Cover not available
Part of
Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres
Edited by Luz Gil-Salom and Carmen Soler-Monreal
[Dialogue Studies 23] 2014
► pp. ix–xvi

Foreword

Published online: 10 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23.01for
References
Bakhtin, Mijail
1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, translated by Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bertau, Marie-Cécile
2011 “Dialogue: Where language meets activity. An essay review of language as dialogue – from rules to principles of probability by Edda Weigand (2009)”. International Journal for Dialogical Science 5 (1): 17–36.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2006 University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Sally
2002 “Packed houses and intimate gathering: Audience and Rhetorical structure”. In Academic Discourse, John Flowerdew (ed), 196–215. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, Dahl, Trine, and Torodd, Kinn
2006 Academic Voices – Across Languages and Disciplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan
2005 “Conflict and consensus: Construing opposition in Applied Linguistics”. In Strategies in Academic Discourse, Elena Tognini Bonelli and Gabriela Del LungoCamiciotti (eds), 1–15. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2002 “Directives: Power and engagement in academic writing”. Applied Linguistics 23 (2): 215–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
2005a “Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse”. Discourse Studies 7: 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005b Metadiscourse. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lafuente-Millán, Enrique, Mur-Dueñas, Pilar, Lorés-Sanz, Rosa, and Vázquez-Orta, Ignacio
.(eds) 2010 Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve
1979 Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, James R
2000 “Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English”. In Evaluation in Text, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and White, Peter Robert Rupert
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Martín-Martín, Pedro
2005 The Rhetoric of the Abstract in English and Spanish Scientific Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
1993a Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
1993b Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes 12: 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “Descriptions or explanations? Some methodological issues in contrastive rhetoric”. In Academic Writing in Context, Martin Hewings (ed), 43–54. University of Birmingham Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R
1984 “Genre as social action”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mur Dueñas, Pilar
2007 “ ‘I/we focus on…’: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6: 143–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Logical markers in L1 (Spanish and English) and L2 English business research articles”. English Text Construction 2 (2): 246–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Attitude markers in business management research articles: a cross-cultural corpus-driven approach”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20 (1): 50–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
1996 “Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 501–530.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise, Alcaraz-Ariza, Mª Angeles, and Zambrano, Nahirana
2003 “The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: Intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English medical discourse (1930–1995)”. English for Specific Purposes 22 (3): 223–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ventola, Eija, and Mauranen, Anna
.(eds) 1996 Academic Writing: Intercultural and Textual Issues. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2009 Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Pascual, Daniel & Pilar Mur-Dueñas
2022. Dialogic interaction with diversified audiences in Twitter for Research Dissemination Purposes. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90 ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez-Jiménez, David & Paulina Meza
2022. Posicionamiento y dialogicidad en la escritura académica y profesional. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Álvarez Álvarez, Manuela & Alba Naroa Romero González
2022. Descubriendo qué estrategias de dialogicidad y posicionamiento se emplean en las introducciones y conclusiones de trabajos fin de grado. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.