Article published in:
Vol. 33:1 (2016) ► pp. 3166
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

No author info given
2019.  In The Carthaginian North: Semitic influence on early Germanic [NOWELE Supplement Series, 32], Crossref logo
Bond, Oliver, Helen Sims‐Williams & Matthew Baerman
2020.  In The Handbook of Language Contact,  pp. 129 ff. Crossref logo
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Petros Karatsareas
2017.  In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188],  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Igartua, Iván
2019. Loss of grammatical gender and language contact. Diachronica 36:2  pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Janse, Mark & Johan Vandewalle
2020. The History and Etymology of CappadocianFšáx‘Child’, PharasiotFšáxi‘Boy’. Transactions of the Philological Society 118:3  pp. 500 ff. Crossref logo
Karatsareas, Petros & Thanasis Georgakopoulos
2016. From syntagmatic to paradigmatic spatial zeroes: The loss of the preposition se in inner Asia Minor Greek . STUF - Language Typology and Universals 69:2  pp. 309 ff. Crossref logo
Ralli, Angela
2020. Matter versus pattern borrowing in compounding: Evidence from the Asia Minor Greek dialectal variety. Morphology 30:4  pp. 423 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.



Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2007Grammars in contact: A cross‑linguistic perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Grammar in contact: A cross‑linguistic perspective, 1–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alektoridis, Anastasios S.
1833Lexilogion tou en Fertakainois tis Kappadokias glossikou idiomatos [Glossary of the Cappadocian dialect of Ferték]. Deltion Istorikis Ethnologikis Etaireias [Historical and Ethnological Society Bulletin] 1. 480–508.Google Scholar
Anastasiadis‑Symeonidis, Anna & Despina Chila‑Markopoulou
2003Synchronikes kai diachronikes taseis sto genos tis ellinikis: Mia theoritiki proseggisi [Synchronic and diachronic tendencies in the gender of Greek: A theoretical approach]. In Anna Anastassiadis‑Symeonidis, Angela Ralli & Despina Chila‑Markopoulou (eds.), To Genos [Gender], 13–56. Athens: Patakis.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1985Typological distinctions in word formation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III, 3–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Backus, Ad
2005Codeswitching and language change: One thing leads to another? International Journal of Bilingualism 9(3–4). 307–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1988Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Chamoreau, Claudine & Isabelle Léglise
2012A multi‑model approach to contact‑induced language change. In Claudine Chamoreau & Isabelle Léglise (eds.), Dynamics of contact‑induced language change, 1–15. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael G.
2003Dynamics of language contact: English and immigrant languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costakis, Athanasios P.
1959Glossikon ylikon ek katoikon toy choriou Misthi Kappadokias engatestimenon nyn eis Agioneri Axioupoleos Makedonias [Linguistic material from the inhabitants of the Cappadocian village of Misthi that now reside in the village of Agioneri in Axioupolis of the Macedonia Prefecture]. Manuscript № 755. Research Centre for Modern Greek Dialects (I.L.N.E.), Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
1962Glossikon ylikon apo ta Flogita Chalkidikis (prosfygikon chorion) [Linguistic material from the village of Flogita of the Chalkidiki Prefecture (refugee village)]. Manuscript № 812. Research Centre for Modern Greek Dialects (I.L.N.E.), Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
Costakis, Athansios P.
1963Glossiko yliko apo to Misti Kappadokias (apo prosfyges sto chorio Thomai (: Mandra) Larisis) [Linguistic material from the Cappadocian village of Misti (from the refugees of the village of Thomai (: Mandra) of the Larissa Prefecture]. Manuscript № 826. Research Centre for Modern Greek Dialects (I.L.N.E.), Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
Costakis, Athanasios P.
1964Le parler grec d’Anakou. Athens: Centre for Asia Minor Studies.Google Scholar
1967Glossiki yli ek Kappadokias (Misti – Dila) [Linguistic material from Cappadocia (Misti – Dila)]. Manuscript № 887. Research Centre for Modern Greek Dialects (I.L.N.E.), Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard M.
1916Modern Greek in Asia Minor: A study of the dialects of Sílli, Cappadocia and Phárasa with grammar, texts, translations and glossary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C.
