Cover not available
Part of
Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres
Edited by Luz Gil-Salom and Carmen Soler-Monreal
[Dialogue Studies 23] 2014
► pp. 87–112

Chapter 3. Multivoiced interaction in English and Italian academic review discourse

A cross-cultural perspective

| University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
The study presented in this chapter is based on an analysis of historical book review articles in English and Italian and investigates the way the genre across national academic cultures represents the typical discursive procedures through the activity of the reviewer and of other voices in the texts. The analysis reveals interesting linguistic features which can shed light on the dialogic and argumentative dimension of the genre under examination. As a result of the analysis carried out, it emerges that both English and Italian historical book review articles are characterised by a plurality of textual voices involved in argumentative dialogue with the reviewer – reviewed book author, discourse community, reader. These voices are powerfully active in the interaction and become the reviewer’s partners in a scientific ‘conversation’.
Published online: 10 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23.05dia
References (89)
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. “Discourse in the novel”. In The Dialogic Imagination, Michael Holquist (ed), 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1991. Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina. 1999. English across Genres: Language Variation in the Discourse of Economics. Modena: Il Fiorino.Google Scholar
. 2004. “‘If you think this sounds very complicated, you are correct’: Awareness of cultural difference in specialized discourse”. In Intercultural Aspects of Specialized Discourse, Maurizio Gotti and Christopher Candlin (eds), 53–78. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Metadiscursive practices in academic discourse: Variation across genres and disciplines”. In Dialogue within Discourse Communities, Metadiscursive Perspectives on Academic Genres, Julia Bamford and Marina Bondi (eds), 3–28. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007a. “Authority and expert voices in the discourse of history”. In Language and Discipline Perspectives on Academic Discourse, Kjersti Fløttum (ed), 66–88. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2007b. “Historical research articles in English and in Italian: A cross-cultural analysis of self-reference in openings”. In Lexical Complexity: Theoretical Assessment and Translational Perspectives, Marcella Bertuccelli Papi, Gloria Cappelli, and Silvia Masi (eds), 65–83. Pisa: Edizioni Plus.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Polyphony in academic discourse. A cross-cultural perspective on historical discourse”. In Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse, Eija Suomela-Salmi and Fred Dervin (eds), 83–108. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John ­Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012a. “Voice in textbooks: Between exposition and argument”. In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, Ken Hyland and Carmen Sancho Guinda (eds), 101–115. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2012b. “Historians at work: Reporting frameworks in English and Italian book review articles”. In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, Ken Hyland and Giuliana Diani (eds), 179–196. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina, and Silver, Marc S. 2004. “Textual voices. A cross-disciplinary study of attribution in academic discourse”. In Evaluation in Spoken and Written Academic Discourse, Laurie Anderson and Julia Bamford (eds), 121–141. Rome: Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina, and Mazzi, Davide. 2009. “Writing history: Argument, narrative and point of view”. In Analizando el Discurso. Homenaje a Adriana Bolívar, Martha Shiro, Paola ­Bentivoglio and Frances de Erlich (eds), 611–626. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar
Breigeva, Kjersti R., Dahl, Trine, and Fløttum, Kjersti (eds). 2002. “Traces of self and others in research articles. A comparative pilot study of English and Norwegian research articles in medicine, economics and linguistics”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12 (2): 218–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calaresu, Emilia M. 2000. Il Discorso Riportato: Una Prospettiva Testuale. Modena: Il Fiorino.Google Scholar
Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen R. 1994. “On reporting reporting: The representation of speech in factual and factional narratives”. In Advances in Written Text Analysis, Malcolm Coulthard (ed), 295–308. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casanave, Christine P. 2004. Controversies in Second Language Writing: Dilemmas and Decisions in Research and Instruction. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Charles, Maggie. 2006. “Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines”. English for Specific Purposes 25 (3): 310–331. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Gerrig, Richard J. 1990. “Quotations as demonstrations”. Language 66 (4): 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coffin, Caroline. 1996. Exploring Literacy in School History. Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged School Program, Erskineville, NSW.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school history”. In Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, Frances Christie and James R. Martin (eds), 196–230. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
. 2006. Historical Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Connor, Ulla. 1996. Contrastive Rhetoric. Cross-cultural Aspects of Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “New directions in contrastive Rhetoric”. TESOL Quarterly 36 (4): 493–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3 (4): 291–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1986. Direct and Indirect Speech. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Trine. 2004. “Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline?” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (10): 1807–1825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diani, Giuliana. 2004. “A genre-based approach to analysing academic review articles”. In Academic Discourse, Genre and Small Corpora, Marina Bondi, Laura Gavioli and Marc Silver (eds), 105–126. Rome: Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar
. 2007. “The representation of evaluative and argumentative procedures: Examples from the academic book review article”. Textus 20 (1): 37–56.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Reporting and evaluation in English book review articles: A cross-­disciplinary study”. In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, Ken Hyland and Giuliana Diani (eds), 87–104. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1984. “Esquisse d’une théorie polyphonique de l’énonciation”. In Le Dire et le Dit, Oswald Ducrot (ed), 171–233. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti. 2003. “Bibliographical references and polyphony in research articles”. In Academic Discourse. Multidisciplinary Approaches, Kjersti Fløttum and François Rastier (eds), 97–119. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. “The self and the others: Polyphonic visibility in research articles”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15 (1): 29–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Language and Discipline Perspectives on Academic Discourse. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, and Rastier, François (eds). 2003. Academic Discourse. Multidisciplinary Approaches. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, Dahl, Trine, and Kinn, Torodd. 2006. Academic Voices. Amsterdam: John ­Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, Kinn, Torodd, and Dahl, Trine. 2006. “‘We now report on…’ versus ‘let us now see how…’: Author roles and interaction with readers in research articles”. In Academic Discourse across Disciplines, Ken Hyland and Marina Bondi (eds), 203–224. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gea-Valor, Maria-Lluïsa. 2010. “The emergence of the author’s voice in book reviewing: A contrastive study of academic vs. non-academic discourse”. In Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres, Rosa Lorés-Sanz, Pilar Mur-Dueñas and Enrique Lafuente-Millán (eds), 117–135. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Giannoni, Davide S., and Maci, Stefania M. (eds). 2008. Identity Traits in English Academic Discourse.Special issue of Linguistica e Filologia 27.Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio (ed). 2012. Academic Identity Traits. A Corpus-Based Investigation. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Groom, Nicholas. 2005. “Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4 (3): 257–277. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2000. “Evaluation and the planes of discourse. Status and value in persuasive texts”. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 176–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harwood, Nigel. 2005. “‘We do not seem to have a theory… the theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing”. Applied Linguistics 26 (3): 343–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 1999. “Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge”. Applied Linguistics 20 (3): 341–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2001a. “Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles”. English for Specific Purposes 20 (3): 207–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. “Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles”. Written Communication 18 (4): 549–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002a. “Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing”. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (8): 1091–1112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002b. “Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing”. Applied Linguistics 23 (2): 215–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Metadiscourse. Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing”. English Text Construction 1 (1): 5–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Bondi, Marina (eds). 2006. Academic Discourse across Disciplines. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Diani, Giuliana (eds). 2009. Academic Evaluation. Review Genres in University Settings. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Sancho Guinda, Carmen (eds). 2012. Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Theo, and Wurff van der, Wim. 1996. Reported Speech. Forms and Functions of the Verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Deanna. 1992. “Thinking as argument”. Harvard Educational Review 62 (2): 155–178.Google Scholar
Kuo, Chih-Hua. 1999. “The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles”. English for Specific Purposes 18 (2): 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, Roz, and Camps, David. 2001. “‘I am how I sound’: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing”. Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (1–2): 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorés Sanz, Rosa. 2009. “(Non-)critical voices in the reviewing of history discourse: A cross-cultural study of evaluation”. In Academic Evaluation. Review Genres in University Settings, Ken Hyland and Giuliana Diani (eds), 143–160. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1993. Reflexive Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: ­Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, Paul K., and Tardy, Christine M. 2007. “Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review”. English for Specific Purposes 26 (2): 235–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 1993a. “Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finish-English economics texts”. English for Specific Purposes 12 (1): 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993b. Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Descriptions or explanations? Some methodological issues in contrastive rhetoric”. In Academic Writing in Context, Martin Hewings (ed), 43–54. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.Google Scholar
Mizzau, Marina. 1994. “La finzione del discorso riportato”. In Fra Conversazione e Discorso. L’Analisi dell’Interazione Verbale, Franca Orletti (ed), 247–254. Rome: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.Google Scholar
Mortara Garavelli, Bice. 1985. La Parola d’Altri. Palermo: Sellerio.Google Scholar
Myers, Greg. 1989. “The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles”. Applied Linguistics 10 (1): 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poos, Deanna, and Simpson, Rita. 2002. “Cross-disciplinary comparison of hedging. Some findings for the Michigan corpus of academic spoken English”. In Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, Randi Reppen, Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Douglas Biber (eds), 3–23. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plantin, Christian. 2005. L’Argumentation: Histoire, Théories et Perspectives. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Poppi, Franca. 2004. “Pragmatic implications of the use of ‘we’ as a receiver-including and receiver-excluding pronoun”. In Understanding and Misunderstanding in Dialogue, Karin Aijmer (ed), 229–242. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Roulet, Eddy, Auchlin, Antoine, Mœschler, Jacques, Rubattel, Christian, and Schelling, ­Marianne (eds). 1985. L’Articulation du Discours en Français Contemporain. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Samraj, Betty. 2002. “Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines”. English for Specific Purposes 21 (1): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2008. WordSmith Tools. Version 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Philip. 1992. “Reasons for the correlation of voice, tense and sentence function in reporting verbs”. Applied Linguistics 13 (3): 302–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silver, Marc S., and Bondi, Marina. 2004. “Weaving voices. A study of article openings in historical discourse”. In Academic Discourse. Linguistic Insights into Evaluation, Gabriella Del Lungo and Elena Tognini Bonelli (eds), 141–160. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Stati, Sorin. 1994. “Passive moves in argumentation”. In The Syntax of Sentences and Text, Světla Čmejrková and František Stícha (eds), 259–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Principi di Analisi Argomentativa: Retorica, Logica, Linguistica. Bologna: Pàtron Editore.Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, John M., Ahmad, Ummul K., Chang, Yu-Ying, Chavez, Daniel, Dressen, Dacia F., and Seymour, Ruth. 1998. “Consider this: The role of imperatives in scholarly writing”. Applied Linguistics 19 (1): 97–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, Ramona, and John, Suganthi. 1999. “The ‘I’ identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun”. English for Specific Purposes18 (S1): S23–S39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Sarah, and Hawes, Thomas P. 1994. “Reporting verbs in medical journal articles”. English for Specific Purposes 13 (2): 129–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 1996. “Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports”. Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 501–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, and Ye, Yiyun. 1991. “Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers”. Applied Linguistics 12 (4): 363–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Paul. 2000. “Citation practices in PhD theses”. In Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective, Lou Burnard and Tony McEnery (eds), 91–102. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Aspects of identification and position in intertextual reference in PhD theses”. In Strategies in Academic Discourse, Elena Tognini Bonelli and Gabriella Del Lungo (eds), 31–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ventola, Eija, and Mauranen, Anna (eds). 1996. Academic Writing. Intercultural and Textual Issues. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 1989. Informal Logic. A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1971. “On reported speech”. In Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Charles J. ­Fillmore and Terence D. ­Langendoen (eds), 73–77. New York: Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ibáñez O., Romualdo & Fernando Moncada N.
2017. ElResumende artículos de investigación científica. Spanish in Context 14:2 ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.