Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 32:4 (2015) ► pp.571–598

New Old Chinese

Published online: 10 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.4.04sch
References (42)
Baxter, William H., III. 1992. A handbook of Old Chinese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bottéro, Françoise. 1996. Review of The origin and early development of the Chinese writing system, by William G. Boltz (1994). Journal of the American Oriental Society 116(3). 574–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David. 1979. Proto-Loloish (Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies monograph series 39). London: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Coblin, W. South. 1983. A handbook of Eastern Han sound glosses. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. Manuscript. Beyond B[uddhist] T[ranscriptional] D[ialect]: An excursion in Han phonology. Academia.edu.Google Scholar
. 2003. A recent contribution to Sino-Tibetan linguistics. Language and Linguistics 4(4). 887–902.Google Scholar
Ferlus, Michel. 1991. Vocalisme du Proto Viet-Muong. Paper presented at the 24th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Bangkok, October.
. 2009. What were the four divisions of Middle Chinese? Diachronica 261. 184–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Remarques sur la pharyngalisation en chinois archaïque (Old Chinese) dans le système Baxter-Sagart. Paper presented at the 25th Meeting of Linguistique de l’Asie Orientale, CRLAO . Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale, Paris, 28–29 June.
Fortson, Benjamin W., IV. 2004. Indo-European language and culture: An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gong Hwang-cherng 龔煌城. 2002. Hàn-Zāng yǔ yánjiù lúnwénjí 漢藏語研究論文集. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Handel, Zev. 2004. Methodological considerations in the application of Tibeto-Burman comparison to the reconstruction of Old Chinese. In Ying-chin Lin, Fang-min Hsu, Chun-chih Lee, Jackson T.-S. Sun, Hsiu-fang Yang & Dah-an Ho (eds.), Studies in Sino-Tibetan Languages: Papers in honor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on his seventieth birthday, 603–620. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
. 2013. Fuzzy word identification: A case study from the oracle bone inscriptions. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 7(2). 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenner, Philip N. & Saveros Pou. 1980–1981. A lexicon of Khmer morphology. Mon-Kkmer Studies 9–10.Google Scholar
Karlgren, Bernhard. 1957. Grammata serica recensa. Stockholm: Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities.Google Scholar
Li Fang-Kuei 李方桂. 1971. Shànggǔ yīn yánjiù 上古音研究 (“Studies on Archaic Chinese phonology”). Tsing Hua journal of Chinese studies n.s. 91. 1–61.Google Scholar
. 1974–75. Fang-Kuei Li: Studies on Archaic Chinese. Translated by G.L. Mattos. Monumenta Serica 311. 219–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: A system and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mei Tsu-Lin. 2012. The causative *s- and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 1–28.Google Scholar
梅祖麟. 2014 [2008]. Jiǎgǔwénlǐde jǐge fùfǔyīn shēngmǔ 甲骨文里的几个复輔音聲母. In Mei Tsu-Lin (ed.), Hàn-Zàng bǐjiào ji lìshǐ fāngyán lúnjí 漢臟比較暨歷史方言論集, 171–191. Shanghai: Zhōngxī shūjú 上海中西书局Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry. 1994. Pharyngealization in early Chinese. Journal of the American Oriental Society 1141. 397–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. A model for Chinese dialect evolution. In Richard VanNess Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken (eds.), Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Dialect, phonology, transcription and text, 1–26. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Pān Wùyún 潘悟云. 1997. Hóu yīn kǎo 喉音考 (An investigation of glottal sounds). Mínzú yǔwén 51. 10–24.Google Scholar
. 2000. Hànyǔ lìshǐ yīnyùnxué 漢語歷史音韻學 (A study of Chinese phonology). Shanghai: Jiàoyù chūbǎnshè 上海教育出版社Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1962. The consonantal system of Old Chinese. Asia Major 91. 58–144, 206–265.Google Scholar
. 1994. The Old Chinese origin of Type A and Type B syllables. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 221. 73–100.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent. 1999. The roots of Old Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Reconstructing Old Chinese uvulars in the Baxter-Sagart system. Paper presented at the 40th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics , Harbin, China, September 26–29.
Sagart, Laurent & William Baxter. 2009. Reconstructing Old Chinese uvulars in the Baxter-Sagart system (Version 0.99). Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 38(2). 221–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuessler, Axel. 1974. R and l in Archaic Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 21. 186–199.Google Scholar
. 1987. A dictionary of Early Zhou Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. The Qièyùn system ‘divisions’ as a result of vowel warping. In David Prager Branner (ed.), The Chinese rime tables: Linguistic philosophy and historical-comparative phonology, 83–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. ABC etymological dictionary of Old Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Minimal Old Chinese and later Han Chinese: A companion to Grammata Serica Recensa. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Phonological notes on Hàn period transcriptions of foreign names and words. In Richard VanNess Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken (eds.), Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Dialect, phonology, transcription and text, 249–293. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Shorto, Harry. 2006. A Mon-Khmer comparative dictionary. Paul Sidwell, Doug Cooper & Christian Bauer (eds.). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2005. The Katuic languages: Classification, reconstruction and comparative lexicon, (LINCOM Studies in Asian Linguistics 58). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Takashima, Kenichi. 2010. Studies of fascicle three of inscriptions from the Yin Ruins. 2 vols1. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Wáng Lì 王力. 1985. Hànyǔ yīnyùnxué 漢語音韻學. Jǐnán: Shāndōng Jiàoyù chūbǎnshè 山东教育出版社Google Scholar
Yú Xǐngwú 于省吾. 1999. Jiǎgǔ wénzì gùlín 甲骨文字詁林. 4 vols1. Beijing: Zhōnghuá shūjú 中华书局.Google Scholar
Zhèngzhāng Shàngfāng 鄭張尚芳. 1984. Shànggǔyīn gòunǐ xiǎoyì 上古音构拟小议. Yǔyīnxué lùncóng 语音学论丛 vol. 141, 36–49.Google Scholar
. 2003. Shànggǔ yīnxì 上古音系 (Old Chinese phonology). Shanghai: Shanghai Jiàoyù chūbǎnshè 上海教育出版社 (Educational Publishing House).Google Scholar
Cited by (18)

Cited by 18 other publications

Schuessler, Axel
2024. Sino-Tibetan *w in Tibetan and Old Chinese. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 25:1 ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Djamouri, Redouane & Waltraud Paul
2021. Clitic pronouns in Archaic Chinese. Journal of Historical Linguistics 11:1 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2021. Review of Hill (2019): The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Journal of Historical Linguistics 11:1 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2022. On the nature of morphological alternations in Archaic Chinese and their relevance to morphosyntax. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 85:3 ► pp. 475 ff. DOI logo
Orlandi, Giorgio (Georg)
2020. Review of Hill (2019): The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 46:2 ► pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2020. A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of constructionalization. Diachronica 37:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Hill, Nathan
2019. The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese, DOI logo
ORLANDI, GIORGIO
2019. Joseph Edkins and the “Discovery” of Early Chinese: the linguistic ideas behind the first (partial) reconstruction of the sound system of Early Chinese. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 29:3 ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Orlandi, Giorgio [Georg]
2019. A Rejection of the Aramaic Origin of the Chinese Word for Monastery. Monumenta Serica 67:2 ► pp. 517 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Chinese. In The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese, ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Complete Lists of Examples. In The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese, ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Index Legum. In The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese, ► pp. 370 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Burmese. In The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese, ► pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Trans-Himalayan. In The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese, ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Index Verborum. In The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese, ► pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Index Rerum et Nomum. In The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese, ► pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Introduction. In The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Tibetan. In The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese, ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.