1993Internally and externally motivated change in language contact settings: Doubts about dichotomy. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 131–155. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
2003Naturalness and morphological change. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 461–471. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drinka, Bridget
2010Language contact. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), The Continuum companion to historical linguistics, 325–345. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Farrar, Kimberley & Mari C. Jones
2002Introduction. In Mari C. Jones & Edith Esch (eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors, 1–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fates, Thomas
2012Chiogos as si charis: Ekmathisi tou mistiotikou idiomatos (anef didaskalou) [May God bless you: A course in the Mistiot dialect (without a teacher)]. Konitsa: n.p.Google Scholar
Fosteris, Dimitrios & Ioannis I. Kesisoglou
1960Lexilogio tou Aravani (Vocabulaire d’Aravani). Athens: Institut Français d’Athènes.Google Scholar
Fraser, Norman M. & Greville G.
. Corbett. 1995. Gender, animacy, and declensional class assignment: A unified account for Russian. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1994, 123–150. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco
2008Borrowing of inflectional morphemes in language contact. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2013Dynamics of morphological productivity: The evolution of noun classes from Latin to Italian. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. & Robert Wilson
1971Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo‑Aryan/Dravidian border in India. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages: Proceedings of a conference held at the University of the West Indies , Mona, Jamaica, April 1968, 151–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin
2009An empirical test of the Agglutination Hypothesis. In Sergio Scales, Elisabetta Magni & Antonietta Bisetto (eds.), Universals of language today, 13–29. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2005Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Günther S.
1976Klitikes kai genikes se ‑o apo arsenika se ‑os sta Mesaionika kai Nea Ellinika [Vocative and genitive forms in ‑o from masculines in ‑os in Medieval and Modern Greek]. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki dissertation.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond
2010Language contact: Reconsideration and reassessment. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 1‑28. Oxford: Wiley‑Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey
2010Greek: A history of the language and its speakers. Oxford: Wiley‑Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janse, Mark
2001Morphological borrowing in Asia Minor Greek. In Yoryia Aggouraki, Amalia Arvaniti, Jim Davy, Dionysis Goutsos, Marilena Karyolaimou, Anna Panagiotou, Andreas Papapavlou, Pavlos Pavlou & Anna Roussou (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics. Nicosia 17‑19 September 1999, 473‑479. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.Google Scholar
2002Aspects of bilingualism in the history of the Greek language. In James Noel Adams, Mark Janse & Simon Swain (eds.), Bilingualism in ancient society: Language contact and the written text, 332–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Animacy, definiteness and case in Cappadocian and other Asia Minor Greek dialects. Journal of Greek Linguistics 5. 3–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Greek‑Turkish language contact in Asia Minor. Études Helléniques/Hellenic Studies 17(1). 37–54.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars
2002Structural factors in Turkic language contacts. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian
1983The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive: A study in areal, general, and historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karampodas, Vassileios
1948To Gourdonos kai to Aravani [Ghúrzono and Araván]. Istanbul: M. Konstantinopoulos.Google Scholar
Karatsareas, Petros
2009The loss of grammatical gender in Cappadocian Greek. Transactions of the Philological Society 107(2). 196–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011A study of Cappadocian Greek nominal morphology from a diachronic and dialectological perspective. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.Google Scholar
2013Understanding diachronic change in Cappadocian Greek: The dialectological perspective. Journal of Historical Linguistics 3(2). 192–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014On the diachrony of gender in Asia Minor Greek: The development of semantic agreement in Pontic. Language Sciences 43. 77–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016The Asia Minor Greek adpositional cycle: A tale of multiple causation. Journal of Greek Linguistics 16(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kesisoglou, Ioannis I.
1951To glossiko idioma tou Oulagats (Le dialecte d’Oulagatch). Athens: Institut Français d’Athènes.Google Scholar
Kim, Ronald I.
2008An individual twist on the individualizing suffix: Definite n‑stem nouns in Pontic Greek. Glotta 84. 72–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
King, Ruth
2000The lexical basis of grammatical borrowing: A Prince Edward Island French case study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krinopoulos, Socrates
1889Ta Fertakaina ypo ethnologikin kai filologikin epopsin exetazomena [Ferték examined from an ethnological and philological perspective]. Athens: Fexis.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron
2009Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Contact, convergence, and typology. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 66–85. Oxford: Wiley‑Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mavrochalyvidis, Georgios & Ioannis I. Kesisoglou
1960To glossiko idioma tis Axou (Le dialecte d’Axos). Athens: Institut Français d’Athènes.Google Scholar
Melissaropoulou, Dimitra
2013Reorganization of grammar in the light of the language contact factor: A case study on Grico and Cappadocian. In Mark Janse, Brian Joseph, Angela Ralli & Metin Bağrıaçık (eds.), Online proceedings of MGDLT5. 5th International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory. Ghent, Belgium . September 20–22, 2012, 311–334. Patras, Greece.
Ortmann, Albert
1998The role of [±animate] in inflection. In Ray Fabri, Albert Ortmann & Teresa Parodi (eds.), Models of inflection, 60–84. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans
1999Split morphology: How agglutination and flexion mix. Linguistic Typology 3(3). 279–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A.
2001Agglutination and flection. In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, 669–678. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pöchtrager, Markus A., Csanád Bodó, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Teresa Schweiger
1998On some inflectional properties of the agglutinating type illustrated from Finnish, Hungarian and Turkish inflection. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 62–63. 57–92.Google Scholar
Ralli, Angela
2000A feature‑based analysis of Greek nominal inflection. Γλωσσολογία/Glossologia 11‑12. 201–227.
2005Morfologia [Morphology]. Athens: Patakis.Google Scholar
2009Morphology meets dialectology: Insights from Modern Greek dialects. Morphology 19. 87–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm D.
1997Social networks and kinds of speech‑community event. In Roger Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.), Archaeology and language 1: Theoretical and methodological orientations, 209–261. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Sarantidis, Archelaos I.
1899I Sinasos, itoi thesis, istoria, ithiki kai dianoitiki katastasis, ithi, ethima kai glossa tis en Kappadokia komopoleos Sinasou [Sinasos, that is, position, history, moral and intellectual state, customs and language of the Cappadocian town Sinasos]. Athens: Ioannis Nikolaidis.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans‑Jürgen
1992Language decay and contact‑induced change: Similarities and differences. In Matthias Brenzinger (ed.), Language death: Factual and theoretical explorations with special reference to East Africa, 59–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew
1991Morphological theory: An introduction to word structure in generative grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spyropoulos, Vassilios & Konstantinos Kakarikos
2011A feature‑based analysis of Cappadocian Greek nominal inflection. In Mark Janse, Brian Joseph, Pavlos Pavlou, Angela Ralli & Spyros Armosti (eds.), Studies in Modern Greek dialects and linguistic theory, 203–213. Nicosia: Research Centre of Kykkos Monastery.Google Scholar
Spyropoulos, Vassilios & Marianna Tiliopoulou
2006Definiteness and case in Cappadocian Greek. In Mark Janse, Brian D. Joseph & Angela Ralli (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, 366–378. Patras: University of Patras.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.
2001Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G.
2001Language contact: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Social and linguistic factors as predictors of contact‑induced change. Journal of Language Contact 2(1). 42–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Contact explanations in linguistics. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 31–47. Oxford: Wiley‑Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman
1988Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsitsopoulos, Eleftherios
1962Syllogi glossikou kai laografikou ylikou ek tou choriou Flogita Chalkidikis (prosfygon tou omonymou choriou Kappadokias) [Collection of linguistic and folk material from the village of Flogita of the Chalkidiki Prefecture (refugees from the Cappadocian village of the same name)]. Manuscript № 811. Research Centre for Modern Greek Dialects (I.L.N.E.), Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
Vryonis, Speros Jr
1971The decline of medieval hellenism in Asia Minor and the process of islamization from the eleventh through the fifteenth century. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald
2003An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2005Contact‑induced changes: Classification and processes. Diachronica 22(2). 373–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Contact and borrowing. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 170–187. Oxford: Wiley‑Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar