On syntactic intervention in Chinese denominal verbs
A diachronic perspective
The derivation of Chinese denominal verbs has undergone a diachronic shift from freedom in Archaic Chinese to restriction in Post-Archaic Chinese. While denominal verbs in Archaic Chinese can be conveniently accommodated in a pragmatic account, those in Post-Archaic Chinese only yield to a syntactic account. The diachronic shift has arguably resulted from syntactic intervention: only those denominal verbs in Archaic Chinese that can possibly be derived in syntax have survived into Post-Archaic Chinese. In support of this hypothesis is the fact that the prefix *s- and qù shēng bié yì (“falling tone for sense distinction”), responsible for verbalization of nouns in Archaic Chinese, have ceased to operate and given way to zero categories in Post-Archaic Chinese, and the denominal verbs in Post-Archaic Chinese exhibit transparent semantic structures. These findings support the general view about the lexicon-syntax interface that word formation should not be reduced to either the lexicon or syntax alone.
References (69)
Arad, Maya
2003a Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(4). 737–778.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arad, Maya
2003b Why syntax matters.
Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 321. 83–108.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark
1988 Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark
1997 Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In
Liliane Haegeman (ed.),
Elements of grammar, 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
1998 Word formation in Old Chinese. In
Jerome L. Packard (ed.),
New approaches to Chinese word-formation: Morphology, phonology, lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese, 35–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, Hagit
2005a Structuring sense, vol I: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, Hagit
2005b Structuring sense, vol II: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chan, Marjorie K.M. & James H-Y. Tai
1995 From nouns to verbs: Verbalization in Chinese dialects and East Asian languages.
NACCL [North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics] 6(2). 49–74.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, Jie & Howard Lasnik
Manuscript.
Parametric variations in English and Mandarin denominal verb derivation.
Chomsky, Noam
1970 Remarks on nominalization. In
Roderick A. Jacobs &
Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.),
Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Co.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Eve V. & Herbert H. Clark
1979 When nouns surface as verbs.
Language 511. 767–811.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deng, Ming
2011 Cong fangfalun de shijiao lun gu hanyu “cilei huoyong” shuo de pianwu [A methodological perspective on the problems in the view of free word-class shift in Ancient Chinese].
Yuwen Yanjiu [
Chinese Studies] 21. 35–39.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Edwin Williams
1987 On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Don, Jan
2005 Roots, deverbal nouns and denominal verbs. In
Geert Booij,
Emiliano Guevara,
Angela Ralli,
Salvatore Sgroi &
Sergio Scalise (eds.),
Morphology and linguistic typology: On-line Proceedings of Mediterranean Morphology Meeting 41, 91–104. Bologna: University of Bologna.
[URL].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dong, Xiufang
2002 Cihuihua: Hanyu shuangyinzi de yansheng he fazhan [
Lexicalization: Genesis and development of disyllabic words in Chinese]. Chengdu, China: Sichuan Renmin Chubanshe [Sichuan People’s Press].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David
1979 Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feng, Shengli
1998 Prosodic structure and compound words in Classical Chinese. In
Jerome L. Packard (ed.),
New approaches to Chinese word-formation: Morphology, phonology, lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese, 197–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feng, Shengli
2005 Qing dongci yiwei yu gujin hanyu de dongbin guanxi [Light-verb movement in Modern and Classical Chinese].
Yuyan Kexue [
Linguistic Science] 11. 3–16.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feng, Shengli
2014 Historical syntax of Chinese. In
C.-T. James Huang,
Y.-H. Audrey Li &
Andrew Simpson (eds.),
The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 537–575. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fodor, Jerry & Ernie Lepore
1999 Impossible words? Linguistic Inquiry 30(3). 445–453.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley
2006 On the licensing of causatives of directed motion: Waltzing Matilda all over.
Studia Linguistica 60(2). 121–155.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, Kenneth & S. Jay Keyser
1993 On argument structure and lexical expression of syntactic relations. In
Kenneth Hale &
S. Jay Keyser (eds.),
The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, Kenneth & S. Jay Keyser
1997 On the complex nature of simple predicators. In
Alex Alsina,
Joan Bresnan &
Peter Sells (eds.),
Complex predicates, 29–65. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, Kenneth & S. Jay Keyser
1999 A response to Fodor and Lepore, ‘Impossible words?’ Linguistic Inquiry 30(3). 453–466.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, Kenneth & S. Jay Keyser
2002 Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, Heidi
2005 How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English. In
Nomi Erteschik-Shir &
Tova Rapoport (eds.),
The syntax of aspect, 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, Heidi
2009 Compounding in distributed morphology. In
Rochelle Lieber &
Pavel Stekauer (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of compounding, 129–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T. James
1997 On lexical structure and syntactic projection.
Chinese Languages and Linguistics 31. 45–89.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray S
1972 Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jin, Haiqiang
2011 Gu jin hanyu mingci dongyong bijiao yanjiao [
The comparative study of denominal verbs in Ancient and Modern Chinese]. Yanbian, China: Yanbian University MA thesis.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jin, Wen
