Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 32:3 (2015) ► pp.293–330

On syntactic intervention in Chinese denominal verbs

A diachronic perspective

| South China Normal University

The derivation of Chinese denominal verbs has undergone a diachronic shift from freedom in Archaic Chinese to restriction in Post-Archaic Chinese. While denominal verbs in Archaic Chinese can be conveniently accommodated in a pragmatic account, those in Post-Archaic Chinese only yield to a syntactic account. The diachronic shift has arguably resulted from syntactic intervention: only those denominal verbs in Archaic Chinese that can possibly be derived in syntax have survived into Post-Archaic Chinese. In support of this hypothesis is the fact that the prefix *s- and qù shēng bié yì (“falling tone for sense distinction”), responsible for verbalization of nouns in Archaic Chinese, have ceased to operate and given way to zero categories in Post-Archaic Chinese, and the denominal verbs in Post-Archaic Chinese exhibit transparent semantic structures. These findings support the general view about the lexicon-syntax interface that word formation should not be reduced to either the lexicon or syntax alone.

Keywords: Chinese, syntax, zero category, denominal verb, morphology
Published online: 10 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.3.01che
References
Arad, Maya
2003a Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(4). 737–778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003b Why syntax matters. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 321. 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark
1988 Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1997 Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
1998 Word formation in Old Chinese. In Jerome L. Packard (ed.), New approaches to Chinese word-formation: Morphology, phonology, lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese, 35–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005a Structuring sense, vol I: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005b Structuring sense, vol II: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Marjorie K.M. & James H-Y. Tai
1995 From nouns to verbs: Verbalization in Chinese dialects and East Asian languages. NACCL [North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics] 6(2). 49–74.Google Scholar
Cheng, Jie & Howard Lasnik
Manuscript. Parametric variations in English and Mandarin denominal verb derivation.
Chomsky, Noam
1970 Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar
1981 Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1995 The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. & Herbert H. Clark
1979 When nouns surface as verbs. Language 511. 767–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deng, Ming
2011 Cong fangfalun de shijiao lun gu hanyu “cilei huoyong” shuo de pianwu [A methodological perspective on the problems in the view of free word-class shift in Ancient Chinese]. Yuwen Yanjiu [Chinese Studies] 21. 35–39.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Edwin Williams
1987 On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Don, Jan
2005 Roots, deverbal nouns and denominal verbs. In Geert Booij, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli, Salvatore Sgroi & Sergio Scalise (eds.), Morphology and linguistic typology: On-line Proceedings of Mediterranean Morphology Meeting 41, 91–104. Bologna: University of Bologna. [URL].Google Scholar
Dong, Xiufang
2002 Cihuihua: Hanyu shuangyinzi de yansheng he fazhan [Lexicalization: Genesis and development of disyllabic words in Chinese]. Chengdu, China: Sichuan Renmin Chubanshe [Sichuan People’s Press].Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1979 Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feng, Shengli
1998 Prosodic structure and compound words in Classical Chinese. In Jerome L. Packard (ed.), New approaches to Chinese word-formation: Morphology, phonology, lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese, 197–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Qing dongci yiwei yu gujin hanyu de dongbin guanxi [Light-verb movement in Modern and Classical Chinese]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Science] 11. 3–16.Google Scholar
2014 Historical syntax of Chinese. In C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Andrew Simpson (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 537–575. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry & Ernie Lepore
1999 Impossible words? Linguistic Inquiry 30(3). 445–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley
2006 On the licensing of causatives of directed motion: Waltzing Matilda all over. Studia Linguistica 60(2). 121–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1984 Syntax: A functional-typological introduction I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & S. Jay Keyser
1993 On argument structure and lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & S. Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997 On the complex nature of simple predicators. In Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan & Peter Sells (eds.), Complex predicates, 29–65. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
1999 A response to Fodor and Lepore, ‘Impossible words?’ Linguistic Inquiry 30(3). 453–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2005 How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English. In Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds.), The syntax of aspect, 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Compounding in distributed morphology. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Stekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 129–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James
1997 On lexical structure and syntactic projection. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 31. 45–89.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S
1972 Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jin, Haiqiang
