Questioning certainty in research articles and popular science articles
A case-study of modalized wh-interrogatives
Elsa Pic | University of Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris, France
This paper is a comparative study of the use of direct and indirect modalized wh-questions in research articles and popular science articles. The corpus analysis reveals that these questions are often interpreted as rhetorical questions and that they are often used to question a proposition that has been previously presented as certain or almost certain. We first suggest that rhetorical questions of this form fall into three semantic types (non-polyphonic, polemic and pseudo-polemic). Their distribution and/or function are then shown to vary across genres – they tend to serve argumentative purposes in research articles and explicative purposes in popular science articles. Finally we examine the parameters which affect the strength with which the presupposition is questioned.
References (29)
Adam, Jean-Michel
1992 Les textes: Types et prototypes. Paris: Nathan.
Behre, Frank
1955 Meditative-Polemic SHOULD in Modern English THAT-Clauses. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Bondi, Marina
2012 “Re-contextualizing Knowledge. Past and Present in Popular History”. Paper presented at the
4th International 360 Conference “Encompassing Knowledge Mediation”. Aarhus, Danemark.
Brooks, Cleanth, and Robert P. Warren
1979 Modern Rhetoric. New York: HBJ.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Butler, Christopher S
1990 “Qualifications in Science: Modal Meanings in Scientific Texts.” In
The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse, ed. by
Walter Nash, 137–170. London: Sage.
Ducrot, Oswald
1991 Dire et ne pas dire: Principes de sémantique structurale. Paris: Hermann.
Ducrot, Oswald, and Jean-Claude Anscombre
1981 “Interrogation et argumentation.” Langue française 52: 5–22.
Fløttum, Kjersti, Trine Dahl, and Torodd Kinn
Furmaniak, Gregory
2014 “Entre logique et réalité: Le cas des interrogatives en why would…?.” Travaux linguistiques du Cerlico 26: 341–360.
Grize, Jean-Blaise
1990 Logique et langage. Paris: Ophrys.
Han, Chung-hye
2002 “Interpreting Interrogatives as Rhetorical Questions.” Lingua 112: 201–229.
Han, Chung-hye, and L. Siegel
1997 “Syntactic and Semantic Conditions on NPI Licensing in Questions.”
Proceedings of the 15th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics
, CSLI, Stanford: 177–191.
Huddleston, Rodney D
1971 The Sentence in Written English: A Syntactic Study Based on an Analysis of Scientific Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, Ken
2002 “What Do They Mean? Questions in Academic Writing.” Text 22 (4): 529–557.
Larreya, Paul
1984 Le possible et le nécessaire. Modalités et auxiliaires modaux en anglais britannique. Paris: Nathan.
Lee-Goldman, Russel
2006 “Rhetorical Questions and Scales: Just What Do You Think Constructions Are for.” Paper presented at the
International Conference on Construction Grammar 4
, Tokyo University.
Lyons, John
1995 Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moirand, Sophie
1999 “L’explication.” In
L’astronomie dans les médias, ed. by
Jean-Claude
Beacco, 141–167. Paris: Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle.
Pic, Elsa, and Gregory Furmaniak
2010 “Grammaire et degré de spécialisation.” ASp 58: 39–55.
Pic, Elsa, and Gregory Furmaniak
2012a “Les modes de discours, interface entre texte et grammaire dans les langues de spécialité.” ASp 62: 25–44.
Pic, Elsa, and Gregory Furmaniak
2012b “A Study of Epistemic Modality in Academic and Popularised Discourse: The Case of Possibility Adverbs Perhaps, Maybe and Possibly”.
Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 18: 11–44.
Pic, Elsa, and Gregory Furmaniak
2013.
“Challenging Points of View in Research Articles and Popular Science Articles: A Case-Study of Rhetorical Questions.” Paper presented at the
XXXIII International VAKKI Symposium
. Vaasa, Finland.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Rohde, Hannah
2006 “Rhetorical Questions as Redundant Interrogatives.” San Diego Linguistics Papers 2: 134–168.
Sadock, Jerrold
1971 “Queclaratives.” Chicago Linguistic Society 7: 223–231.
Thompson, Geoff
2001 “Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning to Argue with the Reader.” Applied Linguistics 22/1: 58–78.
Varttala, Teppo
2001 Hedging in Scientifically Oriented Discourse: Exploring Variation According to Discipline and Intended Audience. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere.
Zwarts, Frans
1997 “Three Types of Polarity.” In
Plurality and Quantification, ed. by
Fritz Hamm, and
Erhard W. Hinrichs, 177–237. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.