Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 33:3 (2016) ► pp. 367–411

Word order patterns in the Old High German right periphery and their Indo-European origins

I investigate deviations from the OV order in the OHG texts Isidor and Tatian. Abstracting away from cases of verb-second, post-verbal constituents tend to be heavy or focused. OHG thus has a head-final VP with extraposition of NPs and PPs. Likewise, verbal complexes with the order finite before non-finite are derived by Verb (Projection) Raising. Ancient Indo-European languages are also underlyingly OV with evidence for extraposition. This suggests that OHG inherited the head-final VP, extraposition and even V(P)R from Proto-Indo-European. Because extraposition and V(P)R are at the periphery of grammar, the resulting surface orders have not resulted in parametric change to the VP from Proto-Indo-European to present-day German.
Keywords: periphery, Verb Phrase, extraposition, Proto-Indo-European, Proto-Germanic, parameter, verbal complex, Old High German
Published online: 15 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.33.3.03sap
References
Axel, Katrin
2007 Studies on Old High German syntax: Left sentence periphery, verb placement and verb-second. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bader, Markus & Tanja Schmid
2009 Verb clusters in colloquial German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 121. 175–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baldi, Philip & Pierluigi Cuzzolin
2009 Syntactic change in the history of Latin: Do new perspectives lead to new results? In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax, 865–894. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte L.M
2009 Word order. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax, 241–316. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto
1932 Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
1929 Zur Stellung des Verbs im Germanischen und Indogermanischen. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der indo-germanischen Sprachen 561. 276–281.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg & Ian Roberts
2014 A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 451. 169–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred
1963 Grammatik des deutschen Verbs (Studia grammatica 2). Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Bubenik, Vit
1991 Nominal and pronominal objects in Sanskrit and Prakrit. In Hans Henrich Hock (ed.), Studies in Sanskrit syntax, 19–30. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Cervin, Richard
1990 Word order in ancient Greek: VSO, SVO, SOV, or all of the above? Champaign-Urbana, IL: University of Illinois dissertation.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Pieter Muysken
1996 How adult second language learning differs from child first language development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 191. 721–723. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cloutier, Robert
2009 West Germanic OV and VO: The status of exceptions. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam dissertation.Google Scholar
DDD Referenzkorpus Altdeutsch
Online at http://​www​.deutschdiachrondigital​.de​/home (last accessed 7 August 2015.
Delbrück, Berthold
1900 Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen, vol. 31. Strasbourg: Trübner.Google Scholar
1911 Germanische Syntax II: Zur Stellung des Verbums. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Devine, Andrew M. & Laurence D. Stephens
2006 Latin word order: Structured meaning and information. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dittmer, Arne & Ernst Dittmer
1998 Studien zur Wortstellung—Satzgliedstellung in der althochdeutschen Tatianübersetzung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Robert Peter
1980 Social and stylistic variation in Early New High German word order: The sentence frame (“Satzrahmen”). Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 1021. 357–398.Google Scholar
1981 Social and stylistic variation in the order of auxiliary and non-finite verb in dependent clauses in Early New High German. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 1031. 204–237.Google Scholar
Eggers, Hans
1964 Der althochdeutsche Isidor. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur
1995 Verbal syntax in the early Germanic languages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University dissertation.Google Scholar
2011 Variation in the syntax of the older runic inscriptions. Futhark 21. 27–50.Google Scholar
Filpus, Raija
1994 Die Ausklammerung in der gesprochenen deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart. Tampere: University of Tampere dissertation.Google Scholar
Fourquet, Jean-Philippe
1938 L'Ordre des éléments de la phrase en germanique ancien: Études de syntaxe de position. Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph
1963 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th
2009 Statistics for linguists with R: A practical introduction. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1992 Theory and description in generative syntax: A case study in West Flemish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Henk van Riemsdijk
1986 Verb projection raising, scope, and the typology of rules affecting verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 171. 417–466.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2010 Wie wurde Deutsch OV? Zur diachronen Dynamik eines Strukturparameters der germanischen Sprachen. In Arne Ziegler (ed.), Historische Textgrammatik und historische Syntax des Deutschen: Traditionen, Innovationen, Perspektiven, vol. 11, 11–32. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland
2015 An interface account of word-order variation in Old High German. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over time: Lexical, morphological and information-structural interactions, 299–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
2015 Proto-Indo-European verb-finality: Reconstruction, typology, validation. In Leonid Kulikov & Nikolaos Lavidas (eds.), Proto-Indo-European syntax and its development, 51–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, Nina
1987 The core/periphery distinction in language acquisition. In Ann Miller & Joyce Powers (eds.), Proceedings of the fourth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics [ESCOL], 126–146. Columbus: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Jäger, Agnes
2008 History of German negation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E
2009 Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 31. 359–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1995 Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 140–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Anne Taylor
