Part of
Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres
Edited by Luz Gil-Salom and Carmen Soler-Monreal
[Dialogue Studies 23] 2014
► pp. 2354
Biber, Douglas, and Finnegan, Edward
1989 “Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect”. Text 9: 93–124.Google Scholar
Brown, Paul, and Levinson, Samuel C
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, Maggie
2006a “Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines”. English for Specific Purposes 25: 310–331. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006b “The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses”. Applied Linguistics 27 (3): 492–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooley, Linda, and Lewkowicz, Jo
1997 “Developing awareness of the rhetorical and linguistic conventions of writing a thesis in English: addressing the needs of EFL/ESL postgraduate students”. In Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse, Ann Duszak (ed), 113–129. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos, Pilar, and Sánchez-Macarro, Antonia
1998 “Scientific discourse as interaction: Scientific articles vs. popularizations”. In Linguistic Choice across Genres. Variation in Spoken and Written English(Vol. 158), Antonia Sánchez-Macarro and Ronald Carter (eds), 173–190. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gea Valor, Mª Luisa
2000–2001 “The pragmatics of positive politeness in the book review”. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 14: 145–160.Google Scholar
Gesauto, Sara
2009 “Evaluation Guidelines: A regulatory genre informing reviewing practices”. In Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, Maurizio Gotti (ed), 325–348. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gil-Salom, Luz, and Soler-Monreal, Carmen
2009 “Interacting with the reader: Politeness strategies in engineering research article discussions”. International Journal of English Studies Special Issue: 175–189.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael
1994 (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan
1993 “Professional conflict: Disagreement in academic discourse”. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Gill Francis and Elena Tognini-Bognelli (eds), 115–134. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
1994 “Evaluation and organisation in a sample of written academic discourse”. In Advances in Written Text Analysis, Malcolm Coulthard (ed), 191–218. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1996 “Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles”. Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 433–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998a “Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 437–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998bHedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 “Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge”. Applied Linguistics 20 (3): 341–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing”. In Academic Discourse, John Flowerdew (ed), 115–130. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2005 “Prudence, precision, and politeness: hedges in academic writing”. In Las lenguas de especialidad: Nuevas perspectivas de investigación (Quaderns de Filologia. Estudis Linguistics 10), Mª Amparo Olivares Pardo & Francisca Suau Jiménez (eds), 99–112. Valencia: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
2008 “Disciplinary voices. Interactions in research writing”. English Text Construction 1 (1): 5–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Diani, Giani
2009 “Introduction: Academic evaluation and review genres”. In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, Ken Hyland and Giani Diani (eds), 1–14. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Koutsantoni, Dimitra
2006 “Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5: 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Attitude, certainty and allusions to common knowledge in scientific research articles”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3: 142–175. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Chih-Hua
1999 “The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles”. English for Specific Purposes 18 (2): 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwan, Becky
2006 “The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics”. English for Specific Purposes 25: 30–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Wenger, Etienne
1991Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LoCastro, Virginia
2008 ““Long sentences and floating commas”: Mexican students’ rhetorical practices and the sociocultural context”. In Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric, Ulla Connor, Ed Nagelhout and William V. Rozycki (eds), 195–217. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Carolyn
1984 “Genre as social action”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno, Ana I
2011 “On the universality of the politeness concept of ‘face’: Evaluation strategies for construing ‘good face’ across writing cultures: writers’ voice in academic book reviews”. Bulería: 1–11. [URL].Google Scholar
Myers, Greg
1989 “The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles”. Applied Linguistics 10 (1): 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 “ ‘In this paper we report…’ Speech acts and scientific facts”. Journal of Pragmatics 17 (4): 295–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Driscoll, Jim
1996 “About face: A defence and elaboration of universal dualism”. Journal of Pragmatics 25 (1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, Brian
2002 “Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice”. English for Specific Purposes 21: 125–143. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paré, Anthony, Starke-Meyerring, Doreen, and McAlpine, Lynn
2009 The dissertation as multi-genre: Many readers, many readings”. In Genre in a Changing World, Charles Bazerman, Adair Bonini, and Débora Figueiredo (eds), 179–193. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
Ridley, Diane
2000 “The different guises of a PhD thesis and the role of a literature review”. In Patterns and Perspectives: Insights into EAP Writing Practice, Paul Thompson (ed), 61–76. Reading: University of Reading.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ronald, and Scollon, Suzanne W
1995Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shaw, Philip. 1
992 “Reasons for the correlation of voice, tense, and sentence function in reporting verbs”. Applied Linguistics 13 (3): 302–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soler-Monreal, Carmen, and Gil-Salom, Luz
2011 “A cross-language study on citation practice in PhD thesis”. International Journal of English Studies 11 (2): 53–76. [URL]Google Scholar
Stotesbury, Hilkka
2003 “Evaluation in research articles abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2 (4): 327–341. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, Malcolm J
1990Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sarah, and Hawes, Thomas P
1994Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 13 (2): 129–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
1996 “Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 501–530.Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul
2002 “Manifesting intertextuality in the PhD thesis”. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses44 (April): 97–114.Google Scholar
2005a “Aspects of identification and position in intertextual reference in PhD theses”. In Strategies in Academic Discourse, Elena Tognini-Bonelli and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds), 31–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005b “Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4: 307–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Literature reviews in applied PhD theses: Evidence and problems”. In Academic Evaluation. Review Genres in University Settings, Ken Hyland and Giani Diani (eds), 50–67. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul, and Tribble, Chris
2001 “Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for Academic Purposes”. Language Learning & Technology 5 (3): 91–105.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoffrey, and Ye, Yiyun
1991 “Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers”. Applied Linguistics 12 (4): 365–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2009Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Etienne
1998Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Bondi, Marina
2018. Dialogicity in written language use. In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31],  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Trushchelev, Pavel N., Elena V. Petrenko & Larisa A. Piotrovskaya
2023. Conceptualizing emotions through discourse: a pragmatic view on the reader's interest. Baltic accent 14:2  pp. 93 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.