2011 A statistical argument for the homophony avoidance approach to the disyllabification of Chinese.
NACCL [North American Conference on Chinese Linguistic] 23(1). 35–50.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lapointe, Steven G
1980 A theory of grammatical agreement. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts doctoral dissertation.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Larson, Richard
1988 On double object constructions.
Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 335–391.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
2005 Thematic hierarchies in argument realization. In
Beth Levin &
Malka Rappaport Hovav (eds.),
Argument realization, 154–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Zuofeng
2005 Gudai hanyu yufa xue [
A grammar of Old Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [Commercial Press].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieber, Rochelle
1992 Deconstructing morphology: Word formation in syntactic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, T.-H. Jonah
2001 Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine, CA: University of California Irvine doctoral dissertation.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, Alec
1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In
Alexis Dimitriadis,
Laura Siegel,
Clarissa Surek-Clark &
Alexander Williams (eds.),
UPenn working papers in Linguistics [UPWPL] 4(2). 201–225.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mateu, Jaume & Gemma Rigau
Mei, Tsu-lin
1980 Sisheng bieyi zhong de shijian cengci [The temporal aspect of the use of tones for semantic distinction].
Zhongguo Yuwen [
Chinese Language] 61. 427–443.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mei, Tsu-lin
1989 The causative and denominative functions of the *s-prefix in Old Chinese. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Sinology, 33–51. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Mei, Tsu-lin
2008 Shanggu Hanyu dongci zhuo qing bieyi de laiyuan [The origin of voicing alternations in Old Chinese verbs].
Minzu Yuwen [
Minority Languages of China] 31. 3–20.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mei, Tsu-lin
2012 The causative *s- and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan.
Language and Linguistics 13(1). 1–28.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pesetsky, David
1995 Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peyraube, A
1996 Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. In
C.-T. James Huang &
Y.-H. Audrey Li (eds.),
New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. New York: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni
2005 The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations.
Linguistic Inquiry 36(3). 389–436.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rothstein, Susan
2004 Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sagart, Laurent & William H. Baxter
2012 Reconstructing the *s- prefix in Old Chinese.
Language and Linguistics (13)11. 29–59.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sanders, Gerald
1988 Zero derivation and the overt analogue criterion. In
Michael Hammond &
Michael Noonan (eds.),
Theoretical morphology, 155–175. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schuessler, Axel
2007 ABC etymological dictionary of Old Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elizabeth O
1982 The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shen, Jiaxuan
2010 Cong “yanyuan shi ge dongci” shuoqi–mingci dongyong he dongci mingyong de buduicheng [Starting from “an actor is a verb”: On the asymmetry between denominal verbs and deverbal nouns].
Dangdai Xiuci Xue [
Contemporary Rhetoric] 11. 1–12.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shen, Li
2004 Aspect agreement and light verbs in Chinese: A comparison with Japanese.
Journal of East Asian Linguistics 131. 141–179.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shu, Zhiwu
2002 Cong sisheng bieyi kan hanyu shengdiao de fazhan [On the development of Chinese tones in the perspective of tones distinguishing meaning].
Yuyan Yanjiu [
Language Studies] 41. 54–57.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Song, Yuwen
1992 Lüe lun sisheng bieyi yu zhonggu kouyu zhijian de guanxi [On the relationship between tones distinguishing meaning and Medieval Chinese speech].
Hubei Daxue Xuebao [
Journal of Hubei University] 61. 75–82.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Speas, Margaret J
1990 Phrase structure in natural language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tai, James H–Y
1983 On the absence of denominal verbs in Chinese. Paper presented at the
Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America
. Minneapolis, MN. Dec. 28th.
Tai, James H–Y
1997 Category shifts and word-formation redundancy rules in Chinese.
Chinese Languages and Linguistics 31. 435–468.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Travis, Lisa
1984 Parameters and effects of word order variation. Cambridge, MA: MIT doctoral dissertation.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vendler, Zeno
1967 Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Kezhong
1989 Gu hanyu cilei huoyong [
Free word class shift in Ancient Chinese]. Changsha: Hunan Renmin Chubanshe [Hunan People’s Press].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Li
1981 Gudai hanyu [
Ancient Chinese]. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju [China Book Company].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wei, Pei-chuan
2003 Shanggu hanyu dao zhonggu hanyu yufa de zhongyao fazhan [Important grammatical developments from Archaic to Medieval Chinese]. In
Da’an He (ed.),
Gujin tongse: Hanyu de lishi yu fazhan [
The history and development of Chinese language], 75–106. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhao, Zongyi
1995 Gu hanyu ‘cilei huoyong’ shuo xianyi [Questioning the view of ‘free word-class shift’ in Archaic Chinese].
Beifang Luncong [
The Northern Forum] 51. 82–86.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Mattiola, Simone & Andrea Sansò
2024.
A typology of denominal verb formation strategies.
Language and Linguistics Compass 18:3
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Cheng, Jie & Howard Lasnik
2016.
Parametric variations in Mandarin and English denominal verb derivation.
Lingua 180
► pp. 25 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.