Core vocabulary, borrowability and entrenchment
A usage-based onomasiological approach
It is often claimed in contact linguistics that core vocabulary is highly resistant to borrowing. If we want to test that claim in a quantitative way, we need both a quantitative measure of coreness and a method for quantifying borrowability. We suggest here a usage-based operationalization of coreness in terms of entrenchment, and of borrowability in terms of onomasiological success. Applying these measures in a corpus-based study on the use of English person reference nouns in Dutch, we show via a multivariate statistical analysis that there are indeed clear indications of an inversely proportional relationship between the success of the English nouns and the degree of coreness/entrenchment of the concept lexicalized by the loanwords.
Keywords: borrowability, entrenchment, core vocabulary, usage-based hypothesis, Cognitive Linguistics, onomasiological variation
Published online: 21 July 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.1.03zen
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.1.03zen
References
Arppe, Antti, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Dylan Glynn, Martin Hilpert & Arne Zeschel
Baayen, Harald
Backus, Ad
Bednarek, Adam
Boon, Ton den & Dirk Geeraerts
Bowern, Claire, Patience Epps, Russell Gray, Jane Hill, Keith Hunley, Patrick McConvell & Jason Zentz
Bybee, Joan & Dan Slobin
Caldwell-Harris, Catherine L. & Alison L. Morris
Carter, Ronald
Chesley, Paula & Harald R. Baayen
Dixon, R.M.W
Doğruöz, Seza & Ad Backus
Edmonds, Philip & Graeme Hirst
Evans, Vyvyan, Benjamin Bergen & Jörg Zinken
Everitt, Brian S. & Torsten Hothorn
Fuster Marquez, Miguel & Barry Pennock Speck
Galwey, Nicholas W
Geeraerts, Dirk
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Peter Bakema
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Dirk Speelman
Geeraerts, Dirk & Dirk Speelman
Greenhill, Simon J., Robert Blust & Russell D. Gray
Haarmann, Harald
Haspelmath, Martin
2008 Loanword typology: Steps toward a systematic cross-linguistic study of lexical borrowability. In Thomas Stolz, Dik Bakker & Rosa Salas Palomo (eds.), Aspects of language contact: New theoretical, methodological and empirical findings with special focus on Romancisation processes, 43-62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haspelmath, Martin & Uri Tadmor
Heggarty, Paul
Hock, Hans Henrich & Brian D. Joseph
Holman, Eric W., Søren Wichmann, Cecil H. Brown, Viveka Velupillai, André Müller & Dik Bakker
Koops, Bert-Jaap, Pim Slop, Paul Uljé, Kees Vermeij & Dick van Zijderveld
Langacker, Ronald
Onysko, Alexander
Onysko, Alexander & Esme Winter-Froemel
Petroni, Filippo & Maurizio Serva
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum & Geoffrey Leech
Rohde, Ada, Anatol Stefanowitsch & Suzanne Kemmer
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
Skybina, Valentyna & Iryna Galutskikh
2009 Historical core vocabulary: Spring and/or anchor. On tendencies and mechanisms of language evolution. In Monique Dufresne, Fernande Dupuis & Etleva Vocaj (eds.), Historical linguistics: Selected papers from the 18th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal, 6–11 August 2007, 295-306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Speelman, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Dirk Geeraerts
Starostin, S.A
Swadesh, Morris
1952 Lexico-statistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts: With special reference to North American Indians and Eskimos.
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society
961. 452-463.
Tadmor, Uri, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor
Yeon-Ju, Lee & Laurent Sagart
Cited by
Cited by 10 other publications
Calude, Andreea Simona, Steven Miller & Mark Pagel
Franco, Karlien, Eline Zenner & Dirk Speelman
Geller, Ewa, Michał Gajek, Agata Reibach & Zuzanna Łapa
Ho-Cheong Leung, Alex & Wim van der Wurff
List, Johann‐Mattis
Morin, Regina & Damián Robles
Schuring, Melissa & Eline Zenner
Trye, David, Andreea S. Calude, Felipe Bravo-Marquez & Te Taka Keegan
van Tilborg, Arjan & Stijn R. J. M. Deckers
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.