Chapter 1. Academic voices and claims
Reviewing practices in research writing
This paper investigates contrastively how politeness strategies that involve reporting verbs are deployed in the Literature Review (LR) chapters of PhD theses written in English and in Spanish. It analyses a comparable corpus of 20 theses– 10 in English and 10 in Spanish – in computer science. It focuses on usesof reporting structures realised through integral and non-integral citations ofother texts (Hyland 1999). The research design is based on the model proposed by Thompson and Ye (1991), who distinguished three categories of reporting verbs according to the process they perform: textual, mental and research verbs,and analysed the evaluative potential of verbal processes whose responsibility is ascribed either to the reviewed author or to the reporting writer. We also took as a reference the politeness model offered by Brown & Levinson (1987) to study the presence of specific face-redressive politeness means in the double-voiced dialogue which is established in the corpus of LRs. Data show that English writers show personal commitment and tentativeness, while Spanish writers tend to mask individual voices and avoid personal confrontation.
References
Biber, Douglas, and Finnegan, Edward
1989 “
Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect”.
Text 9: 93–124.
Brown, Paul, and Levinson, Samuel C
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Charles, Maggie
2006a “
Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines”.
English for Specific Purposes 25: 310–331.
Charles, Maggie
2006b “
The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses”.
Applied Linguistics 27 (3): 492–518.
Cooley, Linda, and Lewkowicz, Jo
1997 “
Developing awareness of the rhetorical and linguistic conventions of writing a thesis in English: addressing the needs of EFL/ESL postgraduate students”. In
Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse,
Ann Duszak (ed), 113–129. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Garcés-Conejos, Pilar, and Sánchez-Macarro, Antonia
Gea Valor, Mª Luisa
2000–2001 “
The pragmatics of positive politeness in the book review”.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 14: 145–160.
Gesauto, Sara
2009 “
Evaluation Guidelines: A regulatory genre informing reviewing practices”. In
Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse,
Maurizio Gotti (ed), 325–348. Bern: Peter Lang.
Gil-Salom, Luz, and Soler-Monreal, Carmen
2009 “
Interacting with the reader: Politeness strategies in engineering research article discussions”.
International Journal of English Studies Special Issue: 175–189.
Halliday, Michael
1994 (1985)
An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hunston, Susan
1993 “
Professional conflict: Disagreement in academic discourse”. In
Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair,
Mona Baker,
Gill Francis and
Elena Tognini-Bognelli (eds), 115–134. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hunston, Susan
1994 “
Evaluation and organisation in a sample of written academic discourse”. In
Advances in Written Text Analysis,
Malcolm Coulthard (ed), 191–218. London: Routledge.
Hyland, Ken
1996 “
Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles”.
Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 433–454.
Hyland, Ken
1998a “
Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse”.
Journal of Pragmatics 30: 437–455.
Hyland, Ken
1999 “
Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge”.
Applied Linguistics 20 (3): 341–367.
Hyland, Ken
2002 “
Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing”. In
Academic Discourse,
John Flowerdew (ed), 115–130. London: Longman.
Hyland, Ken
2005 “
Prudence, precision, and politeness: hedges in academic writing”. In
Las lenguas de especialidad: Nuevas perspectivas de investigación (
Quaderns de Filologia. Estudis Linguistics 10),
Mª Amparo Olivares Pardo &
Francisca Suau Jiménez (eds), 99–112. Valencia: Universitat de València.
Hyland, Ken, and Diani, Giani
2009 “
Introduction: Academic evaluation and review genres”. In
Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings,
Ken Hyland and
Giani Diani (eds), 1–14. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Koutsantoni, Dimitra
2006 “
Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power”.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5: 19–36.
Koutsantoni, Dimitra
2004 “
Attitude, certainty and allusions to common knowledge in scientific research articles”.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3: 142–175.
Kuo, Chih-Hua
1999 “
The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles”.
English for Specific Purposes 18 (2): 121–138.
Kwan, Becky
2006 “
The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics”.
English for Specific Purposes 25: 30–55.
Lave, Jean, and Wenger, Etienne
1991 Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, Carolyn
1984 “
Genre as social action”.
Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167.
Moreno, Ana I
2011 “
On the universality of the politeness concept of ‘face’: Evaluation strategies for construing ‘good face’ across writing cultures: writers’ voice in academic book reviews”.
Bulería: 1–11.
[URL].
Myers, Greg
1989 “
The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles”.
Applied Linguistics 10 (1): 1–35.
Myers, Greg
1992 “
‘In this paper we report…’ Speech acts and scientific facts”. Journal of Pragmatics 17 (4): 295–313.
O’Driscoll, Jim
1996 “
About face: A defence and elaboration of universal dualism”.
Journal of Pragmatics 25 (1): 1–32.
Paltridge, Brian
2002 “
Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice”.
English for Specific Purposes 21: 125–143.
Paré, Anthony, Starke-Meyerring, Doreen, and McAlpine, Lynn
2009
“The dissertation as multi-genre: Many readers, many readings”. In
Genre in a Changing World,
Charles Bazerman,
Adair Bonini, and
Débora Figueiredo (eds), 179–193. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse.
Ridley, Diane
2000 “
The different guises of a PhD thesis and the role of a literature review”. In
Patterns and Perspectives: Insights into EAP Writing Practice,
Paul Thompson (ed), 61–76. Reading: University of Reading.
Scollon, Ronald, and Scollon, Suzanne W
1995 Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Shaw, Philip. 1
992 “
Reasons for the correlation of voice, tense, and sentence function in reporting verbs”.
Applied Linguistics 13 (3): 302–319.
Soler-Monreal, Carmen, and Gil-Salom, Luz
2011 “
A cross-language study on citation practice in PhD thesis”.
International Journal of English Studies 11 (2): 53–76.
[URL]
Stotesbury, Hilkka
2003 “
Evaluation in research articles abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences”.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2 (4): 327–341.
Swales, Malcolm J
1990 Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, Sarah, and Hawes, Thomas P
1994 Reporting verbs in medical journal articles.
English for Specific Purposes 13 (2): 129–148.
Thompson, Geoff
1996 “
Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports”.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 501–530.
Thompson, Paul
2002 “
Manifesting intertextuality in the PhD thesis”.
Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses44 (April): 97–114.
Thompson, Paul
2005b “
Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses”.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4: 307–323.
Thompson, Paul
2009 “
Literature reviews in applied PhD theses: Evidence and problems”. In
Academic Evaluation. Review Genres in University Settings,
Ken Hyland and
Giani Diani (eds), 50–67. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thompson, Paul, and Tribble, Chris
2001 “
Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for Academic Purposes”.
Language Learning & Technology 5 (3): 91–105.
Thompson, Geoffrey, and Ye, Yiyun
1991 “
Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers”.
Applied Linguistics 12 (4): 365–382.
Wenger, Etienne
1998 Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Trushchelev, Pavel N., Elena V. Petrenko & Larisa A. Piotrovskaya
2023.
Conceptualizing emotions through discourse: a pragmatic view on the reader's interest.
Slovo.ru: Baltic accent 14:2
► pp. 93 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.