Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 6:2 (1989) ► pp.287290
References (9)
References
Antonsen, Elmer H. 1967. “On the Origin of Old English Digraph Spellings”. Studies in Linguistics 191.5–17.Google Scholar
. 1969–70. “Old High German and the Laws of Final Syllables”. Studies in Linguistics 211.55–76.Google Scholar
. 1972. “The Proto-Germanic Syllabics (Vowels)”. Toward a Gram-mar of Proto-Germanic ed. by Frans van Coetsem & Herbert Kufner, 117–140. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1975. A Concise Grammar of the Older Runic Inscriptions. (= Sprachstrukturen; Reihe A, 31.) Tubingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1978. “On the Notion of ‘Archaicizing’ Inscriptions”. The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 3 ed. by John Weinstock, 282–288. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Dal, Ingerid. 1967Über den /-Umlaut im Deutschen”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 681.47–64.Google Scholar
Krahe, Hans & Wolfgang Meid. 1969. Germanische Sprachwissenschaft I: Einleitung und Lautlehre. 7th ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, Jerzy. 1952. “The Germanic Vowel System”. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Jezykoznqwczego 111.50–54.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques: Traité de phonologie diachronique. (= Bibliotheca Romanica , 101.) Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Nielsen, Hans Frede

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.