Article published In:
DiachronicaVol. 31:1 (2014) ► pp.74–105
Core vocabulary, borrowability and entrenchment
A usage-based onomasiological approach
It is often claimed in contact linguistics that core vocabulary is highly resistant to borrowing. If we want to test that claim in a quantitative way, we need both a quantitative measure of coreness and a method for quantifying borrowability. We suggest here a usage-based operationalization of coreness in terms of entrenchment, and of borrowability in terms of onomasiological success. Applying these measures in a corpus-based study on the use of English person reference nouns in Dutch, we show via a multivariate statistical analysis that there are indeed clear indications of an inversely proportional relationship between the success of the English nouns and the degree of coreness/entrenchment of the concept lexicalized by the loanwords.
References
Arppe, Antti, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Dylan Glynn, Martin Hilpert & Arne Zeschel
2010 Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora 5(1). 1-27. 
Baayen, Harald
2008 Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Backus, Ad
1996 Two in one: Bilingual speech of Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands. Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
2001 The role of semantic specificity in insertional codeswitching: Evidence from Dutch Turkish. In Rodolfo Jacobson (ed.), Codeswitching worldwide II1, 125-154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bednarek, Adam
2009 Studies in Canadian English: Lexical variation in Toronto. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Boon, Ton den & Dirk Geeraerts
(eds.) 2005 Van Dale groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal, 14th edn. Utrecht: Van Dale Lexicografie.
Borland, Colin
1982 How basic is “basic” vocabulary? Current Anthropology 23(3). 315-316.
Bowern, Claire, Patience Epps, Russell Gray, Jane Hill, Keith Hunley, Patrick McConvell & Jason Zentz
2011 Does lateral transmission obscure inheritance in hunter-gatherer languages? PLoS ONE 6(9). e25195.
Bybee, Joan & Dan Slobin
1982 Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English present tense. Language 581. 265-289.
Caldwell-Harris, Catherine L. & Alison L. Morris
2008 Fast pairs: A visual word recognition paradigm for measuring entrenchment, top-down effects and subjective phenomenology. Consciousness and Cognition 171. 1063-1081.
Carter, Ronald
1987 Is there a core vocabulary? Some implications for language teaching. Applied Linguistics 81. 187-193.
Chesley, Paula & Harald R. Baayen
2010 Predicting new words from newer words: Lexical borrowing in French. Linguistics 48(4). 1343-1374.
Dixon, R.M.W
1971 A method of semantic description. In Dany D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics, 436-471. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doğruöz, Seza & Ad Backus
2009 Innovative constructions in Dutch Turkish: An assessment of ongoing contact-induced change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(1). 41-63.
Dyen, Isidore
1965 Lexicostatistics in comparative linguistics. Lingua 131. 230-239.
Edmonds, Philip & Graeme Hirst
2002 Near-synonymy and lexical choice. Computational Linguistics 28(2). 105-144.
Embleton, Sheila M
1986 Statistics in historical linguistics. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Evans, Vyvyan, Benjamin Bergen & Jörg Zinken
2007 The cognitive linguistics reader. London: Equinox.
Everitt, Brian S. & Torsten Hothorn
2010 A handbook of statistical analyses using R. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group.
Faraway, Julian J
2005 Linear models with R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
Fischer, John L
1961 The retention rate of Chamorro basic vocabulary. Lingua 101. 255-266.
Fuster Marquez, Miguel & Barry Pennock Speck
2008 The spoken core of British English: A diachronic analysis based on the BNC. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies 371. 53-74.
Galwey, Nicholas W
2006 Introduction to mixed modeling: Beyond regression and analysis of variance. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Geeraerts, Dirk
1997 Diachronic prototype semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon.
2010 Lexical variation in space. In Peter Auer & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds.), Language in space: An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol. 1, Theories and methods, 821-837. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Peter Bakema
1994 The structure of lexical variation: Meaning, naming and context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Dirk Speelman
1999 Convergentie en divergentie in de Nederlandse woordenschat. Een onderzoek naar kleding- en voetbaltermen. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.
Geeraerts, Dirk & Dirk Speelman
2010 Heterodox concept features and onomasiological heterogeneity in dialects. In Dirk Geeraerts, Gitte Kristiansen & Yves Peirsman (eds.), Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics, 23-40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Greenhill, Simon J., Robert Blust & Russell D. Gray
2008 The Austronesian basic vocabulary database: From bioinformatics to lexomics. Evolutionary Bioinformatics 41. 271-283.
Haarmann, Harald
1990 “Basic” vocabulary and language contacts: The disillusion of glottochronology. Indogermanische Forschungen 951.7-37.
Haspelmath, Martin
2008 Loanword typology: Steps toward a systematic cross-linguistic study of lexical borrowability. In Thomas Stolz, Dik Bakker & Rosa Salas Palomo (eds.), Aspects of language contact: New theoretical, methodological and empirical findings with special focus on Romancisation processes, 43-62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2009 Lexical borrowing: Concepts and issues. In Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook, 35-54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haspelmath, Martin & Uri Tadmor
2009 The loanword typology project and the world loanword database. In Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook, 1-34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heggarty, Paul
2010 Beyond lexicostatistics: How to get more out of “word list” comparisons. Diachronica 27(2). 301-324.
Hock, Hans Henrich & Brian D. Joseph
1996 Language history, language change and language relationship: An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Holman, Eric W., Søren Wichmann, Cecil H. Brown, Viveka Velupillai, André Müller & Dik Bakker
