linear models with R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
Fischer, John L.
1961The retention rate of Chamorro basic vocabulary. Lingua 10. 255-266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuster Marquez, Miguel & Barry Pennock Speck
2008The spoken core of British English: A diachronic analysis based on the BNC. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies 37. 53-74.Google Scholar
Galwey, Nicholas W.
2006Introduction to mixed modeling: Beyond regression and analysis of variance. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
1997Diachronic prototype semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
2010Lexical variation in space. In Peter Auer & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds.), Language in space: An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol. 1, Theories and methods, 821-837. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Peter Bakema
1994The structure of lexical variation: Meaning, naming and context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Dirk Speelman
1999Convergentie en divergentie in de Nederlandse woordenschat. Een onderzoek naar kleding- en voetbaltermen. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk & Dirk Speelman
2010Heterodox concept features and onomasiological heterogeneity in dialects. In Dirk Geeraerts, Gitte Kristiansen & Yves Peirsman (eds.), Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics, 23-40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J., Robert Blust & Russell D. Gray
2008The Austronesian basic vocabulary database: From bioinformatics to lexomics. Evolutionary Bioinformatics 4. 271-283.Google Scholar
Haarmann, Harald
1990“Basic” vocabulary and language contacts: The disillusion of glottochronology. Indogermanische Forschungen 95.7-37.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2008Loanword typology: Steps toward a systematic cross-linguistic study of lexical borrowability. In Thomas Stolz, Dik Bakker & Rosa Salas Palomo (eds.), Aspects of language contact: New theoretical, methodological and empirical findings with special focus on Romancisation processes, 43-62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2009Lexical borrowing: Concepts and issues. In Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook, 35-54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Uri Tadmor
2009The loanword typology project and the world loanword database. In Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook, 1-34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heggarty, Paul
2010Beyond lexicostatistics: How to get more out of “word list” comparisons. Diachronica 27(2). 301-324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich & Brian D. Joseph
1996Language history, language change and language relationship: An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holman, Eric W., Søren Wichmann, Cecil H. Brown, Viveka Velupillai, André Müller & Dik Bakker
2008Explorations in automated language classification. Folia Linguistica 42(2). 331-354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell
1960Lexicostatistics so far. Current Anthropology 1(1). 3-44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koops, Bert-Jaap, Pim Slop, Paul Uljé, Kees Vermeij & Dick van Zijderveld
2009Funshoppen in het Nederlands: woordenlijst onnodig Engels. Amsterdam: Bakker.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lutz, Mark
2007Learning Python. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
McMahon, April M.S.
1994Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Onysko, Alexander
2007Anglicisms in German: Borrowing, lexical productivity and written codeswitching. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Onysko, Alexander & Esme Winter-Froemel
2011Necessary loans — luxury loans? Exploring the pragmatic dimension of borrowing. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6). 1550-1567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petroni, Filippo & Maurizio Serva
2011Automated word stability and language phylogeny. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 18(1). 53-32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum & Geoffrey Leech
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rohde, Ada, Anatol Stefanowitsch & Suzanne Kemmer
1999Loanwords in a usage-based model. In Sabrina Billings, John Boyle & Aaron Griffith (eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society (= CLS) 35: The Main Session, 265-275. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2007Entrenchment, salience and basic levels. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 117-138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010Does frequency in text instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system? In Dylan Glynn & Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Quantitative cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches, 101-135. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Skybina, Valentyna & Iryna Galutskikh
2009Historical core vocabulary: Spring and/or anchor. On tendencies and mechanisms of language evolution. In Monique Dufresne, Fernande Dupuis & Etleva Vocaj (eds.), Historical linguistics: Selected papers from the 18th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal, 6–11 August 2007, 295-306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Speelman, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Dirk Geeraerts
2003Profile-based linguistic uniformity as a generic method for comparing language varieties. Computers and the Humanities 37. 317-337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starostin, S.A.
1995Comments from Starostin. In William S.Y. Wang (ed.), The ancestry of the Chinese language (Journal of Chinese Linguistics 8), 393-404. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris
1952Lexico-statistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts: With special reference to North American Indians and Eskimos. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96. 452-463.
1956Some limitations of diffusional change in vocabulary. American Anthropologist 58. 301-306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tadmor, Uri, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor
2010Borrowability and the notion of basic vocabulary. Diachronica 27(2). 226-246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yeon-Ju, Lee & Laurent Sagart
2008No limits to borrowing: The case of Bai and Chinese. Diachronica 25(3). 357-385.Google Scholar
Zenner, Eline, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts
2012Cognitive sociolinguistics meets loanword research: Measuring variation in the success of anglicisms in Dutch. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4). 749-792. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Calude, Andreea Simona, Steven Miller & Mark Pagel
2020. Modelling loanword success – a sociolinguistic quantitative study of Māori loanwords in New Zealand English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Franco, Karlien, Eline Zenner & Dirk Speelman
2018. Let's Agree to Disagree. (Variation in) the Assignment of Gender to Nominal Anglicisms in Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 30:1  pp. 43 ff. Crossref logo
Geller, Ewa & Michał Gajek
2021. Loanwords vs relics. Diachronica Crossref logo
Geller, Ewa, Michał Gajek, Agata Reibach & Zuzanna Łapa
2021. Applicability of Wordnet Architecture in Lexical Borrowing Studies. International Journal of Lexicography 34:1  pp. 92 ff. Crossref logo
Ho-Cheong Leung, Alex & Wim van der Wurff
2018.  In The Noun Phrase in English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 246],  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
List, Johann‐Mattis
2019. Automated methods for the investigation of language contact, with a focus on lexical borrowing. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:10 Crossref logo
Morin, Regina & Damián Robles
2020.  In Hispanic Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 26],  pp. 266 ff. Crossref logo
Trye, David, Andreea S. Calude, Felipe Bravo-Marquez & Te Taka Keegan
2020. Hybrid Hashtags: #YouKnowYoureAKiwiWhen Your Tweet Contains Māori and English. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3 Crossref logo
van Tilborg, Arjan & Stijn R. J. M. Deckers
2016. Vocabulary Selection in AAC: Application of Core Vocabulary in Atypical Populations. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups 1:12  pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.