Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 33:1 (2016) ► pp. 95130
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Bez, Gitanjali
2020. The relator noun construction in Assamese. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 7:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Louagie, Dana & Uta Reinöhl
2021. Typologizing nominal expressions: the noun phrase and beyond. Linguistics 0:0 Crossref logo
Reinöhl, Uta & Antje Casaretto
2018. When grammaticalization does not occur. Diachronica 35:2  pp. 238 ff. Crossref logo
Stroński, Krzysztof, Joanna Tokaj & Saartje Verbeke
2019.  In Historical Linguistics 2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 348],  pp. 424 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Primary sources incl. translations

Das Aitareya Brāhmaṇa. Mit Auszügen aus dem Commentare von Sāyaṇācārya und anderen Beilagen
. Theodor Aufrecht (ed.) Bonn: A. Marcus 1879.Google Scholar
[Aitareyabrāhmaṇa] Rigveda Brahmanas: The Aitareya and Kauṣītaki Brāhmaṇas of the Rigveda
. Arthur Berriedale Keith (transl.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1920.Google Scholar
The Dīgha Nikāya
Vols I-III). Thomas William Rhys Davids & Joseph Estlin Carpenter (eds.) London Luzac & Company 1947 1949
[Dīghanikāya] Dialogues of the Buddha
. Thomas William Rhys Davids (transl.). London: Luzac & Company 1956, 1965, 1966.Google Scholar
Karakaṇḍa Cariu of Muni Kanakāmara
. Hiralal Jain (ed.) Karanja, Berar: Karanja Jaina Publication Society 1934.Google Scholar
Majjhima-nikāya
(Bände I-III). Robert Chalmers (ed.) London: Oxford University Press 1948.Google Scholar
[Majjhimanikāya] The Collection of The Middle Length Sayings (Majjhima-Nikāya)
(Vols I-III). Isaline Blew Horner (transl.). London: Luzac & Company 1957, 1967.Google Scholar
[R̥gveda] Die Hymnen des Rigveda
(Vols I & II). Theodor Aufrecht (ed.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz 1955.Google Scholar
[R̥gveda] Rig-Veda: Das heilige Wissen: Erster und zweiter Liederkreis
. Michael Witzel und Toshifumi Gotō (ed. and transl.). Frankfurt am Main: Verlag der Weltreligionen 2007.Google Scholar
The Thera- and Therīgāthā (Stanzas ascribed to Elders of the Buddhist Order of Recluses)
(2nd edn. with appendix). Kenneth Roy Norman & Ludwig Alsdorf (eds.) London: Luzac & Company 1966.Google Scholar
[Therīgāthā] The Elders Verses II. Therīgāthā
. Kenneth Roy Norman (transl.). London: Luzax & Company 1971.Google Scholar

Secondary sources

Andersen, Paul Kent
1979Word order typology and prepositions in Old Indic. In Bela Brogyanyi (ed.), Studies in diachronic, synchronic, and typological linguistics: Festschrift for Oswald Szemérenyi on the occasion of his 65th birthday, 23-34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beames, John
1970 [1875]A comparative grammar of the modern Aryan languages of India - to wit Hindi, Punjabi, Sindhi, Gujarati, Marathi, Oriya and Bengali. Vol. II. The noun and pronoun. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Bloch, Jules
1965Indo-Aryan. From the Vedas to modern times. (rev. and transl. by Alfred Master). Paris: Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient Adrien – Maissonneuve.Google Scholar
Böhtlingk, Otto & Rudolph Roth
1855-1875Grosses Petersburger Wörterbuch (7 Theile). (Online at http://​www​.sanskrit​-lexicon​.uni​-koeln​.de​/scans​/PWGScan​/-disp2​/index​.php, last accessed 10/10/2013)
Bubenik, Vit
2006Cases and postpositions in Indo-Aryan. In John Hewson & Vit Bubenik (eds.), From case to adposition: The development of configurational syntax in Indo-European languages, 102-130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam & Tafseer Ahmed
2011The redevelopment of Indo-Aryan case systems from a lexical semantic perspective. Morphology 21(3-4). 545-572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casaretto, Antje
2010aSyntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda IX: ánu. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 65. 7-64.Google Scholar
2010bSyntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda VI: práti. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 7. 1-53.Google Scholar
2010 [2011]Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda VIII: abhí. Historische Sprachforschung 123. 97-156.Google Scholar
2011 [2012]aSyntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda. XVI: áti und tirás. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 8. 173-216.Google Scholar
2011 [2012]bSyntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda XII: ví. Historische Sprachforschung 124. 134-177.Google Scholar
2011 [2012]cLokalpartikel im R̥gveda XIV: ácchā. Zeitschrift für Indologie und Südasienstudien 28. 1-27.Google Scholar
2012Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln im R̥gveda XXI: purás, purástāt und purā́. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 66. 11-53.Google Scholar
Chatterji, Sunti Kumar
1970 [1926]The origin and development of the Bengali language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Coleman, Robert
1991Latin prepositional syntax in Indo-European perspective. In Robert Coleman (ed.), New studies in Latin linguistics, 323-338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuny, Albert
1907Les préverbes dans le Çatapatabrāhmaṇa. Paris: Université de Paris dissertation.Google Scholar
Davids, T.W. & William Stede
2007 [1921–1925]Pali-English Dictionary. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
2009 [1888]Altindische Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray Barnson
1956India as a linguistic area. Language 32(1). 3-16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fahs, Achim
1989Grammatik des Pali. Leipzig: VEB.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude
2010Adpositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth
1983Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1(1). 5-47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hettrich, Heinrich
1991Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda I: ádhi. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 52. 27-76.Google Scholar
1993Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda II: antár. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 54. 147-176.Google Scholar
2002Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda III: pári. In Matthias Fritz & Susanne Zeilfelder (eds.), Novalis Indogermanica. Festschrift für Günter Neumann zum 80. Geburtstag, 215-242. Graz: Leykam.Google Scholar
Hettrich, Heinrich, Antje Casaretto & Carolin Schneider
2010Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda IV: Allgemeines (H. Hettrich); II. úpa (A. Casaretto); III. áva (C. Schneider). Münchner Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 64. 17-130.Google Scholar
Hewson, John & Vit Bubenik
2006From case to adposition: The development of configurational syntax in Indo-European languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2014Asymmetries in the prosodic phrasing of function words: Another look at the suffixing preference. Language 90(4). 927-960. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, Hermann
1967 [1886]Ausgewählte Erzählungen in Mȃhȃrȃshṭrȋ. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie
1991The syntax of direct speech in Vedic. In Joel Brereton & Stephanie W. Jamison (eds.), Sense and syntax in Vedic, 40-57. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2013Harmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order. Linguistic Typology 17. 187-215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, Rev. Samuel Henry
1972 [1875]A grammar of the Hindī Language, in which are treated the High Hindī, Braj, and the Eastern Hindi of the Ramāyan of Tulsī Dās. New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corporation.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1958L’accentuation des langues Indo-Européennes. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy Imienia Ossolińskich Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2012From Latin to Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20. 303-318.Google Scholar
2002 [1982]Thoughts on grammaticalization. 2nd, rev. edn. (Arbeitspapiere Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft 9). Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2010The rise (and possible downfall) of configurationality. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), The Continuum companion to historical linguistics, 212-229. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin Paul
1976Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1991The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, Manfred
1992Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindoarischen. Band 1. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine & Joseph Vendryes
1927Traité de grammaire comparée des langues classiques. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Oberlies, Thomas
1998Historische Grammatik des Hindi: Die Genese seines morphologischen Systems aus dem Mittel- und Altindischen. Freiburg: Reinbek.Google Scholar
Reinöhl, Uta
Forthcoming. Grammaticalization and the rise of configurationality in Indo-Aryan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Renou, Louis
1956Préposition et préverbe dans le R̥gveda. In Louis Renou (ed.), Études védiques et pāṇinéennes, Vol. II, 113-127. Paris: E. de Boccard.Google Scholar
Davids, Thomas William Rhys & William Stede
2007 [1921-1925]Pali-English Dictionary. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carolin
2009 [2010]Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda V: ní. Historische Sprachforschung 122. 118-169.Google Scholar
2010aSyntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda. VII: níṣ. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 7. 149-193.Google Scholar
2010bLokalpartikel im R̥gveda (Folge 13): ápa. Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik 27. 1-35.Google Scholar
2011Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda X: úd. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 65. 185-241.Google Scholar
2012Local particles in the R̥gveda XVII: párā. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 66. 221-246.Google Scholar
Speijer, Jacob Samuel
1968 [1886]Sanskrit syntax. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Verbeke, Saartje & Ludovic De Cuypere
2009The rise of ergativity in Hindi. Assessing the role of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica 30. 1-24.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight
1983 [1879]Sanskrit grammar. 5th edition. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar