Cover not available
Part of
Dialogic Ethics
Edited by Ronald C. Arnett and François Cooren
[Dialogue Studies 30] 2018
► pp. 25–44

Impassible peace

Enmity and the frozen figures of intractability

This essay investigates the construction of enemy-Others through a post-Freudian notion of dreamwork, as developed in Jean-François Lyotard’s philosophy of the figure. Of critical interest is Lacan’s contention that the unconscious is structured like a language. A fragment of a dream is presented and analyzed as a way to reveal how figuration functions in dreams as images and forms related to enemy-Others and how engagement of the figure-matrix can loosen intractability and engage dialogue, albeit in agony. The essay takes up enmity’s destablizing consequences for innocent others, which in turn leads to a critical discussion of Emmanuel Levinas’ notion of the abyss of otherness out of which the ethical injunction arises, and concludes by considering implications for dialogic ethics.
Keywords: dreamwork, figural, discourse, ethical injunction, otherness
Article outline
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2.Dreaming the enemy
    • 2.1Dreamwork that does not speak
    • 2.2A figural analysis
  • 3.Implications for dialogical ethics
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 June 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.30.02sim
References (26)
References
Arnett, Ronald C. 2017. Levinas’s Rhetorical Demand: The Unending Obligations of Communication Ethics. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, Daniel. 2013. Intractable Conflicts: Socio-Psychological Foundations and Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caputo, John D. 1993. Against Ethics: Contributions to a Poetics of Obligation with Constant Reference to Deconstruction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. “Freud and the Scene of Writing.” In Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 196–231.Google Scholar
. 2001. On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness, trans. by Mark Dooley and Michael Hughes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evans, Fred 2008. The Multivoiced Body: Society and Communication in the Age of Diversity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1953. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, IV, The Interpretation of Dreams, trans. and ed. by James Strachey. London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. J. 1940. “The Ethics of Enmity in Social Evolution.” The American Naturalist 74 (754): 409–17.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konner, Melvin J. 1993. “Do We Need Enemies? The Origins and Consequences of Rage.” In Rage, Power, and Aggression, ed. by Robert A. Glick and Steven P. Roose, 173–193. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1984. Revolution in Poetic Language, trans. Margaret Waller. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1977. Écrits: A Selection, trans. by Alan Sheridan. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1989. “Ethics and Politics,” in The Levinas Reader, ed. by Sean Hand, 289–297. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1991. Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence, trans. by Alphonso Lingis. Boston: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. Driftworks, ed. by Roger McKeon. New York: Semiotext.Google Scholar
. 1988. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute, trans. by Georges Van Den Abbeele. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. “The Dream-Work Does not Think,” in The Lyotard Reader, ed. by Andrew Benjamin, 19–55. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
. 2011. Discours, Figure, trans. by Antony Hudek and Mary Lydon. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (original publication 1971, Klincksieck).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1982. The Differentiation of Society, trans. by Stephan Holmes and Charles Larmore. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Macke, Frank J. 2015. The Experience of Human Communication: Body, Flesh, and Relationship. Madison, NJ: Farleigh Dickenson University Press.Google Scholar
Srikanth, Rajini. 2012. Constructing the Enemy: Empathy/Antipathy in U.S. Literature and Law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Andrew R. 2016. Radical Conflict: Essays in Violence, Intractability and Communication. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
2008a. “Violence and the Arts of Resistance: An Expedition in Critical Communicology.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 16(3): 184–210.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b. “Dialogue in Agony: The Problem of Communication in an Authoritarian Regime.” Communication Theory 18(1): 160–185.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tidwell, Alan C. 1998. Conflict Resolved? A Critical Assessment of Conflict Resolution. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Volkan, Vamik D. 1985. “The Need to Have Enemies and Allies: A Developmental Approach.” Political Psychology 6, (2): 219–247.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. 2008. Violence: Six Sideways Reflections. New York: Picador.Google Scholar