2008 Explorations in automated language classification. Folia Linguistica 42(2). 331-354.
Hymes, Dell
1960 Lexicostatistics so far. Current Anthropology 1(1). 3-44.
Koops, Bert-Jaap, Pim Slop, Paul Uljé, Kees Vermeij & Dick van Zijderveld
2009 Funshoppen in het Nederlands: woordenlijst onnodig Engels. Amsterdam: Bakker.
Langacker, Ronald
1987 Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
1991 Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lutz, Mark
2007 Learning Python. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
McMahon, April M.S
1994 Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Onysko, Alexander
2007 Anglicisms in German: Borrowing, lexical productivity and written codeswitching. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Onysko, Alexander & Esme Winter-Froemel
2011 Necessary loans — luxury loans? Exploring the pragmatic dimension of borrowing. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6). 1550-1567.
Petroni, Filippo & Maurizio Serva
2011 Automated word stability and language phylogeny. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 18(1). 53-32.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum & Geoffrey Leech
1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Rohde, Ada, Anatol Stefanowitsch & Suzanne Kemmer
1999 Loanwords in a usage-based model. In Sabrina Billings, John Boyle & Aaron Griffith (eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society (= CLS) 35: The Main Session, 265-275. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2007 Entrenchment, salience and basic levels. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 117-138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2010 Does frequency in text instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system? In Dylan Glynn & Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Quantitative cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches, 101-135. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Skybina, Valentyna & Iryna Galutskikh
2009 Historical core vocabulary: Spring and/or anchor. On tendencies and mechanisms of language evolution. In Monique Dufresne, Fernande Dupuis & Etleva Vocaj (eds.), Historical linguistics: Selected papers from the 18th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal, 6–11 August 2007, 295-306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Speelman, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Dirk Geeraerts
2003 Profile-based linguistic uniformity as a generic method for comparing language varieties. Computers and the Humanities 371. 317-337.
Starostin, S.A
1995 Comments from Starostin. In William S.Y. Wang (ed.), The ancestry of the Chinese language (Journal of Chinese Linguistics 8), 393-404. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Swadesh, Morris
1952 Lexico-statistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts: With special reference to North American Indians and Eskimos.
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society
961. 452-463.
1956 Some limitations of diffusional change in vocabulary. American Anthropologist 581. 301-306.
Tadmor, Uri, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor
Yeon-Ju, Lee & Laurent Sagart
2008 No limits to borrowing: The case of Bai and Chinese. Diachronica 25(3). 357-385.
Zenner, Eline, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts
2012 Cognitive sociolinguistics meets loanword research: Measuring variation in the success of anglicisms in Dutch. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4). 749-792.
Cited by
Cited by 15 other publications
Calude, Andreea Simona, Steven Miller & Mark Pagel
2020. Modelling loanword success – a sociolinguistic quantitative study of Māori loanwords in New Zealand English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1 ► pp. 29 ff. 
De Smet, Isabeau
2023. An assessment of the fourth law of Kuryłowicz: does prototypicality of meaning affect language change?. Cognitive Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 261 ff.
Franco, Karlien, Eline Zenner & Dirk Speelman
2018. Let's Agree to Disagree. (Variation in) the Assignment of Gender to Nominal Anglicisms in Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Geller, Ewa & Michał Gajek
Geller, Ewa, Michał Gajek, Agata Reibach & Zuzanna Łapa
2021. Applicability of Wordnet Architecture in Lexical Borrowing Studies. International Journal of Lexicography 34:1 ► pp. 92 ff.
Ho-Cheong Leung, Alex & Wim van der Wurff
2018. Chapter 6. Anaphoric reference in Early Modern English. In The Noun Phrase in English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 246], ► pp. 143 ff.
List, Johann-Mattis
2023. Evolutionary Aspects of Language Change. In Evolutionary Thinking Across Disciplines [Synthese Library, 478], ► pp. 103 ff.
List, Johann‐Mattis
2019. Automated methods for the investigation of language contact, with a focus on lexical borrowing. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:10
Morin, Regina & Damián Robles
2020. The differing behavior of loanwords in the Spanish of technology and of fashion and beauty. In Hispanic Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 26], ► pp. 266 ff.
Schuring, Melissa & Eline Zenner
2022. English from Scratch: Preadolescents’ Developing Use of English Lexical Resources in Belgian Dutch. Frontiers in Communication 6
Smith, Chris & Jeanne Vigneron-Bosbach
2021. Introduction. Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 21:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Smith, Chris A.
2023. Productivity from a Metapragmatic Perspective: Measuring the Diachronic Coverage of the Low Level Lexico-Grammatical Construction Have the N (Body Part/Attitude) to ↔<Metapragmatic Comment> Using the COHA. Languages 8:2 ► pp. 92 ff.
Smith, Chris A.
2024. How Is Stickage Different from Sticking? A Study of the Semantic Behaviour of V-age and V-ing Nominalisations (on Monomorphemic Bases). In Nouns and the Morphosyntax / Semantics Interface, ► pp. 445 ff.
Trye, David, Andreea S. Calude, Felipe Bravo-Marquez & Te Taka Keegan
2020. Hybrid Hashtags: #YouKnowYoureAKiwiWhen Your Tweet Contains Māori and English. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3
van Tilborg, Arjan & Stijn R. J. M. Deckers
2016. Vocabulary Selection in AAC: Application of Core Vocabulary in Atypical Populations. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups 1:12 ► pp. 125 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.