Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 33:4 (2016) ► pp.503–529

Sibilant sound change in the history of Portuguese

An information-theoretic approach

An information-theoretic approach
Keywords: Portuguese, sound change, sibilants, surprisal, Information Theory, entropy
Published online: 31 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.33.4.03zam
References (73)
Ali, Ahmed M. Abdelatty, Jan van der Spiegel & Paul Mueller. 2001. Acoustic-phonetic features for the automatic classification of fricatives. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 1091. 2217–2235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azevedo, Milton M. 2005. Portuguese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Gary K. 2003. Sibilant dissimilation and dispersion in the history of Spanish. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida manuscript.Google Scholar
Barros, João de. 1540. Grammatica da lingua portuguesa. Lisbon: Biblioteca Nacional.Google Scholar
Basso, Renato Miguel & Rodrigo Tadeu Gonçalves. 2014. História concisa da língua portuguesa. Petrópolis, Brazil: Vozes.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Travis G. & Ann Marie Delforge. 2006. Systemic contrast and the diachrony of Spanish sibilant voicing. In Randall Gess & Deborah Arteaga (eds.), Historical Romance linguistics: Retrospectives and perspectives, 19–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Formal universals as emergent phenomena: The origins of structure preservation. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 108–121. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Castro, Ivo (ed.). 1988. Sete ensaios sobre a obra de J. M. Piel. Lisbon: Instituto de Linguística da Faculdade de Letras de Lisboa.Google Scholar
. 2006. Introdução à história do português, 2nd edn. Lisbon: Edições Colibri.Google Scholar
Castro Brasil, Bruna de, Carolina Lisbôa Mezzomo, Helena Bolli Mota, Roberta Michelon Melo, Liane Lovatto & Leonardo Arzeno. 2012. Características acústicas dos fones [s] e [ʃ] de adultos e crianças com desenvolvimento fonológico típico. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia 17(2). 182–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chater, Nick, Josh B. Tenenbaum & Alan Yuille. 2006. Probabilistic models of cognition: Conceptual foundations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(7). 287–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cielo, Carla Aparecida & Maísa Tatiana Casarin. 2008. Sons fricativos surdos. Revista CEFAC – Speech, Language, Hearing Sciences and Education Journal 10(3). 352–358.Google Scholar
Cintra, Luís Filipe Lindley. 1971. Nova proposta de classificação dos dialectos galego-portugueses. Boletim de filologia 221. 81–116.Google Scholar
Cohen Priva, Uriel. 2015. Informativity affects consonant duration and deletion rates. Laboratory Phonology 6(2). 243–278.Google Scholar
Coutinho, Ismael de Lima. 1976. Gramática histórica, 7th edn. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Ao Livro Técnico.Google Scholar
Cover, Thomas M. & Joy A. Thomas. 2006. Elements of information theory, 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Cristófaro Silva, Thaïs. 1998. Fonética e fonologia do português: Roteiro de estudos e guia de exercícios. São Paulo: Contexto.Google Scholar
D’Angelis, Wilmar da Rocha. 2002. Sistema fonológico do português: Rediscutindo o consenso. Revista de Documentação de Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada (D.E.L.T.A) 18(1). 1–24.Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa. 2007. The relationship between the perception of non-native phonetics and loanword adaptation. Phonology 241. 261–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark & Michael Ferreira. 2006–. Corpus do Português: 45 million words, 1300s–1900s. [URL]. (27 June–8 July, 2015.)
Dell, Gary S. 1990. Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes 5(4). 313–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira da Silva, Audinéia. 2012. Estudo das características acústicas das fricativas do português do Brasil. Araraquara, Brazil: MA thesis, São Paulo State University.Google Scholar
Fought, John. 1979. The ‘medieval sibilants’ of the Eulalia-Ludwigslied manuscript and their development in early Old French. Language 551. 842–858. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galmés de Fuentes, Álvaro. 1962. Las sibilantes en la Romania. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Galves, Charlotte & Pablo Faria. 2010. Tycho Brahe parsed corpus of historical Portuguese. [URL].
Goldsmith, John. 2000. On information theory, entropy, and phonology in the 20th century. Folia Linguistica 34(1–2). 85–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Kathleen Currie. 2009. A probabilistic model of phonological relationships from contrast to allophony. Columbus, OH: Ph.D. diss., The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Harris, James W. 1969. Sound change in Spanish and the theory of markedness. Language 451. 538–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauy, Amini Boainain. 2008. Séculos XII, XIII e XIV. In Segismundo Spina (ed.), História da língua portuguesa, 21–144. Cotia, Brazil: Ateliê Editorial.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth. 2004. The indeterminacy/attestation model of metathesis. Language 801. 203–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Phonological markedness and its relation to the uncertainty of words. Phonological Studies 191. 107–116.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth & Keith Johnson. 2001. A model of the interplay of speech perception and phonology. In Elizabeth Hume & Keith Johnson (eds.), The role of perception in phonology, 3–26. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth, Kathleen Currie Hall, Andrew Wedel, Adam Ussishkin, Martine Adda-Decker & Cédric Gendrot. 2013. Anti-markedness patterns in French epenthesis: An information-theoretic approach. In Chundra Cathcart, I-Hsuan Chen, Greg Finley, Shinae Kang, Clare S. Sandy & Elise Stikles (eds.), Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 371, 104–123. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth & Frédéric Mailhot. 2013. The role of entropy and surprisal in phonologization and language change. In Alan C.L. Yu (ed.), Origins of sound patterns: Approaches to phonologization, 29–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth, Darcy Rose & Michael Spagnol. 2014. Maltese word-final singleton-geminate contrasts: An information-theoretic approach. In René Kager, Janet Grijzenhout & Kohen Sebregts (eds.), Where the principles fail: A festschrift for Wim Zonneveld, 89–101. Utrecht, Netherlands: Hollandridderkerk.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith. 2012. Acoustic and auditory phonetics, 3rd edn. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Joos, Martin. 1952. The medieval sibilants. Language 281. 222–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2003. The phonological basis of sound change. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 313–342. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Universals constrain change; change results in typological generalizations. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 23–53. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson. 1996. The sounds of the world’s languages. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Keith Johnson. 2015. A course in phonetics, 7th edn. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1980. On explaining language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In William J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipski, John M. 1994. Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lourenço Esteves, Paula Margarida. 2013. As consoantes sibilantes: Oralidade, escrita e consciência fonológica. Aveiro, Portugal: MS thesis, University of Aveiro.Google Scholar
Machado, José Barbosa. 2012. Introdução à história da língua e cultura portuguesas. Braga, Portugal: Edições Vercial.Google Scholar
Maia, Clarinda de Azevedo. 1986. História do galego-português: Estado linguístico da Galiza e do noroeste de Portugal desde o século XIII ao século XVI (com referência à situação do galego moderno). Coimbra, Portugal: Instituto Nacional de Investigação Científica.Google Scholar
Mateus, Maria Helena & Ernesto d’Andrade. 2000. The phonology of Portuguese. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mattos e Silva, Rosa Virgínia. 2006. O português arcaico: Fonologia, morfologia e sintaxe. São Paulo: Contexto.Google Scholar
Miller, D. Gary. 2010. Language change and linguistic theory I: Approaches, methodology, and sound change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munson, Benjamin. 2001. Phonological pattern frequency and speech production in adults and children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 441. 778–792.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Carrie S. Mazek, Roberta A. Hendrick & Mary France Miller (eds.), Papers from the parassession on language and behavior, 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2003. Phonetics and historical phonology. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 669–686. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, Fernão de. 1536. Grammatica da lingoagem portuguesa. Lisbon: Biblioteca Nacional.Google Scholar
Paiva, Dulce de Faria. 2008. Século XV e meados do século XVI. In Segismundo Spina (ed.), História da língua portuguesa, 147–275. Cotia, Brazil: Ateliê Editorial.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1886. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Joan L. Bybee & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 137–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penny, Ralph J. 2000. Variation and change in Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. A history of the Spanish language, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Maria Dolors Pallàres. 2001. De la fonètica a la fonologia: Les consonants i assimilacions consonàntiques del català. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, Scott. 2014. Word informativity influences acoustic duration: Effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation. Cognition 1331. 140–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Claude. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27. 379–423, 623–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spina, Segismundo (ed.). 2008. História da língua portuguesa. Cotia, Brazil: Ateliê Editorial.Google Scholar
Teyssier, Paul. 2014. História da língua portuguesa, 4th edn. Translated by Celso Cunha. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.Google Scholar
Treiman, Rebecca, Brett Kessler, Stephanie Knewasser, Ruth Tincoff & Margo Bowman. 2000. English speakers’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns. In Michael B. Broe & Janet B. Pierrehumbert (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon, 269–282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max W. 2005. The phonology of Catalan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin B. 1962. From Latin to Portuguese: Historical phonology and morphology of the Portuguese language. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Zampaulo, André. 2013. Sibilant dissimilation in the history of Spanish: An information-theoretic approach. In Chad Howe, Sarah E. Blackwell & Margaret Lubbers Quesada (eds.), 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (HLS 15), 172–178. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Zampieri, Marcos & Martin Becker. 2013. Colonia: Corpus of historical Portuguese. [URL].Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Hinskens, Frans
2020. The Expanding Universe of the Study of Sound Change. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Hinskens, Frans
2020. The future of dialects and the dialectology of the future. Taal en Tongval 72:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Hinskens, Frans L.
2019. Chapter 2. Of clocks, clouds and sound change. In Language Variation - European Perspectives VII [Studies in Language Variation, 22], ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.