Cover not available
Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 5:1/2 (1988) ► pp.227–232
Book review

Paul M. Lloyd. From Latin to Spanish. Historical Phonology and Morphology of the Spanish Language Paul M. Lloyd. [Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, 173]. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1987. xi, 439 pp.

Reviewed by
| University of Georgia
Published online: 1 January 1988
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.5.1-2.14gor
References (17)
References
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio. 1958. “Quelques précisions sur la diphthongaison espagnole”. Omagiu lui Iorgu lordan ed. by Alexandru Rosetti, 1–4. Bucha-rest: Academiei Republicii Populare Romîne.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo. 1972. An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Unguis-tics. New York: Macmillan. (2nd enl. ed., Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1989.)Google Scholar
de Gorog, Ralph. 1962. “A Note on the Finnish Treatment of Germanic f-”. Word 181.300–306.Google Scholar
Devine, Andrew M. & Laurence D. Stephens. 1977. Two Studies in Latin Phonology. I1: The Latin Labiovelars; II1: The Latin Consonant Clusters. (= Studia Linguistica et Philologica , 31.) Saratoga, Calif.: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Grandgent, Charles H. 1927. From Latin to Italian. Cambridge, Mass.: Har-vard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. 1967–68. “Range of Variation as a Clue to Dating. Part I”. Romance Philology 211.463–501.Google Scholar
. 1977. “On Hierarchizing the Components of Multiple Causation”. Studies in Language 11.81–108.Google Scholar
. 1983. “Alternatives to the Classic Dichotomy Family Tree /Wave Theory? The Romance evidence”. Language Change ed. by Irmengard Rauch & Gerald F. Carr, 192–256. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1955. Economie des changements phonétiques. Berne: Francke. (3rd ed., 1970.)Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón. 1941. Manual de gramdtica historica espanola. 6a edition. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Pope, Mildred K. 1934. From Latin to Modern French, with especial consideration of Anglo-Norman: Phonology and morphology. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst. 1975. Latin-Romance Phonology: Prosodies and metrics. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Rosoff, Gary H. 1974. “The Phonetic Framework of the Universal Sound Correlates in Romance Vowel Diachrony”. Linguistics No. 1351.57–71.Google Scholar
Tagliavini, Carlo. 1969. Le origini delle lingue neolatine: Introduzione alla filologia romanza. Bologna: Riccardo Patron.Google Scholar
Väänänen, Veikko. 1966. Le latin vulgaire des inscriptions pompiiennes. 3e éd. (= Abhandlungen der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin; Klassefur Sprachen, Literatur und Kunst ; Jahrgang 1966, No.31.) Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin B. 1962. From Latin to Portuguese: Historical phonology and morphology of the Portuguese language. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Zamora Vicente, Alonso. 1967. Dialectologia espanola. 2a edición muy aumentada. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar