Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 32:2 (2015) ► pp. 231267
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Köhnlein, Björn
2016. Contrastive foot structure in Franconian tone-accent dialects. Phonology 33:1  pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Köhnlein, Björn
2018. Apparent exceptions to final devoicing in High Prussian: A metrical analysis. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 30:4  pp. 371 ff. Crossref logo
Köhnlein, Björn
2020.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics,  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
Lu, Yu-An & Sang-Im Lee-Kim
2021. The effect of linguistic experience on perceived vowel duration: Evidence from Taiwan Mandarin speakers. Journal of Phonetics 86  pp. 101049 ff. Crossref logo
Morrison, Donald Alasdair
2019. Metrical structure in Scottish Gaelic: tonal accent, glottalisation and overlength. Phonology 36:3  pp. 391 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Asu, Eva Liina, Pärtel Lippus, Pire Teras & Tuuli Tuisk
2009The realization of Estonian quantity characteristics in spontaneous speech. Nordic Prosody 10. 49–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Adolf
1921Die Schärfung in der moselfränkischen Mundart von Arzbach (Unterwesterwaldkreis). Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur 45. 266–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Jennifer J. Venditti
2010Tone and intonation. In William J. Hardcastle & John Laver (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 603–652. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Intonation. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C.L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn., 485–532. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul
2006The history of the Franconian tone contrast. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam manuscript.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. The history of the Franconian tone contrast. In Wolfgang Kehrein, Björn Köhnlein, Paul Boersma & Marc van Oostendorp (eds.) Segmental structure and tone Berlin Walter de Gruyter
Bremer, Otto
1929Der Schleifton im Nordniedersächsischen. Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch 53. 1–32.Google Scholar
Cajot, José
2006Phonologisch bedingter Polytonieverlust – eine tonlose Enklave südlich von Maastricht. In Michiel de Vaan (ed.), Germanic tone accents. First International Workshop on Franconian Tone Accents, Leiden, 13–14 June 2003 (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beiheft 131), 11–24. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Cumming, Ruth
2011The effect of dynamic fundamental frequency on the perception of duration. Journal of Phonetics 39(3). 375–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dogil, Grzegorz & Briony Williams
1999The phonetic manifestation of word stress. In Harry van der Hulst (ed.), Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe, 272–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Eek, Arvo
1980Estonian quantity: Notes on the perception of duration. In Arvo Eek (ed.), Estonian papers in phonetics, 5–29. Tallinn: Academy of Sciences of the Estonian S. S. R., Institute of Language and Literature.Google Scholar
Eis, Gerhard
1958Historische Laut- und Formenlehre des Mittelhochdeutschen. Halle: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience
2008A grammar of Hup. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feyer, Ursula
1941Die Mundart des Dorfes Baden (Kreis Verden) grammatisch und phonetisch dargestellt, mit einer quantitativen Analyse der Vokale. Berlin: University of Berlin dissertation.Google Scholar
Fikkert, Paula & Haike Jacobs
(eds.) 2003Development in prosodic systems. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilles, Peter
2002Einflüsse der Rheinischen Akzentuierung auf die segmentelle Ebene. Evidenz aus dem Luxemburgischen. In Peter Auer, Peter Gilles & Helmut Spiekermann (eds.), Silbenschnitt und Tonakzente (Linguistische Arbeiten 463), 265–282. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John
1976Autosegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation [Published 1979. New York: Garland.].Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew
1999Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology, typology. Los Angeles: UCLA dissertation.Google Scholar
2002A typology of contour tone restrictions. Studies in Language 25(3). 423–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology, typology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos
1993The Dutch foot and the chanted call. Journal of Linguistics 29(1). 37–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000aThe lexical tone contrast of Roermond Dutch in optimality theory. In Merle Horne (ed.), Intonation: Theory and experiment, 129–167. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Crossref_6Google Scholar
2000bOn the origin and development of the Central Franconian tone contrast. In Aditi Lahiri (ed.), Analogy, levelling, markedness, 215–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007A vowel height split explained: Compensatory listening and speaker control. Laboratory Phonology 9. 145–172.Google Scholar
2009Vowel duration, syllable quantity, and stress in Dutch. In Kristin Hanson & Sharon Inkelas (eds.), The nature of the word: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky, 181–198. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013From Cologne to Arzbach: An account of the Franconian ‘tone reversal’. In Eva-Liina Asu & Partel Lippus (eds.), Nordic prosody. Proceedings of the XIth Conference, Tartu 2012, 11–24. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Gussenhoven, Carlos & Wencui Zhou
2013Revisiting pitch slope and height effects on perceived duration. Interspeech 2013. 1365–1369.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Steven & Eric Zee
