Cover not available
Part of
Literature as Dialogue: Invitations offered and negotiated
Edited by Roger D. Sell
[Dialogue Studies 22] 2014
► pp. 79–98

Misunderstanding and embodied communication

The Comedy of Errors

Published online: 7 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.22.04cas
References
Austin, John L
1975 How to Do Things With Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice
1989 The Space of Literature. Lincoln, NE: Uniersity of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Castore, Antonio
2011 Il dialogo spezzato. Forme dell' incomprensione in letteratura. Pisa: Pacini Editore.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor
1960 Shakespearean Criticism: in Two Volumes. Thomas Middleton Raysor (ed). London: Dent.Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas
2000 Shakespeare’s Brain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Donawerth, Jane
1984 Shakespeare and the Sixteenth-century Study of Language. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Dorsch, T.S. and King, Ros
(eds) 2004 The Comedy of Errors. 2 ed. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elam, Keir
1984 Shakespeare’s Universe of Discourse: Language-Games in the Comedies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michail
2001 Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freedman, Barbara
1997 “Reading Errantly: Misrecognition and the Uncanny in the Comedy of Errors .” In The Comedy of Errors: Critical Essays, Robert S. Miola (ed), 261-298. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund
1916 Wit and Its Relation to the Unconscious. New York: Moffat, Yard & Co.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop
1965 A Natural Perspective: The Development of Shakespearean Comedy and Romance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen
2005 Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul
1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rasch, William
1992 “Injecting Noise into the System: Hermeneutics and the Necessity of Misunderstanding.” Substance 21 (1): 61-76 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pandit, Lalita
2006 “Emotion, Perception and Anagnorisis in The Comedy of Errors: A Cognitive Perspective.” College Literature 33: 94-126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pandit, Lalita, and Patrick Colm Hogan
2006 “Introduction: Morsels and Modules: On Embodying Cognition in Shakespeare’s Plays.” College Literature 33: 1-13.3 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sell, Roger D
2000 Literature as Communication: The Foundations of Mediating Criticism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Communicational Criticism: Studies in Literature As Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William
2005  The Comedy of Errors . In The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works. Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor (eds). 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deidre
1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition (Language and Thought). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1987 That’s Not What I Meant: How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks Your Relations with Others. London: Everyman.Google Scholar
1990 You just don’t understand : Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Taylor, Talbot J
1992 Mutual Misunderstanding: Scepticism and the Theorizing of Language and Interpretation. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wehrs, Donald R
2006 “Moral Physiology, Ethical Prototypes, and the Denaturing of Sense in Shakespearean Tragedy.” College Literature 33: 67-92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
1999 “Misunderstanding: The standard case.” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (6):763-785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1958 Philosophical Investigations. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar