Article published in:
Literature as Dialogue: Invitations offered and negotiated
Edited by Roger D. Sell
[Dialogue Studies 22] 2014
► pp. 2340
References

References

Aristotle
1895Poetics. Samuel H. Butcher (trans.). London: Macmillan.
Bakhtin, M.M.
1978 “Discourse Typology in Prose.” In Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views. Ladislav Matejka and Krystyna Pomorska (eds), 176-196. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Ben-Porat, Ziva
1979 “Method in Madness: Notes on the Structure of Parody, based on Mad’s T.V. Satires.” Poetics Today 1: 245–72. Crossref link
Beversluis, John
2000Cross-Examining Socrates: A Defense of the Interlocutors in Plato’s Early Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Booth, Wayne C.
1961The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
1974A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Fishelov, David
1990 “Types of Characters, Characteristics of Types.” Style 24: 422‑439.
2010Dialogues with/and Great Books: The Dynamics of Canon Formation. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.
2013 “Types of Dialogue: Echo, Deaf and Dialectical.” Semiotica 195: 249-275.
Grice, Paul H.
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, Speech Acts. P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Guthrie, W.K.C.
1975The History of Greek Philosophy, vol. IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamell, George R.
1999 “Mohawks Abroad: The 1764 Amsterdam Etching of Sychnecta.” In Indians and Europe: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays. Christian F. Feest (ed.), 175-190. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
Hutcheon, Linda
1991 [1985]A Theory of Parody. London: Routledge.
Johnson, James William
1958 “Tertullian and A Modest Proposal.” Modern Language and Notes 73: 561–563. Nationalhumanitiescenter.http://​nationalhumanitiescenter​.org​/pds​/becomingamer​/peoples​/text3​/indianscolonists​.pdf (accessed May 2013) Crossref link
Perry, Menakhem
1979 “Literary Dynamics: How the Order of a Text Creates Its Meanings.” Poetics Today1: 35–64, 311–61. Crossref link
Plato.
1969The Last Days of Socrates: Euthyphro, The Apology, Crito, Phaedo. Hugh Tredennick (trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Rawson, Claude
1984 [1978]. “Reading of A Modest Proposal.” In Literature Criticism from 1400-1800, vol. 101, Janet Vitalee (ed.), 309-320. Detroit: Gale Research Inc.
1990 “Final Solutions, Modest Proposals and Shortest Ways.” Cycnos 6: 107-113.
Sell, Roger
2001Mediating Criticism: Literary Education Humanized. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2011Communicational Criticism: Studies in literature as dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref link
Sell, Roger D., Adam Borch and Inna Lindgren
(eds) 2013The Ethics of Literary Communication: Genuineness, Directness, Indirectness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Crossref link
Sloan, Kim
2007A New World: England’s First view of America. London: The British Museum Press.
Swift, Jonathan
1814The Works of Jonathan Swift, D. D. Dean of St Patrick's, Dublin, Containing Additional Letters, Tracts, and Poems not hitherto Published, with Notes and A Life of the Author, by Walter Scott, Esq. Edinburgh: Archibald Constable et al.
1973The Writings of Jonathan Swift. Robert A. Greenberg and William Bowman Piper (eds). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Whitehead, Alfred N.
1979 [1929] Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne (eds). New York: Free Press.
Wittkowsky, George
1943 “Swift’s Modest Proposal: The Biography of an Early Georgian Pamphlet.” Journal of the History of Ideas 4: 75–104. Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Sell, Roger D.
2015. Till Kingel and Jarmila Mildorf (eds). 2014.Imaginary Dialogues in American Literature and Philosophy: Beyond the Mainstream. Language and Dialogue 5:2  pp. 340 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.