This paper presents an analysis of speech rate in spontaneous conversations between Russian interlocutors
conducted on the basis of recordings of 40 speakers and their interlocutors collected in the Speech Corpus of Russian
Everyday Communication “One Day of Speech” (ORD corpus). The results allow us to compare the speech rate between speakers of different mother tongues using data drawn from other researchers’ work. For example, Russians speak on average faster than Norwegians, but considerably slower than Spaniards and Brazilians.The impact of different factors on the rate of speech is illustrated by the following findings: 1. There is a statistically valid difference between men’s (m) and women’s (f) speech rate: men speak substantially (from the statistical perspective) faster than women. 2. With age we start speaking more slowly. 3. Informants whose level of verbal competence was assessed at a high level by experts speak more slowly, while an articulation rate higher than the average is typical of speakers with a lower level of verbal competence. 4. Furthermore, we observed that the speech rate is dependent on a statistically significant way on the number of syllables of the utterance: the longer the phrase, the faster the rate.
Bogdanova-Beglarian, Natalia, Tatiana Sherstinova, Olga Blinova & Gregory Martynenko
2016. An Exploratory Study on Sociolinguistic Variation of Russian Everyday Speech. In Speech and Computer [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9811], ► pp. 100 ff.
Bogdanova-Beglarian, Natalia, Tatiana Sherstinova, Olga Blinova & Gregory Martynenko
2017. Linguistic Features and Sociolinguistic Variability in Everyday Spoken Russian. In Speech and Computer [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10458], ► pp. 503 ff.
2015. The “One Day of Speech” Corpus: Phonetic and Syntactic Studies of Everyday Spoken Russian. In Speech and Computer [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9319], ► pp. 429 ff.
Laurinavichyute, A.K., A. Ulicheva, M.V. Ivanova, S.V. Kuptsova & O. Dragoy
2014. Processing lexical ambiguity in sentential context: Eye-tracking data from brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged individuals. Neuropsychologia 64 ► pp. 360 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.