Dialogue, Science and Academic Writing

| Bar-Ilan University
ISBN 9789027210302 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00
ISBN 9789027275028 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00
This book investigates the dialogic nature of research articles from the perspective of discourse analysis, based on theories of dialogicity. It proposes a theoretical and applied framework for the understanding and exploration of scientific dialogicity.
Focusing on some dialogic components, among them citations, concession, inclusive we and interrogatives, a combined model of scientific dialogicity is proposed, that reflects the place and role of various linguistic structures against the background of various theoretical approaches to dialogicity.

Taking this combined model as a basis, the analysis demonstrates how scientific dialogicity is realized in an actual scientific dispute and how a scientific project is constructed step by step by means of a dialogue with its readers and discourse community. A number of different patterns of scientific dialogicity are offered, characterized by the different levels of the polemic held with the research world and other specific researchers – from the “classic”, moderate and polite dialogicity to a direct and personal confrontation between scientists.
[Dialogue Studies, 13]  2012.  vi, 216 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“There is a longstanding tradition of regarding academic discourse as a way of disseminating "objective truth". In this sense ''Dialogue, Science and Academic Writing'' is a timely book: the author disspells a number of myths about academic discourse, including objectivity. Scientific writing is not as objective as it is usually assumed to be; rather, it is a competition among various points of view. In order to "win the competition" researchers employ conflicting dialogic strategies, and this tendency breaks another myth -- the myth of impartiality of academic writing.

Livnat's work also succeeds in integrating independent theories of dialogism. The author combines the strengths of various models of dialogicity to explain how dialogue is created and what strategies researchers use to position themselves in the existing system of knowledge.

“Livnat’s work is a pleasant read, and can be used both as an introduction to the field as well as a scholarly study of a particular controversy dealing with our understanding of the Bible.”
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Bondi, Marina
2018.  In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31],  pp. 137 ff. Crossref logo
Chesnokova, Olga S., Dmitry S. Khramchenko & Milana E. Kupriyanova
2020.  In Functional Approach to Professional Discourse Exploration in Linguistics,  pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga, Martin Adam, Renata Povolná & Radek Vogel
2020.  In Persuasion in Specialised Discourses,  pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga
2018.  In Persuasion in Public Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 79],  pp. 227 ff. Crossref logo
Ghadyani, Fariba & Mohammad Hassan Tahririan
2015. Interactive Markers in Medical Research Articles Written by Iranian and Native Authors of ISI and Non-ISI Medical Journals: A Contrastive Metadiscourse Analysis of Method Section. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5:2  pp. 309 ff. Crossref logo
Gruber, Helmut
2019. Genres, media, and recontextualization practices. Internet Pragmatics 2:1  pp. 54 ff. Crossref logo
Kayam, Orly
2020. Straight to the people. Language and Dialogue 10:2  pp. 149 ff. Crossref logo
Livnat, Zohar & Ayelet Kohn
2018. Morality, loyalty and eloquence. Journal of Language and Politics 17:3  pp. 405 ff. Crossref logo
Livnat, Zohar & Beverly A. Lewin
2016. The interpersonal strand of political speech. Language and Dialogue 6:2  pp. 275 ff. Crossref logo
Nahotko, Marek
2014. Organizacja wiedzy w umyśle człowieka w świetle teorii schematów i gatunków. Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne 52:1(103)  pp. 80 ff. Crossref logo
Pilkington, Olga A.
2017. Popular Science Versus Lab Lit: Differently Depicting Scientific Apparatus. Science as Culture 26:3  pp. 285 ff. Crossref logo
Rozumko, Agata
2017. Adverbial Markers of Epistemic Modality Across Disciplinary Discourses: A Contrastive Study of Research Articles in Six Academic Disciplines. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 52:1  pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo
Weideman, Albert, Rebecca Patterson & Anna Pot
2016.  In Post-admission Language Assessment of University Students [English Language Education, 6],  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Yus, Francisco
2014.  In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres [Dialogue Studies, 23],  pp. 189 ff. Crossref logo
Zadunaisky Ehrlich, Sara
2019. Paradigmatic literacy features in children’s argumentation in peer talk. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 19:2  pp. 224 ff. Crossref logo
Zeinolabedini, Maryam & Javad Gholami
2016. Colleagues helping each other to publish in medical sciences: Iranian field specialists' convenience editing strategies. Learned Publishing 29:4  pp. 249 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata

Communication Studies

Communication Studies
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2011040343 | Marc record