2000 Verb-object order in Early Middle English. In Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, 132–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P
1972 Proto-Germanic syntax. In Frans van Coetsem & Herbert Kufner (eds.), Toward a grammar of Proto-Germanic, 239–268. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lenerz, Jürgen
1984 Syntaktischer Wandel und Grammatiktheorie: Eine Untersuchung an Beispielen aus der Sprachgeschichte des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Light, Caitlin
2015 Expletive there in West Germanic. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over time: Lexical, morphological and information-structural interactions, 17–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
1990 Old Hittite sentence structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Masser, Achim
1994 Die lateinisch-althochdeutsche Tatianbilingue Stiftsbibliothek St. Gallen Cod. 56. Göttingen: Vandenhœck & Ruprecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann
2007 Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, 25th edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Anthony Kroch
1989 The rightward movement of complements and adjuncts in the Old English of Beowulf. Language Variation and Change 11. 115–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team
2013 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://​www​.R​-project​.org/.Google Scholar
Ratkus, Artūras
2011 The adjective inflection in Gothic and early Germanic: Structure and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University dissertation.Google Scholar
Robinson, Orrin
1997 Clause subordination and verb placement in the Old High German Isidor translation. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo
2011 A formal approach to Latin word order. In Renato Oniga, Rossella Iovino & Guiliana Giusti (eds.), Formal linguistics and the teaching of Latin: Theoretical and applied perspectives in comparative grammar, 23–50. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Sapp Christopher D
2014 Extraposition in Middle and Early New High German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 171. 129–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapp, Christopher D
2011a The verbal complex in subordinate clauses from medieval to modern German. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b The verbal complex in Old High German: Evidence for SOV. Interdisciplinary Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 161. 63–99.Google Scholar
Schallert, Oliver
2010 Als Deutsch noch nicht OV war: Althochdeutsch im Spannungsfeld zwischen OV und VO. In Arne Ziegler (ed.), Historische Textgrammatik und Historische Syntax des Deutschen: Traditionen, Innovationen, Perspektiven, vol. 11, 365–394. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schäufele, Steven
1991 Verb-medial clauses in Vedic: Some theoretical implications. In Hans Henrich Hock (ed.), Studies in Sanskrit syntax, 177–196. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Schlachter, Eva
2012 Syntax und Informationsstruktur im Althochdeutschen: Untersuchungen am Beispiel der Isidor-Gruppe. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Schmid, Tanja & Ralf Vogel
2004 Dialectal variation in German 3-verb clusters: A surface-oriented optimality theoretic account. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 71. 235–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann
1994 The change from SOV to SVO in ancient Greek. Language Variation and Change 61. 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk
2015 Verb order, object position, and information status in Old English. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over time: Lexical, morphological and information-structural interactions, 318–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tatian corpus of deviating examples (T-CODEX 2.0)
https://​korpling​.german​.hu​-berlin​.de​/~annis​/T​-CODEX. last accessed 25 August 2014.
Uriagereka, Juan
2006 Towards a syntax of Proto-Basque. In Joseba Lakarra (ed.), Homage to Larry Trask, 949–968. University of the Basque Country. Google Scholar
Viti, Carlotta
2015 Variation und Wandel in der Syntax der alten indogermanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Walkden, George
2014a Object position and heavy NP shift in Old Saxon and beyond. In Kristin Bech & Kristine M. Eide (eds.), Information structure and word order change in Germanic and Romance languages, 313–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallenberg, Joel C
2015 Antisymmetry and heavy NP shift across Germanic. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over time: Lexical, morphological and information-structural interactions, 336–349. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
1976 Towards Proto-Indo-European syntax: Problems and pseudo-problems. In Stanford Steever, Carol Walker & Salikoko Mufwene (eds.), Papers from the parasession on diachronic syntax, April 22, 1976, 305–326. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred
1993 The diachronic consequences of first and second language acquisition: The change from OV to VO. Linguistics 311. 903–931. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Helmut
Manuscript Die rechte Satzperipherie im Althochdeutschen: Zur Verbstellung in dass-Sätzen. Google Scholar
West, Martin
2011 Old Avestan syntax and stylistics. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wöllstein-Leisten, Angelika, Axel Heilmann, Peter Stepan & Sten Vikner
1997 Deutsche Satzstruktur: Grundlagen der syntaktischen Analyse. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Wunder, Dieter
1965 Der Nebensatz bei Otfrid: Untersuchungen zur Syntax des deutschen Nebensatzes. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi
2004 Syntactic vs. post-syntactic movement. In Sophie Burelle & Stanca Somesfalean (eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association (CLA), 284–295. Montreal: University of Quebec.Google Scholar
2006 Verb clusters, verb raising, and restructuring. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 51, 229–343. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zahn, Günther
1991 Beobachtungen zur Ausklammerung und Nachfeldbesetzung in gesprochenem Deutsch. Erlangen: Palm und Enke.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Baechler, Raffaela & Simon Pröll
2018. Loss and preservation of case in Germanic non-standard varieties. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 Crossref logo
Hock, Hans Henrich
2019. Latin influence on German word order?. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 33 ► pp. 183 ff. Crossref logo
Somers, Katerina, Mary Allison, Matthew Boutilier & Robert Howell
2018. Syntactic Echoes Of Pronominal Cliticization And Grammaticalization: The Case Of Old High German First-Person Plural -Mes. Transactions of the Philological Society 116:2 ► pp. 218 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.