1979On the perception of contour tones. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 45. 150–164.Google Scholar
Hanssen, Judith
2005Tone and intonation in the dialect of Sittard. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen MA thesis.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Aditi Lahiri
1992Durationally specified intonation in English and Bengali. In Rolf Carlson, Lennart Nord & Johan Sundberg (eds.), 1990 Wenner-Gren Center conference on music, language, speech, and brain, 78–91. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce
1995Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heijmans, Linda
2003The relationship between tone and vowel length in two neighboring Dutch Limburgian dialects. In Paula Fikkert & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Development in prosodic systems, 7–46. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hermans, Ben
2009The phonological structure of the Limburg tonal accents. In Kuniya Nasukawa & Phillip Backley (eds.), Strength relations in phonology, 317–372. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012The phonological representation of the Limburgian tonal accents. In Bert Botma & Roland Noske (eds.), Phonological explorations: Empirical, theoretical and diachronic issues, 227–244. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heuven, Vincent J.J.P. van
2014Stress and segment duration in Dutch. In René Kager, Janet Grijzenhout & Koen Sebregts (eds.), Where the principles fail: A festschrift for Wim Zonneveld on the occasion of his 64th birthday, 217–228. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Bruno
1963Experimentalphonetische Untersuchungen zur Bestimmung und Wertung der ‘durativen Funktion’ akzentuierter Vokale im Nordniedersächsischen. Hamburg: University of Hamburg dissertation.Google Scholar
Höder, Steffen
2010Das Lautsystem des Altenwerder Platt. Eine phonetisch-phonologische Bestandsaufnahme. Niederdeutsches Wort 50. 1–27.Google Scholar
2014Low German: A profile of a word language. In Javier Caro Reina & Renata Szczepaniak (eds.), Syllable and word languages (Linguae & Litterae 40), 305–326. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José I.
2012Two Basque accentual systems and the notion of pitch-accent language. Lingua 122(13). 1335–1351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der
2011Pitch accent systems. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 1003–1026. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Deconstructing stress. Lingua 122(13). 1494–1521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M.
2006Word-prosodic typology. Phonology 23(2). 225–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31(2). 213–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011In defense of prosodic typology: A response to Beckman & Venditti. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2011) 200–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Coda conditions on tone. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2012). 189–204.Google Scholar
Iosad, Pavel
2015Pitch accent and prosodic structure in Scottish Gaelic: Reassessing the role of contact. In Martin Hilpert, Janet Duke, Christine Mertzlufft, Jan-Ola Östman & Michael Rießler (eds.), New trends in Nordic and general linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1913Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig/Berlin: BG Teubner.Google Scholar
Jong, Kenneth J. de
1995The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 97. 491–504. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus in English: Patterns of variation in vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics 32. 493–516. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kager, René & Violeta Martínez-Paricio
2014Antepenultimate mora effects: Typology and representation. Paper presented at the Workshop on Word Stress and Accent, Leiden, The Netherlands, August 17.
Kehrein, Wolfgang
2007Moraic stress in Franconian – and elsewhere. Paper presented at Phonetics and Phonology 4, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, October 8.
Forthcoming. There’s no tone in Cologne: Against tone segment interactions in Franconian. In Wolfgang Kehrein, Björn Köhnlein, Paul Boersma & Marc van Oostendorp (eds.) Segmental structure and tone Berlin Walter de Gruyter
Kingston, John
2011Tonogenesis. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 2304–2333. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
Forthcoming. Livonian stød. In Wolfgang Kehrein, Björn Köhnlein, Paul Boersma & Marc van Oostendorp (eds.) Segmental structure and tone Berlin Walter de Gruyter
Kohler, Klaus J.
2001Überlänge im Niederdeutschen? In Robert Peters, Horst P. Pütz & Ulrich Weber (eds.), Vulpis Adolatio. Festschrift für Hubertus Menke zum 60. Geburtstag, 385–402. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Köhnlein, Björn
2011Rule reversal revisited: Synchrony and diachrony of tone and prosodic structure in the Franconian dialect of Arzbach. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series.Google Scholar
2013Optimizing the relation between tone and prominence: Evidence from Franconian, Scandinavian, and Serbo-Croatian tone accent systems. Lingua 131. 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015A tonal semi-reversal in Franconian dialects: Rule A vs. Rule B. North-Western European Language Evolution 68(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Synchronic alternations between monophthongs and diphthongs in Franconian: A metrical approach. In Wolfgang Kehrein, Björn Köhnlein, Paul Boersma & Marc van Oostendorp (eds.) Segmental structure and tone Berlin Walter de Gruyter
Manuscript. Tone accent does not imply lexical tone: Revisiting Estonian overlength. Leiden: Leiden University.
Kortlandt, Frederik
2007The origin of the Franconian tone accents. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 63(1). 1–3.Google Scholar
Kuck, Walther
1925Die nordöstliche Sprachgrenze des Ermlandes. Teuthonista 2. 91–106.Google Scholar
Kuck, Walther & Peter Wiesinger
1965Die nordöstliche Sprachgrenze des Ermlandes. Deutsche Dialektgeographie 56. 107–171.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi & B. Elan Dresher
1999Open syllable lengthening in West Germanic. Language 75(4). 678–719. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laver, John
1994Principles of phonetics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leben, William R.
1973Suprasegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse
1960Segmental and syllabic quantity in Estonian. American Studies in Uralic Linguistics 1. 21–82.Google Scholar
1976Influence of fundamental frequency pattern on the perception of duration. Journal of Phonetics 4. 113–117.Google Scholar
1978Polytonicity in the area surrounding the Baltic Sea. Nordic Prosody 1. 237–247.Google Scholar
2003Prosodic change in progress: From quantity language to accent language. In Paula Fikkert & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Development in prosodic systems, 47–66. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse & Douglas G. Danforth
1977Foneettisten vihjeiden hierarkia viron kvantiteetin havaitsemisessa. Virittäjä 81(4). 404–411.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse & Pavle Ivić
1986Word and sentence prosody in Serbocroatian. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehnert-LeHouillier, Heike
2007The influence of dynamic F0 on the perception of vowel duration: Cross-linguistic evidence. In Jürgen Trouvain & William J. Barry (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences [ICPhS], 757–760. Dudweiler, Germany: Pirrot.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark
1975The intonational system of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Liiv, Georg
1961Eesti keele kolme vältusastme vokaalide kestus ja meloodiatüübid. Keel ja Kirjandus 4(7–8). 412–424.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn
1990Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In William J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modeling (NATO ASI Series D: Behavioural and Social Sciences 55), 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lippus, Pärtel, Karl Pajusalu & Jüri Allik
2009The tonal component of Estonian quantity in native and non-native perception. Journal of Phonetics 37(4). 388–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The role of pitch cue in the perception of the Estonian long quantity. In Sónia Frota, Gorka Elordieta & Pilar Prieto (eds.), Prosodic categories: Production, perception and comprehension (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 82), 231–242. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lippus, Pärtel & Jaan Ross
2011Has Estonian quantity system changed in a century? Comparison of historical and contemporary data. In Wai-sum Lee & Eric Zee (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences [ICPhS], 1262–1265. Hong Kong: Department of Chinese, Translation and Linguistics, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Meyer, Ernst A.
1896–1897Zur Tonbewegung des Vokals im gesprochenen und gesungenen Einzelwort. Die neueren Sprachen 4. 1–21.Google Scholar
1903Englische Lautdauer: Eine experimentalphonetische Untersuchung. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Miglio, Viola G.
1999Interactions between markedness and faithfulness constraints in vowel systems. College Park, MD: University of Maryland dissertation. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Markedness and faithfulness in vowel systems. London: Psychology Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morén, Bruce
2005Danish stød and Eastern Norwegian pitch accent: The myth of lexical tones. Paper presented at the 13th Manchester Phonology Meeting (mfm 13), Manchester, UK, May 26.
2007Central Swedish pitch accent: A retro approach. Paper presented at the 4th Old World Conference in Phonology (OCP 4), Rhodes, Greece, January 19.
Morén-Duolljá, Bruce
2013The prosody of Swedish underived nouns: No lexical tones required. Nordlyd 40(1). 196–248.Google Scholar
Münch, Ferdinand
1904Grammatik der ripuarisch-fränkischen Mundart. Bonn: Cohen.Google Scholar
Niekerken, Walther
1954Zu den Problemen der Zweisprachigkeit im niederdeutschen Raum (mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Nordniedersächsischen). Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch 76. 64–76.Google Scholar
Nörrenberg, Konstatin
1884Ein niederrheinisches accentgesetz. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 9. 402–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Odden, David
1997Some theoretical issues in Estonian prosody. In Ilse Lehiste & Jaan Ross (eds.), Estonian prosody: Papers from a symposium, 165–195. Tallinn: Institute of Estonian Language. Crossref
Ohala, John J.
