Review published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 6:2 (1989) ► pp. 287290
References
Antonsen, Elmer H.
1967 “On the Origin of Old English Digraph Spellings”. Studies in Linguistics 191.5–17.Google Scholar
1969–70 “Old High German and the Laws of Final Syllables”. Studies in Linguistics 211.55–76.Google Scholar
1972 “The Proto-Germanic Syllabics (Vowels)”. Toward a Gram-mar of Proto-Germanic ed. by Frans van Coetsem & Herbert Kufner, 117–140. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975A Concise Grammar of the Older Runic Inscriptions. (= Sprachstrukturen; Reihe A, 31.) Tubingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1978 “On the Notion of ‘Archaicizing’ Inscriptions”. The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 3 ed. by John Weinstock, 282–288. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Dal, Ingerid
1967Über den /-Umlaut im Deutschen”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 681.47–64.Google Scholar
Krahe, Hans & Wolfgang Meid
1969Germanische Sprachwissenschaft I: Einleitung und Lautlehre. 7th ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, Jerzy
1952 “The Germanic Vowel System”. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Jezykoznqwczego 111.50–54.Google Scholar
Martinet, André
1955Économie des changements phonétiques: Traité de phonologie diachronique. (= Bibliotheca Romanica , 101.) Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Nielsen, Hans Frede
1991. Review of Bammes-berger (1990): Die Morphologie des urgermanischen Nomens. Diachronica 8:2  pp. 273 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.