Cover not available
Part of
Dialogue across Media
Edited by Jarmila Mildorf and Bronwen Thomas
[Dialogue Studies 28] 2017
► pp. 117–136

Dialogic interactions on radio

Studs Terkel’s literary interviews

This paper focuses on a sub-category of journalistic interviews, namely the so-called “literary interview,” where writers are interviewed about their lives and works. More specifically, the paper investigates the dynamics of literary interviews as radio broadcasts and therefore emphasizes their conversational and medial side, paying attention to turn-taking mechanisms and the use of voice quality and prosody in the authors’ multimodal self-presentations. Key linguistic concepts in this regard are interviewees’ “audience design,” and also participants’ speech accommodation and verbal “duetting,” which point to the collaborative nature of these interviews. The case studies are drawn from American radio journalist Studs Terkel’s interviews with Ralph Ellison, Maya Angelou and Toni Morrison.
Published online: 19 January 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.28.07mil
References (37)
References
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar. 2003. “Zur (Aus-)Nutzung konzessiver Konstruktionen in radio interviews. Eine qualitativ-quantitative Untersuchung zur Kontextabhängigkeit von Äußerungen.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 4: 251-281. [URL]Google Scholar
Brawer, Bruce. 1988. “Talk Show: The Rise of the Literary Interview.” The American Scholar 57 (3): 421-429.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1984. “Language Style as Audience Design.” Language in Society 13 (2): 145-204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2014. Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1986. “The Audience as Co-Author: An Introduction.” Text 6 (3): 239-247.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jane A. 2003. “The Transcription of Discourse.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton. Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Reference Online. Available at <[URL]> [Acessed December 13, 2007].Google Scholar
Falk, Jane. 1980. “The Conversational Duet.” Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 6: 507-514.
Filk, Christian. 2005. “Medienphilosophie des Radios.” In Systematische Medienphilosophie, ed. by Mike Sandbothe and Ludwig Nagl, 299-314. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Michael. 2010. “Studs Terkel, Historian.” History Workshop Journal 69: 189-198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood, and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and David Greatbatch. 1991. “On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews.” In Talk and Social Structure, ed. by Deirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, 93-137. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hilliard, Robert L. 2015. Writing for Television, Radio and New Media. 11th ed. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Paul, and Daniel B. Cornfield. 2010. “When He Listened, People Talked.” Contexts 9 (2): 38-43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, Carey. “An Introduction to Multimodality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. by Carey Jewitt, 14-27. London: Routledge.
Klaus, Elisabeth. 2008. “Studs Terkel – Oral Historian, Journalist, Hoffnungsträger.” Massenmedien und Kommunikation 168/169: 7-126.Google Scholar
Klebl, Michael, and Stephan Lukosch. 2008. “Kollaboratives und audio-basiertes Storytelling: Prinzipien und Anwendung.” In Erzählen: Reflexionen im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung, ed. by Yvonne Gächter et al., 142-167. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press.Google Scholar
Krämer, Sybille. 2005. “Medienphilosophie der Stimme.” In Systematische Medienphilosophie, ed. by Mike Sandbothe and Ludwig Nagl, 221-237. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzmičová, Anežka. 2016. “Audiobooks and Print Narrative: Similarities in Text Experience.” In Audionarratology: Interfaces of Sound and Narrative, ed. by Jarmila Mildorf and Till Kinzel, 217-237. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, Nick, and Carly W. Butler. 2011. “Walking out on Air.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44 (1): 44–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masschelein, Anneleen et al. 2014. “The Literary Interview: Towards a Poetics of a Hybrid Genre.” Poetics Today 35 (1/2): 1-49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMullen, Linda M. 2005. “Talk about Receiving, Giving, and Taking in Radio Interviews: ‘Doing Modesty’ and ‘Making a Virtue out of Necessity.’” British Journal of Social Psychology 44: 557-570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meizoz, Jérôme. 2007. Postures Littéraires: Mises en scène modernes de l’auteur. Geneva: Slatkine Érudition.Google Scholar
Mildorf, Jarmila. 2015. “Performing Selves and Audience Design: Interview Narratives on the Internet.” In Narrative Theory, Literature, and New Media: Narrative Minds and Virtual Worlds, ed. by Mari Hatavara, Matti Hyvärinen, Maria Mäkälä, and Frans Mäyrä, 256-277. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mowitt, John. 2012 [1987]. “The Sound of Music in the Era of Its Electronic Reproducibility.” In The Sound Studies Reader, ed. by Jonathan Sterne, 213-224. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nofsinger, Robert E. 1991. Everyday Conversation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Quinlan, Mary Kay. 2011. “The Dynamics of Interviewing.” In The Oxford Handbook of Oral History, 23-36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schubert, Christoph. 2014. “Dialogue of Dissent: Stance Marking in Gertrude Stein’s Radio Interview (1934).” In Imaginary Dialogues in American Literature and Philosophy: Beyond the Mainstream, ed. by Till Kinzel and Jarmila Mildorf, 243-257. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Stewart, Charles J. 2009. “Interviewing.” In 21st Century Communication: A Reference Handbook, ed. by William T. Eadie, 186-193. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Terkel, Studs. 1967. Division Street: America. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
. 2005. Voices of Our Time: The Original Live Interviews. Prod. by WFMT/Chicago in cooperation with The Chicago Historical Society. 6 CDs. HighBridge Company.Google Scholar
Terkel, Studs with Sydney Lewis. 2007. Touch and Go: A Memoir. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Urbanová, Ludmila. 1998. “Impersonality in Radio Interviews as a Manifestation of Semantic Indeterminacy.” Brno Studies in English 24: 109-117.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2009. “Parametric Systems: The Case of Voice Quality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. by Carey Jewitt, 68-77. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H. 1998. “Identity, Context and Interaction.” In Identities in Talk, ed. by Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe, 87-106. London: Sage.Google Scholar