Article published in:
Dialogue in Multilingual and Multimodal Communities
Edited by Dale Koike and Carl S. Blyth
[Dialogue Studies 27] 2015
► pp. 195–219

Dialogic knowledge building in learning communities

Discovering an electric circuit through collaborative learning

| A*STAR, Institute of High Performance Computing, Singapore
In modern education, there has been an increasing emphasis on creative thinking, collaborative problem-solving and critical discussion. In this chapter, I argue that learning communities foster these skills and thus provide a strong foundation for deep learning; i.e. learning that is based on deep reasoning and active knowledge building as defined by Krathwohl (2002), Chi and Ohlsson (2005) and Sfard (2001). Furthermore, learning communities cater to the learner’s main psychological needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness (ACR) (Deci and Ryan 1985). This is important, since ACR fulfillment facilitates deep learning by providing the ground for active knowledge building in the teaching and learning interaction. An analysis of an authentic teaching and learning interaction, in which a student is taught about an electric circuit, shows how the teacher facilitates deep learning through selected communicative means; e.g. questions that scaffold deep reasoning along higher cognitive processes like ‘evaluating’ and ‘creating’. An in-depth analysis of selected sequences in the interaction leads to a communicative model for deep learning, which I call ‘Dialogic Knowledge Building’ (DKB). DKB revolves around question-answer sequences that promote the learner’s re-representation of knowledge in terms of complex conceptualizations.
Published online: 10 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.27.07fel
References
Alexander, Robin J
2004 Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk. York: Dialogos.Google Scholar
Benware, Carl A., and Edward L. Deci
1984 “Quality of Learning with an Active versus Passive Motivational Set.” American Educational Research Journal 21: 755–765. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bielaczyc, Katerine, and Alan Collins
2013 “Learning Communities in Classrooms: A Reconceptualization of Educational Practice.” In Instructional Design Theories and Models, vol. 2, ed. by Charles M. Reigeluth, 269–292. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bloom, Benjamin
1956 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives – Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Brown, Ann L., and Joseph C. Campione
1994 “Guided Discovery in a Community of Learners.” In Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice, ed. by Kate McGilly, 229–270. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Chi, Michelene T., and Stellan Ohlsson
2005 “Complex Declarative Learning.” In The 
Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, ed. by Keith J. Holyoak, and Robert G. Morrison, 371–399. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Scotty D., Barry Gholson, Matthew Ventura, Arthur C. Graesserthe Tutoring Research Group
and 2000 “Overhearing Dialogues and Monologues in Virtual Tutoring Sessions: Effects on Questioning and Vicarious Learning.” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11: 242–253.Google Scholar
Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan
1985 Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior.” Psychological Inquiry 11: 227–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Handbook of Self-Determination Research. New York: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Elder, Linda, and Richard Paul
1998 “The Role of Socratic Questioning in Thinking, Teaching, and Learning.” The Clearing House 71(5): 297–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Etemadzadeh, Atika, Samira Seifi, and Hamid R. Far
2013 “The Role of Questioning Technique in Developing Thinking Skills: The Ongoing Effect on Writing Skills.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 77: 1024–1031. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feller, Sebastian
2014 “Designing a Cognitive Speech Act Taxonomy for Dialogic Teaching and Learning: Explorative Action Games for Conceptual Change Learning.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research 3: 524–535.Google Scholar
2013 “Language for Deep Learning: Cognitive Explorative Action Games for Teacher-Learner Interactions.” Journal of Cognitive Science 14(4): 361–378.Google Scholar
Fisher, Robert
2007 “Dialogic Teaching: Developing Thinking and Metacognition through Philosophical Discussion.” Early Child Development and Care 177(6–7): 615–631. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freire, Paulo
1970 Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
1973 Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Gee, James P
2005 “Semiotic Social Spaces and Affinity Spaces: From the Age of Mythology to Today’s Schools.” In Beyond Communities of Practice: Language, Power and Social Context, ed. by David Barton, and Karin Tusting, 214–232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grolnick, Wendy. S., and Richard M. Ryan
1987 “Autonomy in Children’s Learning: An Experimental and Individual Difference Investigation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 890–898. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hewson, Peter W
1992 “Conceptual Change in Science Teaching and Teacher Education.” Paper presented at a meeting on “Research and Curriculum Development in Science Teaching.” Madrid. Spain.
Hicks, Deborah
(ed) 2008 Discourse, Learning, and Schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jokinen, Kristina
2010 “Rational Communication and Affordable Natural Language for Ambient Environments.” In Spoken Dialogue Systems for Ambient Environments, ed. by Gary G. Lee, 163–168. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kage, Masaharu, and Hiroshi Namiki
1990 “The Effects of Evaluation Structure on Children’s Intrinsic Motivation and Learning.” Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology 38: 36–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knezic, Dubravka, Theo Wubbels, Ed Elbers, and Maaike Hajer
2010 “The Socratic Dialogue and Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26(4): 1104–1111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krathwohl, David R
2002 “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41(4): 212–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koestner, Richard, Richard. M. Ryan, Frank Bernieri, and Kathleen Holt
1984 “Setting Limits on Children’s Behavior: The Differential Effects of Controlling versus Informational Styles on Intrinsic Motivation and Creativity.” Journal of Personality 52: 233–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCain, Ted
2005 Teaching for Tomorrow. Teaching Content and Problem-Solving Skills. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
National Institute of Education, Singapore
2009 “A Teacher Education Model for the 21st Century.” Online at http://​www​.nie​.edu​.sg​/files​/aboutnie​/TE21%20online%20version​.pdf (last date of downloads: 6 March, 2012)
Scardamalia, Marlene, and Carl Bereiter
2006 “Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology.” The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 97–115. New York: 
Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Baruch, Tommy Dreyfus, and Rina Hershkowitz
(eds) 2009 Transformation of Knowledge through Classroom Interaction. Oxon: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Sfard, Anna
2001 “There is More to Discourse than Meets the Ears: Looking at Thinking as Communicating to Learn More about Mathematical Learning.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 46(1–3): 13–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Frank
1988 Joining the Literacy Club. Portsmouth NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Surakka, Veikko, and Toni Vanhala
2011 “Emotions in Human-Computer Interaction.” In Face-to-face Communication over the Internet: Emotions in a Web of Culture, Language, and Technology, ed. by Arvid Kappas, and Nicole C. Krämer, 213–236. Cambridge, UK / New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swedin, Eric G., and David L. Ferro
2007 Computers: The Life Story of a Technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Richard M. Ryan, and Edward L. Deci
2008 “Self-Determination Theory and the Explanatory Role of Psychological Needs in Human Well-Being.” In Capabilities and Happiness, ed. by Luigino Bruni, Flavio Comim, and Maurizio Pugno, 187–223. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S
1978 Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2000 “The Dialogic Action Game.” In Dialogue Analysis VII. Working with Dialogue, ed. by Michael Coulthard, Janet Cotterill, and Francis Rock, 1–18. Tübingen: Niemeyer (Beiträge zur Dialogforschung 22).Google Scholar
2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Étienne
2010 “Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems: The Career of a Concept.” In Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice, ed. by Chris Blackmore, 179–198. London: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar