This paper presents the results of a corpus-based diachronic investigation into the semantic evolution of the Dutch modals kunnen “can”, mogen “may” and moeten “must”, revealing an interaction between processes of (inter)subjectification and of semantic competition (‘no synonymy’). Mogen and kunnen do, but moeten does not, show an evolution in terms of (inter)subjectification. But developments in mogen and kunnen also show an effect of the fact that historically they have been competing for the same semantic ground. There is no comparable competition for semantic ground in moeten. This strongly suggests an interaction between the ‘no synonymy’ principle and (inter)subjectification, whereby the former may actually trigger the latter.
2003Analogy: The warp and woof of cognition. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 425–440. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bolinger, Dwight
1968Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 21. 119–127.
1999Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald
2006Subjectification, grammaticalization and conceptual archetypes. In Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds.), Subjectification, 17–40. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Lehrer, Adrienne
1985The influence of semantic fields on semantic change. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical semantics — Historical word formation, 283–296. Berlin: De Gruyter.
López-Couso, María José
2010Subjectification and intersubjectification. In Andreas Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 127–163. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Martinet, André
1955Économie des changements phonétiques. Bern: Francke.
2001bSubjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 383–400.
Nuyts, Jan
2005The modal confusion: On terminology and the concepts behind it. In Alex Klinge & Henrik H. Müller (eds.), Modality: Studies in form and function, 5–38. London: Equinox.
Nuyts, Jan
2006Modality. In William Frawley (ed.), The expression of modality, 1–26. Berlin: Mouton.
Nuyts, Jan
2007Kunnen diachroon. Taal en Tongval 591. 118–148.
2009aThe ‘one-commitment-per-clause’ principle and the cognitive status of qualificational categories. Linguistics 471. 141–171.
Nuyts, Jan
2009bThe Dutch modals and (de)grammaticalization. In Stef Slembrouck, Miriam Taverniers & Mieke van Herreweghe (eds.), From will to well, 347–355. Ghent: Academia Press.
2013De-auxiliarization without de-modalization in the Dutch core modals: A case of collective degrammaticalization?Language Sciences 361. 124–133.
Nuyts, Jan
Forthcoming. Analyses of the modal meanings. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.) Oxford handbook of mood and modality Oxford Oxford University Press
Nuyts, Jan, Pieter Byloo & Janneke Diepeveen
2010On deontic modality, directivity, and mood: The case of Dutch mogen and moeten. Journal of Pragmatics 421. 16–34.
Oertel, Hanns
1901Lectures on the study of language. New York: Scribner’s.
Ostaeyen, Gert Van & Jan Nuyts
2004De diachronie van kunnen. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 1091. 1–186.
Pijnenburg, W.J.J., K.H. van Dalen-Oskam, K.A.C. Depuydt & T.H. Schoonheim
2003Syntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, Gustaf
1931Meaning and change of meaning, with special reference to the English language. Gothenburg: Elander.
Traugott, Elizabeth C
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English. Language 651. 31–55.
Traugott, Elizabeth
1995Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein & Suzanne Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectification, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth C
2010(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Traugott, Elizabeth & Richard Dasher
2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trier, Jost
1931Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. Heidelberg: Winter.
Trudgill, Peter
1986Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
Valin, Robert Van & Randy LaPolla
1997Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 20 other publications
Abraham, Werner
2020. Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics,
Almela-Sánchez, Moisés
2023. Daniela Pettersson-Traba, The development of the concept of SMELL in American English: A usage-based view of near-synonymy (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 51). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2022. Pp. xviii + 270. ISBN 9783110792201.. English Language and Linguistics► pp. 1 ff.
Caers, Wim & Sune Gregersen
2019. Wat mutt, dat mutt*.
Nederlandse Taalkunde
24:3 ► pp. 399 ff.
Coussé, Evie & Gerlof Bouma
2022. Semantic scope restrictions in complex verb constructions in Dutch. Linguistics 60:1 ► pp. 123 ff.
FONTEYN, LAUREN
2017. The aggregate and the individual: thoughts on what non-alternating authors reveal about linguistic alternations – a response to Petré. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
2022. How do middle voice markers and valency reducing constructions interact? Typological tendencies and diachronic considerations. Folia Linguistica 56:2 ► pp. 239 ff.
Kolyaseva, Alena
2022. The Russian prepositional TIPA and VRODE in online student discourse: evidence of attraction?. Linguistics 60:5 ► pp. 1451 ff.
Koohkan, Sepideh & Jan Nuyts
2021. Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification in an Iranian modal verb: A paradox resolved by Dutch. Australian Journal of Linguistics 41:4 ► pp. 389 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.