2011 Gu jin hanyu mingci dongyong bijiao yanjiao [The comparative study of denominal verbs in Ancient and Modern Chinese]. Yanbian, China: Yanbian University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Jin, Wen
2011 A statistical argument for the homophony avoidance approach to the disyllabification of Chinese. NACCL [North American Conference on Chinese Linguistic] 23(1). 35–50.Google Scholar
Lapointe, Steven G
1980 A theory of grammatical agreement. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard
1988 On double object constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 335–391.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
2005 Thematic hierarchies in argument realization. In Beth Levin & Malka Rappaport Hovav (eds.), Argument realization, 154–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Zuofeng
2005 Gudai hanyu yufa xue [A grammar of Old Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [Commercial Press].Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
1992 Deconstructing morphology: Word formation in syntactic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lin, T.-H. Jonah
2001 Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine, CA: University of California Irvine doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Alexis Dimitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek-Clark & Alexander Williams (eds.), UPenn working papers in Linguistics [UPWPL] 4(2). 201–225.Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume & Gemma Rigau
2002 A Minimalist account of conflation processes: Parametric variation at the lexicon-syntax interface. In Artemis Alexiadou (ed.), Theoretical approaches to universals, 211–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mei, Tsu-lin
1980 Sisheng bieyi zhong de shijian cengci [The temporal aspect of the use of tones for semantic distinction]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Chinese Language] 61. 427–443.Google Scholar
1989 The causative and denominative functions of the *s-prefix in Old Chinese. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Sinology, 33–51. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
2008 Shanggu Hanyu dongci zhuo qing bieyi de laiyuan [The origin of voicing alternations in Old Chinese verbs]. Minzu Yuwen [Minority Languages of China] 31. 3–20.Google Scholar
2012 The causative *s- and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 1–28.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995 Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Peyraube, A
1996 Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. In C.-T. James Huang & Y.-H. Audrey Li (eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. New York: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni
2005 The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3). 389–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Susan
2004 Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagart, Laurent
1999 The roots of Old Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagart, Laurent & William H. Baxter
2012 Reconstructing the *s- prefix in Old Chinese. Language and Linguistics (13)11. 29–59.Google Scholar
Sanders, Gerald
1988 Zero derivation and the overt analogue criterion. In Michael ­Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology, 155–175. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schuessler, Axel
2007 ABC etymological dictionary of Old Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth O
1982 The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan
2010 Cong “yanyuan shi ge dongci” shuoqi–mingci dongyong he dongci mingyong de buduicheng [Starting from “an actor is a verb”: On the asymmetry between denominal verbs and deverbal nouns]. Dangdai Xiuci Xue [Contemporary Rhetoric] 11. 1–12.Google Scholar
Shen, Li
2004 Aspect agreement and light verbs in Chinese: A comparison with Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 131. 141–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shu, Zhiwu
2002 Cong sisheng bieyi kan hanyu shengdiao de fazhan [On the development of Chinese tones in the perspective of tones distinguishing meaning]. Yuyan Yanjiu [Language Studies] 41. 54–57.Google Scholar
Song, Yuwen
1992 Lüe lun sisheng bieyi yu zhonggu kouyu zhijian de guanxi [On the relationship between tones distinguishing meaning and Medieval Chinese speech]. Hubei Daxue Xuebao [Journal of Hubei University] 61. 75–82.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret J
1990 Phrase structure in natural language. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tai, James H–Y
1983 On the absence of denominal verbs in Chinese. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America . Minneapolis, MN. Dec. 28th.
1997 Category shifts and word-formation redundancy rules in Chinese. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 31. 435–468.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa
1984 Parameters and effects of word order variation. Cambridge, MA: MIT doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1967 Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Kezhong
1989 Gu hanyu cilei huoyong [Free word class shift in Ancient Chinese]. Changsha: Hunan Renmin Chubanshe [Hunan People’s Press].Google Scholar
Wang, Li
1981 Gudai hanyu [Ancient Chinese]. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju [China Book Company].Google Scholar
Wei, Pei-chuan
2003 Shanggu hanyu dao zhonggu hanyu yufa de zhongyao fazhan [Important grammatical developments from Archaic to Medieval Chinese]. In Da’an He (ed.), Gujin tongse: Hanyu de lishi yu fazhan [The history and development of Chinese language], 75–106. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Zhao, Zongyi
1995 Gu hanyu ‘cilei huoyong’ shuo xianyi [Questioning the view of ‘free word-class shift’ in Archaic Chinese]. Beifang Luncong [The Northern Forum] 51. 82–86.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Cheng, Jie & Howard Lasnik
2016. Parametric variations in Mandarin and English denominal verb derivation. Lingua 180 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.