1978Production of tone. In Victoria A. Fromkin (ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey, 5–39. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993The phonetics of sound change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Oostendorp, Marc van
Forthcoming. Tone, final devoicing and assimilation in Moresnet. In Wolfgang Kehrein, Björn Köhnlein, Paul Boersma & Marc van Oostendorp (eds.) Segmental structure and tone Berlin Walter de Gruyter
Peeters, Wim & Bert Schouten
1989Die Diphthongierung der westgermanischen î-und û-Laute im Limburgischen. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 56(3). 309–318.Google Scholar
Peters, Jörg
2006The Cologne word accent revisited. In Michiel de Vaan (ed.), Germanic tone accents. First International Workshop on Franconian Tone Accents, Leiden, 13–14 June 2003 (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beiheft 131), 107–133. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
2008Tone and intonation in the dialect of Hasselt. Linguistics 46. 983–1018. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, David B.
1976Fundamental frequency and perceived vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59(1). 39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plüschke, Mareike
2013Peak alignment in Estonian. Munich: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich dissertation.Google Scholar
Prehn, Maike
2012Vowel quantity and the fortis-lenis distinction in North Low Saxon. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation series.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan S.
1980A metrical theory for Estonian quantity. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 511–562.Google Scholar
Remmel, Mart
1975The phonetic scope of Estonian: Some specifications. Preprint KKI-5. Tallinn: Academy of Sciences of the Estonian S.S.R., Institute of Language and Literature.Google Scholar
Rietveld, Toni, Joop Kerkhoff & Carlos Gussenhoven
2004Word prosodic structure and vowel duration in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 32(3). 349–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Stuart M.
1977The effect of fundamental frequency patterns on perceived duration. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report 1. 17–30.Google Scholar
Ruscher, Maria D.H.
1983On the phenomenon of Schleifton in the dialect of Heikendorf. Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen E.
1986Die Mittelfränkischen Tonakzente (Rheinische Akzentuierung) (Mainzer Studien zur Sprach- und Volksforschung 8). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
2002Die sprachhistorische Genese der mittelfränkischen Tonakzente. In Peter Auer, Peter Gilles & Helmut Spiekermann (eds.), Silbenschnitt und Tonakzente (Linguistische Arbeiten 463), 201–233. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaul, David L.
2006Tonogenesis in a Piman variety. Sells/Tucson, AZ: Venito Garcia Library and Archives (Tohono O’odham Nation) & University of Arizona manuscript.
Stuhrmann, Johann
1895–1898Das Mitteldeutsche in Ostpreussen. Barms: Deutsch-Krone.Google Scholar
Svantesson, Jan-Olof
1989Tonogenetic mechanisms in northern Mon-Khmer. Phonetica 46. 60–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teras, Pire
2010Quantity in Leivu. Linguistica Uralica 1. 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ternes, Elmar
1981Über Herkunft und Verbreitung der Überlänge in deutschen Dialekten. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Оskar E. Pfeiffer & John R. Rennison (eds.), Phonologica 1980, 379–386. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
2006Tone reversal in Franconian and elsewhere. North-Western European Language Evolution 48. 91–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teßmann, Wilhelm
1969Kurze Laut- und Formenlehre des Hochpreußischen (des Oberländischen und des Breslauschen). Jahrbuch d. Albertus-Universität zu Königsberg/Preußen 19. 115–171.Google Scholar
Wells, John C.
1981Accents of English. London: Longman. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Werth, Alexander
2011Perzeptionsphonologische Grundlagen der Prosodie. Eine Analyse der mittelfränkischen Tonakzentdistinktion (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beiheft 143). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Wijk, Nicolaas van
1935De klinkerrekking en de stoottoon voor stemhebbende medeklinkers in het Limburgs en in andere dialekten en talen. Nieuwe Taalgids 29. 405-41l.Google Scholar
1936Rekking en stoottoon in het Limburgs. Onze Taaltuin 5. 179–183.Google Scholar
1939De Rijns-Limburgse polytonie, vergeleken met de Kasjoebse. Onze Taaltuin 8. 146–152.Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C.L.
2010Tonal effects on perceived vowel duration. Laboratory Phonology 10. 151–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Jie
2001The effects of duration and sonority on contour tone distribution: Typological survey and formal analysis. Los Angeles: UCLA dissertation. CrossrefGoogle Scholar