Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 33:1 (2016) ► pp.95130
References
Das Aitareya Brāhmaṇa. Mit Auszügen aus dem Commentare von Sāyaṇācārya und anderen Beilagen
. Theodor Aufrecht (ed.) Bonn: A. Marcus 1879.Google Scholar
[Aitareyabrāhmaṇa] Rigveda Brahmanas: The Aitareya and Kauṣītaki Brāhmaṇas of the Rigveda
. Arthur Berriedale Keith (transl.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1920.Google Scholar
The Dīgha Nikāya
Vols I-III1). Thomas William Rhys Davids & Joseph Estlin Carpenter (eds.) London Luzac & Company 1947 1949
[Dīghanikāya] Dialogues of the Buddha
. Thomas William Rhys Davids (transl.). London: Luzac & Company 1956, 1965, 1966.Google Scholar
Karakaṇḍa Cariu of Muni Kanakāmara
. Hiralal Jain (ed.) Karanja, Berar: Karanja Jaina Publication Society 1934.Google Scholar
Majjhima-nikāya
(Bände I-III1). Robert Chalmers (ed.) London: Oxford University Press 1948.Google Scholar
[Majjhimanikāya] The Collection of The Middle Length Sayings (Majjhima-Nikāya)
(Vols I-III1). Isaline Blew Horner (transl.). London: Luzac & Company 1957, 1967.Google Scholar
[R̥gveda] Die Hymnen des Rigveda
(Vols I & II1). Theodor Aufrecht (ed.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz 1955.Google Scholar
[R̥gveda] Rig-Veda: Das heilige Wissen: Erster und zweiter Liederkreis
. Michael Witzel und Toshifumi Gotō (ed. and transl.). Frankfurt am Main: Verlag der Weltreligionen 2007.Google Scholar
The Thera- and Therīgāthā (Stanzas ascribed to Elders of the Buddhist Order of Recluses)
(2nd edn. with appendix). Kenneth Roy Norman & Ludwig Alsdorf (eds.) London: Luzac & Company 1966.Google Scholar
[Therīgāthā] The Elders Verses II. Therīgāthā
. Kenneth Roy Norman (transl.). London: Luzax & Company 1971.Google Scholar
Andersen, Paul Kent
1979Word order typology and prepositions in Old Indic. In Bela Brogyanyi (ed.), Studies in diachronic, synchronic, and typological linguistics: Festschrift for Oswald Szemérenyi on the occasion of his 65th birthday, 23-34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beames, John
1970 [1875]A comparative grammar of the modern Aryan languages of India - to wit Hindi, Punjabi, Sindhi, Gujarati, Marathi, Oriya and Bengali. Vol. II. The noun and pronoun. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Bloch, Jules
1965Indo-Aryan. From the Vedas to modern times. (rev. and transl. by Alfred Master). Paris: Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient Adrien – Maissonneuve.Google Scholar
Böhtlingk, Otto & Rudolph Roth
1855-1875Grosses Petersburger Wörterbuch (7 Theile). (Online at [URL], last accessed 10/10/2013)
Bubenik, Vit
2006Cases and postpositions in Indo-Aryan. In John Hewson & Vit Bubenik (eds.), From case to adposition: The development of configurational syntax in Indo-European languages, 102-130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam & Tafseer Ahmed
2011The redevelopment of Indo-Aryan case systems from a lexical semantic perspective. Morphology 21(3-4). 545-572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casaretto, Antje
2010aSyntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda IX: ánu. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 651. 7-64.Google Scholar
2010bSyntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda VI: práti. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 71. 1-53.Google Scholar
2010 [2011]Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda VIII: abhí. Historische Sprachforschung 1231. 97-156.Google Scholar
2011 [2012]aSyntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda. XVI: áti und tirás. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 81. 173-216.Google Scholar
2011 [2012]bSyntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda XII: ví. Historische Sprachforschung 1241. 134-177.Google Scholar
2011 [2012]cLokalpartikel im R̥gveda XIV: ácchā. Zeitschrift für Indologie und Südasienstudien 281. 1-27.Google Scholar
2012Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln im R̥gveda XXI: purás, purástāt und purā́. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 661. 11-53.Google Scholar
Chatterji, Sunti Kumar
1970 [1926]The origin and development of the Bengali language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Coleman, Robert
1991Latin prepositional syntax in Indo-European perspective. In Robert Coleman (ed.), New studies in Latin linguistics, 323-338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuny, Albert
1907Les préverbes dans le Çatapatabrāhmaṇa. Paris: Université de Paris dissertation.Google Scholar
Davids, T.W. & William Stede
2007 [1921–1925]Pali-English Dictionary. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
2009 [1888]Altindische Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray Barnson
1956India as a linguistic area. Language 32(1). 3-16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fahs, Achim
1989Grammatik des Pali. Leipzig: VEB.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude
2010Adpositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth
1983Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1(1). 5-47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hettrich, Heinrich
1991Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda I: ádhi. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 521. 27-76.Google Scholar
1993Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda II: antár. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 541. 147-176.Google Scholar
2002Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda III: pári. In Matthias Fritz & Susanne Zeilfelder (eds.), Novalis Indogermanica. Festschrift für Günter Neumann zum 80. Geburtstag, 215-242. Graz: Leykam.Google Scholar
Hettrich, Heinrich, Antje Casaretto & Carolin Schneider
2010Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda IV: Allgemeines (H. Hettrich); II. úpa (A. Casaretto); III. áva (C. Schneider). Münchner Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 641. 17-130.Google Scholar
Hewson, John & Vit Bubenik
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P
2014Asymmetries in the prosodic phrasing of function words: Another look at the suffixing preference. Language 90(4). 927-960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, Hermann
1967 [1886]Ausgewählte Erzählungen in Mȃhȃrȃshṭrȋ. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie
1991The syntax of direct speech in Vedic. In Joel Brereton & Stephanie W. Jamison (eds.), Sense and syntax in Vedic, 40-57. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2013Harmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order. Linguistic Typology 171. 187-215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, Rev. Samuel Henry
1972 [1875]A grammar of the Hindī Language, in which are treated the High Hindī, Braj, and the Eastern Hindi of the Ramāyan of Tulsī Dās. New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corporation.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1958L’accentuation des langues Indo-Européennes. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy Imienia Ossolińskich Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2012From Latin to Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 201. 303-318.Google Scholar
2002 [1982]Thoughts on grammaticalization. 2nd, rev. edn. (Arbeitspapiere Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft 9). Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2010The rise (and possible downfall) of configurationality. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), The Continuum companion to historical linguistics, 212-229. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin Paul
1976Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1991The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, Manfred
1992Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindoarischen. Band 11. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine & Joseph Vendryes
1927Traité de grammaire comparée des langues classiques. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Oberlies, Thomas
1998Historische Grammatik des Hindi: Die Genese seines morphologischen Systems aus dem Mittel- und Altindischen. Freiburg: Reinbek.Google Scholar
Reinöhl, Uta
Forthcoming. Grammaticalization and the rise of configurationality in Indo-Aryan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logo
Renou, Louis
1956Préposition et préverbe dans le R̥gveda. In Louis Renou (ed.), Études védiques et pāṇinéennes, Vol. II1, 113-127. Paris: E. de Boccard.Google Scholar
Davids, Thomas William Rhys & William Stede
2007 [1921-1925]Pali-English Dictionary. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carolin
2009 [2010]Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda V: ní. Historische Sprachforschung 1221. 118-169.Google Scholar
2010aSyntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda. VII: níṣ. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 71. 149-193.Google Scholar
2010bLokalpartikel im R̥gveda (Folge 13): ápa. Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik 271. 1-35.Google Scholar
2011Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda X: úd. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 651. 185-241.Google Scholar
2012Local particles in the R̥gveda XVII: párā. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 661. 221-246.Google Scholar
Speijer, Jacob Samuel
1968 [1886]Sanskrit syntax. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Verbeke, Saartje & Ludovic De Cuypere
2009The rise of ergativity in Hindi. Assessing the role of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica 301. 1-24.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight
1983 [1879]Sanskrit grammar. 5th edition. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Bez, Gitanjali
2020. The relator noun construction in Assamese. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 7:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Louagie, Dana & Uta Reinöhl
2022. Typologizing nominal expressions: the noun phrase and beyond. Linguistics 60:3  pp. 659 ff. DOI logo
Reinöhl, Uta & Antje Casaretto
2018. When grammaticalization does not occur. Diachronica 35:2  pp. 238 ff. DOI logo
Stroński, Krzysztof, Joanna Tokaj & Saartje Verbeke

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.