Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 33:1 (2016) ► pp.31–66

Convergence in word structure

Revisiting agglutinative noun inflection in Cappadocian Greek

| University of Westminster
Cappadocian Greek is reported to display agglutinative inflection in its nominal system, namely, mono-exponential formatives for the marking of case and number, and nom.sg-looking forms as the morphemic units to which inflection applies. Previous scholarship has interpreted these developments as indicating a shift in morphological type from fusion to agglutination, brought about by contact with Turkish. This study takes issue with these conclusions. By casting a wider net over the inflectional system of the language, it shows that, of the two types of agglutinative formations identified, only one evidences a radical departure from the inherited structural properties of Cappadocian noun inflection. The other, on the contrary, represents a typologically more conservative innovation. The study presents evidence that a combination of system-internal and -external motivations triggered the development of both types, it describes the mechanisms through which the innovation was implemented, and discusses the factors that favoured change.
Keywords: Cappadocian Greek, inflectional class shift, language contact, multiple causation, noun inflection, agglutinative, fusional
Published online: 12 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.33.1.02kar
References (75)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2007. Grammars in contact: A cross‑linguistic perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Grammar in contact: A cross‑linguistic perspective, 1–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alektoridis, Anastasios S. 1833. Lexilogion tou en Fertakainois tis Kappadokias glossikou idiomatos [Glossary of the Cappadocian dialect of Ferték]. Deltion Istorikis Ethnologikis Etaireias [Historical and Ethnological Society Bulletin] 11. 480–508.Google Scholar
Anastasiadis‑Symeonidis, Anna & Despina Chila‑Markopoulou. 2003. Synchronikes kai diachronikes taseis sto genos tis ellinikis: Mia theoritiki proseggisi [Synchronic and diachronic tendencies in the gender of Greek: A theoretical approach]. In Anna Anastassiadis‑Symeonidis, Angela Ralli & Despina Chila‑Markopoulou (eds.), To Genos [Gender], 13–56. Athens: Patakis.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1985. Typological distinctions in word formation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III1, 3–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Backus, Ad. 2005. Codeswitching and language change: One thing leads to another? International Journal of Bilingualism 9(3–4). 307–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1988. Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Chamoreau, Claudine & Isabelle Léglise. 2012. A multi‑model approach to contact‑induced language change. In Claudine Chamoreau & Isabelle Léglise (eds.), Dynamics of contact‑induced language change, 1–15. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael G. 2003. Dynamics of language contact: English and immigrant languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costakis, Athanasios P. 1959. Glossikon ylikon ek katoikon toy choriou Misthi Kappadokias engatestimenon nyn eis Agioneri Axioupoleos Makedonias [Linguistic material from the inhabitants of the Cappadocian village of Misthi that now reside in the village of Agioneri in Axioupolis of the Macedonia Prefecture]. Manuscript № 755. Research Centre for Modern Greek Dialects (I.L.N.E.), Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
. 1962. Glossikon ylikon apo ta Flogita Chalkidikis (prosfygikon chorion) [Linguistic material from the village of Flogita of the Chalkidiki Prefecture (refugee village)]. Manuscript № 812. Research Centre for Modern Greek Dialects (I.L.N.E.), Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
Costakis, Athansios P. 1963. Glossiko yliko apo to Misti Kappadokias (apo prosfyges sto chorio Thomai (: Mandra) Larisis) [Linguistic material from the Cappadocian village of Misti (from the refugees of the village of Thomai (: Mandra) of the Larissa Prefecture]. Manuscript № 826. Research Centre for Modern Greek Dialects (I.L.N.E.), Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
Costakis, Athanasios P. 1964. Le parler grec d’Anakou. Athens: Centre for Asia Minor Studies.Google Scholar
. 1967. Glossiki yli ek Kappadokias (Misti – Dila) [Linguistic material from Cappadocia (Misti – Dila)]. Manuscript № 887. Research Centre for Modern Greek Dialects (I.L.N.E.), Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard M. 1916. Modern Greek in Asia Minor: A study of the dialects of Sílli, Cappadocia and Phárasa with grammar, texts, translations and glossary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. 1993. Internally and externally motivated change in language contact settings: Doubts about dichotomy. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 131–155. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2003. Naturalness and morphological change. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 461–471. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drinka, Bridget. 2010. Language contact. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), The Continuum companion to historical linguistics, 325–345. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Farrar, Kimberley & Mari C. Jones. 2002. Introduction. In Mari C. Jones & Edith Esch (eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors, 1–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fates, Thomas. 2012. Chiogos as si charis: Ekmathisi tou mistiotikou idiomatos (anef didaskalou) [May God bless you: A course in the Mistiot dialect (without a teacher)]. Konitsa: n.p.Google Scholar
Fosteris, Dimitrios & Ioannis I. Kesisoglou. 1960. Lexilogio tou Aravani (Vocabulaire d’Aravani). Athens: Institut Français d’Athènes.Google Scholar
Fraser, Norman M. & Greville G. Corbett. 1995. Gender, animacy, and declensional class assignment: A unified account for Russian. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1994, 123–150. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco. 2008. Borrowing of inflectional morphemes in language contact. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Dynamics of morphological productivity: The evolution of noun classes from Latin to Italian. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. & Robert Wilson. 1971. Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo‑Aryan/Dravidian border in India. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages: Proceedings of a conference held at the University of the West Indies , Mona, Jamaica, April 1968, 151–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2009. An empirical test of the Agglutination Hypothesis. In Sergio Scales, Elisabetta Magni & Antonietta Bisetto (eds.), Universals of language today, 13–29. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Günther S. 1976. Klitikes kai genikes se ‑o apo arsenika se ‑os sta Mesaionika kai Nea Ellinika [Vocative and genitive forms in ‑o from masculines in ‑os in Medieval and Modern Greek]. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki dissertation.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2010. Language contact: Reconsideration and reassessment. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 1‑28. Oxford: Wiley‑Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2010. Greek: A history of the language and its speakers. Oxford: Wiley‑Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janse, Mark. 2001. Morphological borrowing in Asia Minor Greek. In Yoryia Aggouraki, Amalia Arvaniti, Jim Davy, Dionysis Goutsos, Marilena Karyolaimou, Anna Panagiotou, Andreas Papapavlou, Pavlos Pavlou & Anna Roussou (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics. Nicosia 17‑19 September 1999, 473‑479. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Aspects of bilingualism in the history of the Greek language. In James Noel Adams, Mark Janse & Simon Swain (eds.), Bilingualism in ancient society: Language contact and the written text, 332–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Animacy, definiteness and case in Cappadocian and other Asia Minor Greek dialects. Journal of Greek Linguistics 51. 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Greek‑Turkish language contact in Asia Minor. Études Helléniques/Hellenic Studies 17(1). 37–54.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2002. Structural factors in Turkic language contacts. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian. 1983. The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive: A study in areal, general, and historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karampodas, Vassileios. 1948. To Gourdonos kai to Aravani [Ghúrzono and Araván]. Istanbul: M. Konstantinopoulos.Google Scholar
Karatsareas, Petros. 2009. The loss of grammatical gender in Cappadocian Greek. Transactions of the Philological Society 107(2). 196–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. A study of Cappadocian Greek nominal morphology from a diachronic and dialectological perspective. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2013. Understanding diachronic change in Cappadocian Greek: The dialectological perspective. Journal of Historical Linguistics 3(2). 192–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. On the diachrony of gender in Asia Minor Greek: The development of semantic agreement in Pontic. Language Sciences 431. 77–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. The Asia Minor Greek adpositional cycle: A tale of multiple causation. Journal of Greek Linguistics 16(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kesisoglou, Ioannis I. 1951. To glossiko idioma tou Oulagats (Le dialecte d’Oulagatch). Athens: Institut Français d’Athènes.Google Scholar
Kim, Ronald I. 2008. An individual twist on the individualizing suffix: Definite n‑stem nouns in Pontic Greek. Glotta 841. 72–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krinopoulos, Socrates. 1889. Ta Fertakaina ypo ethnologikin kai filologikin epopsin exetazomena [Ferték examined from an ethnological and philological perspective]. Athens: Fexis.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2009. Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Contact, convergence, and typology. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 66–85. Oxford: Wiley‑Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mavrochalyvidis, Georgios & Ioannis I. Kesisoglou. 1960. To glossiko idioma tis Axou (Le dialecte d’Axos). Athens: Institut Français d’Athènes.Google Scholar
Melissaropoulou, Dimitra. 2013. Reorganization of grammar in the light of the language contact factor: A case study on Grico and Cappadocian. In Mark Janse, Brian Joseph, Angela Ralli & Metin Bağrıaçık (eds.), Online proceedings of MGDLT5. 5th International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory. Ghent, Belgium . September 20–22, 2012, 311–334. Patras, Greece.
Ortmann, Albert. 1998. The role of [±animate] in inflection. In Ray Fabri, Albert Ortmann & Teresa Parodi (eds.), Models of inflection, 60–84. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1999. Split morphology: How agglutination and flexion mix. Linguistic Typology 3(3). 279–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. Agglutination and flection. In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, 669–678. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pöchtrager, Markus A., Csanád Bodó, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Teresa Schweiger. 1998. On some inflectional properties of the agglutinating type illustrated from Finnish, Hungarian and Turkish inflection. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 62–631. 57–92.Google Scholar
Ralli, Angela. 2000. A feature‑based analysis of Greek nominal inflection. Γλωσσολογία/Glossologia 11‑121. 201–227.
. 2005. Morfologia [Morphology]. Athens: Patakis.Google Scholar
. 2009. Morphology meets dialectology: Insights from Modern Greek dialects. Morphology 191. 87–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm D. 1997. Social networks and kinds of speech‑community event. In Roger Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.), Archaeology and language 1: Theoretical and methodological orientations, 209–261. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Sarantidis, Archelaos I. 1899. I Sinasos, itoi thesis, istoria, ithiki kai dianoitiki katastasis, ithi, ethima kai glossa tis en Kappadokia komopoleos Sinasou [Sinasos, that is, position, history, moral and intellectual state, customs and language of the Cappadocian town Sinasos]. Athens: Ioannis Nikolaidis.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans‑Jürgen. 1992. Language decay and contact‑induced change: Similarities and differences. In Matthias Brenzinger (ed.), Language death: Factual and theoretical explorations with special reference to East Africa, 59–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological theory: An introduction to word structure in generative grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spyropoulos, Vassilios & Konstantinos Kakarikos. 2011. A feature‑based analysis of Cappadocian Greek nominal inflection. In Mark Janse, Brian Joseph, Pavlos Pavlou, Angela Ralli & Spyros Armosti (eds.), Studies in Modern Greek dialects and linguistic theory, 203–213. Nicosia: Research Centre of Kykkos Monastery.Google Scholar
Spyropoulos, Vassilios & Marianna Tiliopoulou. 2006. Definiteness and case in Cappadocian Greek. In Mark Janse, Brian D. Joseph & Angela Ralli (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, 366–378. Patras: University of Patras.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language contact: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. Social and linguistic factors as predictors of contact‑induced change. Journal of Language Contact 2(1). 42–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Contact explanations in linguistics. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 31–47. Oxford: Wiley‑Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsitsopoulos, Eleftherios. 1962. Syllogi glossikou kai laografikou ylikou ek tou choriou Flogita Chalkidikis (prosfygon tou omonymou choriou Kappadokias) [Collection of linguistic and folk material from the village of Flogita of the Chalkidiki Prefecture (refugees from the Cappadocian village of the same name)]. Manuscript № 811. Research Centre for Modern Greek Dialects (I.L.N.E.), Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
Vryonis, Speros Jr. 1971. The decline of medieval hellenism in Asia Minor and the process of islamization from the eleventh through the fifteenth century. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2003. An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2005. Contact‑induced changes: Classification and processes. Diachronica 22(2). 373–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Contact and borrowing. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 170–187. Oxford: Wiley‑Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Arkadiev, Peter & Kirill Kozhanov
2023. Borrowing of Morphology. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Meyer, Robin
2023. Towards a Typology of Contact‐Induced Change: Questions, Problems and the Path Ahead. Transactions of the Philological Society 121:3 ► pp. 336 ff. DOI logo
Bond, Oliver, Helen Sims‐Williams & Matthew Baerman
2020. Contact and Linguistic Typology. In The Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Janse, Mark & Johan Vandewalle
2020. The History and Etymology of CappadocianFšáx‘Child’, PharasiotFšáxi‘Boy’. Transactions of the Philological Society 118:3 ► pp. 500 ff. DOI logo
Ralli, Angela
2020. Matter versus pattern borrowing in compounding: Evidence from the Asia Minor Greek dialectal variety. Morphology 30:4 ► pp. 423 ff. DOI logo
Igartua, Iván
2019. Loss of grammatical gender and language contact. Diachronica 36:2 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Petros Karatsareas
2017. A diachronic take on the Source–Goal asymmetry. In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188], ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Karatsareas, Petros & Thanasis Georgakopoulos
2016. From syntagmatic to paradigmatic spatial zeroes: The loss of the prepositionsein inner Asia Minor Greek. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 69:2 ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. The Carthaginian North: Semitic influence on early Germanic [NOWELE Supplement Series, 32], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.