Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 33:2 (2016) ► pp.187–219

Chindamani and reconstruction of Thai tones in the 17th century

Chindamani, the oldest surviving text about the Thai language, contains a direct but equivocal description of Thai orthography and prosody. Combining careful textual study with findings and analytical tools from Comparative Tai, I argue that 17th century Thai had already established a five-tone system that only differs from present-day Thai in two respects. First, some tones were pronounced differently from their present-day counterparts. While Tone 2 and Tone 3 are now low falling and high falling respectively, they were both pronounced with medium pitch. Second, the set of tones allowed on syllables ending in stop consonants was smaller than today. Currently, Tones 2, 3 and 4 can occur in stop-final syllables, but only the first two were allowed in the 17th century.
Keywords: tonal changes, tonal reconstruction, tones, textual analysis, Thai, Chindamani, orthography
Published online: 23 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.33.2.02pit
References (54)
Abramson, Arthur S. 1962. The vowels and tones in Standard Thai: Acoustical measurements and experiments. International Journal of American Linguistics 28(2). Part II.Google Scholar
Anchaleenukoon, Sunant. 2005. The study of the development of the Thai grammar. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Banditkul, Panchanit. 1993. Tones in monosyllabic and disyllabic words in the central Thai dialect of Prachuap Khiri Khan. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University M.A. thesis.Google Scholar
Baxter, William H. 1992. A handbook of Old Chinese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart. 2014. Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickner, Robert J. 1991. An introduction to the Thai poem “Lilit Phra Law” (The Story of King Law). Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University, Center for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Brown, Marvin J. 1965. From Ancient Thai to modern dialectsFrom Ancient Thai to modern dialects. In Marvin J. Brown (ed.), From Ancient Thai to modern dialectsFrom Ancient Thai to modern dialects, and other writings on historical Thai linguistics, 69–254. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
. 1985. Historical explanations for the peculiarities of the Thai writing system. In Marvin J. Brown (ed.), From Ancient Thai to modern dialects, and other writings on historical Thai linguistics, 5–17. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
Canilao, Kritsana. 2010. Tonal geography of the provinces of central Thailand. Nakhon Pathom: Mahidol University dissertation.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, James R. 1975. A new look at the history and classification of the Tai languages. In Jimmy G. Harris & James R. Chamberlain (eds.), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Gedney, 49–66. Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1930. A system of tone-letters. Le Maître Phonétique 451. 24–27.Google Scholar
Damrong Rajanubhab, Prince. 1932. Tamnan khlong chan kap klon [The stories of potery]. Banthuek Samakhom Wannakhadi Thai 1(5). 19–40.Google Scholar
Danvivathana, Nantana. 1981. The Thai writing system. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Eoseewong, Nidhi. 2004. Kanmueang Thai samai Phrachao Krung Thonburi [Thai politics during the reign of King Taksin], 7th edn. Bangkok: Matichon.Google Scholar
Gedney, William J. 1972. A checklist for determining tones in Tai dialects. In Smith M. Estellie (ed.), Studies in linguistics in honor of George L. Trager, 423–438. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1989a. Siamese verse forms in historical perspective. In Robert J. Bickner, John Hartmann & Thomas J. Hudak (eds.), Selected papers on comparative Tai studies, 489–544. Ann Arbor: Center for South and Southeast Asian studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
. 1989b. Speculations on early Tai tones. In Robert J. Bickner, John Hartmann, Thomas J. Hudak & Patcharin Peyasantiwong (eds.), Selected papers on comparative Tai studies, 207–228. Ann Arbor: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
. 1991. Comments on linguistic arguments relating to Inscription One. In James R. Chamberlain (ed.), The Ram Khamhaeng controversy, 193–226. Bangkok: The Siam Society.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1943. The Thai system of writing. Washington: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
. 1964. Thai-English student’s dictionary. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, John T. 1842. Brief grammatical notices of the Siamese language, with an appendix. Bangkok: The Mission Press.Google Scholar
Jonsson, Nanna L. 1991. Proto-Southwestern Tai. Albany, NY: SUNY Albany dissertation.Google Scholar
Kamalanavin, Varisa. 2003. The tonal system of speakers in the Ayutthaya period: Evidence from “Khon” recitation and “Chindamani.” Journal of Liberal Arts, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Thammasat University 3(2). 28–54.Google Scholar
Kanchanawan, Nitaya. 2006. Romanization, transliteration, and transcription for the globalization of the Thai language [July – September 2006]. The Journal of the Royal Institute of Thailand 31(3). 832–841.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei. 1977. Handbook of Comparative Tai. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
McFarland, George Bradley. 1944. Thai-English dictionary. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mei, Tsu-lin. 1970. Tones and prosody in Middle Chinese and the origin of the rising tone. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 301. 86–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naksakun, Kanchana. 1977. Rabop siang phasa Thai [The sound system of Thai]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Nualjansaeng, Janya. 1992. Tones of the Thai dialect of Amphoe Muang Nakhon Pathom. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University M.A. thesis.Google Scholar
Pallegoix, Jean-Baptiste. 1850. Grammatica linguæ Thai. Bangkok: Typographia Collegii Assumptionis B. M. V.Google Scholar
Panarut, Peera. 2015. On a quest for the jewel: A review of the Fine Arts Department’s edition of Phra Horathibodi’s Chindamani. Manusya: Journal of Humanities 18(1). 23–57.Google Scholar
Panupong, Vichin. 1970. The classification of consonants in Thai. In Tej Bunnag & Michael Smithies (eds.), In memoriam Phya Anuman Rajadhon: Contributions in memory of the late president of the Siam Society, 55–67. Bangkok: The Siam Society.Google Scholar
Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2007. Directionality of tone change. In Jürgen Trouvain & Wiliam J. Barry (eds.), ICPhS XVI [16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences], 1421–1424. Saarbrücken, Germany: Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar
. 2009a. Phonology of Proto-Tai. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2009b. Proto-Southwestern-Tai revised: A new reconstruction. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 21. 121–144.Google Scholar
Plungsuwan, Wipawan. 1981. A tonal comparison of Tai dialects in Ratchaburi. Nakhon Pathom: Mahidol University M.A. thesis.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1978. The nature of the Middle Chinese tones and their development to Early Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 61. 173–203.Google Scholar
. 1984. Middle Chinese: A study in historical phonology. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Smalley, William A. 1994. Linguistic diversity and national unity: Language ecology in Thailand. Hamden, CT: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Supanvanit, Ingorn. 1984. Wiwatthanakan akson lae akkharawithi Thai [Development of Thai scripts and orthography]. Bangkok: Research Publication Project, Division of Research Affairs, Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Teeranon, Phanintra. 2002a. Changes in phonetic characteristics of Thai Tone 4. Warasan Aksorasat [Arts Journal], Silpakorn University 24(1–2). 188–209.Google Scholar
. 2002b. Thai tones in the reigns of King Rama VI and King Rama IX. Journal of Language and Linguistics 21(1). 32–46.Google Scholar
. 2007. The change of Standard Thai high tone: An acoustic study and a perceptual experiment. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4(3). 1–16.Google Scholar
Teeranon, Phanintra & Rungwimol Rungrojsuwan. 2009. Change in the Standard Thai high tone: An acoustic study. Manusya: Journal of Humanities, Special issue 171. 34–44.Google Scholar
Ting, Pang-Hsin. 1996. Tonal evolution and tonal reconstruction in Chinese. In Cheng-Teh James Huang & Yen-Hui Audrey Li (eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 141–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tingsabadh, M.R. Kalaya 1980. A phonological study of the Thai language of Suphanburi Province. University of London dissertation.Google Scholar
2001. Thai tone geography. In M.R. Kalaya Tingsabadh & Arthur S. Abramson (eds.), Essays in Tai linguistics, 205–228. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Varasarin, Uraisi. 1984. Les éléments khmers dans la formation de la langue siamoise. Paris: Société d’études linguistiques et anthropologiques de France.Google Scholar
Vespada, Dhanate. 2000. Thai texts on poetics: Concept and relation to Thai literary convention. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University dissertation.Google Scholar
Withayasakpan, Sompong. 1979. A study of Rayong sub-dialects. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University M.A. thesis.Google Scholar
Worawong, Netnapa. 2000. Tone in Kanchanaburi Thai. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University M.A. thesis.Google Scholar
Yooyen, Wipawan. 2008. The evolution of the use of the high ( ๊) and the rising  ๋ tone marks in Thai. Nakhon Pathom: Silpakorn University dissertation.Google Scholar
Yupho, Dhanit. 2001. Chindamani lem 1–2: Banthuek rueang nansue chindamani lae chindamani chabap phra chao barommakot [Chindamani 1–2 with a memorandum on Chindamani and King Barommakot’s Chindamani], 10th edn. Bangkok: Department of Fine Arts.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth. 2008. Modeling diachronic change in the Thai tonal space. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14(1). 395–408.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Liao, Hanbo
2023. Tonal Behavior as of Areal and Typological Concerns: Centering on the Sinitic and Kam-Tai Languages in Lingnan. Languages 8:2 ► pp. 148 ff. DOI logo
Liao, Hanbo
2023. An integrated tone box scheme for determining tones in Tai varieties beyond Southwestern Tai: diachronic and synchronic concerns. Folia Linguistica 57:s44-s1 ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Cathryn
2022. The phonetic tone change *high > rising. Diachronica 39:2 ► pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Pittayaporn, Pittayawat
2018. Chapter 17. Quantitative and qualitative restrictions on the distribution of lexical tones in Thai. In Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 250], ► pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Diller, Anthony
2017. Early Thai orthography. Written Language & Literacy 20:2 ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.